政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/94647
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 51109449      在线人数 : 999
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/94647


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94647


    题名: 探討企業社會績效的決定因素：以兩個社會責任評等機制為例的實證研究
    作者: 楊鈞閔
    贡献者: 黃秉德
    楊鈞閔
    关键词: 企業社會績效
    企業社會責任
    國際化程度
    企業規模
    功能背景
    差異化策略
    日期: 2008
    上传时间: 2016-05-09 11:24:45 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 　　企業社會責任已經是現今社會中不可輕視的企業議題，各種評等機構也紛紛開始針對個別企業的社會績效進行量化的評估與排名。本研究的主題即為企業社會績效的決定因素，並依據先前研究而選出規模、國際化程度、差異化策略程度、CEO的功能背景、並且加上本研究自選出企業社會責任的競爭強度為第五個變數來解釋不同企業之間其企業社會績效的差異，以求實證研究的結果。為求有意義的研究議題、以及避免變數資料收集上的偏誤，研究界說範圍乃為美國的製造業公司。
    參考文獻: 一、英文部分

    1. Abbott, W.F. and Monsen, R.J., 1979. On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22, p.501.
    2. Alexander, G. and Bucholtz, R, 1978. Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Academy of Management Journal, 21:p.479.
    3. Backman, J. (Ed.), 1975. Social responsibility and accountability. New York: New York University Press.
    4. Baron, David P, 2001. Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 10 (1) , p.7.
    5. Bigelow, B., Fahey. L., and Mahon, J. F., 1990. Political strategy and issues evolution: Toward a framework for analysis and action. International Association for Business and Society Proceedings 1990; p.156.
    6. Bowen, H. R., 1953. Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.
    7. Bradgon, J. H., and Marlin, J., 1972. Is pollution profitable? Risk Management, 19(4); p.9.
    8. Burke, L and Logson, M., 1996. How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off, Long Range Planning, Volume 29, Number 4, p.495.
    9. Carroll, A.B., 1983. Corporate social responsibility: Will industry respond to cutbacks in social program funding? Vital Speeches of the Day, 49, p.604.
    10. Carroll, A.B., 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, p.497.
    11. Carroll, A.B., 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, p.39.
    12. Carroll, A.B., 1999. Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definition construct. Business and Society, 38, 3, p.268.
    13. Carr, A., 1996. Is Business Bluffing Ethical? In Rae et al. (Eds) Beyond Integrity: A Judeo-Christain Approach. United States: Zondervan Publishing House. p.55.
    14. Chrisman, J. and R. Archer, 1984. Small business social responsibility. American Journal of Small Business. 9(2), p.46.
    15. Coffey, Betty S, Fryxell, Gerald E, 1991. Institutional Ownership of Stock and Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics. Jun 1991. Vol. 10, Iss. 6; p.437.
    16. Cochran, P.L., and Wood, R. A., 1984. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27, p.42.
    17. Cornell, B., and Shapiro, A., 1987. Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management, 16: p.5.
    18. Davis, K., 1960. Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2, p.70.
    19. Davis, K., 1973. The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16, p.312.
    20. Davis, K., 1967. Understanding the social responsibility puzzle: What does the businessman owe to society? Business Horizons, 10, p.45.
    21. Dearborn, D. C. and H. A. Simon, 1958. Selective perceptions: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. Sociometry 4(21), p.140.
    22. Dierkes, M. and R. Coppock, 1978. Europe tries the corporate social report. Business and Society Review, Spring, p.21.
    23. Drucker, P. F., 1954. The practice of management. New York: Harper & Row.
    24. Drucker, P. F., 1984. The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 26, p.53.
    25. Epstein, E. M., 1987. The corporate social policy process: Beyond business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and corporate social responsiveness. California Management Review, 29, p.99.
    26. Fitch, H. G., 1976. Achieving corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 1, p.38.
    27. Fombrun, C. and M. Shanley, 1990. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal 33, p.233.
    28. Frederick, W. C., 1960. The growing concern over business responsibility. California Management Review, 2, p.54.
    29. Freeman, R. E., 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
    30. Friedman, Milton, 1970, The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine September 13.
    31. Graves, Samuel B. and Waddock, Sandra A., 1994. Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 4; Academic Research Library p.1034.
    32. Hambrick, D. C., and Mason, P. A., 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review 9: p.193.
    33. Hart S. and Ahuja G., 1996. Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business, Strategy and the Environment 5: p.30.
    34. Haveman, Heather A., 1993. Organizational size and change: Diversification in the savings and loan industry. Administrative Science Quarterly; Mar 1993; 38, 1; Academic Research Library p.20.
    35. Hemingway, Christine A. and Maclagan Patrick W., 2004. Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics; Mar 2004; 50, 1; Academic Research Library p.33.
    36. Herman, E., 1981. Corporate control, corporate power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    37. Hull, Clyde E. and Rothenberg Sandra, 2006. Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Saunders College of Business, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, U. S. A.
    38. Ibrahim, N. and J. Angelidis, 1995. The corporate social responsiveness orientation of board members. Journal of Business Ethics 14, p.405.
    39. Johnson, H. L., 1971. Business in contemporary society: Framework and issues. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    40. Jones, Marc T., 1996. Missing the forest for the trees: A critique of the social responsibility concept and discourse. Business and Society 35(1), p.7.
    41. Jones, Marc T., 1999. The institutional determinants of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics; Jun 1999; 20, 2; Academic Research Library p.163.
    42. Kennely, James J. and Lewis, Eric E., 2002. Degree of internationalization and corporate environmental performance: Is there a link? International Journal of Management, Poole, 9(3), Sep, P.478.
    43. Key, S. and Popkin, S., 1998. Integrating ethics into the strategic management process: doing well by doing good. Management Decision, Volume 6, Number 5, p.331.
    44. King A. and Lenox M. J., 2001. Lean and green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance. Production and Operations Management 10(3); p.244.
    45. Klassen R. D. and Whybark D. C., 1999. The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal 42: p.599.
    46. Lad, L. J., 1985. Policy-making between business and government. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.
    47. Levitt, T., 1958. The Dangers of Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, Sep-Oct, p.41.
    48. Levitt, T., 1965. Industrial Purchasing Behavior: A Study of Communications Effects, Division of Research. Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
    49. Margolis J. D. and Walsh J. P., 2003. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly 48: p.268.
    50. Manne, H. G. and Wallich, H. C., 1972. The modern corporation and social responsibility. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
    51. McDonald, G. M. and Zepp, R. A., 1989. Business ethics: practical proposals. The Journal of Management Development, Vol.8 No. 1, p.55.
    52. McGuire, J., A. Sundgren and T. Schneeweis, 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Review 31(4), p.854.
    53. McGuire, J. W., 1963. Business and society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    54. McWilliams A. and Siegel D., 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal 21(5): p.603.
    55. Miller, Danny, 1988. Relating porter’s business strategies to environment and structure: Analysis and performance implications. Academy of Management Journal; Jun 1988; 31, 2; Academic Research Library p. 280.
    56. Mintz, B. and M. Schwartz, 1990. Capital flows and the process of financial hegemony. In S. Zukin and P. DiMaggio(eds.), Structures of Capital(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), p.203.
    57. Moskowitz, Milton R., 1972. Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review 1: p.71.
    58. Moussavi, F. and Evans, D., 1986. An attributional approach to measuring corporate social performance. Paper presented at the Academy of Management meetings, San Diego.
    59. Parket, R. and Eibert, H., 1975. Social responsibility: The underlying factors. Business Horizons, 18: p.5.
    60. Payne, Dinah and Brenda E. Joyner, 2006. Successful U.S. Entrepreneurs: Identifying Ethical Decision-making and Social Responsibility Behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics. Dordrecht: May 2006. Vol. 65, Iss. 3; p. 203
    61. Petrick, J. and R. Scherer, 1993. Competing social responsibility values and the functional roles of managers. Journal of Managerial Psychology 8(3), p.14.
    62. Pil F. and Rothenberg S., 2003. Environmental performance as a driver of superior organizational performance. Journal of Production and Operations Management 12(3): p.404.
    63. Porter M. E. and van der Linde C., 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4): p.97.
    64. Porter M. E., 1985. Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press.
    65. Preston, L. E. and Post, J. E., 1975. Private management and public policy: The principle of public responsibility. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    66. Preston, L. E. and O’Bannon, D. P., 1997. Corporate social-financial performance relationship, Business and Society, 36, p.419.
    67. Salmones, Ma del Mar Garcia, Crespo A. H., and Bosque Ignacio Rodriguez, 2005. Influence of corporate social responsibility on loyalty and valuation of services. Journal of Business Ethics 61: p.369.
    68. Scott, W. and D. Hart, 1989. Organizational values in America (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ).
    69. Sethi, S. P., 1975. Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytic framework. California Management Review, 17, p.58.
    70. Sheldon, Oliver, 1924. The philosophy of management. London: Routledge.
    71. Simerly, Roy L. and Li, Minfang, 1997. Corporate social performance and multinationality: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Management, 14(4), P.699.
    72. Smith, A., 1994. Small business grapples with green. Management (May), p.78.
    73. Soloman, R. and Hansen, K., 1985. It’s good business. New York: Atheneum.
    74. Song, J. H., 1982. Diversification strategies and experience of top executives in large firms’. Strategic Management Journal, 3, p. 377.
    75. Spicer, B. H., 1978. Investors, corporate social performance, and information disclosure: An empirical study. Accounting Review, 53: p.94.
    76. Srivastava, P., 1987. Bhopal: Anatomy of a crisis. New York: Ballinger (Harper Collins).
    77. Stanwick, Peter A. and Stanwick Sarah D., 1998. The relationship between corporate social performance and organizational size, financial performance and environmental performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics; Jan 1998; 17, 2; Academic Research Library p.195.
    78. Starik, M. and A. Carroll, 1990. In search of benifisence: Reflections on the connections between firm social and economic performance. International Association for Business and Society Proceedings, p.1.
    79. Thomas, Aniysa S. and Simerly Roy L, 1995.Internal determinants of corporate social performance: The role of top managers. Academy of Management Journal; Academic Research Library p.411.
    80. Trotman, K. and G. Bradley, 1981. Associations between social responsibility disclosure and characteristics of companies. Accounting Organizations and Society 6, p.355.
    81. Turban, Daniel B. and Greening Daniel W., 1996. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal Vol. 40, No. 3, p.658.
    82. Ullmann, A., 1985. Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance. Academy of Management Review, 10: p.540.
    83. Vance, S., 1975. Are socially responsible firms good investment risks? Management Review, 64: p.18.
    84. Votaw, D., 1973. Genius becomes rare. In D. Votaw & S. P. Sethi (Eds.) The corporate dilemma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    85. Waddock, Sandra A. and Grave, Samuel B., 1999. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), p.303.
    86. Walton, C. C., 1967. Corporate social responsibilities. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    87. Windsor, D., 2001. The future of corporate responsibility. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 9, no. 3, p. 225.
    88. Wood, D. J., 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, p.691.

    二、中文部分

    1. 黃營杉與齊德彰(民94)，企業倫理、社會責任與慈善公益作為之研究－以台灣高科技電子產業為例。人文暨社會科學期刊，1(2)，p.65。
    2. 莫冬立(無日期)。追求典範：企業社會責任評等系統的發展與應用。取自：http://csr.moea.gov.tw/articles/articles_content.asp?ar_ID=1078
    3. 許菁菁(民88)。模擬社會責任投資組合績效之探討，中原大學管理學系研究所碩士論文。
    4. 林依陽(民93)。國際企業之社會績效研究，大葉大學國際企業管理學系碩士論文。
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理學系
    95355047
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095355047
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    没有与此文件相关的档案.



    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈