English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51097032      Online Users : 966
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/90998


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/90998


    Title: 社會困境之研究 : 不同誘因型態對合作行為之影響
    Authors: 莊慧秋
    Contributors: 陳皎眉
    莊慧秋
    Date: 1987
    Issue Date: 2016-05-04 17:20:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 摘要
    目錄
    圖表目錄………iii
    第一章 結論………1
    第一節 引言………1
    第二節 相關文獻探討………7
    第三節 研究假設………33
    第二章 研究方法………36
    第一節 研究對象………36
    第二節 實驗設計………37
    第三節 實驗程序………39
    第四節 研究架構與統計方法………53
    第三章 研究結果………57
    第一節 主要研究結果分析………57
    第二節 附帶研究結果分析………89
    第三節 其他次要變項分析………95
    第四節 結果摘要………97
    第四章 討論與建議………101
    參考目錄

    圖表目錄
    圖一 囚犯困境中嫌犯反應與其刑責關係的矩陣………8
    圖二 囚犯困境中，互動双方行為反應與其利益關係的酬賞矩陣………9
    圖三 多人囚犯困境中，合作人數與利益高低關係………11
    圖四 社會困境中的酬賞矩陣………13
    圖五 拿取遊戲與給予遊戲的酬賞矩陣………18
    圖六 Ke11ey & Grzelak(1972)所設計之四種酬賞矩陣………20
    圖七 Dawes et a1(1977)所設計之酬賞矩陣………22
    圖八 根據個人利益高低、合作代價高低、直綫或非直綫酬賞方式所設計之八種酬賞矩陣………41
    圖九 根據八種矩陣所繪之酬賞結構圖形………43
    圖十 實驗室設計平面圖………44
    圖十一 得分記錄表型式………49
    圖十二 實驗結果記錄表………51
    圖十三 本研究之研究架構圖………55
    表一 訊息回饋、酬賞方式、個人利益、合作代價在預測合作人數上的四向度列聯表………60
    表二 訊息回饋、酬賞方式、個人利益、合作代價在預測合作人數上的獨立性考驗………61
    表三 組間變項與組內變項有一級交互作用之綫性模式適合度考驗………62
    表四 組內變項具有一級交互作用的綫性模式適合度考驗………63
    表五 根據表四、綫性模式所得之效果參數值與其標準誤………64
    表六 酬賞方式、個人利益在預測合作人數上之細格平均數………65
    表七 八次嘗試中，合作及競爭人數分佈情形………66
    表八~表十五 八次嘗試中，預測合作人數與受試反應人數列聯表及其相關性考驗68~71
    表十六 訊息回饋、個人利益、合作代價、酬賞方式在受試反應上之四向度列聯表………72
    表十七 訊息回饋、個人利益、合作代價、酬賞方式在受試反應上的獨立性考驗………73
    表十八 組內變項與組間變項間具一級交互作的綫性模式適合度考驗………74
    表十九 組內變項間有一級交互作用的綫性模式適合度考驗………74
    表二十 二級交互作用綫性模式適合度考驗………75
    表二十一 根據表二十、綫性模式所得之參數估計值及標準誤………76
    表二十二 酬賞方式與個人利益在受試合作行為上的細格平均數………78
    表二十三 個人利益、合作代價在受試合作行為上的細格平均數………78
    表二十四 訊息回饋與酬賞方式在受試合作行為上的細格平均數………79
    表二十五~表三十二 八次嘗試中，受試反應與反應得分之人數分配列聯表，及其相關性考驗………81~83
    表三十三 訊息回饋、個人利益、合作代價、酬賞方式對反應得分之四因子重覆量數變異數分析表………85
    表三十四 訊息回饋、個人利益、合作代價、酬賞方式在反應得分上的細格平均數………86
    表三十五 酬賞方式、訊息回饋在反應得分上的細格平均數………87
    表三十六 酬賞方式、個人利益在反應得分上的細格平均數………88
    表三十七 個人利益、合作代價在反應得分上的細格平均數………88
    表三十八 個人意向、性別在預測合作人數之變異數分析摘要表………90
    表三十九 個人意向、性別在預測合作人數之細格平均數………90
    表四十 選擇合作次數的人數及百分比………91
    表四十一 個人意向、性別在合作次數之變異數分析摘要表………92
    表四十二 個人意向、性別在合作次數之細格平均數………92
    表四十三 平均預測合作人數、合作次數、反應總分間之皮爾遜相關係數檢定………94
    表四十四 個人意向、性別在反應總分之變異數分析摘要表………94
    表四十五 個人意向、性別在反應總分上之細格平均數………95
    表四十六 合作次數、預測合作人數、得分名次、得分滿意度、對他人行為策略滿意度間的等級相關係數檢定………97
    Reference: 參考文獻
    Bonacich, P (1972) Norms and cohesion as adaptive responses to potential conflict: an experimental study. Sociometry, 35, 357-375.
    Bonacich, P., shure, G.H. kahan, J.P. & Meeker, R.J. (1976) Cooperation and group size in the N-Person Prisoners` Dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 20(4), 687-706.
    Caldwell, M.D. (1976) Communication and sex effects in a five-person prisoner`s dilemma game. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 33(3), 273-280.
    Coombs. C.H. (1973) A reparmeterization of the prisoner`s dilemma game. Behavior Science, 18, 424-428.
    Dawes, R.M. (1973) The commons dilemma game: an N-person mixed motive game with a dominating strategy for defection. Oregon Research Institute Bull. 13, 2.
    Dawes, Robyn, M. (1975) "Formal Models of Dilemmas in Social Decision-Making". Human Judgement and Decision Process. New York: Academic Press.
    Dawes, R.M. (1980) Social dilemmas. Annual Review, 31, 169-193.
    Dawes, R.M., Mctavish, J. & Shaklee, H. (1977) Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people`s behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(1), 1-11.
    Fox, J., & Guyer, M. (1978) "Public" choice and cooperation in n-person prisoner`s dilemma. Journal of Conflict resolution, 22(3), 469-481.
    Goehring, D.J. & kahan, J.P. (1976) The uniform n-person prisoner`s dilemma game. Journal of conflict resolution, 20(1), 111-128.
    Grizzle, Starmer, & koch(1969) Analysis of categorical data by linear models. Biometrics, 25, 489-504.
    Hardin, G. (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science, .162, 1243-1248.
    Jorgenson, D.O. & Papciak, A.S. (1981) The effects of communication, resource feedback, and identifiablity on behavior in a simulated commons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 373-385.
    Kelley, H.H. & Grzelak, J. (1972) Conflict between individual and common interest in an n-person relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(2), 190-197.
    Kelley, H.H. & Stahelaki, A.J. (1970) Social interaction basis of cooperators` and competitors` beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(1), 66-91.
    Kelley, H.H. & Thibaut, J.W. (1978) Interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
    Koch, Landis, freeman & Lehnen (1977) A general methodology for the analysis of experiments with repeated measurement of categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 133-158.
    Komorita, S.S. (1965) Brief articles: Cooperative choice in a prisoner`s dilemma game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(5), 741-745.
    Komorita, S.S. (1976) A model of the n-person dilemma-type game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,12, 375-373.
    Komorita, S.S. & Lapworth, C.W. (1982) Cooperative choice among individua1s versus groups in an n-person di1emma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
    42(3),487-496.
    Luce R. D. & H. Raiffa (1957) Games & decisions. New York: John Weily.
    Madsen, M. C. (1967) Cooperative and competitive motivation of children in there Mexican subcultures. Psychological Reports, 20, 365-371.
    Marwell, G. & Ames, R.E. (1979) Experiments on the provision of public goods. I. resoures, interest, group size, and the free-rider problems. American Journal of Sociology, 84(6), 1335-1360.
    Marwell, G. & Schmitt, D.R. (1972) Cooperation in a three-person prisoner`s dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 376-383.
    Messick, D. M. (1973) To join or not to join: An approach to the unionization decision. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 10, 145-156.
    Messick, D. M. & Wilke, H. (1983) Individual adaptations and structural change as solution to social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(2), 294-309.
    Meux, E.P. (1973) Concern for the common good in an n-person game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(3),414-418.
    Mintz, A. (1951) Non-adaptive group behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 150-159.
    Olsen, M. (1965) The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, mass: Harvard university press.
    Platt, J. (1973) social traps. American Psychologist. August, 641-651.
    Rapoport & C. Orwant (1962) Experimental games: a review. Behavioral Science,7, 1-37.
    Rapoport, A. & Chammah, A.M. (1965) Prisoner`s dilemma: A study in conflict and cooperation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Rubin, J. & B. Brown. (1975) The social psychology of Bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press.
    Rutte, C.G. & Wilke, H.A.M. (1984) Social dilemma and leadership, European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 105-121.
    Seligman, C., & Darley, J.M. (1977) Feedback as a means of decreasing residential energy consumption Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 363-368.
    Scodel, A. (1959) Some descriptive aspects of two-person non-zero-sum games: I. Journal of Conflict Resolution,3(2), 114-119.
    Stern, P. C. (1976) Effects of incentive & education on resource conservation decisions in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 34, 1285-1292.
    Schelling, T. (1960) The strategy of conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University.
    Tyszka, T. & Grzelak, J. L. (1976) Criteria of choice in non-constant-sum games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 20(2), 357-376.
    Vinacke, W. E. (1969) Variables in experimental games: Toward a field theory. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 293-318.
    Vinokur, A. & Burnstein, E. (1974) Effects of partially shared Persuasive arguments on group-induced shifts: a group-problem-solving approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 305-315.
    Weil, Jr. R.L. ( 1965) The n-person prisoner`s dilemma: Some theory and a computer-oriented appoach. Computers in Behavior science, 227-234.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學系
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002006079
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[心理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2266View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback