| Reference: | Alder, P., & Goldoftas, B. L., D. 1999. Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeover in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10: 43-68.
Argyris, C. 1977. Double-loop Learning in Organizations. Harvard Business Review, September-October: 115-125.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Ariely, D. 2008. Predictably Irrational: the Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. New York: HarperCollins.
Baldwin, C., Hienerth, C., & von Hippel, E. 2006. How User Innovations Become Commercial Products: a Theoretical Investigation and Case Study. Research Policy, 35(9): 1291-1313.
Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. 2001. Bringing work back in. Organization Science, 12(1): 76–95.
Bartel, C. A., & Garud, R. 2009. The Role of Narratives in Sustaining Organizational Innovation. Organization Science, 20(1): 107-117.
Beath, C. M., & Orlikowski, W. J. 1994. The contradictory structure of systems development methodologies: Deconstructing the IS-user relationship in Information Engineering. Information Systems Research, 5(4): 350-378.
Beaudry, A., & Pinsonneault, A. 2005. Understanding user response to information technology: a Coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quarterly, 29(3): 493-526.
Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (Eds.). 1987. The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Bloomfield, B. P., & Vurdubakis, T. 1997. Paper traces: Inscribing organizations and information technology. In B. P. Bloomfield, R. Coombs, D. Knights, & D. Littler (Eds.), Information Technology and Organisations: Strategies, Networks and Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brunsson, N. 1982. The Irrationality of Action and Action Rationality: Decisions, Ideologies and Organisational Action. Journal of Management Studies, 19(1): 29-44.
Davidson, E. J. 2002. Technology frames and framing: A socio-cognitive investigation of requirements determination. MIS Quarterly, 26(4): 329-358.
Dougherty, D. 1992. A Practice-Centered Model of Organizational Renewal Through Product Innovation. Strategic Management Journal., 13: 77, 16 pgs.
Dunbar, R., & Garud, R. 2009. Distributed knowledge and indeterminate meaning: the Case of the Columbia Shuttle Flight. Organization Studies, 30(4): 397-421.
Edmondson, A. C. 2002. The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level. Organization Science, 13(2): 128-146.
Faraj, S., Kwon, D., & Watts, S. 2004. Contested artifact: Technology sensemaking, actor networks, and the shaping of the Web browser. Information Technology & People, 17(2): 186-209.
Forrester, J. W. 1994. System Dynamics, System Thinking, and Soft OR. System Dynamics Review, 10(2-3): 245-256.
Fulk, J. 1993. Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5): 921-950.
Garud, R., & Rappa, M. A. 1994. A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: The case of cochlear implants. Organization Science, 5(3): 344-362.
Gopal, A., & Prasad, P. 2000. Understanding GDSS in symbolic context: Shifiting the focus from technology to interaction. MIS Quarterly, 24(3): 509-546.
Griffith, T. 1999. Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 472-488.
Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E. 2003. Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Research Policy, 32(10): 1753-1769.
Hienerth, C. 1987. The commercialization of user-innovation: The development of rodeo kayak industry. R&D Management, 36: 273-294.
Hsiao, R.-L., Wu, S. W., & Hou, S. T. 2008. Sensitive cabbies: Ongoing sense-making within technology structuring. Information and Organization, 18(4): 251–279.
Hsiao, R. L., Tsai, D. H., & Lee, C. F. 2006. The problem of knowledge embeddedness: Knowledge transfer, coordination and reuse in information systems. Organization Studies, 27(9): 1289–1317.
Jeppesen, L. B., & Frederiksen, L. 2006. Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? the Case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organization Science, 17(1): 45-63.
Lee, Z., & Lee, J. 2000. An ERP implementation case study from knowledge transfer perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 15(4): 281-288.
Lin, A., & Silva, L. 2005. The social and political construction of technological frames. European Journal of Information Systems, 14: 49-59.
Maguire, S. 2004. The co-evolution of technology and discourse: a Study of substitution processes for the insecticide DDT. Organization Studies, 25(1): 113-134.
March, J. G. 1978. Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice. Bell Journal of Economics, 9: 587-608.
Mitev, N. N. 1996. More than a Failure? The Computerized Reservation Systems at French Railways. Information Technology & People, 9(4): 8-19.
Morecroft, J. D. W. 1988. System Dynamics and Microworlds for Policymakers. European Journal of Operational Research, 35: 301-320.
Newell, S., Swan, J. A., & Galliers, R. D. 2000. A knowledge-focused perspective on the diffusion and adoption of complex information technologies: the BPR example. Information Systems Journal, 10(3): 239-259.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. 1994. Technology frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(2): 174-207.
Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. 2003. How Users Matter: the Co-construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. 1994. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
Schreier, M., Oberhauser, S., & Prugl, R. 2007. Lead users and the adoption and diffusion of new products: Insights from two extreme sports communities. Marketing Letters, 18(1/2): 15-30.
Senge, P. M. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. In J. S. Ott (Ed.), Classic readings in organizational behavior, 1996 ed., Vol. 44: 506-513. Belmont: Wadsworth Pub. Co.
Simon, H. A. 1990. Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 125-134.
Spicer, A. 2005. The political process of inscribing a new technology. Human Relations, 58(7): 867-890.
Suchman, L. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human Machine Communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
von Hippel, E. 1986. Lead users: a Source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7): 791-805.
von Hippel, E. 1988. The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
von Hippel, E. 2007. Horizontal innovation networks: by and for users. Industrial & Corporate Change, 16(2): 293-315.
von Hippel, E., & Katz, R. 2002. Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science, 48(7): 821-833.
Weick, K. E. 1990. Technology as equivoque: Sensemaking in new technologies. In P. S. Goodman, & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Technology and Organizations: 1-44. San Francisco.: Jossey-Bass. |
