政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/94664
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113392/144379 (79%)
造访人次 : 51209304      在线人数 : 917
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94664


    题名: 歐美葡萄酒貿易協定與WTO規範合致性研究
    作者: 周紹偉
    贡献者: 楊光華
    周紹偉
    关键词: 歐美葡萄酒貿易協定
    釀造規範
    TBT協定
    美國酒類標示
    地理標示
    TRIPS協定
    Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on trade in wine
    Oenological practice
    TBT Agreement
    TRIPS Agreement
    Semi-generic name
    Geographical indication
    Derogation
    日期: 2008
    上传时间: 2016-05-09 11:26:30 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 歐美葡萄酒貿易協定於2006年3月10日經歐美雙方簽署後，對於延宕多年之數項關於雙方葡萄酒貿易上之爭議，達成了一定程度之妥協。然雙方所妥協之內容均與WTO協定之規範有衝突之處；然從另一方面觀之，該協定卻有助於美國在其葡萄酒產品使用歐盟地理標示之爭議上，朝向與TRIPS協定較為合致之方向去修正。

    歐美葡萄酒貿易協定最主要之爭議可分為兩大部分，一為歐盟關於葡萄酒釀造製程上之規範；另一是美國葡萄酒產品使用歐盟地理標示，本文主要將針對此二議題與WTO協定間之合致性進行探討，以了解該協定所妥協之部分與WTO協定間之合致性。由於歐盟與美國係為WTO內最具影響力之兩大會員，本文最後將探討該協定對於WTO多邊架構以及爭端解決機制上之所衝擊與影響。
    The EU-US agreement on trade in wine was signed on March 10, 2006, marking the end of a first phase in wine trading discussions began in 1983. The Agreement addresses several key issues, such as oenological practices, import certification, the use of European geographical indication on the wine label which produced in US and other labeling issues. This thesis is to analyze the most controversial parts of this agreement.

    This agreement compromises 17 provisions, there are two parts most controversial: one is the mutual acceptance of the EU-US oenological practice regulations, which would facilitate the trading of wine between the two parties. And the other is that finally U.S. agreed to prohibit new brands from using these names on non-European wine and grandfather those existing uses.

    The oenological regulation of EU is more strictly and conservative compare to the related international standard. Moreover, EU ban the import of wine which is not conform with its oenological regulation unless the exporting country meet the Derogation requirement to allow the wine to be imported and circulated in the territory of EU. This article is to analyses the consistency of the EU oenological regulation with the TBT agreement, and the MFN treatment with this derogation.

    And the U.S. had allowed the use of specific EU geographical indications, which is called semi-generic names in U.S. regulation, on the wine label for the wine producing in the U.S in its labeling regulation. According to the TRIPS Agreement, the use of EU’s GI is in a continuous matter before 1994 can be excepted from the regulation of additional for GI. This thesis would like to clarify which part of the use of those semi-generic names may or may not except from the context of TRIPS agreement about GI.

    Since the wine agreement settle down several issues which violate the WTO agreement, this thesis would like to discuss the impact of the wine agreement to the WTO multilateral system.
    參考文獻: 一、中文書籍

    1. 方彬彬，《產地標示之地理保護，公平法與智財法系列(6)》，台北，三民，1995年9月。

    2. 陳麗娟，《歐洲共同體貿易法》，台北，五南，1995年。

    3. 羅昌發，《國際貿易法》，台北，元照，1999年7月。

    4. 顏慶章，《WTO論述文集─台灣國際化之機會與挑戰》，台北，作者自行出版，2005年5月。


    二、英文書籍

    1. FINK, CARSTEN & KEITH MASKUS (2006), The Debate on Geogaphical Indications In the WTO, TRADE, DOHA AND DEVELOPMENT A WINDOW INTO THE ISSUES, Richard Newfarmer ed.

    2. MATSUSHITA, MITSUO, THOMAS J. SCHOENBAUM & PETROS C. MAVROIDIS (2006), THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION: LAW, PRACTICE AND POLICY. Oxford, 2nd ed.

    3. PINNEY, THOMAS(1989) A HISTORY OF WINE IN AMERICA: FROM BEGINNINGS TO PROHIBITION. Berkeley: University of California Press.


    三、英文期刊文章

    1. Agdomar, Michelle (2008), Removing the Greek from Feta and Adding Korbel to Champagne: The Paradox of Geographical Indications in International Law, 18 FORDAM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, MEDIA & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 541-608.

    2. Evans, G. E. (2006), The Protection of Geographical Indications After Doha: Quo Vadis? 9 JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW 575-614.

    3. Galpin,Vashti Christina(2006), A COMPARISION OF LEGISLATION ABOUT WINEMAKING ADDITIVES AND PROCESSES, the Cape Wine Academy Paper, available at www.capewineacademy.co.za/seminars/Vgalpin_CWM_Thesis.pdf

    4. George, Carol C. (2004), EC-US bilateral on wine: Lower standards quid pro quo for GI protection? 37 TRADE HOT TOPICS 1-7.

    5. Hanrahan, Charles E. (2003), Geographical Indications and WTO Negotiations, CRS REPORT FOR CONGRESS, RS21569.

    6. Hughes, Justin (2006), Champagne Feta and Bourbon: the Spirited Debated about Geographical Indications, 58 HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL 299-386.

    7. Josling, Tim(2006), The War on Terroir: Geographical Indications as a Transatlantic Trade Conflict, 57(3) JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS 337–363.

    8. Lindquist, Leigh Ann(1999), Champagne or Champagne? An Examination of U.S. Failure to Comply with the Geographical Provisions of the TRIPS Agreement, 27 THE GEOGRGIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW 308-344.

    9. Monten, Lina(2006), Geographical Indications of Origin: Should They Be Protected and Why? - An Analysis of the Issue From the U.S. and EU Perspectives, 22 SANTA CLARA COMPUTER AND HIGH TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL 315-348.

    10. Rose, Brain (2007), No More Whining About Geographical Indications: the 2005 Agreement Between the United States and the European Community on the Trade in Wine, 26 HOUSTON JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 732-757.

    11. Schnepf, Randy (2003), The International Wine Market: Description and Selected Issues, CRS REPORT FOR CONGRESS, RL32028.

    12. Silva, Mark (2005), Sour Grapes: the Comprimising Effect of the United States’ Failure to Protect Foreign Geographic Indications of Wines, 28 BOSTON COLLEGE INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW REVIEW 197-211.

    13. Smitherman, Charles W. (2003), The New Transatlantic Marketplace: A Contemporary Analysis of United States -- European Union Trade Relations and Possibilities for the Future, 12 MINNESOTA JOURNAL OF GLOBAL TRADE 251-297.

    14. FOOD STANDARD AUSTRALIA NEWZEALAND FSANZ REPORT(2001),USER GUIDE TO STANDARD 1.3.1-FOOD ADDITIVES, available at http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/_srcfiles/Additives_0801.pdf.

    15. Waye, Vicki (2005), Assessing Multilateral vs. Bilateral Agreements and Geographical Indications through International Food and Wine, Vol. 14 INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW JOURNAL 56-66.

    16. Yue, Chengyan, Stéphan Marette, and John C. Beghin, HOW TO PROMOTE QUALITY PERCEPTION IN WINE MARKETS: BRAND ADVERTISING OR GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION? Center for Agricultural and Rural Development of Iowa State University Working Paper 06-WP 426(August 2006), available at http://www.agmrc.org/NR/rdonlyres/8048CD06-6AB0-4E49-927E-7815857A35D2/0/HowtoPromoteQuality.pdf

    17. Zacher, Frances G. (2005), Pass the Parmesan: Geographical Indications in the United States and the European Union-Can there Be Compromise? 19 EMORY INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW 427-463.

    四、參考網站

    世界貿易組織：www.wto.org

    歐盟網站：http://europa.eu/

    美國菸酒武器管制局：http://www.ttb.gov/index.shtml

    美國駐歐盟大使館：http://useu.usmission.gov/Dossiers/Trade/default.asp

    國際葡萄及葡萄酒組織：http://www.oiv.int

    聯合國糧農組織：http://www.fao.org

    澳洲葡萄酒研究機構分析服務網站：http://www.awri.com.au/industry_development/additives/default.asp
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易學系
    95351047
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095351047
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2439检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈