政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/85487
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113325/144300 (79%)
造访人次 : 51162587      在线人数 : 912
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/85487


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/85487


    题名: 注意力在概念性內隱記憶扮演角色的探討
    作者: 許清雄
    贡献者: 顏乃欣
    許清雄
    关键词: 注意力
    概念性內隱記憶
    日期: 2000
    上传时间: 2016-04-18 16:31:23 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究主要是探討注意力在概念性內隱記憶扮演的角色。遷移—適當歷程(TAP)認為概念性歷程需要注意力資源來幫助記憶表現，因此概念性內隱記憶會受到分配性注意力的影響，使概念性促發效果減少。但TAP仍受到許多的質疑，顯示概念性促發與注意力有更複雜的關係。本研究檢驗TAP在概念性內隱記憶作業的限制，並以“項目特殊性與相關性歷程”和“競爭性與非競爭性接觸歷程”來延伸TAP的觀點。本研究將分別檢驗在登錄和反應階段的一些不同情況，對注意力在概念性內隱記憶作業的影響。實驗一和實驗二操弄登錄處理變項，使用項目特殊性與項目相關性登錄處理來檢驗兩種不同的項目訊息所造成的影響。實驗三和實驗四操弄線索與反應聯想詞間的強弱關聯程度，探討注意力在字彙聯想作業的角色。在測驗階段是使用「歷程分離程序」(PDP)和「測驗後分離法」(PTP)，估計導致反應的意識“ Pc ”和無意識記憶“ Pu ”的機率值。並進一步比較兩種方法所得到的結果。
    參考文獻: 胡志偉、陳胎照、張世華、宋永麒 (1996)。中文多字多義詞自由聯想常模。「中華心理學刊」，38, 67-168。
    黃金蘭、鄭昭明(2000)。歷程分離程序的檢驗：「包含/排除」與「包含—標示」作業對意識和無意識記憶的分離。「中華心理學刊」，42, 17-36。
    鄭昭明(1999)。意識和無意識記憶的分離：「測驗後」分離法。「中華心理學刊」，41, 167-180。
    蔡佳珊(2000)。「知覺與概念性的訊息處理對顯示及隱示記憶測驗的影響」。國立台灣大學心理學研究所未發表碩士論文。
    Bentin, S., Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1995). Semantic processing and memory for attended and unattended words in dichotic listening: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 54-67.
    Besson, M., Fischler, I., Boaz, T., & Raney, G. (1992). Effects of automatic associative activation on explicit and implicit memory test. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 89-105.
    Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociation among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 657-668.
    Blaxton, T. A. (1992). Dissociations among memory measures on memory-impaire subjects: Evidence for a processing account of memory. Memory and Cognition, 20, 549-562.
    Bornstein, R. F., Leone, D. R., & Galley, D. J.(1987). The generalizability of subliminal mere exposure effects: Influences of stimuli perceived without awareness. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 53, 1070-1079.
    Cabeza, R. (1994). A dissociation between two implicit conceptual tests supports the distinction between types of conceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 505-508.
    Cofer, C. N. (1967). Conditions for the use of verbal associations. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 1-12.
    Cowan, N., & Stadler, M. A. (1996). Estimating unconscious processes: Implications of a general class of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 195-200.
    Craik, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities (pp. 409-4222). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    Curran, T., & Hintman, D. L. (1997). Consequences and causes of correlations in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 496-504.
    Debner, J. A., & Jacoby, L. L., (1994). Unconscious perception: Attention, awareness, and control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 304-317.
    Eich, E. (1984). Memory for unattended events: Remembering with and without awareness, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 864-875.
    Einstein, G. O., & Hunt, R. R. (1980). Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual-item and relational processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 588-598.
    Fisk, A. D., & Schneider, W. (1984). Memory as a function of attention, Level of processing, and automatization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 181-197.
    Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 501-518.
    Graf, P., & Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 553-568.
    Graf, P., & Masson, M. (1993). Implicit Memory. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Graf, P., Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1985). Priming across modalities and across category levels: Extending the domain of preserved function in amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 385-395.
    Hamman, S. B. (1990). Level-of-processing effects in conceptually driven implicit tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 970-977.
    Hamann, S. B., & Squire, L. R. (1996). Level-of–processing effects in word-completion priming: A neuropsychological study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 933-947.
    Hawley, K. J., & Johnston, W. A. (1991).Long-term perceptual memory for briefly exposed words as a function of awareness and attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 807-815.
    Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 497-514.
    Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 421-445.
    Hunt, R. R., & Seta, C. E. (1984). Category size effects in recall: The roles of relational and individual item information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 454-464.
    Isingrini, M., Vazou, F., & Leroy, P. (1995). Dissociation between implicit and explicit memory tests: Effects of age and divided attention on category exemplar generation and cued recall. Memory and Cognition, 23, 462-467.
    Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
    Jacoby, L. L.(1998). Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Towards a user’s guide for the PDP. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 3-26.
    Jacoby, L. L., Begg, I. M., & Toth, J. P. (1997). In defense of functional independence: Violations of assumptions underlying the PDP? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 484-495.
    Jacoby, L. L., & Shrout, P. E. (1997). Toward a psychometric analysis of violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 505-510.
    Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., & Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139-154.
    Jacoby, L. L., Yonelinas, A. P., & Jennings, J. M. (1997). The relation between conscious and unconscious (automatic) influence: Toward showing independence. In. J. Cohen & J. Schooler (Eds.), Scientific approaches to the question of consciousness (pp. 13-47). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, D. (1982). Remembering without awareness. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 300-324.
    Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelley, C. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by divided attention, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 115-125.
    Jelicic, M., Bonke, B., Wolters, G., & Phaf, R. H. (1992). Implicit memory for words presented during anaesthesia. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 71-80.
    Joordens, S., & Merikle, P. M. (1993). Independence or redundancy? Two models of conscious and unconscious influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 462-467.
    Klein, S. B., Loftus, J., Kihlstrom, J. F., & Aseron, R. (1989). Effects of item specific and relational information on hypermnesic recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1192-1197.
    Koriat, A., & Feuerstein, N. (1976). The recovery of incidentally acquired information. Acta Psychologica, 40, 463-474.
    Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557-558.
    Light, L. L. (1991). Memory and aging: Four hypothesis in search of data. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 333-376.
    Light, L. L., & Albertson, S. A.(1989). Direct and indirect tests of memory for category exemplars in young and older adults. Psychology & Aging, 4, 487-492.
    Light, L. L., & LaVoie, D. (1993). Direct and indirect tests of memory in old age. In. P. Graf & M. E. J. Masson (Eds.). Implicit memory: New directions in cognition, Development, and neuropsyhcology (pp. 207-230). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Mandler, G., Nakamura, Y., & Vanzandt, B. J. S. (1987). No specific effects of exposure on stimuli that cannot be recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 646-648.
    McKone, E., & Slee, J. A. (1997). Explicit contamination in “implicit” memory for new associations. Memory & cognition, 25, 352-366.
    McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (1996). Exact and conceptual repetition dissociate conceptual memory test: Problems for transfer appropriate processing theory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 1, 57-71.
    Merikle, P., & Reingold, E. (1991). Comparing direct(explicit) and indirect(implicit) measures to study unconscious memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning , Memory, & Cognition, 17, 224-233.
    Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
    Mulligan, N. W. (1997). Attention and implicit memory: The effects of varying attentional load on conceptual priming. Memory and Cognition, 25, 11-17.
    Mulligan, N. W. (1998). The role of attention during encoding in implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 27-47.
    Mulligan, N. W., Guyer, P. S., & Beland, A. (1999). The effects of levels-of-processing and organization on conceptual implicit memory in the category exemplar production test. Memory and Cognition, 24, 633-647.
    Mulligan, N. W., & Hartman, M. (1996). Divided attention and indirect memory tests. Memory and Cognition, 24, 453-465.
    Mulligan, N. W., & Stone, M. (1999). Attention and Conceptual Priming: Limits on the effects of Divided Attention in the Category-Exemplar Production Task. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 253-280.
    Parkin, A. J., Reid, T. K., & Russo, R. (1990). On the differential nature of implicit and explicit memory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 507-514.
    Parkin, A. J., & Russo, R. (1990). Implicit and explicit memory and the automatic/effortful distinction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 71-80.
    Perruchet, P., & Baveux, P. (1989). Correlational analyses of explicit and implicit memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 14, 77-86.
    Rabinowitz, J. C., Craik, F. I. M., & Ackerman, B. P. (1982). A processing resource account of age differences in recall. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 352-344.
    Rappold, V. A., & Hashtroudi, S. (1991). Does organization improve priming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 103-114.
    Richardson-Klavehn, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1988). Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 475-453.
    Roediger, H. L., & Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in word-fragment completion. Memory and Cognition,24, 27-47.
    Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds. ), Handbook of neuropsychology (pp. 63-131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    Roediger, H.L., Weldon, M. S., & Challis, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit memory: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 3-14). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Russo, R., & Parkin, A. J. (1993). Age differences in implicit memory; More apparent than real. Memory & Cognition, 21, 73-80.
    Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501-518.
    Schacter, D. L. (1992). Understanding implicit memory: A Cognitive neuroscience approach. American Psychologist, 47, 559-569.
    Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (1996). The effects of divide attention on implicit and explicit memory performance. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2, 111-152.
    Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (1999). Effects of divided attention on perceptual and conceptual memory tests：An analysis using a process-dissociation approach. Memory and Cognition, 27, 512-525.
    Seamon, J., Marsh, R., & Brody, N. (1984). Critical importance of exposure duration for attentive discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 465-469.
    Shimamura, A. P. (1986). Priming effects in amnesia: Evidence for a dissociable memory function. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 38A, 618-644.
    Shimamura, A. P. (1993). Neuropsychological analysis of implicit memory: History, methodology and theoretical interpretations. In P.Graf & M. E. J. Masson (Eds.), Implicit memory: New directions in cognition, development, and neuropsychology (pp. 265-285). Hillisdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Smith, E. R., & Branscombe, N. R. (1988). Category accessibility as implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 223-239.
    Smith, M. E., & Oscar-Berman, M. (1990). Repetition priming of words and pseudowords in divided attention and in amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognitive Psychology, 16, 1033-1042.
    Srinivas, K., & Roediger, H. L., III (1990). Classifying implicit memory tests: Category association and anagram solution. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 389-412.
    Toth, J. P., Reingold, E. M., & Jacoby, L. L.(1994). Toward a redefinition of implicit memory; Process dissociations following elaborative and self-generation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognitive Psychology, 7, 113-130.
    Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301-305.
    Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., & Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 993-1003.
    Vaidya, C. J., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Monti, L. A., Gutierrez-Rivas, H., & Zarella, M. M. (1997). Evidence for multiple mechanisms of conceptual priming on implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1324-1343.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學系
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001747
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[心理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2307检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈