政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/87588
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51245972      線上人數 : 917
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/87588


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/87588


    題名: 社會閒散與社會彌補之探討
    Social Loafing and Social Compensation
    作者: 呂錦智
    Lu, Chin-Chih
    貢獻者: 陳皎眉
    Chen, Jeaw-Mei
    呂錦智
    Lu, Chin-Chih
    關鍵詞: 社會閒散
    社會彌補
    人際親疏度
    團體滲透性
    工作表現
    Social loafing
    Social compensation
    Interpersonal relationships
    Permeability
    Performance
    日期: 1995
    上傳時間: 2016-04-28 15:18:16 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 團體合作的情境對人們工作表現的影響究竟是利抑或是弊？在以往的研究結果大多支持團體合作對人們具有不良的影響，亦即個人在團體中工作會產生偷懶的行為，而且隨著團體愈大，個人的努力程度會愈趨下降，社會心理學家稱之為「社會閒散」現象。然而 Williams 與 Karau（1991）卻發現當工作意義度高且預期到同伴的表現不佳時，團體合作的情境反而會有正面的影響，亦即此時人們會因為重視團體的表現反而較單獨一人時更加努力工作，以彌補同組夥伴表現的不足，故Williams 等人稱之為「社會彌補」現象。此兩種現象均可能發生於團體合作的情境下，但社會彌補現象對組織而言是最有利的，因此若能更進一步地瞭解，則當能有助於組織人力資源的管理及提高組織的生產力。故本研究的目的主要在於以初探的角度，來探討除 Williams 等人所提的條件外，是否存在其他可能的因素會影響社會彌補現象的發生，並再次驗證社會閒散的現象。現象對組織而言是最有利的，因此若能更進一步地瞭解，則當能有助於組織人力資源
    Most of previous research had supported the social loafing
    參考文獻: 一﹒中文部分
    王榮春。 (民83)。 人際親疏與目標設定對團體中個人工作及團體工作努力分配的影響。 國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
    朱令娟。 (民.77)。 酬賞型態、角色重要性及工作變異性對社會閒散之影響。 國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
    吳秀美。 (民84)。 社會開散或社會補償:勞力辯正的作用。 私立中原大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
    吳靜吉、高泉豐、王敬仁、丁興祥。(民70)。 拓弄思語文創造思考測驗(乙式)指導及研究手冊。 台北市，遠流出版社。
    李美枝(1993 )。從有關公平判斷的研究結果看中國人之人己關係的界限。 本土心理學研究， 1, 267-300 。
    林幸台、王木榮。 (民76)。 威廉斯創造力測驗指導手冊。 台北市，心理出版社。
    用佩芬。 (民83)。 人際親疏度及工作次數對團體中個人工作表現的影響。 國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
    張國義、陳皎眉。 (民84) 。不同的激勵策略對社會閒散之影響。中華心理學刊， 37(1) , 71-81 。
    許正聖。(民83)。 中國人的內團體偏私行為?從「關係」角度探討社會認同理論。 國立政治大學心理研究所
    碩士論文。
    陳品華。 (民.82)。 人際親疏度，情境後果對差序性反應的影響?以公正知覺為例。 國立政治大學心理研究所
    碩士論文。
    程懷琳。(民77) 。工作類型、工作能力及酬賞分配方式對團體中個人玉作表現的影響。 國立政治大學心理研
    究所碩士論文。
    費孝通。 (1974) 。差序格局。 見費孝通著:鄉土中國，頁22-30 。上海:觀察社。
    黃光國(1985)。 人情與面子:中國人的權力遊戲。 見楊國書主編:中國人的心理，頁289-318 。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
    黃光國。 (民80) 。中國人的權力遊戲。 台北市:巨流圖書公司。
    黃靜怡。 (民83)。 團體成員間的關係及個人動機對社會因境中合作行為的影響。 國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
    楊國樞(1993)。 中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點。見楊國樞、余安邦主編:中國人的心理與社會心理
    念及方法篇(一九九二) ，頁87-142 。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
    鄭美芳。(民77) 。社會助長與社會閒散之比較研究。 國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
    二、英文部分
    Allport, F.R. (1920). The influence of the group upon association and thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 159 - 182 .
    Baron, R.S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress
    and problems. Advances in Experiemntal Social Psychology,
    12, 1-40.
    Bartis, S., Harkins, S.G., & Szymanski, K. (1988).
    Evaluation and performance: A two-edged knife. Personality
    and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14(2),242-251.
    Brickner, M.A., Harkins, S.G., & Ostrom, T.M. (1986).
    Effects of Personal involvement: Thought-provoking
    implications for social loafing. Journal of Personality
    and Social Psychology, 51, 763-769.
    Burwitz, L., & Newell, K.M. (1972). The effects of the
    mere presence of co actors on learning a motor skill.
    Journal of Motor Behavior, 4, 99-102.
    Cannent, D. W. (1970). Rate of simple moter responding
    as a function of coaction, competition, and sex the participants. PsychollOlnic Science, 12, 340-341.
    Clark, M.S. (1981). Noncompariability of benefits gjven
    and received: A cue to the existence of friendship. Social
    Psychology Quarterly, 44, 375-381.
    Clark, M. S. (1984). Reocrd keeping in two types fo relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
    47, 549-557.
    Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction
    · In exchange and communal relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
    Clark, M.S., Powell, M.C., & Mills, J. (1986). Keeping
    track of needs in communal exchange relationships.
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, g,333-338.
    Clark, M.S., Quellette, R., Powell, M.C., & Milberg, S.
    (1987). Recipient`s mood, relationship type, and helping.
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53,94-103.
    Cottrell, N.B. (1972). Social facilitation. In C.G.
    McClintock (Ed.), Experimental Social Psychology.
    New York: Holt.
    Dashiell, J.F. (1930). An experiemntal analysis of some
    group effects. Joural of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
    25, 190-199.
    Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context:
    An interactive model of gender-related behavior.
    Psycholo gical Review, 94-3, 369-389.
    Ellemers, N., Van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1990).
    · The influence of permeability of group boundaries and
    stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233-246.
    Ellemers, N., Van Knippenberg, A., de Vries, N.K., &
    Wilke, H. (1988). Social identification and permeability
    of group boundaries. European Journal of Social
    Psychology,18, 497-513.
    Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison process.
    Human Relations, 7, 117 -140.
    Goethals, G., & Darley, J. (1987). Social companson
    theory: Self-evaluation and group life. In B. Mullen &
    G.R. Geothals(Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp.
    21-47). New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Harcum, E.R., & Badura, L.L. (1990). Social Loafing as a
    response to an appraisal of appropriate effort. Journal
    of Psychology, 124,629-637.
    Harkins, S.G., & - Jackson, J.M. (1985). The role of
    evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Personality
    and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 575-584.
    Harkins, S.G., & Petty, R. E. (1982). Effects of task difficult and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of
    Personality and Social Psychology:, 43, 1214-1229.
    Harkins, S.G., & Szymanski, K. (1988). Scialloafing and
    self-evaluation with an objective standard. Journal of
    Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 354-365.
    Harkins, S.G., & Szymanski, K. (1989) . Social loafing
    group evaluation . Journal of Personality: and Social
    Psychology, 56, 934-941.
    Harkins, S.G., Latane`, B., & Williams, K. (1980). Social
    loafing: allocating effort or taking it easy? Journal of
    Experimental Social Psychology:, lQ(5), 457 -465.
    Heckhausen, H. (1977). Achievement motivation and its `
    constructs: A cognitive model. Motivation and Emotion,
    1, 283-329.
    Holmes, J.G., & Rempel, J.K. (1989) .. Trust in close relationships. In C.Hendrick (Ed .), Close relationships
    (pp. 187-220). Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
    Hui, C.H., & Triandis, H.C. (1991). Cultural differences
    in reward allocation: Is collectivism the explanation?
    · British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 145-157.
    Inglham, A.G., Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V.
    (1974). Theringelmann effect:_ Studies of group size
    and group performance. Journal of Personality and Social
    Psychology, 10, 371-384.
    Jackson, J.M., & Williams, K.D. (1985). Social loafing
    on difficult tasks: Working collectively can improve
    performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
    49, 937-942.
    Kerr, N.L., & Bruun, S. (1981) . ringelmann revisited: Alternative explanations for the social loafing effect.
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
    7, 224-231.
    Kerr, N.L., & Bruun, S.E. (1983). Dispensability ofmember
    effort and group motivation losses: free-rider effects.
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1),78-94.
    Kravitz, D. A., & Martin, B. (1986). Ringelmann rediscovered: The original article. Journal of Personality
    and Social Psychology, 50, 936-941.
    Latane`, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many
    hands make light the work: The causes and consequences
    of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
    Li, M.e. (1992). The effect of group identuty on reaction
    to injustice as a ffunction of individualism and collectivism. Unpulished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania
    State University.
    Markus, H. (1978) .. The effect of mere presence on social
    facilitation: An unobtrusive test. Journal of Experimental
    Social Psychology,14, 389-397.
    Marten, R., & Landers, D.M. (1972). Evaluation potential
    as a determinant of coaction effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 347-359.
    Meumann, E. (1904). Haus-und schularbeit: experimente
    an kindern der volkschule. Die Deutsche Schule, 8,
    278-303.
    Pessin, J. (1933). The compatative effects of social and
    mechanical stimulation on memorizing. American Journal of Psychology, 45, 263-270.
    Petty, R., Harkins, S., Williams, K., & Latane` B. (1977).
    The effects of group size on cognitive effort and evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
    3, 579-582.
    Sanna, L.I. (1992). Self-efficacy theory: Implications for
    social facilitation and social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(5), 774-786.
    Shepperd, I.A. & Wright, R.A. (1989). Individual contributions to a collective effort: An incentive analysis.
    Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, D.,141-149.
    Sholar, W.A., & Clark, M.S. (1982). Deciding in communal
    and exchange relationships: By consensus or
    should majority rile? Paper presented in a symposium
    on "Communal and Exchange Relationship", Clark, M.S. (Chair), Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Baltinl0re, MD.
    Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social
    behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook
    of social psychology (Vol 2, 3rd ed., pp.883· -947) . New
    York: Random House.
    Szymanski, K. , & Harkins, S.G. (1987). Social loafing
    and self-evaluation woth a social standard. Journal of
    Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 891-897.
    Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. (1978). An integrative theory
    of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin & Worchel
    (Eds), The social psychology of intergroup relations
    (pp.33-47) . Montercy, CA:Brooks/Cole.
    Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. (1985). The social identity theory
    of intergroup behavior. IN S. Worchel & W.G.
    Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd
    ed.,). Chicago: Neison-Hall.
    Tajfel, H. (1975). The exit of social mobility and the
    voice of social change. Social Science Information,
    14, 101-118 .
    Tajfel, H. (1978a). Interindividual behavior and intergroup
    behavior. In H. Tajfel (Ed.). Differentiation between
    social groups. New York: Academic Press.
    Tajfel, H. (1978b). Social categorization, social identity,
    and social companson. In H. Tajfel (Ed.).
    Differentiation between social groups . New York:
    Academic Press.
    Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory
    of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W.G.
    Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup relations (2nd
    ed., pp.7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
    Travis, L.E. (1925). The effect of small audience upon
    hand-eye coordination. Journal of Abnormal and Social
    Psychology, 20, 142-146.
    Travis, L.E. (1928). The influence of the group upon the
    stuterer`s speed in free association. Journal of Abnormal
    Psychology, 23, 45-51.
    Triandis, H. (1989). The self and social behavior in different
    culture contexts. Psychological Review, 96,506-520.
    Triandis, H.C., Bontempo, R., & Villareal, M.l (1988).
    Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives
    in self-ingroup relationship. Journal of Personality
    and Social Psychology,54，323-338.
    Triplett, N. (1897). The dynamogenic factors In
    pacemaking and competition. American Journal of
    Psychology, 9, 507-533.
    Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York:
    Wiley.
    Waddell, B.A., & Clark, M.S. (1982). Feelings of exp;oitation
    in communal and exchange relationship. Paper
    presented in a symposiulll on "Communal and Exchange
    Relationships", Clark, M.S. (Chair), Meeting
    of the Eastern Psychological Association, Baltimore,
    MD.
    Weston, S.B., & English, H.B. (1926). The influence of
    the group on psychological test scores. American
    Journal of Psychology, 37, 600-601.
    Williams, K.D., & Karau, S.J. (1991). Social loafing and
    social compensation: The effects of expectations of coworker
    performance . Journal of Personality and Social
    Psychology, 21, 571-581.
    Williamson, G.M., & Clark, M.S. (1989). Providing help
    and desired relationship type as determinants of
    changes in moods and self-evaluations. Journal of
    · Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 722-734.
    Williams, K., Harkins, S., & Latane`, B. (1981). Identifiability
    as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering
    experiments. Journal of personality and Social Psychology,
    40, 303-311.
    Williams, K.D. (1981, May). The effects of group cohensiveness
    on social loafing. Paper presented at the Annual
    Convention of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Detroit, MI.
    Williamson, G.M., & Clark, M.S. (1992). Impact of desired
    relationship type on affective reactions to choosing
    abd being required to help. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 10-18.
    Yamagishi, T. (1988). Exit from the group as an individualistic solution to the free rider problem in the United States and Japan. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 530-542.
    Zajonc, R.B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149,269-274.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學系
    G795901
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002002590
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[心理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2206檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋