Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94637
|
| Title: | 贈品促銷深度與品牌形象對知覺價值與價格知覺的影響效果與外溢效果之研究
The Influences and Spillover Effects of Gift Promotion Depth and Brand Image on Perceived Value and Price |
| Authors: | 曾忠蕙
Tseng, Chung Hui |
| Contributors: | 樓永堅
別蓮蒂
曾忠蕙
Tseng,Chung Hui |
| Keywords: | 贈品促銷深度
品牌形象
知覺價值
外溢效果
Gift promotion depth
Brand image
Perceived value
Spillover effect |
| Date: | 2008 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-05-09 11:24:20 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 贈品促銷在各行各業的採用愈來愈普遍，但有關贈品促銷的影響效果卻被許多學者所忽略，原因可能是因為大部分學者將贈品價格愈高，促銷效果愈好的正向影響效果視為理所當然，但是否真實如此?本研究認為若探討贈品促銷的效果，其中所探討的贈品促銷是指買A送B，其中A與B為不同產品類別。而針對贈品價值的吸引力方面，應著眼於贈品價格相當於主產品價格的百分比來進行探討，在本文中簡稱為贈品促銷深度(例如，贈品促銷廣告中：「購買一雙$2000的Nike球鞋，即贈送價值$200的Casio手錶一只」，則此贈品促銷深度為$200/$1000=10%)。本文將贈品促銷深度分為十組(10%、20%...100%)，並加入主產品與贈品品牌形象的干擾變數一同探討。正式研究包含三項研究主題，深入分析贈品促銷深度的轉折現象、對產品知覺價值影響效果與外溢效果。理論基礎採用內在參考價格相關理論與定錨調整鋰論，研究方法採用10x2x2的組間因子設計之實驗法進行，針對北部兩所大學在校學生進行問卷發放，有效問卷975份。
研究主題一的目的欲找出贈品促銷深度對贈品價格合理性影響的轉折點，研究結果顯示，當主要產品與贈品沒有出現品牌訊息時，贈品促銷深度的轉折點為50%，但加入品牌訊息之後，轉折點便有所不同，品牌形象高時，贈品促銷深度轉折點為50%，品牌形象低時，轉折點往下修正，變成40%或20%。
根據研究主題一找出的轉折點，研究主題二則進一步探討轉折前的合理贈品促銷深度以及轉折後的誇張贈品促銷深度對產品知覺價值的影響效果，再加入主產品與贈品的品牌形象之情境變數，探討此三者彼此間的互動如何影響消費者對贈品促銷的評價。研究結果發現：(1)合理深度下，深度愈深，整組產品知覺價值愈高，但誇張深度下，深度愈深，整組產品知覺價值愈低。(2)贈品促銷深度愈深，贈品價格知覺愈高;合理深度愈深，贈品價值升值愈少，誇張深度愈深，贈品價值貶值愈多。(3)主產品與贈品品牌形象皆產生干擾效果。
研究主題三則想瞭解消費者心中對贈品免費的印象是否會外溢出去影響到贈品同類產品的其他品牌(同品他牌)、或者外溢出去影響到贈品同品牌的其他產品(同牌他品)，而貶低對同品他牌或同牌他品的評價? 研究結果發現：贈品促銷的確會產生外溢效果，且隨著合理深度加深，外溢效果降低，但隨著誇張深度加深，外溢效果增加。透過本研究，一方面可更豐富贈品促銷效果的相關學術研究結果，另一方面可提供實務界相關建議。
Gift promotion is taken as a common technique in most industry for a long time. It is believed that the higher the gift price is, the more successful gift promotion works. But, must it be true? In this study, gift promotion was defined as “buy A, get a free gift B”；that is, A and B were different products. Furthermore, promotion depth was taken as a main independent variable and defined as a percentage of gift price by main product price. By experiment design, promotion depth was manipulated as ten groups (10%, 20%,..., 100%), and brand images of main product and gift were chosen to be two moderators in this study. An 10x2x2 between subject design was further held, and totally 975 valid questionnaires was gathered.
Three themes were arranged to further investigate effects of gift promotion. Inferences and discussions were based on literature of reference price and anchor-adjustment theory. In the first research theme, it is proposed that there is a turning point in promotion depth—50% of promotion depth, and the turning point was fluctuant in accordance with brand image. If the brand image was high, the turning point was 50%；however, if the brand image was low, the turning point was downward to 40% under low brand image of main product and downward to 20% under low brand image of gift. Based on these findings, promotion depth was divided into two categories—reasonable (depth before turning point) and exaggerated (depth after turning point) promotion depth—in order to do further investigations.
The second research theme focused on the effect of reasonable or exaggerated promotion depth and its interaction with brand image of main product and gift. Findings were (a) In the range of reasonable promotion depth, the deeper the promotion depth was, the higher the perceived value of product bundle was (eg. positive relationship). However, in the range of exaggerated promotion depth, negative relationship was exhibited. (b) The deeper the promotion depth was, the higher the price perception of gift was. In the range of reasonable promotion depth, as the depth increased, value-adding level of gift decreased. In the range of exaggerated promotion depth, as the depth increased, value-discounting level of gift increased. (c) The brand image of main product and gift did show significant moderating effect.
The third research theme was going to investigate whether the discounting perception toward gift would spill to other products with the same brand of the gift, or spill to the same product with other brand. In this study, we defined the phenomenon as a “spillover effect” of gift promotion. Findings were: (a) No matter in the range of reasonable or exaggerated promotion depth, gift promotion did cause discounting of perceived value toward other products with the same brand of the gift and to the same product with other brand. That is, spillover effect did exist. (b) As the promotion depth increased, the spillover effect would first go downward then upward. In other words, the relationship between promotion depth and spillover effect showed a type of U-shape. Findings of this study will enrich literature of promotion as well as offer practical suggestions to managers implementing strategies of gift promotions. |
| Reference: | 1.林陽助、陳郡怡(2006)，「贈品－主產品配適度對消費者的知覺價值購買意圖影響之研究」，交大管理學報，第26卷(第2期)，頁123-154
2.李曉賢、呂英瑞與林怡蕊(2005)，「贈品價值、油品價格與共同贈送的贈品策略」，公平交易季刊，第14卷(第3期)，頁89-112。
3.張愛華、陳仁惠、張馨云(2006)，「主題廣告、促銷活動與品牌層級之綜效研究」，管理與系統，第13期，頁16-47。
4.陳振燧(1996)，顧客基礎的品牌權益衡量與建立之研究，國立政治大學企業管理學系博士論文。
5.黃俊英(1996)，行銷研究，台北：華泰書局，第五版。
6.Aaker, D. A. (1991a), “Guarding the Power of Brand Name,” New York Times, Dec., 313.
7.Aaker, D. A. (1991b), Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, New York: The Free Press.
8.Aaker, D. A. (1996a), “Measuring Brand Equity across Products and Markets,” California Management Review, 38(3), 102-120.
9.Aaker, D. A. (1996b), Building Strong Brand, New York: The Free Press.
10.Aaker, D. A. (1997), “Should You Take Your Brand to Where the Action Is?” Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 135-144.
11.Ahluwalia, R., H. R. Unnava, and R. E. Burnkrant (2001), “The Moderating Role of Commitment on the Spillover Effect of Marketing Communications,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38(Nov.), 458-470.
12.Alba, J. W., S. M. Broniarczyk, T. A. Shimp, and J. E. Urbany (1994), “The Influences of Prior Beliefs, Frequency, Cues, and Magnitude Cues on Consumers’ Perceptions of Comparative Price Data,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21(Sep.), 219-235.
13.Alba, J. W., C. F. Mela, T. A. Shimp, and J. E. Urbany (1999), “The Effect of Discount Frequency and Depth on Consumer Price Judgment,” Journal of Consumer Research, 26(Sep.), 99-114.
14.Alvarez, B. A. and R. V. Casielles (2005), “Consumer Evaluation of Sales Promotion: the Effect on Brand Choice,” European Journal of Marketing, 39(Jan./Feb.), 54-70.
15.Anderson, J. R. (1983), “A Spreading Actication Theory of Memory,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 261-295.
16.Anderson, E. T. and D. I. Simester (2004), “Long-run Effects of Promotion Depth on New versus Established Customers: Three Field Studies,” Marketing Science, 23(1), 4-20.
17.Balachander, S. and S. Ghose (2003), “Reciprocal Spillover Effects: A Strategic Benefit of Brand Extentions,” Journal of Marketing, 67(Jan.), 4-13.
18.Baron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual , Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173-1182.
19.Baumgarth, C. (2004), “Evaluations of Co-Brands and Spillover Effects: Further Empirical Results,” Journal of Marketing Communications, 10(June), 115-131.
20.Beckwith, N. E., H. H. Kassarjian, and D. R. Lehmann (1978), “Halo Effects in Marketing Research: Review and Prognosis,” Advance in Consumer Research, 465-467.
21.Bell, D. R., G. Iyer, and V. Padmanabhan (2002), “Price Competition under Stockpiling and Flexible Consumptions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 39(Aug.), 292-303.
22.Bertrand, K. (1998), “Premiums Prime the Market,” Advertising Age’s Business Marketing, 83(5), s6.
23.Biel, A. L. (1992), “How Brand Image Drives Brand Equity,” Journal of Advertising Research, 32(6), RC6-12 (Special Section).
24.Biswas, A. and E. A. Blair (1991), “Contextual Effects of Reference Prices in Retail Advertisements,” Journal of Marketing, 55(July), 1-12.
25.Biswas, A. (1992), “The Moderating Role of Brand Familiarity in Reference Price Perceptions,” Journal of Business Research, 25(Nov.), 251-262.
26.Biwas, A., C. Pullig, B. C. Krishnan, and S. Burton (1999), “Consumer Evaluation of Reference Price Advertisements: Effects of Other Brands’ Prices and Semantic Cues,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 18(Spring), 52-65.
27.Biswas, A. and S. Burton (1993), “Consumer Perceptions of Tensile Price Claims: An Assessment of Claim Types Across Different Discount Levels,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(Summer), 217-230.
28.Blair, E. A. and E. L. Landon, Jr. (1981), “The Effects of Reference Price in Retail Advertising,” Journal of Marketing, 45(Spr.), 61-69.
29.Blattberg, R. C. and A. Levin (1987), “Modeling the Effectiveness and Profitability of Trade Promotions,” Marketing Science, 6, 124-146.
30.Block, R. A. and D. R. Harper (1991), “Overconfidence in Estimation: Testing the Anchoring and Adjustment Hypothesis,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49(Aug.), 188-207.
31.Broniarczyk, S. M. and J. W. Alba (1994a), “The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31(May), 214-228.
32.Broniarczyk, S. M. and J. W. Alba (1994b), “The Role of Consumers’ Intuition in Inference Making,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21(Dec.), 393-407.
33.Carlson, B. W. (1990), “Anchoring and Adjustment in Judgment Under Risk,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16(July), 665-676.
34.Chandon, P., B. Wansink, and G. Laurent (2000), “A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, 64(Oct.), 65-81.
35.Collins, A. M. and E. F. Loftus (1975), “A Spreading Activation Theory of Semantic Processing,” Psychological Review, 82(6), 407-428.
36.Cotton, B. C. and E. M. Babb (1978), “Consumer Response to Promotional Deals,” Journal of Marketing, 42, 109-113.
37.Crites Jr., S. L., L. R. Fabrigar, and R. E. Petty (1994), “Measuring the Affective and Cognitive Properties of Attitudes: Conceptual and Methodological Issues,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(6), 619-634.
38.Darke, P. R. and C. M. Chung (2005), “Effects of Pricing and Promotion on Consumer Perceptions: It Depends on How you Frame it,” Journal of Retailing, 81(1), 35-47.
39.D’Astous, A. and I. Jacob (2002), “Understanding Consumer Reactions to Premium-Based Promotional Offers,” European Journal of Marketing, 36(Nov./Dec.), 1270-1287.
40.D’Astous, A. and V. Landreville (2003), “An Experimental Investigation of Factors Affecting Consumers’ Perceptions of Sales Promotions,” European Journal of Marketing, 37(Nov./Dec.), 1746-1761.
41.D’Astous, A., R. Legoux, and F. Colbert (2005), “Consumer Perceptions of Promotional Offers in the Performing Arts: An Experimental Approach,” Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, 21(3), 242-254.
42.Davis, H. L., S.J. Hoch, and E. K. Easton Ragsdale (1986), “An Anchoring and Adjustment Model of Spousal Predictions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13(June), 25-37.
43.Dawes, J. (2004), “Assessing the Impact of a Very Successful Price Promotion on Brand Category and Competitor Sales,” Journal of Product and Brand Management, 13(5), 303-314.
44.Della Bitta, A. J., K. B. Monroe, and J. M. McGinnis (1981), “Consumer Perceptions of Comparative Price Advertisement,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(Nov.), 416-427.
45.DelVecchio, D., H. S. Krishnan, and D. C. Smith (2004), “Cents or Percent? Promotion Framing and Consumer Price Expectations,” Working paper, University of Kentucky.
46.DelVecchio, D. (2005), “Deal-Prone Consumers’ Response to Promotion: The Effects of Relative and Absolute Promotion Value,” Psychology and Marketing, 22(5), 373-391.
47.DelVecchio, D., D. H. Henard, and T. H. Freling (2006), “The Effect of Sales Promotion on Post-Promotion Brand Preference: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Retailing, 82(3), 203-213.
48.Desai, K. K. and K. L. Keller (2002), “The Effect of Ingrediant Branding on Strategies on Host Brand Extendibility,” Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 73-93.
49.Dobni, D. and G. M. Zinkhan (1990), “In Search of Brand Image: A Foundation Analysis,” Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1), 110-120.
50.Dobson, J. A. and B. Sternthal (1988), “Impact of Deals and Deal Retraction on Brand Switching,” Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (Jan.), 72-81.
51.Dodds, W. B., K. B. Monroe, and D. Grewal (1991), “Effect of Price, Brand, Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28(Aug.), 307-319.
52.Einhorn, H. J. and R. M. Hogarth (1985), “Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Probabilistic Inference,” Psychological Review, 92(Oct.), 456-461.
53.Friedlander, M. L. and S. J. Stockman (1983), “Anchoring and Publicity Effects in Clinical Judgment,” Jounal of Clinical Psychology, 39(July), 637-643.
54.Gounaris, S. and V. Stathakopoulos (2004), “Antecedents and Consequences of Brand Loyalty: An Empirical Study,” Brand Management, 11(4), 283-306.
55.Grewal, D., K. B. Monroe, and R. Krishnan (1998), “The Effects of Price-Comparison Advertising on Buyers’ Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (Apr.), 46-59.
56.Grewal, D., R. Krishnan, J. Baker, and N. Borin (1998), “The Effects of Store Name, Brand Name and Price Discounts on Consumers’ Evaluations and Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Retailing, 73(3), 331-352.
57.Gupta, S. (1988), “Impact of Sales Promotion on When, What and How Much to Buy,” Journal of Marketing Research, 25(Nov.), 342-355.
58.Gupta, S. and L. G. Cooper (1992), “The Discounting of Discounts and Promotion Thresholds,” Journal of Consumer Research, 19(Dec.), 401-411.
59.Hardesty, D. M. and W. O. Bearden (2003), “Consumer evaluations of different promotion types and price presentations: the moderating role of promotional benefit level,” Journal of Retailing, 79(1), 17-25.
60.Heilman, M. C., K. Nakamoto, and G. A. Rao (2002), “Pleasant Surprises: Consumer Response to Unexpected Instore Coupons,” Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 242-252.
61.Helson, Harry (1964), Adaptation-Level Theory: An Experimental And Systematic Approach To Behavior； New York: Harper and Row
62.Herr, P. M., S. J. Sherman, and R. H. Fazio (1983), “On the Consequences of Priming: Assimilation and Contrast Effects,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 323-340.
63.Herr, Paul M. (1989), “Priming Price: Prior Knowledge and Context Effects,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16(June), 67-75.
64.Hogarth, R. M. and H. J. Einhorn (1989), “Order Effects in Belief Updating: The Belief Adjustment Model,” Working Paper, Center for Decision Research, University of Chicago.
65.Hoyer, W. D. and S. P. Brown (1990), “Effects of Brand Awareness on Choice for a Common, Repeat-Purchase Product,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 141-148.
66.Janiszewski, C. and S.M. J. Van Osselaer (2000), “A Connection Model of Brand Quality Associations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37(3), 331-350.
67.Johnson, E. J. and D. A. Schkade (1988), “Bias in Utility Assessments: Further Evidence and Explanations,” Management Sciences, 35(April), 406-424.
68.Joyce, E. and G. C. Biddle (1981), “Anchoring and Adjustment in Probabilistic Inference in Auditing,” Journal of Accounting Research, 19(Spring), 12-145.
69.Kalyanaram, G. and John D. C. Little (1994), “An Empirical Aanlysis of Latitude of Price Acceptance in Consumer Package Goods,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21(Dec.), 408-418.
70.Keller, K. L. (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, Managing Customer-Based Brand,” Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-23.
71.Keller, K. L. and D. A. Aaker (1992), “The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 35-50.
72.Keller, K. L. (2001), “Building Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Marketing Management, 10(2), 14-19.
73.Kotler, Philip (2003), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 11th ed., Englewood Cliff, NJ: Pretice-Hall, Inc.
74.Lichtenstein, D. R. and W. O. Bearden (1989), “Contextual Influences on Merchant-Supplied Reference Prices,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16(June), 55-66.
75.Lichtenstein, D. R., R. G. Netemeyer, and S. Burton (1990), “Distinguishing Coupon Proneness form Value Consciousness: An Acquisition-Transaction Utility Theory Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, 54, 54-67.
76.Liao, S. (2006), “The Effects of Nonmonetary Sales Promotions on Consumer Preferences: The Contigent Role of Product Category,” Journal of American Academy of Business, 8 (2), 196-203.
77.Loken, B. and D. R. John (1993), “Diluting Brand Beliefs: When Do Brand Extensions Have a Negative Effect,” Journal of Marketing, 57, 71-84.
78.Lola, L. L. (1982), “Toward a Procedural Theory of Judgment,” Working Paper 17, Wisconsin Human Processing Program, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
79.Lola, L. L. (1985), “Averaging Rules and Adjustment Processes in Bayesian Inference,” Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23(6), 509-512.
80.Lola, L. L. (1987), “Procedural Debiasing,” Acta Psychologica, 64(Feb.), 167-185.
81.Lola, L. L. and P. S. Ekberg (1980), “Test of an Ordering Hypothesis in Risky Decision Making,” Acta Psychologica, 45(Aug.), 161-167.
82.Mano, H. (1990), “Anticipated Deadline Penalties: Effects on Goal Levels and Task Performance,” in Insights in Decision Making, ed. R. M. Hogarth, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 173-176.
83.Mitchell, V. W. and M. Greatorex (1993), “Risk Perception and Reduction in the Purchase of Consumer Services,” Service Industries Journal, 13(4), 179-200.
84.Monroe, Kent B. (1990), Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
85.Monroe, K. B. and S. M. Petroshius (1981), “Buyers’ Perceptions of Price: An Update of the Evindence,” in Perspectives in Consumer Behavior, eds. H. H. Kassarjian and T. S. Robertson, Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman, 43-55.
86.Morein, J. A. (1975), “Shift from Brand to Product Line Marketing,” Harvard Business Review, 53(Sep.-Oct.), 56-64.
87.Northcraft, G. B. and M. A. Neale (1987), “Experts, Amateurs, and Real Estate: An Anchoring and Adjustment Perspective on Property Pricing Decisions,” Organizational Behivor and Human Decision Processes, 39(Feb.), 84-97.
88.Njis, V. R., M. G. Dekimpe, Jan-Benedict Steenkamp (2001), “The Category-Demand Effect of Price Promotions,” Marketing Science, 20(1), 1-22.
89.Palazon-Vidal, M. and E. Delgado-Ballester (2005), “Sales Promotions Effects on Consumer-Based Brand Equity,” International Journal of Market Research, 47(2), 179-204.
90.Park, C. W., B. J. Jaworski, and D. J. MacInnis (1986), “Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management,” Journal of Marketing, 50(Oct.), 135-145.
91.Park, C. W., S. Y. Jun, and A. D. Shocker (1996), “Composite Branding Alliances,” Journal of Marketing Research, 33(4), 453-466.
92.Preton, R. H., F. Dwyer, and W. Rodelius (1978), “The Effectiveness of Bank Premiums,” Journal of Marketing, 42(3), 96-101.
93.Raghubir, P. and K. P. Corfman (1999), “When Do Price Promotions Affect Brand Evaluations?” Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 211-222.
94.Raghubir, P. (2004), ”Free Gift with Purchase: Promoting or Discounting the Brand,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1&2), 181-186.
95.Raghubir, P., J. J. Inman, and H. Grande (2004), “The Three Face of Consumer Promotions,” California Management Review, 46(4), 23-42.
96.Raghubir, P. (2005), “Framing a price bundle: the case of "buy/get" offers,” Journal of Product and Brand Management, 14(2), 123-128.
97.Reibstein, D. J. and P. A. Traver (1982), “Factors Affecting Coupon Redemption Rates,” Journal of Marketing, 46, 102-113.
98.Roehn, M. L. and A. M. Tybout (2006), “When Will a Brand Scandal Spill Over, and How Should Competitors Respond,” Journal of Marketing Research, XLIII(Aug), 366-373.
99.Rossiter J. R. and L. Percy (1987), Advertising and Promotion Management, Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Samu, S., H. S. Krishnan, and R. E. Smith (1999), “Using Advertising Alliance for New Product Introduction,” Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 57-74.
100.Sherif, M. and C. I. Hovland (1961), Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
101.Shoemaker, R. W. and V. Tibrewala (1985), “Relating Coupon Redemption Rates to Past Purchasing of the Brand,” Journal of Advertising Research, 25, 40-47.
102.Simonson, I., Z. Carmon, and S. O’Curry (1994), “Experimental Evidence on the Negative Effect of Product Features and Sales Promotions on Brand Choice,” Marketing Science, 13(1), 23-40.
103.Simonin, B. L. and J. A. Ruth (1998), “Is a Company Known by the Company Its Keeps?” Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 30-42.
104.Swaminathan, V. and S. K. Reddy (2004), “Assessing the Spillover Effect of Ingredient Branded Strategies,” (working paper).
105.Switzer, F. S. and J. A. Sniezek (1991), “Judgment Processes in Motivation: Anchoring and Adjustment Effects on Judgment and Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49(Aug.), 208-229.
106.Thaler, R. (1985), “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,” Marketing Science, 4, (3), 199-214.
107.Thorndike, E. L. (1920), “A Constant Error in Psychological Ratings,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25-29.
108.Till, B. D. and T. A. Shimp (1998), “Endorsers in Advertising: The Case of Negative Celebrity Information,” Journal of Advertising, 27, 67-82.
109.Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1974), “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science, 185(Sep.), 1124-1131.
110.Urbany, J. E., W. O. Bearden, and D. C. Weilbaker (1988), “The Effect of Plausible and Exaggerated Reference Price on Consumer Perceptions and Price Search,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15(June), 95-110.
111.Vaidyanathan, R. and P. Aggarwal (2000), “Stratigeic Brand Alliance,” Journal of Product and Brand Management, 9(4), 214-226.
112.Washburn, J. H., B. D. Till, and R. Priluch (2000), “Co-Branding: Brand Equity and Trial Effect,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17, 591-604
113.Wernerfelt, B. (1988), “Umbrella Branding as a Signal of New Product Quality: An Example of Signalling by Posting a Bond,” Rand Journal of Economics, 19(Autumn), 458-466.
114.Wright, W. F. and U. Anderson (1989), “Effects of Situation Familarity and Financial Incentives on Use of the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic for Probability Assessment,” Organizaitonal Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44(Aug.), 68-82.
115.Yadav, M. S. (1994), “How Buyers Evaluate Product Bundles: A Model of Anchoring and Adjustment,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21(Sep.), 342-353.
116.Zeithaml, V. A. (1985), “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, 52(July), 2-22. |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
企業管理學系
93355506 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093355506 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [企業管理學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
