English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113313/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50947661      Online Users : 1006
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94561


    Title: 解讀英國布萊爾政府的歐元決策:公共政策理論的檢驗與評析
    Other Titles: Interpreting the Blair Government`s Euro Policy-Making: An Examination of Public Policy Theories
    Authors: 羅至美
    Luo, Chih-Mei
    Keywords: 歐元政策;布萊爾政府;公共政策理論;新工黨
    Euro/EMU policy;the Blair government;Public policy-making theories;New Labour
    Date: 2005-11
    Issue Date: 2016-05-06 16:56:50 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 自歐盟會員國簽訂馬斯垂克條約，決定建立經濟與貨幣聯盟，採行單一貨幣－歐元(the Euro)之後，「英國是否要加入歐元？」即成為英國歷任政府所面臨最重要的政策議題。本文即在探討布萊爾政府其歐元政策的形成與決策過程。該政府延續前任者的觀望政策，而以發明五項檢驗標準標榜其經濟決定論／去政治化的決策手法，意圖降低此一議題在製造工黨分裂、大選以及公投中的多重政治風險。在所檢驗的四種公共政策理論中，理性選擇權理論較之多元主義、馬克斯主義、核心官僚理論，表現出最佳的適用性。
    Following the agreement to establish the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and the single currency, the euro, with the completion of the Maastricht Treaty in January 2002, the question remains whether or not the UK should join. This decision has been momentous for policy-makers. This paper is an attempt to investigate into how policy-making on the UK`s EMU/euro membership has operated in the Blair government. The Blair government inherited the wait-and-see policy from its predecessor, but varies in detail. The five economic tests are invented and placed at the center of euro policymaking in order to, on the one hand, depoliticize political risks in general elections. On the other hand, the referendum serves the needs of party management. This paper to applies four main public policy-making theories to the euro policy case: the broker-state pluralist model; instrumental Marxism; the core executive model, and the rational choice theory. It found that, while each model demonstrates respective applicabilities to some extent, the core executive model and rational choice theory seem to be more applicable in our examination. However, in terms of constructing a theoretical framework, the rational choice theory provides a more clear and well-defined model.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 44(6), 103-131
    Issues & studies
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    446103.pdf1496KbAdobe PDF2347View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback