English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50937679      Online Users : 923
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94351


    Title: 歐盟執委會駐外代表團之分析
    Other Titles: An Exploration of EU External Delegations
    Authors: 黃偉峰
    Huang, David W. F.
    Keywords: 歐洲聯盟;執委會駐外代表團;政治機會之窗;去集中化;去中央化;對外援助與發展政策
    European Union;External Delegations of the European Commission;Decentralization;De-concentration;Window of Political Opportunity
    Date: 2004-04
    Issue Date: 2016-05-06 16:24:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 「歐盟駐台北經濟暨貿易辦事處」(European Economic and Trade Office in Taipei, EETO)在台灣十餘年經貿外交的努力之下，終於在二○○三年三月十日正式成立。這無疑是近年來台灣對歐關係的一大突破。然而對於歐盟駐外代表團的設立原因及其工作性質之國內外研究仍相當的少。有鑑於此，本文有系統地檢視歐盟執委會駐外代表團的外交特質，探討其涉外能力的限制和優勢，並比較執委會各地駐外代表團的功能與運作。本文討論執委會的「改革執委會白皮書」、「改革對外援助之管理」，以及「對外服務之發展」等行政改革計畫。筆者認為執委會的上述三大改革計畫實乃開啟了改革的機會之窗，預先排除歐盟內部的政治阻力，使得執委會在二○○一年重新佈署其各地駐外代表團有了正常性依據。所以執委會內部行政改革乃其來台設處之必要但非充分條件。
    On 10 March 2003, the Commission of the European Union (EU) finally set up its “European Economic and Trade Office” in Taipei. This new EU office comes after decades of efforts by Taipei in trade and economic diplomacy, and is doubtlessly a breakthrough in EU-Taiwan relations. Given the significant role played by the commission’s external delegations in the EU’s external affairs, it is surprising that few studies have investigated why they are deployed and how they operate. This paper seeks to enrich our understanding of the EU’s external delegations by systematically exploring their nature, function, and operation. It is argued that the grand administrative reform in Commission that took place in 2000 actually opened a window of political opportunity for reforming EU external delegations. Not only did the Commission’s administrative reform overcome existing interests’ political opposition, it also provided legitimacy for the redeployment of external delegations. Legitimacy based on administrative rationale, rather than on political preference, is important for the Commission to justify all its redeployment decisions in 2001. For this reason, I suggest that administrative reform was a necessary but not sufficient condition for the Commission to open its economic and trade office in Taipei.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 43(2), 141-170
    Issues & studies
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    432141.pdf1394KbAdobe PDF2236View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback