English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50937129      Online Users : 987
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/91352
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/91352


    Title: 社會困境中貪心與擔心動機因素之探討
    Authors: 鍾昆原
    Contributors: 陳彰儀
    鍾昆原
    Date: 1987
    Issue Date: 2016-05-05 14:29:20 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 論文提要
    目錄
    論文提要………壹
    致謝詞………參
    圖表目次………柒
    第一章 緒論………1
    第二章 研究方法………23
    第一節 研究對象………23
    第二節 情境操弄………23
    第三節 測量工具………29
    第四節 實驗程序………33
    第三章 研究結果………35
    第一節 有關操弄變相的檢驗………35
    第二節 主要研究變相的分析………40
    第四章 討論與建議………59
    第一節 結果與討論………59
    第二節 建議………64
    參考書目………66
    附錄一 八種模擬情境
    附錄二 本研究之問卷
    附錄三 Yamagishi與Sato(1986)設計之貪心與擔心特質量表

    圖表目次
    圖1-1 本研究的研究架構圖………20
    表1-1 公有財產所剩數目的回饋………13
    表2-1 樣本人數性別分配表………24
    表2-2 樣本人數院別分配表………24
    表2-3 樣本人數年級分配表………24
    表3-1 高信任組與低信任組受試在操弄檢驗量表上的t檢定………36
    表3-2 高訊息組與低訊息組受試在操弄檢驗量表上的t檢定………37
    表3-3 結合情境組與分散情境組受試在操弄檢驗量表上的t檢定………38
    表3-4 各細格受試在貪心動機量表上的平均數、標準差………39
    表3-5 信任感、訊息量、情境類別等各組受試在貪心動機量表上的差異數分析摘要表………40
    表3-6 8組受試在貪心動機量表上的多重比較(DUNCAN)法………41
    表3-7各細格受試者在不信任感擔心動機量表上的平均數、標準差………42
    表3-8信任感、訊息量、情境類別等各組受試在不信任感擔心動機量表上的差異數分析摘要表………43
    表3-9各細格受試者在無用感擔心動機量表上的平均數、標準差………44
    表3-10信任感、訊息量、情境類別等各組受試在無用感擔心動機量表上的差異數分析摘要表………45
    表3-11 高、中、低貪心動機組受試在抽象的合作行為傾向上的平均數、標準差………46
    表3-12高、中、低貪心動機組受試在抽象的合作行為傾向上的變異數分析摘要表………46
    表3-13高、中、低貪心動機組受試在具體的合作行為傾向上的平均數、標準差………47
    表3-14高、中、低貪心動機組受試在具體的合作行為傾向上的變異數分析摘要表………47
    表3-15高、中、低不信任感擔心動機組受試在抽象的合作行為傾向上的平均數、標準差………48
    表3-16高、中、低不信任感擔心動機組受試在抽象的合作行為傾向上的變異數分析摘要表………48
    表3-17高、中、低不信任感擔心動機組受試在具體的合作行為傾向上的平均數、標準差………49
    表3-18高、中、低不信任感擔心動機組受試在具體的合作行為傾向上的變異數分析摘要表………49
    表3-19高、中、低無用感擔心動機組受試在抽象的合作行為傾向上的平均數、標準差………50
    表3-20高、中、低無用感擔心動機組受試在抽象的合作行為傾向上的變異數分析摘要表………51
    表3-21高、中、低無用感擔心動機組受試在具體的合作行為傾向上的平均數、標準差………51
    表3-22高、中、低無用感擔心動機組受試在具體的合作行為傾向上的變異數分析摘要表………52
    表3-23 特質變項、動機變項及行為變項之相關矩陣………53
    表3-24 在結合情境知覺下貪心與擔心動機、貪心與擔心特質及馬基維利特質對具體合作行為傾向之多元迴歸(STEPWISE)摘要表………54
    表3-25在結合情境知覺下貪心與擔心動機、貪心與擔心特質及馬基維利特質對抽象合作行為傾向之多元迴歸(STEPWISE)摘要表………54
    表3-27在分散情境知覺下貪心與擔心動機、貪心與擔心特質及馬基維利特質對具體合作行為傾向之多元迴歸(STEPWISE)摘要表………55
    表3-28貪心與擔心動機、貪心與擔心特質及馬基維利特質對抽象合作行為傾向之多元迴歸(STEPWISE)摘要表………55
    表3-29貪心與擔心動機、貪心與擔心特質及馬基維利特質對具體合作行為傾向之多元迴歸(STEPWISE)摘要表………56
    Reference: 參考書目
    葉光輝: (民72) 人情取向、分配方式與工作表現,國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
    陳皎眉: (民75) 影響「社會困境」問題解決的心理因素,國科會專題研究計畫 編號: NSC. 74-0301-H004-10。
    Abelson, R.P. (1976). Script Processing in Attitude Formation and Decision Making. In J. S. Carroll and J.W. Payne (Eds.), Cognition and Social Behavior. Lawence Erlbaum Associates.
    Bonacich, P. (1972). Norms and Cohesion as Adaptive Responses to Political Conflict: An experimental study. Sociometry, 35, 357-375.
    Bonacich, P. (1976). Secrecy and Solidarity. Sociometry, 39, 200-208.
    Brubaker, E.P. (1975). Free Ride, Free Revelation, or Golden Rules? Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 147-161.
    Brechner, K.C. (1973). An Experimental Analysis of Social Traps. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 18, 552-564.
    Coombs, C.A. (1973). A Reparameterization of the Prisner`s Dilemma Game. Behavioral Science, 18, 424-428.
    Cross, J.G. & Guyer, M.J. (1980). Social Traps. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Dawes, R.M., Mctavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Communication and Assumptions about other People`s Behavior in a Commons Dilemma Situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 169-193.
    Edney, J.J. (1979). Free Riders en route to Disaster. Psychology Today, 13 (3), 80-87.
    Edney, J. J. & Harper, C. S. (1976). The Effect in a Resource Management Problem: A social trap analysis. Human Ecology, 6, 387–395.
    Edney, J. J. (1980) . The Common Problem: Alternative perspectives.
    Fox, J. & Guyer, M. (1978). "Public" Choice and Cooperation in N-Person Prisoner`s Dilemma Game. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22, 468-481.
    Hardin, G.R. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
    Jerdee, T.H. & Rosen, B. (1974). Effects of Opportunity to Communication and Visibility of Indivisual Decision on Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 712-716.
    Kelley, H. H., Grzelak, J., (1972). Conflict between Individual and Common Interest in an N-Person Relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 190-197.
    Marwell, G. & Schmidt, D.R. (1972). Cooperation in a ThreePerson Prisoner`s Dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 376-383.
    Marwell, G. &Ames, R.E. (1979). Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods, " : Provision points, experience, and the free-rider problem. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 926-937.
    Messick, D.M., Wilke, H., Brewer, M.B., Kramer, R.M., Zemke, P. E. , & Lui , L. (1983) . Individual Adaptations and Structural Change as Solution to Social dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 294-309.
    Messick, D.M. & Brewer, M.B. (1983). Solving Social Dilemmas: A review. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 4, 11-14. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    Meux, E.P. (1973). Concern for the Common Good in an N-Person Game. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 28, 414 - 418.
    Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
    Platt, G. (1973). Social Traps. American Psychologists, 28, 641-651.
    Poppe, M. & Utens, L. (1986). Effects of Greed and Fear of being Gypped in a social Dilemma situation with changing Pool Size. Journal of Economic Psychology, 7, 61-73.
    Pruitt, D.G. & M.J. Kimmel (1977). Twenty Years of Experimental Gaming: Critique, synthesis, suggestions for the future Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 363-392.
    Rapoport, A., Chammah, A., Dwyer, J., & Gyr, J. (1962). Three -Person non-Zero-sum nonnegotiable Games. Behavioral scien??, 7, 30—58.
    Schelling, T.C. (1978). Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W.W. Noeton.
    Simons, R.T., Dawes, R.M., & Orbell, J.M. (1984). An Experimental Comparison of the Motives for not Contributing to a Public Good: Desire to free reid and fear of being gypped. Unpublished Manuscript. Utah State University / University of Dregon.
    Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group Process and Productivity. New York Academic Press.
    Stern, P.C. (1976). Effects of Incentive and Education on Resource Conservation Decisions in a Simulated Commons Dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1285-1292.
    Sweeney, J.W., Jr. (1973). An Experimental Investigation of the Free-rider Problem. Social Science Research, 2, 227-292.
    Tyszka, T. & Grzelak, J. L. (1976). criteria of choice in nonConstant Zero-Sum Games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 20, 357-376.
    Wiel, R. L. (1966). The N-Person Prisoner`s Dilemma: ome theory and a computer-orieted approach. Behavioral Science, 11, 227 -236.
    Yamagishi, T. & Sato, K. (1986). Motivational Bases of the Public Goods Problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 67-73.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學系
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002006317
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[心理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2309View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback