| Reference: | 參考文獻
壹、中文部分
1.孔慶鳳(民78) 臺北市政府第一期中程計畫績效評估。臺北: 臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會。
2 .朱志宏(民68) 公共政策概論。臺北:三民書局。
3. 吳定(民77) 公共行政論叢。臺北:天一圖書公司。
4. 林水波。張世賢(民73) 公共政策。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。
5. 紀俊臣(民76) 市政府計畫與管理。臺北. :臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會。
6. 紀俊臣(民77)臺北市單行法規的制訂過程。臺北：臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會。
7 .陸光(民77) 臺北市老人在宅服務政策之研究。臺北:臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會。
8. 張允玲(民77) 臺北市政府中程計畫功能之研究。臺北:國立中與大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。
9. 湯絢章。鄭興弟(民69) 如何強化台北市政府各機關決策程序之研究。臺北:臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會。
10. 黃千慧(民74) 臺北地區水資源政策制訂過程之研究。臺北. :國立中與大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。
11.黃健二(民73) 臺北市都市更新長期政東之研究。臺北:臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會。
12. 黃慶隆(民74) 「推動華北市計畫作業之經驗談」。研考月刊，第95期：3-11 。
13. 馮正民(民77) 臺北市東區設置徒步區及自行車道可行性之研究。臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會。
14. 羅子大(民73)「 地方政府計畫作業問題之探討及分析」。研考月刊，第86 期20-29 。
15 . 臺北市政府研考會(民73) 臺北市政府中程計畫作業手冊，再版。
16. 臺北市政府研考會(民76)臺北市政府第二期中程計畫作業手冊
17. 臺北市政府研考會（民78）臺北市政府第二期中程計畫作業手冊，修訂版。
貳、英文部分
l. Allison , G. T. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston:
Little , Brown and Company.
2.Beyer , J. M. , Stevens , J. M. , & Trice , H. M. (1983). The implementing organization: Exploring the black box in research on public policy
In R. H. Hall and R. E. Quinn (Eds.) , Organizational l theory and public Policy (pp.227-
243). Beverly Hills , CA: Sage .
3.Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research
: Some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 1,560-569.
4.Brehmer, B., & Hagafors, R. (1986). Use of experts in complex decision making: A paradim for the study of staff work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, aa, 181-195.
5.Catanese, A. J. (1984). The politics of planning and development. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.Curley, S. P., Yates, J. F., & Abrams R. A. (1986). Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38. 230-256.
7.Daft, R. L., & Steers R. M. (1986). Organizations:A micro/macro approach. Glenview, IL:
Scott, Foresman and Company.
8.Dubnick. M. J., & Bardes, B. A. (1983). Thinking about public policy: A problem-solving approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9.Dunn, W. N. (1981). Public policy analysis: An introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10.Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley and Los Angles. CA: University of California Press.
11.Friedmann, J. (1965). A response to Altshuler Comprehensive planning as a process. In A. Faludi (Eds.), A reader in planning theory.(pp. 211-215). New York: Pergamon Press.
12.Friedmann. J. (1967). A concept model for the analysis of planning behavior. In A. Faludi(Eds.), A reader in planning theory. (pp. 345-370). New York: Pergamon Press.
13.Friend, J., & Hickling A. (1987). Planning under pressure: The strategic choice approach.
New York: Pergamon Press.
14.Gilbreath, R. D. (1988). Working with pulses,not streams: Using projects to capture opportunity.In D. I. Cleland and W. R. King (Eds.), Project management handbook (2nd ed.)(pp. 3-15). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
15.Gioia, D. A., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (1986).Cognition-behavior connections: Attribution and verbal behavior in leader-subordinate interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Processes, 37, 197-229.
16.Hall, R. H ., & Quinn R. E. (1983). Question:Is there a connection between organizationaltheory and public policy. In R. H. Hall and R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Organizational theory and public policy (pp. 7-20). Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
17.Ingram, H. M., & Mann, D. E. (1980). Policy failure: An issue deserving analysis, In H. M.Ingram and D. E. Mann (Eds.), Why policies succeed or fai1 (pp. 11-32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.Johnson, W. C. (1989). The Politics of Urban Planning. New York: Paragon House.
19.Lasswell, H. D., & Kaplan A.(1950). Power and society. New Haven: Yale University Press.
20. Lee, S. M. (1981). Management by multiple objectives:A modern management approach. New York: Petrocelli Books.
21.Lindblom, C. E.(1980). The policy-making process(2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.
22.Mainzer, L. C. (1973). Political bureaucracy.Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
23.March, J. G., & Simon H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
24.Mayer, R. R. (1985). Policy and program planning: A developmental perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25.Peters, L. H., & O`Connor, E. J. (1980). Situational constraints and work outcomes: The influences of a frequently overlooked construct.Academy of Management Review, 5, 391-397.
26.Potkay, C. R., & Allen, B. P. (Eds.).(1986).Personality: Theory, research and applications Monterey. CA: Books/Cole.
27.Rourke, F. E. (1976). Bureaucracy, politics and public policy. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
28.Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior:A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (3rd ed.). New York:Macmillan.
29.Stoner, J. A. F., Wankel C.(1986). Management.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30.Stanich, P. J. (1982). Implementing strategy:making strategy happen. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
31.Van de Ven, A. H. (1983). Three Rs of administrative behavior: Rational, random, and reasonable (and the greatest of these is reason). In R. H. Hall and R. E. Quinn (Eds.),Organizational theory and public policy (pp.37-53). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32.Van Dyke, V. (1968). Process and policy as focal concepts in political research. In Austin R. (Eds.), Political science and public policy (pp 23-40). Chicago: Markham.
33.Vasu, M. L. (1979). Politics and planning: A national study of American planners. Chapel Hill, CA: The University of North California Press.
34.Wamsley, G. L. (1985). Policy subsystems as a unit of analysis in implementaion studies: A struggle for theoretical synthesis. In K. Hanf and T. A. J. Toonen (Eds.), Policy implementation in federal and unitary systems (pp.71-96). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
35.Wildavsky, A. (1984). The politics of the budgetary process (4th ed.). Boston: Little, Brown and Company. |
