Reference: | 參考書目
壹、 政府出版品
台北市政府
民國71年11月 市政建設意向調查報告:第三梯次專案調查。
民國72年4月 市政建設意向調查報告:第四梯次專案調查。
台北市選舉委員會
民國70年 台北市議會第四屆議員選舉實錄。
台北市議會
民國71年 台北市議會有關法規彙編
日期不詳 第四屆議員審議議案統計表
貳、 中文部分(書籍與論文)
朱志宏
民國69年 「當前立法研究途徑之評析」,思與言,第十八卷第一期,頁六二~一00。
李麟添
民國69年 立法角色之研究-桃園縣議會第八屆縣議員角色傾向之分析,台灣商務印書館印行。
姜言斌
民國71年 理性選擇模式與集體抉擇理論之研究,台大政治研究所碩士論文。
袁頌西
民國58年 「湯斯著『民主政治的經濟理論』評介」,憲政思潮第八期,頁一六八~一七九。
黃立三
民國67年 台北市議會不成文行為規範之研究,台大政治研究所碩士論文。
黃紀、陳忠慶
民國72年 政治學的範圍與方法,台北,幼獅文化事業公司。
鄒篤麒
民國74年 政治聯合理論-內閣制國家政府聯合之分析,政大政治研究所碩士論文。
鄭瓊秋
民國71年 公共選舉與投票行為理論之研究,政大財政研究所碩士論文。
謝復生
民國73年 「選舉制度與政黨多寡──從理性選擇途徑到科學法則的建立」,中國政治學會學術研討會論文。
參、 英文部分(書籍與論文)
Abramowitz, Allen Ⅰ.
1980 “A Comparison of Voting for U.S. Senator and Representative in 1978,” American Political Science Review, 74: 633-640.
Achen, Christopher H.
1978“Measuring Representation,”American Journal of Political Science, 22: 475-510.
Bullock Ⅲ, Charles S. and David W. Brady
1983 “Party, Constituency, and Roll-Call Voting in the U.S. Senate, ”Legislative Studies Quarterly, 8: 29-43.
Cain, Bruce E., John A. Ferejohn, and Morris P. Fiorina
1984 " The Constituency Service Basis of the Personal Vote for U.S. Representatives and British Members of Parliament, ”American Political Science Review, 78 : 110-125.
Cnudde, Charles F. and Donald J. McGone
1966 " The Linkage Between Constituency Attitudes and Congressional Voting Behavior: A Causal Model, " American Political Science Review. 60: 66-72.
Cover, Albert and David Mayhew
1977 "Congressional Dynamics and the Decline of Competitive Congressional Elections," in Lawence Dodd and Bruce Oppenheiner, eds. Congress Revisited, New York: Praeger.
Cook, Thomas D. and Donald T. Campbell
1979 Quasi-Experimentation: Designs and Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.
Downs, Anthony
1957 An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper and Row.
Dunn, Willian N.
1981 Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Erikson, Robert S. and Gerald C. Wright, jr.
1980 " Policy Representation of Constituency Interests," Political Behavior, 2: 91-106.
Ealau, Heinz and Paul D. Karps
1978. " The Duzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness," in Heinz Eulau and John C. Wahlke, eds., The Politics of Representation, Beverly Hills, London: Sage Publications.
Fenno, Richard F.
1973 Congressmen in Committess. Boston: Little ?rown.
1977 "U.S. House Members in Their Districts: An Exploration," American Political Science Review. 71: 883-917.
1978 Home Style-House Members in Their Districts, Boston: Little and Brown.
Ferejohn, John A.
1974 Pork Barrel Politics-Rivers and Harbors Legislation, 1947 - 1968, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
1977 "On the Decline of Competition in Congressional Elections, " American Political Science Review. 71: 166-176.
Fiorina, Morris P.
1974 Representatives, Roll Calls and Constituencies, London: Heath and Company.
1977a Congress — Keystone of the Washington Establishment, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
1977b “The Case of the Vanishing Marginals – The Bureauccacy Did it, "American Political Science Review, 7.1: 177-181.
1981 “Some Problems in Studying the Effects of Resource Allocation in Congressional Elections, ”American Journal of Political Science, 25: 5 43-567.
Fiorina, Morris P. and Roger G. No11
1978 “Voters, Bureaucracy and Legislators
– A Rational Choice Perspective on the
Growth of Bareaucracy, "Journal of Public Economics, 9: 239-254.
1979 "Majority Rule Models and Legislative Elections," The Journal of Politics. 41: 1081 - 1104.
Frohlich, Norman and Joe A. Oppenheime, at al.
1978 "A Test of Downsian Voter Rationality 1964 Dresidential Voting,” American
Political Science Review, 72: 178-197.
Gant, Michael M. and Dwight F. Davis
1984 “Mental Economy and Voter Rationality — the Informed Citizen Problem in Voting Research,”The Journal of Politics, 46: 132-153.
Hanushek, Eric A. and John E. Jackson
1977 Statistical Methods for Social Scientists, New York: San Francisco, London: Academic Press.
Hedlund, Ronald D. and H. Paul Friesema
1972 “Representatives’ Perspections of Constituency Opinion,” The Journal of
Politics, 34: 730-752.
Hinckley, Barbara
1978 Stability and Change in Congress, New York: Harper & Row, Publishers
1981 Congressional Elections, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Inc.
Jewell. Malcolm E.
1970 " Attitudial Determinants of Legislative Behavior – The Utility of Role Analysis," in Allan Kornberg and Lloyd D. Musolf, eds., Legislatures in Developmental Perspective, Durlian, NC: Duke University Press.
1983 “Legislator – Constituency Relations and the Representative Process.”
Legislative Studies Quarterly, 8: 303-337.
Johannes, John R.
1980 "The Distribution of Casework in the U. S. Congress – An Uneven Burden," Legislative Studies Quarterly, 4: 517-544.
Johannes, John R. and John C. McAdams
1981. "The Congressional Incumbency Effect - Is It Casework, Policy Compability, or Something Else? An Examination of the 1978 Election," American Journal of Political Science. 25: 512-542.
Jones, Bryan D.
1973 " Competitiveness, Role Orientations and Legislative Responsiveness. "The Journal of Politics. 3.5 - 924–947.
Krehbiel, Keith and John R. Wright 1983 " The Incumbency Effect in Congressional Elections: A Test of Two Explanations,"American Journal of Political Science, - 27: 140-157
Kuklinski, James H.
1978 " Representativeness and Elections – A Policy Analysis," American Political Science Review, 72: 165-177.
Kuklinski, James H. and Richard C. Elling
1977 " Representational Role, Constituency Opinion and Legislative Roll Call Behavior," American Journal of Political Science, 21: 135-147
Lakeman, Erid
1974. How Democracies Vote - A Study of Electoral Systems, London: Faber and Faber
Mackay, Alfred F.
1980 Arrow`s Theorem: The Paradox of Social choice, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Mann, Thomas E. and Raymond E. Wolfinger
1980 “Candidates and Parties in Congressional Elections,”American Political Science Review, 74 - 67-632
Mayhew, David R.
1976 Congress-The Electoral Connection, New Haven & London : Yale University Press.
Miller. Warren E.
1970 "Majority Rule and the Representative System of Government," in Eric All-ardt & Stein Rokken, eds. Mass Politics– Studies in Political Science, New York: The Free Press
Miller, Warren E. and Donald E. Stokes
1963 " Constituency Influence in Congress,"American Political Science Review, 57: 45-56.
Nelson. Candice
1978 "The Effect of Incumbency on Voting in 1979 Congressional Elections, 1964-1974."Political Science Quarterly, 93: 665-678.
Olson, Mancur
1965 The Logic of Collective Action, New York:Schocken.
Parker, Glenn
1980a "The Advantage of Incumbency in House Elections,"American Politics Quarterly, 8:-449-464.
1980b "Sources of Change in Congressional District-Attentiveness." American Journal of Political Science, 24: 115-124
Pitkin, Hanna
1967 The Concept of Representation, Berkley: University of California Press Powell, Lynda W.
1982 "Issue Representation in Congress," The Journal of Politics, 44: 658-678
Ragsdale, Lyn
1983 "Responsiveness and Legislative Elections – Toward a Comparative Study." Legislative Studies Quarterly, 8: 339-378.
Riker, William H.
1977 ‘’The Future of a Science of Politics, American Behavioral Scientist, 21: 11-38
Riker, William H. and Peter C. Ordeshock
1973 An Introduction to Positive Political Theory, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall
Searing, Donald D.
1985 "The Role of the Good Constituency Member and the Practice of Representation in Great Britain,” Journal of Politics, 47: 348-381
Sinclair, Barbara
1983 "Purposive Behavior in the U.S. congress-A Review Essay, "Legislative
Studies Quarterly, 8: 117-131
Sullivan, John L. & Eric M. Uslaner
1978 "Congressional Behavior and Electoral Marginality," American Journal of Political Science, 22: 5, 36-553
Weisberg, Robert
1979 "Assessing Legislator – Constituency Policy Agreement, "Legislative Studies Quarterly, 4: 605-621
Wright jr., General C.
1978 "Candidates` Policy Positions and Voting in the U.S. Congressional Elections, "Legislative Studies Quarterly, 3: 445-464
Yiannakis, Diana E.
1981. "The Grateful Electorate - Casework and Congressional Elections,” American Journal of Political Science, 25: 568-580. |