政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/89462
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50959922      線上人數 : 953
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/89462


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/89462


    題名: 通過分數之標準設定的研究
    作者: 鄭明長
    ZHENG, MING-CHANG
    貢獻者: 余民寧
    YU, MIN-NING
    鄭明長
    ZHENG, MING-CHANG
    關鍵詞: 通過分數
    標準設定
    分類
    教育
    日期: 1993
    1992
    上傳時間: 2016-05-02 15:27:12 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究之目的有二：（一）探討基於試題反應理論的設定通過分數之標準的可能方法
    參考文獻: 余民寧(民80 )試題反應理論的介紹(一)：測驗理論的發展趨勢
    。 研習資訊， 8 卷( 6 期) , 13-18 頁。
    余民寧(民81a )試題反應理論的介紹(二)：基本概念與假設。
    研習資訊， 9 卷( 1 期) , 5-9 頁。
    余民寧(民81b )試題反應理論的介紹(三)：試題反應模式及其
    特性。研習資訊， 9 卷( 2 期) , 6-10 頁。
    余民寧(民81c )測驗理論的發展趨勢。政治大學心理研究所主辦：
    心理測驗之學術及實務研討會論文。
    余民寧(民81d )試題反應理論的介紹(六)：能力量尺。 研習資
    訊， 9 卷( 5 期) , 8-12 頁。
    余民寧(民81e )試題反應理論的介紹(七)：訊息函數。 研習資
    訊， 9 卷( 6 期) , 5 - 9 頁。
    吳裕益(民75 )標準參照測驗通過分數設定方法之研究。政大教研
    所博士論文，未出版。
    林惠芬(民82 )通過分數設定方法在護理人員按竅筆試測驗之研究
    。測驗年刊， 40 輯， 253-262 頁。
    許擇基、劉長萱(民81) 試題作答理論簡介。 臺北:中國行為科學社。
    郭生玉(民74) 心理與教育測驗。 臺北:精華。
    陳英豪、吳裕益(民75 )新舊測驗理論之比較及其應用。 臺南師專
    學報，19 期~ 253-290 頁。



    Andrew, B. J. & Hecht, J. (1976). A preliminary
    investigation of two procedures for setting examination
    standards. Educational and Psychological Measurement,
    36,45-50.
    Angoff, W. H. (1971). Scales, norms, and equivalent scorea.
    In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational Measurement(pp.508
    -600). Washington, D. C.: American Council on
    Education.
    Beaton, A. E., & Allen, N. L.
    through scale anchoring.
    Statistics, !2, 191-204.
    (1992). Interpreting scales
    Journal of Educational
    Behuniak, P. JR., Archambault, F. X., & Gable, R. K. (1982).
    Angoff and Nedelsky standard setti ng procedures:
    implications for the validity of Pr oficiency test score
    interpretation. Educational and Psychological
    measurement, 42, 247-255.
    Berk, R. A. (1986). A consumer`s guide to setting
    performance stsndards on criterion-referenced tests.
    Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 137-172.
    Berk, R. A. (1976). Determination of optiomal cutting scores
    In criterion-referenced measurement.
    Experimental Education, 45, 4-9.
    Journal of
    Beuk, C. H. (1984). A method for reaching a compromlse
    between absolute and relative standards in examinations.
    Journal of Educational Measurement, 21,147-152.
    Birnbaum, A. (1968). Estimation of an ability. In F. M. Lord
    and M. R. Novick, Statistical theories of mental test
    scores (chapters 20). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Block, J. H. (1971). Critertion-referced measurements:
    Potential. Shool Review,69,289-298.
    Block, J. N. (1972). Student learning and the setting of
    mastery performance standards. Educational Horizons, 50,
    183-190.
    Block, J. H. (1978). Standards and criteria: A respose.
    Journal of Education Measurement, 15, 291-295.
    Brennan, R. L., & Locb`JQod, R. E. (1980). A comparlson of
    the Nedelsky and Angoff cutting score procedures using
    Generalizability theory. Applied psychological
    measurement, 4, 219-240.
    Burton, N. W. (1978). Societal standards.Journal of
    Educational Measurement, 15,263-271.
    Cascio, W. F., Alexander, R. A., & Barrett, G. V. (1988).
    Setting cutoff scores: Legal, psychometric, and
    professional lssues and guidelines. Personnel
    Psychology, 41, 1-24.
    Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical
    and modern test theory. New York: Bolt, Rinehart &
    Winston.
    Cross, L. B., Impara, J. C., Frary, R. B., & Jaeger, R. M.
    (1984). A comparison of three methods for establishing
    minimum standards on the national teacher examinationa.
    Journal of Education Measurement, 21, 113-129.
    Davis, F. B., Diamond, J. J. (1974). The preparation of
    criterion-referenced tests. In C. W. Barris, M. C.
    Alkin, & W. J. Popham. (Eds.), Problems ln criterion
    referenced measurement. Los &ngeles: UCLA Graduate
    school of Education, Center for the study of Evaluation.
    de Gruijter, D. N. M., & Bambleton, R. K. (1984). On
    problems encountered using decision theory to set cutoff
    scores. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 1- 8.
    Ebel, R. L.(1971). Critertion-referced measurements:
    Limitation. Shool Review,69,282-288.
    Ebe1, R. L. (1972). Essentials of Educational Measurement.
    Englewood. Cli££s, N. J.:Prentice-Hall.
    Ebel, R. L. (1978). The case for minimum competency testing.
    phi Delta Kappan, April, 546-549.
    Ebel, R. L. (1979). Essentials of Educational Mensurement
    (3rd ed.). Englewood Cli£fs, NJ: Prentice-flaIl.
    Emrick, J. A. (1971). An evaluation model for mastery
    testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, ~(4),
    321-326.
    Gagn`e, R. M. (1985). The conditions of Learning and theory
    of instruction. New York: Holt, Rinechart & Winston.
    Garcia-Quintana, R. A., & Mappus, L. L. (1980). Using
    norm-referenced data to set standards for a minimum
    competency program III the stats of South Carolina:
    Aieasibility study. Educational Evaluation and Policy
    Analysis,~, 47-52.
    Glass, G. V. (1978). Standards and criteria. Journal of
    Educational Measurement, 15(4), 237-261.
    Glaser, R. (1963). Instructional technology and the
    measurement of learning outcomes . American Psychologist,
    18, 519-521.
    Glaser, R., & Klaus, D. J. (1962). Proficiency measurement:
    Assessing human performance. In R. M. Gagne` (Ed),
    Psychological Principles in Systems Development(pp.419-
    474). New York: Holt, Rinhart and Winston.
    Glaser, R. & Nitko,A J.(1971).Measurement in learning and
    instruction. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational
    measurement(pp.625-670). Washington: American Council on
    Education,
    Guion, R. M., & Ironson, G. H. (1983). Latent trait theory
    for organizational research. Organizational Behavior and
    Human Performance, 31,54-87.
    Haladyna, T. M., & Roid, G. H. (1983). A cornparlBon of two
    approaches to criterion-referenced test construction.
    Journal of Educational Measurement, 20,271-281.
    Halpin, G., Sigmon, G.,
    competency standards
    & Halpin,
    set by
    G. (1983). Minimum
    three judgmental
    procedures:implications for validity. Educational and
    psychological measurement , 43,185- 196.
    Hambleton, R. K. (1978). On the use of cut- off scores with
    criterion- referenced tests in instructional settings.
    Journal of Educational Measurement, 15(4), 277-290.
    Hambleton, R. K. (1979) Latent trait models and their
    applications. In R. T. Guest, (Ed), Methodological
    developments. Washington: Jossey-Bass.
    Hambleton, R. K.(1980). Test score validity and
    standars-setting methods. In R. A. Berk, (Ed.),
    Criterion-referenced Measurement: The state of the
    art(pp.80-128). Baltimore, MD:John Hopkins University
    Press.
    Hambleton, R. K. (1983). Application of item response models
    to criterion referenced assessment. Applied
    psychological Measurement, 7, 33-44.
    Hambleton, R. K. (1989). Principles and selected
    applications of item response theory. In R. L. Linn
    (ED.), Educational measurment (3rd ed., pp. 147-200).
    New York: Macmillan.
    Hambleton, R. K. (1990). Criterion referenced-testing
    methods and practices. In T. B. Gutkin & C. R.Reynolds
    (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (pp. 388-415).
    New Jork:John Wiley & Sons.
    Hambleton, R. K.,Algina, J., & coulson, D. S. (1978).
    criterion- referenced testing and measurement:A review
    of technical issues and developments. Review of
    Educational Research, 48, 1- 47.
    Hambleton, R. K., & Cook, L. L. (1977). Latent trait models
    and their use in the analysis of educational test data.
    Journal of Educational Measurement, 14,75 -96.

    Hambleton, R. K., & de
    Application of
    criterion-referenced
    Gruijter, D. N.
    item
    test
    response
    selection.
    Educational Measurement, 20, 355-367.
    M. (1983).
    model to
    Journal of
    Hambleton, R. K., & Eignor, D. R. (1978). Guidelines for
    evaluating criterion-referenced tests and test
    manuals. Journal of Educational Measurement, 15,321-327.
    Hambleton, R. K., & Eignor, D. R. (1980). Competency test
    development ,validation,and standard setting. In R. M.
    Jaeger & C. K. Tittle (Eds.), Minimum Competency
    Achievement Testing: Motives, models, measures, and
    consequences(pp.367-396). Berkeley, CA.: McCutchan.
    Hambleton, R. K., Mills, C. N. & Simon, R. (1983).
    Determining the lengths for criterion- referenced tests.
    Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 27-38.
    Hambleton, R. K., & Novick, M. R. (1973). Toward an
    integration of theory and method for
    criterion-referenced tests. Journal of Education
    Measurement, 10,159-170.
    Hambleton, R. K., swaminathan, H., Algin a , J., & Coulson, D.
    S. (1978). Criterion-referenced testing and measurement:
    A review of technical issues and developments. Review of
    Educational research, 48, 1-47.
    Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response
    theory : Principles and applications. Boston, Ma:
    Kluwer-Nijhoff.
    Hambleton, R. K., Swaminthan, H. & Rogers, H. J. (1991).
    Fundamentals of item response theory. Newburry Park,
    CA: SAGE.
    Harasym, P. H. (1981). A comparison of the Nedelsky and
    modified Angoff standard-setting procedure on evaluation
    outcome. Educational and Psycholoical Measurement,
    41,725-734.
    Harris, C. W., (1972).An interpretation of Livingston`s
    reliability coefficient for criterion-referenceed tests.
    Journal of Educational Measurement, 9, 27-29.
    Harris, D.J., & Subkoviak, M. J. (1986). Item analysis: A
    short-cut statisitic for mastery tests. Educational and
    Psychological Measurement, 46, 494-507.
    Hu li l1; L. L., Drasgm`J, F., & Parsons, C. K. (1983). Item
    response theory: Application to psychological
    measurement. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones- Irwin.
    Huynh, H. (1976). On the reliability of decisions In
    domain-referenced testing. Journal of Educational
    Measurement, 13, 253-264.
    Huynh, E. (1978). Reliability of mutiple classifications.
    Psychmetrika, 45, 317-325.
    Euynh, E. (1985). Assessing Mastery of basic skills through
    summative testing. In D. V. Levine, (Ed), Improving
    student achievement through mastery learning programs.
    San Francisco, Califoenia: Jossey-Bass.
    Euynh, E., & Castel, J. (1985). A comparslon of the mllllmax
    and Rasch approaches to set simultaneous- passlllg scores
    for subtests. Journal of Education Statistics, 10,
    334-344.
    Jaeger, R. M. (1991). Selection of judges for
    standard-setting. Educational Measurement: Issues and
    Practice, 10(2), 3-6.
    Jaeger, R. M. (1989). Certification of student competence.
    In R. L. Linn (ED.), Educational rneasurment (3rd ed.,
    pp. 147-200). New York: Macmillan.
    Jaeger, R. M. (1982). An iterative structured judgment
    process for establishing standards on competency tests:
    Theory and application Educational Evaluation and
    Policy Analysis, 4, 461-476.
    Kane, M. T. (1987). On the use of IRT models with
    judgemental standard setting procedures. Journal of
    Educational Measurement, 24, 333-345.

    Koffler, S. L. (1980). A comparlson of approaches for
    setting proficiency standards. Journal of Educational
    measurement, li, 167-178.
    Kriewal, T. E. (1972). Aspects and applications of
    criterion-referenced tests. I.llinois school research,
    9, 5-18.
    Levin, H. M. (1978). Educational performance standards:lmage
    or substance? Journal of Educational Measurement, 15,
    309-319.
    Livingston, S. A. (1975). A utility-based approach to the
    evaluation of pass/fall testing decision procedures (
    Rep. No. Copa-75-01). Princeton, NJ: Center for
    Occupational and Professional Assessment, Educational
    Testing Sevice.
    Livingston, S. A. (1980). Choosing minimum pessing score by
    stochastic approximation techniques. Education and
    Psychological Measurement, 40, 859-873.
    Livingston, S. A., & Zieky, M. J. ("1982). Manual for setting
    standards on the basic skills assessment tests.
    Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service.
    Lord, F. M. (1980).Applications of item response theory to
    practical test problem. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
    associates.



    (P86未key)

    Mislevy, R. J., & Bock, R. D. (1983). BILOG: Item analysis
    and test with binary logistic models. Mooresville IN:
    Scientific Software , Inc.
    Mislevy, R. J., Johnson, E. G., & Muraki, E. (1992). Sclaing
    procedures in N~. Journal of Education statistics, 17,
    131-154.
    Mislevy, R. J. & Stocking, M; L. (1989). A consumer`s guide
    to LOGIST and BILOG. Applied Psychological Measurement,
    13, 57-75.
    Nedelsky, L. (1954). Absolute grading standards for
    objective tests. Educational and Psychological
    Measurement, 14, 3-19 .
    Norcini, J. J., Lipner, R. S., Langdon, L. 0., & Strecker,
    C. A. (1987). A comparlSon of three variations on a
    standard-setting method. Journal of Educational
    Measurement, 24, 56-64.
    Novick , M. R. , & Lewis ; C. (1974)= Prescribing test length
    for estimation criterion-referenced measurement. In C.
    w. Harris, M. C. Alkin, & W. J. Popham (Eds.), Problems
    in criterion-referenced measurement(CSE Monograph Series
    in Evaluation, No.3, pp. 139-158). Los Angeles: Center
    for the Study of Evaluation, University of California.
    Novick, M. R., Lewis, C., & Jackson, P. H. (1973). The
    estimation of proportions in m groups. Psychometrika,
    38, 19-46.
    Peng, C.-Y. J., & Subkoviak, M. J. (1980). A note on Huynh`s
    nomal approximation procedure for estimating
    criterion-referenced reliability. Journal of
    Educational Measurement, 10(2), 359-368.
    Plake, B. S., Melican, G. J., & Mills, c. N. (1991). Factore
    influencing intrajudge consistency during
    standard-setting. Educational Measurement: Issues and
    practice, 10(2), 15-16,22.
    Plake, B. S., & Kane, M. T. (1991). Comparison of method for
    combining the minimum passing levels for individual item
    into a passing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28,
    249-256.
    Popham, W. K., & Husek, T. R. (1969). Implications of
    criterion- referenced measurement. Journal of
    Educational Measurement,6~, 1-9.
    Popham, W. J. (1978). As always, provocative. Journal of
    Educational Measurement, 15, 297-300.
    Popham,W.J.(1981). Modern educational measurement.
    Prentic-hall.
    Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence
    and attainment tests. Chicago: The Oniversity of Chicago
    Press (Or iginal edition was published in 1960).
    Reid, J. B. (1991). Training judges to generate
    standard-setting data. Educational Measurement: Issues
    and practice, 10(2), 11-14.
    Rowley, G. L.(1982). Historical antecedents of the
    standard-setting debate: An inside account of the
    minimal-beardedness controversy. Journal of Educational
    Measurement, 19,87-95.
    hannon, G. A., & Cliver, B. A. (1987). An application of
    item response theory in the compariaon of four
    conventional item discrimination indices for
    criterion-referenced tests. Journal of Educational
    Measurement, 24, 347-356.
    aunders, J. C., Ryan, J.P., & Huynh, H. (1981). A
    comparison of two approaches to setting passing scores
    based on the nedelsky procedure. Applied Psychological
    Measurement, 5, 209-217 •
    . 1epard, L. (1980). Technical issures in minimum competence
    testing. In D. C. Berlinger(Ed.), Review of research In
    education (Vol. 8). Itasca, Illinois: F.E. Peacock.
    lepard, L. A. (1984). setting performance standards. In R.
    A. Berk (Ed), A guide to criterion-referenced test
    construction (pp.169-198). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins
    University Press.
    Skakun, E. N., & Kling, S. (1980). Comparablity of methods
    for setting standards. Journal of Educational
    Measurement, 17, 229-235.
    Smith, R. L., & Smith, J. K. (1988). Di££erential use of
    item in£ormation by judges ueing Angoff and Nedelsky
    procedures. Jorn::nal of Educational Measurement,
    25,259-285.
    Subkoviak, M. J. (1976). Estimating reliability from a
    single administraion of a criterion-referenced test.
    Journal of Educational Measurement, 13/265-276.
    Subkoviak, M. J.(1978). Empirical investigation of
    procedures for estimating reliability for mastery tests.
    Journal of Educational Measurement, 15, 111-115.
    Subkoiak, M. J. (1980). Decision-consistency appoaches. In
    R. A. Berk, (Ed.), criterion-referenced Measurement:The
    state of the art(pp . 129-185) . Baltimore, Md . : Johns
    University Press.
    ubkoviak, M. J. (1988). A practitioner`s guide to
    computation and interpretation of reliability indices
    for mastery tests. Journal of Educational Measurement,
    25, 47-55.
    waminathan, H., Hambleton, R. K., & Algina, J. (1975). A
    Bayesian Decision-theoretic procedure for use with
    criterion-referenced tests. Journal of Educational
    Measurement, 12, 87-98.
    hissen, D. & steinberg, L.(1986). A taxonommy of item
    response models. Psychmetrika, 51, 567-577.
    an der Linden, W. J.(1978). Forgetting, guesslng, and
    mastery: The Macready and Dayton models revisited and
    compared with a latent trait approach. Journal of
    Educational Statistics, 3, 305-317.
    an der Linden, W. J. (1981). A latent trait look at
    pretest-posttest validation of criterion-referenced
    test items. Review of Educational Research, 51, 379-402.
    In der Linden, W. J. (1982). A latent trait method for
    determining intermining intra judge inconsistency in
    the Angoff and Nedelsky techniques of standard setting.
    Journal of Educational Measurement, 19, 295-308.
    an der Linden, W. J. (1984). Some thoughts on the use of
    decision theory to set cutoff scores: Comment on de
    Gruijter and Hambleton. Applied Psychological
    Measurement, 8, 9-17.
    rm, T. A. (1978). Aprimer of item response theory.
    Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.
    lilcox, R. R. (1979). Prediction analysis and the
    reliability of a mastery test. Educational and
    Psychological Measurement, 39, 825-839.
    oehr, D. J., Arthur, W. JR., & Fehrmann, M. L. (1991). An
    empirical comparlson of cutoff score method for
    content-related and criterion-related validity settings.
    Educational and Psychological Mea surement, 51,
    1029-1039.
    reight, B. D. (1977). Solving measurement problems with the
    Rasch model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14,
    97-166.
    right, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design.
    Chicago: MESA Press.
    en, W. M. (1987). A comparison of the efficiency and
    accuracy of BILOG and LOGIST. Psychometrika, 52,
    275-291.
    _eky, M. J., & Livingston, S. A. (1977). Manual for setting
    standards on the basic skills assessment tests.
    Princeton, NJ: Educational testing service .
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    教育學系
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004311
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[教育學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2332檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋