English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112704/143671 (78%)
Visitors : 49778796      Online Users : 690
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94539


    Title: 伊斯蘭教與民主－一個新制度論的分析
    Other Titles: Islam and Democracy: An Analysis of New Institutionalism
    Authors: 羅彥傑
    Lo, Yen-Chieh
    Keywords: 伊斯蘭;民主;新制度論;世俗化
    Islam;Democracy;New Institutionalism;Secularization
    Date: 2005-08
    Issue Date: 2016-05-06 16:54:51 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 強調政教合一的伊斯蘭教，究竟能不能與建立於政教分離基礎上的西方式民主體制相容，迄今猶未有定論。以Samuel P. Huntington為首的西方學者從文明衝突的觀點質疑伊斯蘭教有礙民主，不利於民主制度的發軔與發展。另外也有阿拉伯學者提出「穆斯林例外主義」，強調過去的一段歷史對穆斯林社會有深刻的影響力，它已限定穆斯林的認知與處理基本問題的方式，穆斯林社會不可能演化成民主社會。本文認為這兩種觀點都失之偏頗。本文透過新制度論途徑去探究伊斯蘭教與民主能否相容，經過對古蘭經的分析後發現，大部分的經文其實都與猶太教、基督教的聖經一脈相承，至於伊斯蘭律法的其他三大法源也都具有彈性解釋的空間，因此很難說伊斯蘭教的政治根源有悖於民主原則。然而，穆斯林社會在走向民主化之前，似必須先經歷世俗化的過程，解決內部政治認同的爭議與達到某種程度的政教分立。世俗化與政教分立雖不代表民主化，但卻是民主化的前提。從80年代中期以來，我們已看到中東國家的伊斯蘭團體透過自由選舉在議會袒占有一席之地，或者在選舉尚未開放的國家扮演強有力的反對勢力。本文舉伊朗與土耳其的伊斯蘭運動經驗為例，說明此一將伊斯蘭神學重新詮釋的跡象與趨勢。總之，過去西方殖民的歷史時空背景確實影響到穆斯林對民主的認知，而且這種認知又因當代的以巴衝突、美國介入中東事務而益形複雜。換言之，決定穆斯林社會民主化前途的關鍵不在伊斯蘭教，而可能是強權主導下的國際局勢。
    Whether Islam can coexist with Western democracy, based upon the separation of politics and religion, remains an issue of speculation. Western scholars led by Samuel P. Huntington opined that Islam hinders the development of democratic institutions from the view of conflicts of civilization. Meanwhile, some Arab scholars labeled the non-democratic phenomenon in Islamic societies as ”Muslim Exceptionism,” arguing that certain periods of past influenced Muslim societies heavily that they could condition the perception and way of thinking by Muslims so that their societies cannot evolve towards democracies.
    This article analyzes this issue through the new institutionalist approach. After studying the Koran, we found that most part of it is congruent with the Bible. Three other sources of Islamic laws are flexible in interpretation. Thus it is difficult to say that the political base of Islam disagrees with the principle of democracy. Muslim societies, however, must experience secularization before democratization, in order to solve the internal debate about identity. Although secularization cannot equate democratization, it still is the prerequisite for democratization. We have seen Muslim groups in the Middle East compete in free elections or play a rigorous role as opposition. Iran and Turkey are two good examples of such Muslim societies that support the reinterpretation of Islamic theology. In all, the history of Western colonization has influenced the perception of Muslim about democracy. The conflicts between Israel and the Palestine and the American interference further complicate the perception. Despite these, Muslim societies do not necessarily averse to democracy.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 44(4), 45-73
    Issues & studies
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    44445.pdf1466KbAdobe PDF2527View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback