English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50801318      Online Users : 599
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/89328
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/89328


    Title: 人際親疏度.情境後果對差序性反應的影響 : 以公正知覺為例
    Authors: 陳品華
    CHEN, PIN-HUA
    Contributors: 李美枝
    陳品華
    CHEN, PIN-HUA
    Date: 1992
    1991
    Issue Date: 2016-05-02 15:20:52 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 摘要
    本研究的主要目的在於透過公正知覺的判斷驗證中國人會因人際關係親疏程度而表露差序性反應的假設,並探討此差序性反應的情境概括性。本研究採行二個涉及不同公正範疇的情境。第一分項研究涉及程序不公正的情境;第二分項研究涉及分配不公正的情境。研究均以情景實驗法進行之,樣本皆為大學生。結果發現,受試者在公正知覺上的反應的確因著目標人物與自身親疏程度而有差序性
    ;並且,此種差序性反應並不因事件後果嚴重程度的增加而改變;也不因情墳範疇的改變而異。此一結果不僅支持中國社會「關係取向」的特質,也指出此種因人論事的特質含蘊了「差序格局」的考量。
    目次
    第一章 緒論....................1
    第一節 人際關係與差序性反應....................2
    第二節 人際關係與公正知覺.................... 13
    第三節 影響公正知覺的因素.................... 21
    第四節 研究目的、問題、與假設.................... 26
    第二章 人際親疏程度的測量.................... 29
    第三章 研究一.................... 31
    第一節 研究方法.................... 31
    第二節 結果....................33
    第三節 討論.................... 47
    第四章 研究二........................................51
    第一節 研究方法.................... 51
    第二節 結果.................... 53
    第三節 討論.................... 64
    第五章 綜合討論....................69
    參考文獻....................79
    附錄一 人際親疏度測量問卷....................87
    附錄二 研究一的測量問卷.................... 89
    附錄三 研究二的測量問卷.................... 92
    Reference: 參考文獻
    天下雜誌。 一九九二年三月。
    朱真茹、楊國樞(民65) 。個人現代性與相對作業量對報酬分配行為的影響。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,第41 期,頁79-95 。
    何友暉、陳淑娟、趙志裕(1989 )。關係取向:為中國社會心理方法論求答案。見楊國摳、黃光國主編:中國人的心理與行為,頁49-66 。
    李美技(1991) 。個體王義與集體主義社會中團體認同對不公正情境之反應的影響。國科會補助研究計畫。
    李美技(1992 )。從不公正反應看中美大學生的內團體偏私。中國人的心理與行為科際學術研討會,台北。
    沈秉鈞(民79) 。人際正義與價值觀。台大心理研究所碩士論文。
    林邦傑(1992) 0 不同年齡的青少年所知覺的不公平情境及其預期後果。國科會補助研究計畫。
    金輝基(1988 )。人際關係中人情之分析。見楊國樞主編:中國人的心理,頁75-104。
    時蓉華(1988)。透視中國社會的社會心理學。明鏡文化事業(台北:谷風)
    孫隆基(1985)。中國文化的「深層結構」。香港:集賢社。
    張玉潔、胡志偉(1992) 。中國大學生的自發性自我概念:內容向度及向度重要性研究。 中華心理學刊即將出版。
    黃光國(1985) 。 人情與面子:中國人的權力避戲。見楊國樞主編:中國人的心理,頁289-318 。
    黃光國( 1988 )。儒家思想與東亞現代化。 台北:巨流。
    黃光國( 198 9 )。儒家思想中的正義觀。見楊國樞、黃光國主編:中國人的心理與行為,頁67-94 。
    喬健(民71 )。關係芻議。 見楊國樞、文崇一主編:社會及行為科學研究的中,國化,頁345-360 。
    費孝通(1947) 。差序格局。見費孝通著: 鄉土中國,頁22-30 。
    楊中芳(1991) 。試論中國人的「自己」理論與研究方向。見楊中芳、高尚仁合編:中國人.中國心---人格與社會篇,頁93-145 。
    楊中芳、許志超(民75) 。平均分酬與不公平感。中華心理學刊, 28 卷,二期,頁61-71 。
    楊國樞(1988) 。 中國人孝道的概念分析。見楊國樞主編:中國人的心理,頁39-74 。
    顧瑜君(民78) 。內外有別,豈可不分。見張老師月刊編輯部主編:人情與面子,頁28-39。
    Adams,J.S.(1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
    Anderson,N.H.(1983) . Psychodynamics of everyday life: Blaming and avoiding blame (CHIP Rep. No.120 ) . San Diego, Ca: University of California.
    Austin,W.G.(1986). Justice in intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & Austin (Eds)., Psychology of Intergroup Relatons,p153-175, Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
    Bond,M.H., Leung,K.,& Wan,K.C.(1982). How does cultural collectivism operate? The impact of task and maintenance contributions on reward distribution. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 186-200.
    Burger,J.M. (1981). Motiyational biases in the attribution of responsibility for an accident: A meta-analysis of the defensive-attribution hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 496-512.
    Chiu,C.Y.(1989). The notion of justice and pattern of justice behaviour in Chinese culture. Thesis of Hong Kong University.
    Chiu,C.Y.(1990). Distributive justice among Hong Kong Chinese college students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 130(5), 649-656.
    Chiu,C.Y.& Hong,Y.Y.(1989). The Chinese percelver as lawyer: The effects of intentionality and validation on individual and collective responsibility attribution. Paper presented in the CCU-ICP International Conference, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Deutsch,M.(1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-150.
    Deutsch,M.(1983) . Current social psychological perspectives on justige. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 305-319.
    Gebotys,R.J.& Dasgupta,B.(1988). Attribution of responsibility and crime seriousness. The Journal of Psychology, 121(6), 607-613.
    Hui,C.H.,& Triandis,H.C.(1986). Individualism -collectivism: A study of cross - cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 17, 225-248.
    Hui,C.H.,& Triandis,H.C.(1991). Cultural differences in reward allocation: Is collectivism the explanation? British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 145-157.
    Hwang,K.K.(1990). Modernization of the Chinese family business. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 593-618.
    Kan,Y.S.(1991) . Five "F`s" crucial to positive impact in Asia. Compass Readings. Feb.
    Lerner,M.J.(1975). The justice motive in social behavior: An Intorduction. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 1-20.
    Leung,K.,& Bond,M.H.(1984). The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 47, 793-804.
    Lind,B.A.,& Tyler,T.R.(1988). The social psychology of procedual justice. New York: Plenum Press.
    Mikula,G., Petri,B.,& Tanzer,N.(1990). What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experience of injust. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 133-149.
    Miller,R.J., Chino,A.F., Harney,M.K., Haines.D.A.& Saavedra,R.L. (1986). Assignment of punishment as a function of the severity and consequences of the crime and the status of the defendant. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 77-91.
    Phares,E.J.,& Wilson,K.G.(1972). Responsibility attribution: Role of outcome severity, situational ambiguity, and internal-external control. Journal of Personality, 40, 392-406.
    Sampson,E.E.(1975). On justice as equality. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 45-64.
    Sampson,E.E.(1985). The decentralization of identity: Toward a revised concept of personal and social order. American Psychologist, 40, 1203-1211.
    Sampson,E.E.(1988) . The debate on individualism: Indigenous psychologies of the individual and their role in personal and societal functioning. American Psychologist, 43, 15-22.
    Schroeder,D.A., & Linder,D.E.(1976). Effects of actor`s causal role, outcome severity, and knowledge of prior accidents upon attributions of responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 340-356.
    Shaver,K.G.(1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101-113.
    Triandis,H.C., Bontempo,R.,& Villareal,M.J.(1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
    Walster,E.(1966). Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 73-79.
    Walster,E., Berscheid,E.,& Walster,W.(1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151-176.
    Walster,E.,& Walster.W.(1975). Equity and social justice. Journal of Social Issues, 31, 21-44.
    wilson,R.J.,& Jonah,B.A.(1988). Assignment of responsibility and penalities for an impaired driving incident. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 564-583.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學系
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004414
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[心理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2267View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback