政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/90572
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113483/144470 (79%)
Visitors : 51366059      Online Users : 784
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/90572


    Title: 社會助長與社會閒散之比較研究
    Authors: 鄭美芳
    Contributors: 陳皎眉
    鄭美芳
    Date: 1988
    Issue Date: 2016-05-04 14:31:15 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 論文摘要
    目錄
    第一章 緒論………1
    第一節 研究目的與動機………1
    第二節 文獻探討………5
    第三節 研究假設………22
    第二章 研究方法………25
    第一節 研究對象………25
    第二節 實驗工具………25
    第三節 實驗設計………28
    第四節 實驗程序………29
    第五節 統計方法………39
    第三章 研究結果………41
    第一節 有關操弄變項的檢驗………41
    第二節 各組受試在抄寫音數上之分析………42
    第三節 各組受試在「是否達到目標」上的分析………52
    第四節 結論………56
    第四章 討論與建議………59
    第一節 討論………59
    第二節 應用與建議………64
    參考書目………69
    附錄A 實驗作業………83
    附錄B 問卷………87
    附錄C 單獨組參與目標決定方式之指導語………89

    圖表目次
    圖1-1 參與決策的中介機制及其影響………18
    圖2-1 單獨組之實驗室佈置圖………32
    圖2-2 團體/可以辨認組之實驗室佈置圖………33
    圖2-3 團體/不可辨認組之實驗室佈置圖………34
    圖3-1 工作情境與作業難度二因子之交互作用圖………50
    表2-1 受試樣本人數分佈表………26
    表3-1 困難作業組與簡單作業組在操弄檢驗量表上的t考驗………43
    表3-2 參與目標決定組與分配目標組受試在操弄檢驗量表上的t考驗………44
    表3-3 各組受試在抄寫音數上的平均數、標準差與變異數………46
    表3-4 經對數轉換後，各組受試在抄寫音數上的平均數、標準差、與變異數………47
    表3-5 工作情境、作業難度、及參與目標決定方式等各組受試在抄寫音數上之變異數分析摘要表………49
    表3-6 經對數轉換後，工作情境與作業難度兩因子在抄寫音數上之組格平均數………50
    表3-7 工作情境與作業難度二因子在單純主要效果考驗的變異數分析摘要表………51
    表3-8 在簡單作業情況下，各工作情境間之事後比較………52
    表3-9 工作情境、作業難度、與參與目標決定方式在「是否達到目標」上之觀察值與百分比………54
    表3-10 根據表3-9之四向度列聯表所進行之各類模式適合度考驗………55
    Reference: 參考書目
    林邦傑 (民75) 品質變項的因果分析──洛基對數線性模式及其應用。測驗年刊，33，125-141。
    林清山 (民65) 心理與教育統計學。台北:東華出版社，287-292。
    Allport, F. H. (1920) The influence of the gronp upon association and thought. Journal of Experiemental Psychology,3,159-182.
    Brickner, M. A., Harkins, S. G. & Ostrom, T. M. (1986) Effects of personal involvement: thought-provoking implications for social loafing Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(4), 763-770.
    Burwitz, L., & Newell, K. M. (1972) The effects of the mere presence of coactors on learning a motor skill Journal of Motor Behavior,4, 99-102.
    Campbell, D. J. & Gingrich, K. F. (1986) The interactive effects of task complexity and participating on task performance.: a field experiement.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process,38, 162-180.
    Carment, D. W. (1970) Rate of simple mater responding as a function of coaction, competition, and sex the participants Psychonomic Science.19. 340-341.
    Chen, S. C. (1937) Social modification of the activity of ants in nestbuilding, Physiological Zoology 10,420-436.
    Coch, L. & French, J. J. R. P. (1948) Overcoming resistance to change.Human Relations, 1, 512-533 .
    Cottrell, N. B. (1972) Social facilitation.In C. G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Holt, Rinehart, 5 Winston.
    Cottrell, N. B., Wack, D. L., Sekerak, G. J., & Rittle, R. H. (1968) social faciliation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others. Journal of Personity and Social Psychology, 9, 245-250.
    Dachler, H. P., & Wilpert, B. (1978) Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: a critical evaluation, Administrative Science Quarterly , 23(1), 1-39.
    Dashiell, J. F. (1930) An experimental analysis of some group effects, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology; 25, 190-199.
    Davis, J. H. (1969) Group performance. Mass: Addison-Wesley.
    Deutsch, M., & Krauss, R. M. (1960) The effect of threat upon interpersonal bargaining, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology.61. 181-189.
    Dossett, D. L., Latham, G. P., & Mitchell, T. R. 1979) Effects of assigned versus participatively set goals, knowledge of results, and individual differences on employee behavior when goal difficulty is held constant. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(3), 291-298.
    Forsyth, D. R. (1983) An introduction to group dynamics, California Wadsworth, Inc.
    Frost, P. J., & Mahoney, T. A. (1976) Goal setting and the task proess: I. An int8ractive influence on individual performance, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 17, 328-350.
    Gabrenya, W. K. Latane, B. & Wang, Y. (1983) Social loafing in cross-cultural perspective: Chinese on Taiwan, Joural of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14(3), 368-384.
    Gibb, J.R. (1961) Defensive level and influence potential in small groups. In L. Pettrullo & B. M. Bass (Eds.), Leadersship and Interpersonal Behavior. New york: Holt, Rinehart, 5 Winston.
    Gibb, J. R. (1973) Defensive Communication. In W. G. Bennis, D. E. Berlew, E. H. Schein, & F. I. Steele(Eds.), Interpersonal Dynamics (3rd ed.). Homewood, Ill. : Dorsey.
    Goethals, G., & Zanna, M. (1979) The role of social comparison in choice shifts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1469-1476.
    Gorz, A. (1973) Socialism and Revolution. Garden City: Anchor.
    Hackman, J. R. (1968) Effects of task characteristics on group products. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 162-187.
    Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975) Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: a review and proposed integration. In L. Borkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experiemental Social Psychology (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press.
    Harkins, S. G. (1987) Social loafing and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social
    Psychology, 23, 1-18.
    Harkins, S. G. a Jackson, J. M. (1985) The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(4), 457-465.
    Harkins, S. G., Latane, B., & Williams, K. (1980) Social loafing: allocating effort or taking it easy? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(5), 457-465.
    Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. (1982) Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Persornality and Social Psychology,43(6). 1214-1229.
    Harper, N. L., & Askling, L. R. (1980) Group communication and quality of task solution in a media production organization. Communication Monographs, 47 , 77-100.
    Henchy , T., & Glass, D. C. (1968) Evaluaion apprehension and the social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 10, 446-454.
    Hirokawa, R. Y. (1980) A comparative analysis of communication patterns within effective and ineffective decision-making groups. Communication Monographs, 47, 312-321.
    Ingham, A. G., Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V., (1974) The Ringelmann effect: studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 371-384.
    Jackson, J. M., & Harkins, S. G. (1985) Equity in effort: an explanation of the social loafing effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(5). 1199-1206.
    Jackson, J. M., & Williams, K. D. (1985) Social Loafing on difficult tasks: Working collectively can improve performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(4), 937-942.
    Jellison, J., & Riskind, J. ( 1970) A social comparison of abilities interpretation of risk-taking behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 375-390.
    Kerr, N. L. & Bruun, S. E. (1981) Ringelmann revisited: alternative explanations for the social loafing effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(2), 224-231.
    Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983) Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 78-94.
    Kravitz, D., & Martin, B. (1986) Ringelmann rediscovered: the original article. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 936-941.
    Latan?, B. (1981) Social loafing in Thailand in the sound production procedure, Unpublished manuscript.
    Latan?, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979) Many hands make 1ight the work: the causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822-832.
    Latham, G. P., Mitchell, T. R., & Dossett, D. L. (1978) Importance of participative goal setting and anticipated rewards on goal difficulty and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63` 163-171.
    Latham, G. P., & Saari, L. M. (1979) The effects of holding goal difficulty constant on assigned and participatively set goals. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 163-168. (a).
    Latham, G. P., & Saari, L. M. (1979) Importance of supportive relationships in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 151-156.(b).
    Latham, G. P., & Steele, T. P. (1983) The motivational effects of participation versus goalsetting on performace. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 406-417.
    Latham, G. P., & Yukl, G. A. (1976) Effects of assigned and participative versus goal setting on performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology , 61, 166-171.
    Laughlin, P. R. (1980) Social combination processes of cooperative problem solving groups on verbal intellective tasks. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in Social Psychology. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
    Laughlin, P. R., & Adamopoulos, J. (1980) Social combination processes and individual learning for six-person cooperative groups on an intellective task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 941-947.
    Lieberman, D. A. (1979) Behaviorism and the mind: A (limited) call for a return to : introspection. American Psychologist, 34, 319-333.
    Locke, E. A., Feren, D. B., McCaleb, V. M., Shaw, K. N., & Denny, A. T. (1980) The relative effectiveness of four methods of motivating employee performance. In K. Duncan, M. Grunebery, & D. Wallis (Eds.), Changes in working life. New York: Wiley.
    Locke, E. A. Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981) Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Balletin, 90(1), 125-152.
    Locke, E. A., & Schweiger, D. M. (1979) Participation in decision-making: one more look. In B. M. Shaw (Ed.) Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 1). Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
    Locke, E. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Latham, G. D. (1984) Participation in decision-making: when should it be used? Manuscript submitted for publication.
    London, M., & Oldham, G. R. (1976) Effects of varying goal types and incetive systems on performance and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 537-546.
    Martens, R., & Landers, D. M., (1972) Evaluation potential as a determinant of coaction effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 347-359 .
    McCormick, E. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (1985) Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Plentice-Hall.
    Mento, A. J., Cartledge, N. D., & Locke, E. A. (1980) Maryland vs . Michigan vs. Minnesota: another look at the relationship of expectancy and goal difficulty to task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 419-440.
    Meumann, E. (1904) Haus-und schularbeit: experiments an kindern der volkschule. Die Deutsche Schule, 8, 278-303.
    Morse, N. C.,& Reimer, E. (1956) The experimental change of a major organizational variable. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 120-129.
    Morris, C. G. (1966) Task effects on group interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(5), 545-554.
    Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychologyical Review, 84, 231-259.
    Oldham, G. R. (1975) The impact of supervisory characteristics on goal acceptance. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 461-475.
    Olson, M. (1965) The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambrige, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    Organ, D. W. (1977) Intentional vs arousal effects of goal-setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance , 18, 378 - 389.
    Pessin, J. (1933) The comparative effects of social and mechanical stimulation on memorizing. American Journal of Psychology, 45, 263-270.
    Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G., & Williams, K. D. (1980) The effects of group diffusion of cognitive effort on attitudes: a information-processing view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 81-92.
    Sanders, G. S. (1981) Driven by distraction: an integrative review of social facilitation theory and research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 227-251.
    Sanders, G. S., Baron, R. S., & Moore, D. L. (1978) Distraction and social comparison as mediators of social facilitation effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 291-303.
    Shaw, M. E. (1963) Scaling group tasks: a method for dimensional analysis. Technical Report No. 1, ONR Contract NR, 170-266, Nonr-580(11).
    Shaw, M. E. (1981) Group dynamics: the psychology of small group behavior (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill, 1981.
    Steiner, I. D. (1972) Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
    Steiner, I. D. (1976) Task-performing groups. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology. Morris town, N. J.: Genearal Learning Press.
    Travis, L. E. (1925) The effect of a small audience upon eye-hand coordination. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 20, 142-146.
    Travis, L. E. (1928) The influence of the group upon the stuterer`s speed in free association. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 23, 45-51.
    Triplett, N. (1897) The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology. 9. 507-533.
    Vanek, J. (1971) The participatory Economy : An Evolutionary Hypothesis and a Strategy for Development. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    Ward. C. (1982) Socia1 1oading in Ma1aysia in the sound production procedure. Unpublished manuscript.
    Weiner, N., Pandey , J .. & Latan?, B. (1981) Individual and group productivity in the United States and India. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA
    Weston, S. B., & English, H. B. (1926) The influence of the group on psychological test scores. American Journal of Psychology , 37, 600-601.
    Williams, K. D. (1981) The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Detroit.
    Williams, K., Harkins, S., & Latun?, B. (1981) Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 40(2), 303-311.
    Williams, K. , Williams, K. , Kawana, Y. , & Latan?, B. (1984) Social loafing in Japan: a developmental cross-cultural study . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
    Yukl, G. A., & Latham, G. P. (1978) Interrelationships among employee participation, individual differences, goal difficulty , goal acceptance , goal instrumentality , and performance. Personnel Psychology , 31, 305- 323.
    Zajonc, R. B. (1965) Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.
    Zajonc, R. B. (1980) Compresence. In P. Paulus (Eds.) , Psychology of Group Inflnence. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlaum.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學系
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002005898
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Psychology] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2324View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback