Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/85903
|
| Title: | 震災重建與政府財政
Earthquake Reconstruction and Public Finance |
| Authors: | 呂雅萍
Lyu, Yapin |
| Contributors: | 黃明聖
呂雅萍
Yapin Lyu |
| Keywords: | 震災
慰助金
地震險
政府救助
震災經費
財源籌措
震災重建
英國DBFO |
| Date: | 1999 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-04-21 17:05:03 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 我國於民國88年9月21日在南投集集發生規模7.3級的大地震，此次地震約有2,471人死亡，11,305人受傷，有形財物損失估計約3,412億元（107億美元），是台灣自民國48年以來損失最嚴重的大地震。 |
| Reference: | 參考文獻
一、期刊部分
1.方清風 (2000)，「由災區重建談BOT政策立法」，《立法院院聞》，第二十八卷，第二期，頁94-103。
2.江丙坤 (1999)，「九二一震災之經濟影響評估」，《自由中國之工業》，89:11期，頁5-18。
3.江丙坤 (1998)，《政府再造與預算制度改革》，行政院經濟建設委員會。
4.胡勝正 (1999)，「巨災財源籌措的探討」，《災後重建的財政規劃與巨災風險證券化研討會論文》，頁1-9。
5.韋端 (1999)，「震災經費籌措執行及對經濟財政之影響」，中國國民黨中央常務委員會專題報告。
6.韋端、許璋瑤、鹿篤瑾、蔡坤鴻 (1999)，「財政改善之十年政策形成、執行成果即未來展望」，《財政平衡與經濟發展研討會論文集》，行政院主計處贊助，台北：中華經濟研究院，頁17-76。
7.孫克難 (2000)，「震後應否加稅？」，《經濟前瞻》，第67期，頁10-14。
8.孫克難 (1999)，「1980年代以來的財政收支與財政改革」，《1980年代以來台灣經濟發展經驗學術研討會論文》，台北：中華經濟研究院，頁11-1~11-14。
9.孫健忠，萬育維 (2000)，「九二一震災政府慰助金發放的商榷」，《月旦法學雜誌》，第56期，頁41-45。
10.黃明聖 (2000)，「九二一地震後政府財政的資產管理與負債控制」，公共經濟學研討會論文。
11.梁發進，徐芳霞，方振瑞，徐國慶 (1998)，《台北市政府獎勵民間投資市政建設之研究─以BOT為例》，市政建設專題研究報告第274輯，台北市政府研究發展考核委員會委託。
12.曾輩滇 (1997)，「美國重大災害重建之財務支援措施」，行政院經濟建設委員會出國考察報告。
13.絲文銘 (2000)，「災後政府金融借貸問題探討」，《月旦法學雜誌》，第56期，頁35-40。
14.廣原盛明(1999)，「日本神戶復興計畫的檢討」，林崇傑譯，《空間雜誌》，第123期，頁37-44。
二、網路部分
1.行政院(1999)，「九二一大地震」行政院所採取的重要救援措施。
http://www.ey.gov.tw/earth/sp881002-01.htm
2.行政院主計處 (2000a)，台灣921、阪神及加州北嶺大地震比較表。
(2000b)，九二一大地震災害損失估計表。
(2000c)，台灣921與日本阪大地震因應措施表。
http://www.dgbasey.gov.tw/dgbas03/bs7/
3.神戶市政府
(2000a)，神戶市財政現狀─震災整體事業費。
(2000b)，神戶市財政現狀─震災關聯事業費的財源。
(2000c)，神戶市財政現狀─市債的狀況(1999)。
http://www.city.kobe.jp/cityoffic
4.Private Financial Initiative (2000), “DBFO-value in road a case study on the first eight DBFO roads.”
http://www.treasury-projects-taskforce.gov.uk/studies/case.htm
三、英文部分
1.Albala-Bertrand, J. M. (1993). Political Economy Of Large Natural Disasters with Special Reference to Developing Countries, New York: Oxford University Press.
2.Barro, R. J. (1990). Macroeconomics, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
3.Barro, R. J. (1998). “Reflections on Ricardian Equivalence,” Debt and Deficits: A Historical Perspective, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 47-59.
4.Bruce, N. (1998). Public Finance and the American Economy, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
5.Buchanan, J. M. (1958). Public Principles of Public Debt, Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
6.Choy, J. (1995a). Quake Shakes Tokyo’s Fiscal Plans, Japan Economic Institute Report, Report B.
7.Choy, J. (1995b). Earthquake Relief Sails Through Diet, Japan Economic Institute Report, Report B.
8.Choy, J. (1995c). Diet Approves Extra Spending While Tax Debate Continues, Japan Economic Institute Report, Report B.
9.Choy, J. (1995d). Japanese Fiscal Policy: A Big Empty Gun. Japan Economic Institute Report, Report A.
10.Committee on Earthquake Engineering; Division of Nature Hazard Mitigation; Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems; National Research Council (1992). The Economic Consequence of a Catastrophic Earthquake: Proceedings of a Forum Aug 1 and 2, 1990. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
11.Committee on the Budget, House of Representatives (1998). Budgetary Treatment of Emergencies, Washington, D.C.
12.Diamond, P. A. (1965). “National Debt in a Neoclassicl Growth Model,” American Economic Review, pp.1126-1150.
13.Dreier, P. & R. Rothstein (1994). “Seismic Stimulus: The California Quake’s Creative Destrction,” The American Prospect, Issue18, Summer.
14.Eisner, R. (1991). “Our Real Deficits,” Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol.57, No.2, Spring, pp.131-135.
15.Feldstein, M. (1985). “Debt and Taxes in the Theory of Public Finance,” Journal of Public Economics, pp. 233-245.
16.Kunreuther, H. (1973). Recovery from Natural Disasters, Insurance or Federal Aid? Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
17.Kunreuther, H. and R. J. Roth (1998). Paying the Price: The Status and Role of Insurance Against Natural Disasters in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.
18.Kunreuther, H. (1978) Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons, New York: Wiley.
19.May, P. J. (1991). “Addressing Public Risks: Federal Earthquake Policy Design,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 10, No.2, pp. 263-285.
20.National Land Agency (1998). Disasier Prevention White Paper, 1995-1998 editions, Japan: Asian Disaster Reduction Center.
21.OECD (1999). National Accounts of OECD Countries, Vol 1.
22.Pahlman, C. (1996). “Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT)-Private investment in public projects…or just more public subsidies for the private sector?” Watershed, Vol. 2 No.I, Bankok: Towards Ecological Recovery and Regional Alliance (TERRA).
23.Pettak, W. J. and A. A. Atikisson (1982). Natural Hazard Risk Assessment and Public Policy: Anticipating the Unexpected. New York: Springer-Verlag.
24.Roth, R. J. Jr. (1997). Insurance: What are the Principles of Insuring Natural Disasters? Oakland, California: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
25.Seater, John J. (1993). “Ricardian Equivalence,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol.1, pp.142-190.
26.World Bank, Operations Evaluation Department (1994). Financing Disaster Reconstruction: The Popayan Earthquake, Operations Evaluation Department Report No.68. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
財政學系
87255018 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002000982 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [財務管理學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
