English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51577100      Online Users : 961
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/90776


    Title: 論公民投票三階段：各國實施經驗分析
    Other Titles: A Study of the Three Phases of Referendums: Cross-Country Experiences
    Authors: 曹金增
    Tsao, Chin-Tseng
    Keywords: 人民投票;公民複決;公民創制;直接民主
    plebiscite;referendum;initiative;direct democracy
    Date: 2003-07
    Issue Date: 2016-05-04 15:53:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文主要是從各國實施公民投票的經驗，分析並申論公民投票實行三階段之發展。（１）第一階段：尋求主權獨立之公民投票時期(Plebiscite)，如五十年代之亞、非洲各國、一九九一年至一九九三年前蘇聯各共和國、一九九九年東帝汶。(2) 第二階段：尋求反代議民主之公民複決時期(Referendum)，如一九六二年的法國、一九九三年的義大利、一九八八年的智利、一九九三年的巴西等。(3)　第三階段：追求人民直接立法之公民創制時期(Initiative) ，如一九八０年以後的瑞士、美國各州。另外，有兩個例外：魁北克和台灣，其公民投票發展模式有別於一般國家，但筆者相信魁北克和台灣最終仍必須尋求主權立之公民投票，才能真正解決其內部代議政治之問題。
    The purpose of this article is to analyze and explain the practice of the three phased referendums from the experiences implemented among all countries. (1) First phase : the plebiscite period of independence or sovereignty-for example, the countries in Asia and Africa in 1950s, the Former Soviet Republics during 1991-1993, and East Timor in 1999. (2) Second phase: the referendum period against the representative democratic system-for instance, France in 1962, Italy in 1993, Chile in 1988, and Brazil in 1933. (3) Third phase: the initiative period for direct legislation, such as Switzerland and the American States after 1980s.There are two exceptions, Quebec and Taiwan, because their referendum developmental models are different from other countries. Therefore, the author believes if Quebec and Taiwan want to solve the representative democratic system problem thoroughly, they have to try to gain independence or initiate a Sovereignty Plebiscite.
    Relation: 問題與研究42(4),129-159頁
    Issues & studies
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    42,4,p129-159.pdf1623KbAdobe PDF2416View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback