政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/90361
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113392/144379 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51232128      線上人數 : 932
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 中國行政 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/90361


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/90361


    題名: 官僚體制中「服從」與「自主」矛盾現象之探討—韋伯觀點的詮釋
    作者: 王千文
    關鍵詞: 官僚體制;形式理性;實質理性;責任倫理;信念倫理
    bureaucracy;formal rationality;substantive rationality;ethic of conviction;ethic of responsibility
    日期: 2008-12
    上傳時間: 2016-05-03 16:31:07 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 兼從理論研究或從實務運作觀察，現代政府的功能與權力，有向行政部門集中的趨勢。行政人員的作為不僅影響到政府功能的發揮，也直接關係到社會大眾的福祉，因此，對其角色與責任的界定實有重新檢視的必要。\\r由於理論發展的趨勢與社會價值的更迭，使得執行情境益漸複雜，行政人員所應考慮的因素也相對增加，不能再單純的就執行技術問題，作為其行動的唯一基礎。在這樣的理解之下，官僚成員是否能夠再像韋伯所言，以服從上級指示為其義務及榮譽？基於這樣的問題意識，興起本文探討官僚體制中是否會有服從與自主的矛盾現象？以及此種矛盾現象是如何產生？又，韋伯是否有關注到這種現象？若有，其是否有提出解決方法？如何解套？若無，又是為什麼？最後，當代學者對於這樣的現象又是如何提出不同的觀點？\\r本文發現，在講求理性化的情況下，形式理性至上的結果往往會抹煞成員的價值理性，在服從紀律與自主創新的要求下，勢必產生服從與自主的矛盾。然，韋伯也注意到這樣的窘境，雖曾提出責任倫理來平衡形式理性與價值理性間的不平衡，但卻僅限於政治領導者。據此，本文試著從責任觀點提出官僚人員在面對服從命令與專業自主產生衝突時的解決建議。
    As is known, either reflected in theory or in practice, government power has become more and more concentrated on its executive branches with citizens’ increasing demands. Administrator’s actions or inactions, as a result, can contribute not only to government functioning but also public well-being. It seems logical for administrators to take orders and act in accordance with laws since they are responsible for getting things done. However, social development and changing values have made executing situations even more complex. Administrators can hardly afford to do nothing but conceive upper orders as their duties and honors just like what Weber noted. With this in mind, this paper tries to further examine the governments’ roles and responsibilities. To be more specific, is it contradictory in essence as far as bureaucrats subjecting to authority and being autonomous is concerned. If it is the case, how does it happen? Has Weber noticed it at all? If he had had, what was the solution? If he did not offer a solution, how come?
    關聯: 中國行政, 80,101-127
    Chinese journal of administration
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[中國行政] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    80( p101-127 ).pdf574KbAdobe PDF25800檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋