English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113313/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50947630      Online Users : 993
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/83474


    Title: 自製率政策與原產地規定對地主國最適貿易政策的影響
    Authors: 程智惠
    Contributors: 翁永和
    程智惠
    Keywords: 自製率
    原產地規定
    關稅
    Date: 2000
    Issue Date: 2016-03-31 16:45:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著貿易自由化的趨勢,各國貿易障礙面臨到被迫取消或降低的狀況。以往用來達成「扶植國內中間財產業」目的的「自製率政策」,因為不符合WTO協定之「國民待遇」原則,欲加入WTO之國家,必須符合撤除(降低)自製率的要求。在撤除(降低)此項貿易障礙的同時,各國政府應如何配套調整一國的關稅政策,才能減緩對產業的衝擊,並仍維持追求福利最大的目標。由本文理論分析所得的結論:調降自製率下限要求的同時,在中間財方面,地主國應配套降低中間財之進口補貼。最終財方面,當自製率低於某一水準,此自製率水準使得地主國與出口國生產中間財的邊際成本出現互有高低的情形,若直接投資廠商最終財產量對自製率變動的彈性小於0時,地主國應提高最終財之進口關稅;彈性大於1時,則應降低最終財之進口關稅。延伸自製率的概念,並將貿易範圍擴大為自由貿易區,考慮「原產地規定」對地主國貿易政策的影響。結果在調降原產地認定水準的同時,地主國中間財關稅(補貼)政策仍維持原水準,不受認定水準變動的影響。但進口國之最終財進口關稅則視直接投資廠商最終財產量對自製率變動的彈性而定,彈性小於0時,應提高最終財之進口關稅;彈性大於0時,降低最終財之進口關稅。
    Reference: 于模泯(2000),「國產車vs進口車 拼的是售後服務」,中時電子報,2000年02月10日。
    李繁康(1989),自製率、最適出口補貼與多國籍企業,國立台灣大學經濟研究所碩士論文。
    何世強(1999),「泰取消汽機車組裝自製率規定」,經濟日報,1999年10月6日,9版。
    周一玲(1999),「泰國明年將提高進口車零件關稅」,經濟日報,1999年2月24日,8版。
    翁永和、劉碧珍、丁嘉瑋(1997),「自製率政策與中間財廠商技術之選擇」,經濟論文,第26卷2期,頁219-42。
    陳正澄(1997),海峽兩岸產業之調整:汽車產業之研究,行政院國家科學委員會,頁21。
    陳正澄(1999),「WTO協定─台灣汽車產業」,成長或消失─產業的管理經濟分析,華泰書局,頁210-236。
    彭文輝(1994),國際經濟法上原產地規範之研究,中興大學法律研究所碩士論文。
    經濟部工業局(1994),北美自由貿易區對我國經濟之衝擊與因應。
    經濟部工業技術研究院機械工業研究所(1997),1997汽、機、自行車現況與趨勢分析。
    經濟部國貿局(1995),烏拉圭回合多邊貿易談判協定。
    劉碧珍(1987),「進口關稅與自製率規定之政策效果」,中央研究院三民主義研究所叢刊,第2期第5次社會科學院研討論文集,頁341-357。
    蔡宏明(1994),「美歐原產地規定與烏拉圭回合原產地協定之研究」,進口救濟論叢,第4期,頁135-196。
    賴永聲(1994),原產地規則之探討,國立政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文。
    Balassa, Bela(1961), The Theory of Economic Integration, Homewood, Illinois: Irwin.
    Davidson, C., S.J. Matusz and M.E. Kreinin(1987),"Analysis of Performance Standards for Direct Foreign Investment", Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, No.4, p.876-890.
    Davis, Donald R.(1995), "Comment on Conference Version of Paper," New Directions in Trade Theory, edited by Jim Levinsohn, Alan V. Deardorff, and Robert M. Stern, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 1995, p.191-98.
    Falvey, Rod and Geoff Reed(1998), "Economic Effects of Rules of Origin," Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol.134, No.2, p.209-229.
    Feenstra, Robert C.(1995), "Comment on Conference Version of Paper," New Directions in Trade Theory, edited by Jim Levinsohn, Alan V. Deardorff, and Robert M. Stern, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 1995, p.188-91.
    GATT, Basic Instrument and Selected Documents(1955), Third Supplement. p.94-99.
    Grossman, Gene M.(1981), "The Theory of Domestic Content Protection and Content Preference," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.96, No.4, p.583-603.
    Hoekman, Bernard(1993), "Rules of Origin for Goods and Services: Conceptual Issues and Economic Considerations," Journal of World Trade, Vol.27, No.4, p.81-99.
    Johnson, H. G.(1971), Aspects of the Theory of Tariffs, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, p.285-306.
    Ju, Jiandong and Kala Krishna(1996), "Market Access and Welfare Effects of Free Trade Areas without Rules of Origin," NBER Working Paper 5480.
    Krishna, Kala, and Anne O. Krueger(1995), "Implementing Free Trade Areas: Rules of Origin and Hidden Protection," New Directions in Trade Theory, edited by Jim Levinsohn, Alan V. Deardorff, and Robert M. Stern, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 1995, p.149-87.
    Lloyd, P.J.(1993), "A Tariff Substitute for Rules of Origin in Free Trade Area," World Economy, Vol.16, No.6, p.699-712.
    Nowicki, Lawrence W.(1997), "Rules of Origin and Local Content Requirements: Protectionism After the Uruguay Round," The International Trade Journal, Vol. 11, No.3, p.349-87.
    Palmeter, N. David(1990), "The U.S. Rules of Origin Proposal to GATT: Monotheism or Polytheism? " Journal of World Trade, Vol.24, No.2, p.25-36.
    U.S. Int`l Trade Commision (1987), Standardization of rules of Origin, Pub. No. 1976, Rep. No. 332-239 at Ⅵ(Preminary),P.1-20.
    Vermulst, Edwin A.(1992), " Rules of Origin as Commercial Policy Instruments─Revisited," Journal of World Trade, Vol.26, No. 6, p.62-102.
    Vousden, N.(1987), "Content Protection and Tariffs Under Monopoly and Competition," Journal of International Economics, Vol.23, No.3/4, p.263-282.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經濟學系
    87258011
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001805
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[經濟學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2306View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback