政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/89987
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113483/144470 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51354252      線上人數 : 754
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 新聞學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/89987


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/89987


    題名: 立克特量表在傳播研究上之適用性初探
    作者: 黃明蕙
    貢獻者: 王石番
    黃明蕙
    日期: 1990
    1989
    上傳時間: 2016-05-03 14:06:00 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 態度研究的主要工具一立克特量表的建構有四項基本假設：一是假設每一題項具有同等量值；二是假設反應變異性不重要；三是假設所選擇的題項代表研究者所欲測量的變項；四是假設每一反應類目之間具有等距尺度的性質。
    參考文獻: 中文部分：
    李月華，我國報社編採工作者對新聞客觀性認知之研究國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文，民國七十五年一月。
    李美枝，社會心理學--理論研究與應用，台北： 大洋出版社， 民國七十六年十月修定版。
    吳英璋，「測驗量表法」，社會及行為科學研究法，楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園編，台北：東華書局，第十九章，頁589-623，民國七十七年十一月十一版。
    吳聰賢，「態度量表的建立」，社會及行為科學研究法，楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園編，台北：東華書局，第十六章，頁463-491，民國七十七年十一月十一版。
    林照真，從新聞報導實例探討新聞客觀性之體現，國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文，民國七十六年一月。
    卓清俊，MTV 視聽中心消費者使用動機與行為之研究一以北、高二市為例，國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文，民國七十八年六月。
    紀效正，政府官員與記者互動關係之研究一以行政院環境保護署為例，國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文，民國七十八年六月。
    郭生玉，心理與教育測驗，台北：精華書局，民國七十八年四版。
    楊秀娟，我國新聞從業人員專業化程度之研究一以報紙為例，國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文，民國七十八年六月。
    蔡淑芬，電視新聞性節目觀賞者生活型態之研究，國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文，民國七十八年七月。
    賴光臨，潘家慶，謝?春，鄺湘霞，玉石番，政令宣導與媒體效用之調查研究，行政院新聞局專題研究，民國七十三年十月。
    潘家慶，「臺灣地區民眾大眾傳播行為(l 984)」，發展中的傳播媒介，台北：帕米爾書店，頁205-246 ，民國七十六年三月。
    鄭瑞城，報紙新聞報導之正確性研究， 國科會專題研究報告， 民國七十二年五月。
    羅文輝，「客觀與新聞報導」，報學， 頁110-116，民國七十四年十二月。
    蕭蘋，環保記者專業意理及其影響因素研究，國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文，民國七十八年六月。


    英文部分：
    Aiken, Lewis R. (1983)
    "Number of Response Categories and Statistics on a Teacher Rating Scale", Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol.43, pp.397-401.
    Allport, F. H. (1935)
    "Attitudes", reprint in Readings in Attitude and Measurement, Fishbein, Martin edited, N.Y.: Jahn Wiley & Sans Inc., 1967.
    Andrich, , David. (1978)
    "Scaling Attitude Items Constructed and Scored in the Likert Tradition", Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 38, pp.665-680.
    Babbie, Earl (1985)
    "Indexes, Scales, and Typologies", The Practice of Social Research, 4th edition, chap. 15, Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing Co., pp.360-385.
    Bachman, G. Jerald &. O`Maliey, M. Patrick (1984)
    "Yea-saying, Nay-saying, and Going to Extremes: Black-White Differences in Response Styles", Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 48, pp.491-509.
    Banta, Thomas J. (1961)
    "Social Attitudes and Response Styles", Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. xxi, No.3, pp.543-557.
    Bass, Bernard M.; Cascio, Wayne F. &. O`Connor, Edward. J.(1974)
    "Magnitude Estimations of Expressions of Frequency and Amount", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 59, No.3, pp.313-320. ,
    Belson, William A. (1966)
    "The Effects of Reversing the Presentation Order of Verbal Rating Scales", Journal of Advertising Research, Vo1.6, pp.33-37.
    Bendig, A. W. (1954)
    "Reliability and the Number of Rating Scale Categories", The Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 3.8 , No.1, pp.38-40.
    Bishop, F. George (1987)
    "Experiments with the Middle Response Alternative in Survey Questions", Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol.51, pp.220-232.
    --------;Oldendick. W. Robert; Tuchfarber. J. Alfred & Bennett, E. Stephen (1980)
    "Pseudo-Opinion on Public Affairs", Public Opinion Quarterly, pp.198-209.
    Bogardus, Emory S. (1925)
    "Measuring Social Distances", reprint in Readings in Attitude and Measurement, Fishbein, Martin edited, N.Y. :John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1967, pp.71-76.
    Boyer, John H. (1981)
    "How Editors View Objectivity", Journalism Quarterly, Vol.58, No.1-2, pp.24-28.
    Cantril, Hadley (1947)
    Gauging Public Opinion, Princeton, N.J.:Princeton University Press.
    Champney, Horace & Marshall, Helen (1939)
    "Optimal Refinement of the Rating Scale", Journal of Applied Psychology, pp.323-331.
    Cranbach, Lea J. (1946)
    " Response Sets and Test Validity", Educational and Psychological Measuremrnt, VI, pp.475-494.
    -------- (1950)
    "Futher Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design", Educational and Psychological Measurement, X, pp.3-29.
    Cunningham, H. William; Cunningham, C. M. Isabella & Green,
    T. Robert (1977)
    "The Ipsative Process to Reduce Response Set Bias", Public Opinion Quarterly, pp.379-384.
    Dixon, Paul N.; Bobo, Mackie & Stevick, Richard A. (1984) "Response Differences and Preferences of All-category-defined and End-defined Likert", Educational and Psychological Measurement, pp.61-66.
    Edwards, L. Allen & Kenney, Kathryn Claire (1967)
    "A Comparison of the Thurstone and Likert Technique of Attitude Scale Construction", Attitude Theory and Measurement, Fishbein, Martin edited, N.Y. ;John Wiley & Sons Inc., pp.249-256.
    Gregoire, Timothy G. (1989)
    "Analysis of Likert-scale Data Revisited", Psychological Bulletin, Val.l05, No.1, pp.171.
    --------& Driver, B. C. (1987)
    "Analysis of Ordinal Data to Detect Population Differences", Psychological Bulletin, Vol.101, No.1, pp.l59-165.
    Guilford, J. P. (1954)
    Psychometric Methods, 2nd edition, N.Y. :McGraw-Hill.
    Guttman, Louis (1944)
    "A Basis for Scaling Qualitative Data", reprint in Readings in Attitude and Measurement, Fishbein, Martin edited. N.Y.:John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1967, pp.96-107.
    Hamiltion, David L. (1988)
    "Personality Attributes Associated with Extreme Response Style", Psychological Bulletin, Vol.69, No.3, pp.192-203 . .
    Hui, C. Harry & Triandis, Harry C. (1985)
    "The Instability of Response Sets", Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol.49, pp.253-280.
    --------(1989)
    "Effects of Culture and Response Format an Extreme Response Style", Journal of Cross-cultural Psychological, Vo1.20, No.3, pp.296-309.
    Jackman, Mary R. (1973)
    "Education and Prejudice or Education and Response-set?", American Sociological Review, Vol, 38, pp.327-339.
    Jacoby, Jacob & Matell, Michael S. (1971)
    "Three-point Likert Scales are Good Enough", Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.viii, -pp.495-500.(a)
    Jansen, Paul G. W. & Roskam, Edward E. (1986)
    "Latent Trait Models and Dichotomization of Graded
    Resonses", Psychometrika, Vo1.51, No.1, pp.69-9l.
    Koch, William R. (1983)
    "Likert Scaling Using the Graded Response Latent Trait Model", Applied Psychological Measurement, Val. 7, No.1, pp.15-32.
    Komorita, S. S. & Graham, William K. (1965)
    "Number of Scale Points and the Reliability of Scales", Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol.xxv, No.4, pp.987-995.
    Landsberger, Henry A. & Saavedra, Antonio (1970)
    "Response Set in Developing Countries", Public Opinion. Quarterly, pp.214-229.
    Likert, Rensis (1932)
    "The Method of Constructing an Attitude Scale", reprint in Attutude Theory and Measurement, Fishbein, Martin edited, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., pp.90-95, 1967.
    Lin, Nan (1976)
    "Measurement", Foundations of Social Research, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill Inc., chap.10, pp.166-196.
    Matell, Michael S. & Jacoby, Jacob (1971)
    "Is There an Optimal Number of Alternatives for Likert Scale Items? Study I: Reliability and Validity", Educational and Psychological Measurement, pp.657-674. (b)
    -------- (1972)
    "Is There an Optimal Number of Alternatives for Likert-scale Items?--Effects of Testing Time and Scale Properties", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.56, No.6, pp.506-509.
    Meyer, Philip (1988)
    "Defining and Measuring Credibility of Newspapers: Developing an Index", Journalism Quarterly, Vol.65, No.3-4, pp.567-574.
    Maser, C. A. & Kalton, G. (1971)
    Survey Methods in Social Investigation, London: Heinentann Educational Books, 2nd edition, pp.352-365.
    Newstead, Stephen E. & Arnold, John (1989).
    "The Effect of Response Format on Ratings of Teaching", Educational and Psychological Measurement, pp.33-43.
    O`Donovan, D. (1965)
    "Rating Extremity: Pathology or Meaningfulness?", Psychological Review, pp.358-372.
    Osgood, C.E.; Suci, G.J. & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957)
    The Measurement of Meaning, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
    Oskamp, Stuart (I977)
    "Measurement of Attitude", Attitude and Opinions, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. :Prentice-Hall, Inc., chap.2, pp.21-72.
    Payne (951)
    The Art of Asking Question s, Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.
    Petersen, Karenkay & Dutton, E. Jeffrey (1975)
    "Centrality, Extrtremity, Intensity--Neglected Variables in Research on Attitude-behavior Consistency", Social Forces, pp.393-414.
    Presser, Stanley & Schuman, Howard (1980)
    "The Measurement of a Middle Position in Attitude Surveys", Public Opinion Quarterly, pp.70-85.
    Rasmussen, Jeffrey Lee (1989)
    "Analysis of Likert-scale Data: A Reinterpretation of Gregoire and Driver", Psychological Bulletin, Vol.105,No.1, pp.167-170.
    Ray, John J. (1983)
    "Reviving the Problem of Acquiescent Response Bias", The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol.121, pp.81-96.
    -------- (1984)
    "A Futher Comment on the Winkler, Kanouse, and Ware Method of Controlling for Acquiescent Response Bias", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.69, No.2, pp.359.
    Rorer, Leonard G. (1965)
    "The Great Response-style Myth", Psychological Bulletin,Vol.63, No.3, pp.12.9-156.
    Rosengren, Karl Erik (1980)
    "Bias in News: Methods and Concepts", Mass Communication Review Yearbook, Vol. 1, pp. 249-263.
    Roshco, Bernard (1975)
    "The Difficulty of Defining News", Newsmaking. Chicago, Ill. :The University of Chicago Press, pp.8-19.
    Rost, Jurgen (1988)
    "Measuring Attitudes with a Threshold Model Drawing on a Traditional Scaling Concept", Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol.12, No.4, pp.397-409.
    Rubin, Alan M.: Perse, Elizabeth M. & Taylor, Donald S. (1988)
    "A Methodological Examination of Cultivation", Communication Research, Val.1S, No.2, pp.l07-134.
    Schriesheim, Chester A. (1981)
    "The Effect of Grouping or Randomizing Items on Leniency Response Bias", Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vo1.41, pp.401-411.
    --------&Schriesbeim, Janet F. (1978)
    "The Invariance of Anchor Points Obtained by Magnitude Estimation and Pair-comparision Treatment of Complete Ranks Scaling Procedures: An Empirical Comparison and Implications for Validity of Measurement", Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol.38, pp.977-983.
    --------& Novelli, Luke Jr. (1989)
    "A Ckomparative Test of the Interval-scale Properties of Magnitude Estimation and Case III Scaling and Recommendations for Equal-interval Frequency Response Anchors", Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vo1.49, pp.59-74.
    --------; Kopelman, Richard E & Solomon, Esther (1989)
    "The Effect of Grouped Versus Randomized Questionnaire Format on Scale Reliability and Validity: A Three-study Investigation", Educational and Psychological Measurement,
    Vol.49, pp.487-508.
    Schuman, Howard & Presser, Stanley (1981)
    Question and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording and Context, N.Y.: Academic Press.
    Scott, William A. (1968)
    "Attitude Measurement", The Handbook of Social Psychology, 2nd ed., Vol. II, Lindzey, Gardner & Aronson, Elliot eds., Reading, Mass. :Addison-Wesley, pp.204-273.
    Sears, David.; Freedman, Jonathan L. & Peplau, L. Anne (1985)
    "Attutudes", Social Psychology, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall, Inc., chap.6, pp.131-163.
    Solaman, Esther & Kopelman, Richard E. (1984)
    "Questionnaire Format and Scale Reliability: An examination of Three Modes of Item Presentation", Psychological Report, pp.447-452.
    Stevens, Stanley Smith (1975)
    Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural, and Social Prospects, edited by Stevens, Geraldine, N.Y.:Wiley.
    Sudman, Seymour & Bradburn, M. Norman (1983)
    Asking Questions, S. F.: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    Symonds, Percival K. (1924)
    "On the Loss of Reliability in Ratings Due to Coarseness of the Scale" , Journal of Experimental Psychology, pp.456-461.
    Thurstone, L.L. (1928)
    "Attitude Can be Measured", reprint in Readings in Attitude and Measurement, Fishbein, Martin edited, N.Y.:John" Wiley & Sons Inc., 1967, pp.77-89.
    Wallsten , Thomas S.; Budescu, David V.; Rapoport, Amnon; Zwick, Rami & Forsyth, Barbara (1986) "Measuring the Vague Meanings of Probability Terms", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol.115, No.4, pp.348-365.
    Winkler, John D.; Kanouse, David E. & Ware, John E. Jr. (1982)
    "Controlling for Acquiescence Response Set in Scale Development", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 67, No.5, pp.555-551.
    -------- (1984)
    "Does Acquiescence Distort Attutude Scale
    Structure: Round and Round with Ray", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.69, No.2, pp.356-358.
    Young, V. Pauline (1966)
    Scientific Social Surveys and Research, 4th edition, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. :Prentice-Hall Inc., pp.359.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    新聞學系
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002005396
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[新聞學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2341檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋