政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/83379

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/83379

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113393/144380 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51241455 線上人數 : 892

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 公共行政學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/83379

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/83379

題名:	網際網路與公民參與－台北市政府網路個案分析 Internet and Citizen Participation
作者:	徐千偉 Shyu, Chian-Woei
貢獻者:	施能傑 Jay Shih, N. 徐千偉 Shyu, Chian-Woei
關鍵詞:	網際網路公民參與網路公共論壇電子化民主網路民主全球資訊網資訊及通訊科技電腦中介傳播 Internet Citizen participation Internet Public Forum Electronic Democracy Cyberdemocracy World Wide Web (WWW) Information and Communication Technology (ICT or IT) Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC)
日期:	2000
上傳時間:	2016-03-31 16:39:49 (UTC+8)
摘要:	自一九八Ｏ年代起，現代資訊與通訊科技(Information and Communication Technology or ICT)、電腦中介傳播(Computer-Mediated Communication or CMC)、網際網路(Internet)及全球資訊網(World Wide Web or WWW)的發展和普及化，已被學者、政治人物、以及論者們認為是可用以加強實踐公民參與及民主政治之有效工具。本研究即探討政府如何透過網際網路來提供公民參與機制。 Since the 1980`s, many scholars, statesmen, and researchers have come to realize that the development and popularity of modern Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Computer-mediated Communication (CMC), Internet, and the World Wide Web (WWW) will become the effective mechanism for citizen participation. The main purpose of this research paper is to study how government provides citizen participation through Internet.
參考文獻:	【一】中文部分丘昌泰民84 《公共政策：當代政策科學理論之研究》，台北：巨流。王必芳民80 《民眾參與污染性設施設置程序之研究制度面之檢討與建議》，國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。王招惠民76 《民間團體參與公共政策執行之研究---台北市政府委託民間辦理事項個案探討》，國立中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。王德蓉民86 《資訊科技對組織之影響---以網際網路為例》，國立中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。台北市政府研考會民88a 《民國八十八年七月至九月「市長信箱」電子信件辦理情形季報》，台北市政府研考會。民88b 《民國八十八年十月至十二月「市長信箱」電子信件辦理情形季報》，台北市政府研考會。民88c 《台北市政府市政資訊系統「市長信箱」電子信件作業督導考核計畫》，台北市政府研考會。台北市政府民政局民88 《民國八十八年七月至十二月台北市市民上網改善市容查報案件執行情形統計表，台北市政府民政局。朱堅章譯，Pickles Dorothy著民67 《民主政治》(Democracy)，台北：幼獅。何佩穎民82 《政策運作過程中的公民參與：以臺北市政府為例》，國立中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。江存仁民84 《政策過程中之公民參與：以山豬窟垃圾掩埋場為例》，國立中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。行政院研考會民84 《行政機關電子資料流通推動策略》，行政院研考會。行政院資訊發展推動小組民85 《八十六年度政府業務電腦化報告書》，台北：行政院研究發展考核委員會。民87 《八十七年度政府業務電腦化報告書---邁向二十一世紀的電子化政府》，台北：行政院研究發展考核委員會，URL:http://www.rdec.gov.tw/white87/white87.doc (visited 1999/10/30)。吳英明民83a 《都市生活與市民參與》，高雄：中山大學都市發展與政策學術研討會論文。民83b 「公私部門協力關係和公民參與之探討」，《中國行政評論》，第二卷，第三期，頁1-14。吳姝倩民85 《電腦中介傳播人際情感親密關係之研究：探訪電子佈告欄(BBS)中的「虛擬人際關係」》，國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。李英明、羅曉南民86 「資訊科技與人的處境」，謝春瀛編，《資訊科技對人文、社會的衝擊與影響期末研究報告》，台北：中研院資訊科學研究所，頁53-76。李素貞民86 《環境影響評估中民眾參與之探討：以84、85年為例》，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。林正壹民78 《環境影響評估之民眾參與方式之研究---臺灣地區個案分析》，國立中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。林志文民88 《電子化政府與民意表達行為》，國立中正大學政治學系暨研究所碩士論文。林民程民87 《網路犯罪之問題建構研究》，國立中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。柳林緯民85 《組織中電腦中介傳播系統使用之研究：以電子郵件為例》，國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。陳百齡民84 「不見公共資訊的電子公路？若干政策上的省思」，《圖書與資訊學刊》，第14期，頁7-14。民86 「網際網路的「接近使用」問題」，《圖書與資訊學刊》，第20期，頁1-12。陳金貴民81 「公民參與的研究」，《行政學報》，24期，頁95-128。陳怡君民87 《顧客導向理念應用於公共官僚體制之研究》，國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文。陳俊宏民87 「永續發展與民主：審議式民主理論初探」，《東吳政治學報》，第九期，頁85-122。民88 「『鄰避』(NIMBY)症候群，專家政治與民主審議」，《東吳政治學報》，第十期，頁97-132。陳桂香民85 《公共政策與民眾參與環境影響評估過程中民眾參與制度之研究》，國立中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。陳韻如民83 《民間團體參與國家文化建設之研究---以台北市藝文表演團體為探討》，國立中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。陳威豪民87 《行政革新之研究---一個顧客導向的觀點》，國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文。張明貴譯，Crawford B. Macpherson著民82 《自由民主的經驗與時代》(The life and times of liberal democracy)，台北：桂冠。張明貴譯，Roland J. Pennock著民69 《民主政治理論》(Democratic political theory)，台北：國民大會憲政研討委員會。張瑞星民86 《Internet法律問題上線》，台北：永然文化。馬榮安民86 《法國網際網路憲章，保障隱私權》，中國時報，6月17日，第47版。翁芳怡民89 《民主行政與電子化民主---我國地方政府網路民意論壇版面的探討》，私立東海大學公共行政學系碩士論文。黃文陽民84 《民眾參與公共政策制定：高雄地區衛武營都會公園推動過程為例》，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。黃金鳳民82 《民間團體參與社會教育政策執行之研究---以全國性財團法人文教基金會為例》，國立中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。黃瑞祺民79 《批判理論與現代社會學》，台北：巨流。黃學碩民86 《網際網路公共傳播內容的分析---以交大BBS站為例》，國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。黃曙曜譯，Jong S. Jun著民83 《公共行政：設計與問題解決》( Public Administration : Design and Problem Solving )，台北：五南。葉俊榮民86 《邁向「電子化政府」：資訊公開與行政程序的挑戰與因應》，台北：網路與法律研討會，URL：http://www.law.ntu.edu.tw/TaiwanLawSociety/netlaw.htm (visited 1999/1/18)。葉慶元民86 《網際網路上之表意自由：以色情資訊之管制為中心》，國立中興大學法律學研究所碩士論文。項月霞民86 《電腦暨網際網路專有名詞註解》，台北：儒林。項靖民86 《線上政府：初探全球資訊網與台灣地區地方政府行政》，行政發展與地方政府競爭力之提昇研討會論文集。民88 「地方政府網路公共論壇與民主行政之實踐」，《東海社會科學學報》，第十八期，頁149-178。曾素芳民86 《社區民眾參與環境營造作法之探討：以「輔導美化地方傳統文化建築空間計畫」為對象》，私立中華工學院建築與都市計畫研究所碩士論文。游婉娟譯，增田米二著 1994 《資訊地球村》，台北：天下。傅麗英民84 《公民參與之理論與實踐：民間教育改革團體的個案研究》，國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。楊長苓、王原賢、謝孟叡譯，David Morse著民86 《網路辭典：線上世界指引》，臺北：貓頭鷹。齊立平民85 《電子郵件的使用對組織傳播民主化的影響》，國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。潘彥佃民88 《我國政府WWW網站與資訊公開之研究》，私立東海大學公共行政學系碩士論文。戴怡君民87 《使用網際網路進行互動者特質的探索》，私立南華管理學院教育社會學研究所碩士論文。樂為良譯，Bill Gates著民88 《數位神經系統》，台北：商業週刊出版公司。蘇彥豪民87 《網路空間的公共與私密---以TANet女性主義BBS站為例》，國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。謝清俊民85 「談資訊的定義與性質」，《資訊科技與社會轉型研討會論文集》，台北：中研院社會研究所籌備處。民86 《資訊科技對人文、社會的衝擊與影響期末研究報告》，台北：行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究計畫。謝慶達民73 《都市更新社區民眾參與之研究：以臺北市為例》，私立淡江大學建築研究所碩士論文。謝瀛春民86 「數位媒介對大眾傳播的革命性挑戰」，謝瀛春編，《資訊科技對人文、社會的衝擊與影響期末研究報告》，台北：中研院資訊科學研究所。劉靜宜民86 《資訊科技與法律制度的互動：從網路規範模式看台灣社會面臨的網路言論自由與資訊隱私危機》，第二屆資訊科技與社會轉型研討會論文。韓榮姿民87 《社區發展政策中民眾參與情形之研究：以臺北市社區發展協會為例》，國立中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。瞿海源民86 「資訊網路與台灣社會---網路使用的社會意義」，謝春瀛編，《資訊科技對人文、社會的衝擊與影響期末研究報告》，台北：中研院資訊科學研究所，頁147-168。【二】網站中華民國總統府全球資訊網 http://www.oop.gov.tw/ 台北市政府全球資訊網 http://www.taipei.gov.tw/ 台北市政府「市民論壇」 http://www.taipei.gov.tw/disc.htm 台北市政府「市長信箱」 http://163.29.36.6/mayor/main.htm 台北市政府「市容查報」 http://www.taipei.gov.tw/CityLooks/Default.asp 台北市政府都市發展局的「都市論壇」 http：//www.planning.taipei.gov.tw/6/6home.asp 台北市政府台北捷運公司的「捷運開講」 http：//www.trtc.com.tw/disc8801/default.htm 台北市政府交通局的「交通討論區」 http：//www.dot.taipei.gov.tw/prog/message.asp 台北市政府國宅處的「國宅大家談」 http：//www.phd.gov.tw/News-G/Title.asp 台北市政府婦女權益促進委員會的「婦權論壇」 http：//www.women.taipei.gov.tw/discuss.htm 台北縣政府資訊服務站 http://www.tphg.gov.tw/ 台北縣政府「縣民開講」 http://www.tphg.gov.tw/select3/Main4.html 行政院全球資訊網 http://www.ey.gov.tw/ 行政院人事行政局全球資訊網 http://www.cpa.gov.tw/ 基隆市政府全球資訊網 http://www.klcg.gov.tw/ 桃園縣政府全球資訊網 http://163.29.253.1/ 新竹市政府全球資訊網 http://www.hccg.gov.tw/ 新竹縣政府全球資訊網 http://www1.hchg.gov.tw/ 苗栗縣政府全球資訊網 http://www.miaoli.gov.tw/ 台中市政府全球資訊網 http://www.tccg.gov.tw/ 台中縣政府全球資訊網 http://www.taichung.gov.tw/ 彰化縣政府全球資訊網 http://www.chhg.gov.tw/index.htm 南投縣政府全球資訊網 http://www.nthg.gov.tw/ 雲林縣政府全球資訊網 http://www.yunlin.gov.tw/main.htm 嘉義市政府全球資訊網 http://www.chiayi.gov.tw/chinese.htm 嘉義縣政府全球資訊網 http://www.cyhg.gov.tw/ 台南市政府全球資訊網 http://www.tncg.gov.tw/ 台南縣政府全球資訊網 http://www.tnhg.gov.tw/ 高雄市政府全球資訊網 http://www.kcg.gov.tw/ 高雄縣政府全球資訊網 http://www.kscg.gov.tw/ 屏東縣政府全球資訊網 http://www.pthg.gov.tw/ 宜蘭縣政府全球資訊網 http://www.ilhg.gov.tw/ 花蓮縣政府全球資訊網 http://www.hlhg.gov.tw/ 台東縣政府全球資訊網 http://www.taitung.gov.tw/taitung/ 澎湖縣政府全球資訊網 http://www.phhg.gov.tw/index.htm 金門縣政府全球資訊網 http://www.kinmen.gov.tw/ 連江縣政府全球資訊網 http://www.apot.com/gi/gov12/ 常見網路名詞解釋網址 http://www.nges.chc.edu.tw/常見網路名詞解釋.htm Amsterdam, City Talks, City Consultations, and Digital City http://www.dds.nl California Online Voter Guide http://www.calvoter.org/ City of Santa Monica Official Homepage http://pen.ci.santa-monica.ca.us/cm/index.htm Communication Center - City of Santa Monica http://pen.ci.santa-monica.ca.us/communication/ Cybercrate, Belgium http://www.axismundi.org/cybercrate Democr@cy Forum http://www.gotzespace.dk/democracy/ GOVNEWS http://www.govnews.org/govnews/govnews.html INTEGRAL STUDIES: citizen, society, polity http://www.snafu.de/~mjm/init.html Korea http://forum.nca.or.kr/edem/index.htm Mehr Demokratie, Federal Republic of Germany http://www.mehr-demokratie.de Minnesota, E-democracy http://www.e-democracy.org/ Netherlands http://www.xs4all.nl/~roesderz/english/ Peru http://www.protelsa.com.pe/kybernesis/ Sweden http://www.ltdalarna.se Switzerland http://www.politics.ch TAN+N Teledemocracy Action News and Network http://www.auburn.edu/tann THOMAS, U.S. Congress on the Internet http://thomas.loc.gov/ 【三】英文部分 Arnstein, Sherry R. 1969 “A ladder of citizen participation”, Journal of the American Institute of Planner, No.35, pp. 216-224. Arterton, Christopher F. 1987 Teledemocracy, California: Sage. Baber, Benjamin R. 1997 “The new telecommunications technology: Endless frontier or the end of democracy?”, Constellations, Vol.4, No.2, pp. 208-228. Bellamy, Christine and John A. Taylor 1998 Governing in the Information Age. Buckingham: Open University Press. Berman, Evan M. 1997 “Dealing with cynical citizens,” Public Administration Review, Vol.57, No.2, pp. 105-112. Berman, Jerry and Daniel J. Weitzner 1997 “Technology and democracy”, Social Research, Vol.64, No.3, pp. 1313-1320. Berry, Jeffrey M., Kent E. Portney, and Ken Thomas 1989 “Empowering and involving citizens”, in James L. Perry (ed.), Handbook of Public Administration, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 217-218. Bonchek, M. S. 1995 “Political Participation on the Internet”, On-line paper, URL: http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/ppp/summary.html. Bos, Edwin 1993 “Can information technology improve the quality of democracy? ”, Behavior & Information Technology, Vol.12, pp. 194-195. Brants, Kees, Martine Huizenga, and Reineke van Meerten 1996 “The new canals of Amsterdam: an exercise in local electronic democracy”, Media, Culture & Society, Vol.18, pp. 233-247. Brants, Cathy 1998 “Manchester: Democratic implications of an economic initiative?”, in Roza Tsagarousianou, Damian Tambini, and Cathy Bryan (eds), Cyberdemocarcy: Technology, cities and civic networks, London: Routledge, pp. 152-166. Browning, Graeme 1996 Electronic Democracy: Using the Internet to Influence American Politics, CT: Pemberton Press. Calabrese, Andrew and Mark Borchert 1996 “Prospects for electronic democracy in the United States: Rethinking communication and social policy”, Media, Culture, and Society, Vol.18, pp. 249-268. Calhoun, C. 1992 “Introduction: Habermas and the Public Sphere”, in C. Calhoun(ed.), Habermas and the Public Sephere, pp.1-48, Cambridge, MA: MIT press. Casaregola, Vincent and Robert A. Cropf 1998 “Virtual town halls: Using computer networks to improve public discourse and facilitate service delivery”, On-line Paper, URL: http://www.gonzaga.edu/rr/v4nl/cropf.html (visited 1999/10/25). Chandler, Ralph C. and Jack C. Plano 1988 The Public Administration Dictionary, New York: Wiley. Checkoway, B. and Van J. Til 1978 ”What do we know about citizen participation? A selective review of research”, in Stuart Langton (ed.), Citizen Participation in America, Massachusetts Toronto: Lexington, pp. 25-42. Clarke, Roger 1998 “Information technology: Weapon of authoritarianism or tool of democracy”, On-line Paper, URL:http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke/DV/PaperAuthiam.html(visited 1999/10/27). Cooper , Terry L. 1983 “Citizen participation”, in Thomas D. Lynch (ed.), Organization Theory and Management, New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 13-45. Crosby, Ned, Janet M. Kelly, and Pool Schaefer 1986 “Citizen Panels: A new approach to citizen participation”, Public Administration Review, Vol.46, No.2, pp. 171-178. Dahlgren, P. 1991 “Introduction”, in P. Dahlgren and C. Sparks (eds), Communication and Citizenship: Journalism and the Public Sphere, London: Routledge, pp.1- 24. Dahlgren, P. and C. Sparks 1991 Communication and Citizenship: journalism and the Public Sphere, London: Routledge. Department of Industrial Technology 1999 “55% of Net Users in Taiwan Have Multiple Accesses to the net” , Internet in Taiwan, URL: http://www.isoc.org.tw/howmany_disp.asp?hm_id=1013. Docter, Sharon and William H. Dutton 1998 “The first Amendment online: Santa Monica’s Public Electronic Network”,in Roza Tsagarousianou, Damian Tambini, and Cathy Bryan (eds), Cyberdemocarcy: Technology, cities and civic networks, London: Routledge, pp. 125-151. Dutton, William H. 1996 “Network rules of order: Regulating speech in public electronic forum”, Media, Culture & Society, Vol.18, pp. 269-290. 1999 Society on the Line: Information Politics in the Digital Age, New York: Oxford University Press. Ess, C. 1996 “The political computer: democracy, CMC, and Habermas ”, in C. Ess (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication, New York: State University of New York. Etzioni, Minerva A. 1972 “An electronic town hall”, Policy Sciences, Vol.3, pp. 457-474. Fagence, Michael 1977 Citizen Participation in Planning, Oxford: Pergamon. Fishkin, James 1995 “Bringing deliberation to democracy”, in Robert P. Churchill (ed.), TheEthics of Liberal Democracy: Morality and Democracy in Theory and Practice, Oxford: Berg Publisher, pp. 101-110. Fox, Charles J. and Hugh T. Miller 1994 Postmodern Public Administration: Toward Discourse, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Francissen, Letty and Kees Brants 1998 “Virtually going places: Square-shopping in Amsterdam’s Digital City”, in Roza Tsagarousianou, Damian Tambini, and Cathy Bryan (eds), Cyberdemocarcy: Technology, cities and civic networks, London: Routledge, pp. 18-40. Fraser, N. 1995 “What’s critical about Critical theory”, in J. Meehan(ed.), Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse, New York: Routledge. Gandy, Oscar H. 1989 “The Surveillance society: information technology and bureaucratic social control”, Journal of Communication,Vol.39, No.3, pp. 61-75. Garson, David G. and Oliver J. Williams 1982 Public Administration: Concepts, Readings, Skills, Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Gittell, Marilyn 1980 Limits to Citizen Participation, Beverly Hills, California: Sage. Gonzales, Hernando 1989 “Interactivity and feedback in third world development campaigns”, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, Vol.6, No.3, pp. 295-314. Grossman, Lawrence K. 1995 The Electronic Republic: Reshaping Democracy in the Information Age, N.Y.: Viking. Gubash, G. J. 1997 “The impact of the internet on popular democracy in the United States”, Master thesis, Saint Mary’s university of Minnesota, On-line Paper, URL: http://www.freenet.msp. mn.us/people/gubash/thesis.html(visited 1999/10/20). Habermas, Juergen 1971 Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics, Boston:Beacon Press. Hacker, Kenneth L. 1996 “Missing links in the evolution of electronic democratization”, Media,Culture & Society, Vol.18, pp. 213-232. Hagen, Martin 1997 “A typology of electronic democracy”, On-line Paper, URL:http://www.unigiessen.de/fb03/vinci/labore/netz/hag_en.html(visited 1999/10/26). Hamelink, Cees J. 1986 “Is there life after the information revolution?”, in Michael Traber (ed.),The Myth of the Information Revolution: Social and Ethical Implications of Communication Technology, London: Sage, pp. 7-20. Hansell, William H. 1996 “A common vision for the future: the role of local government and citizen in the democratic process”, National Civic Review, Vol.85, No.3, pp. 5-13. Hansen, Kenneth N. 1998 “ Identifying facets of democratic administration”, Administration & Society, Vol.30, No.4, pp. 443-461. Johnson, M. Stephen 1998 " The internet changes everything: Revolutionizing public participation and access to government information through the internet", Administrative Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 277-337. Jones, S. G. 1995 “Introduction: From where to who know? ”, In S. G. Jones (ed.), Cybersociety: Computer-mediated Communication and Communication, pp. 1-9, London: Sage. Jordan, Tim 1999 Cyberpower: the Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet, New York: Routledge. Jun, Jong S. 1986 Public Administration: Design and Problem Solving, N.Y.: MacMillan. Kathlene, Lyn and John A. Martin 1991 “Enhancing citizen participation: Panel designs, perspectives, and policy formation”, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol.10, No.1, pp.46-63. Keller, James 1995 “Public access issues: an introduction,” in Brian Kahin and James Keller (eds), Public Access to the InterNet, MIT Press: Cambridge, Mass. King, Cheryl S., Kathryn M. Feltey, and Bright O. Susel 1998 “The Question of Participation: Toward authentic participation in public administration,” Public Administration Review, Vol.58, No.4, pp. 317-326. Kirschner, Bruce H. 1991 “Electronic democracy in the 21st century”, National Civic Review, Fall, pp. 406-412. Ku, L. 1995 “Toward a research framework for computer-mediated communication”, Journal of Radio & Television Studies, Vol.2, No.1, pp. 185-212, Taipei: National Chenchi University, Department of Radio & Television. Kweit, Mary G. and Robert W. Kweit 1981 Implementing Citizen Participation in a Bureaucratic Society, New York: Praeger Publisher. Langton, Stuart 1978 “What is citizen participation”, in Stuart Langton (ed.), CitizenParticipation in America, Massachusetts Toronto: Lexington, pp. 13-24. Lievrouw, Leah A. 1994 “Information resources and democracy: Understanding the paradox”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, No.45, p. 351-356. London, S. 1995 “Teledemocracy vs. deliberative democracy: A comparative look at twomodels of public talk”, Journal of Interpersonal Computing andTechnology, Vol.3, No.2, pp. 33-55. Longley, Dennis and Michael Shain 1986 Dictionary of Information Technology, New York: Oxford University Press. Loader, Brian D. 1997 The Governance of Cyberspace: Politics, Technology and Global Restructuring, New York: Routledge. Macpherson, Crawford B. 1983 “Participatory democracy”, in David Held (ed.), States and Societies, N.Y.: New York University Press. Macpherson, Michael 1997a “Open forum: citizens resolve”, On-line paper, URL: http://www.snafu.de/~mjm/prop2.html(visited 1999/10/25) and http://www.snafu.de/~mjm/offenes-forum.html(visited 1999/10/25). 1997b “Citizen politics and the renewal of democracy”, On-line paper, URL: http://www.snafu.de/~mim/CP/cp2.html(visited 1999/10/25). 1998a “Citizen participation in politics and the new communication media”, On-line paper, URL: http://www.snafu.de/~mjm/CP/cp. html(visited 1999/10/28). 1998b “Some applications of information technology to citizen participation in politics”, On-line paper, URL:http://www.snafu.de/~mjm/miercurea.html(visited 1999/10/25). Masco, Vincent 1989 “The pay-per society: Computer and communication in the information age”, Essays in Critical Theory and Public Policy, Norwood, N.Y.: Ablex. Morris, Merrill 1996 “ The Internet as Mass Medium”, Journal of Communication, Vol.46, No.1, URL: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/voll/issue4/morris.html(visited 1999/10/26). Newhagen, J. E. and S. Rafaeli 1996 “ Why communication research should study the Internet: A dialogue”, Journal of Communication, Vol.46, No.1, pp. 4-13. Nunn Samuel and Joseph B. Rubleske 1997 "Webbed cities and development of the national information highway: The creation of World Wide Web sites by U. S. city government", Journal of Urban Technology, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 53-79. O’Sullivan, Patric B. 1995 “Computer networks and political participation: Santa Monica’s Teledemocracy Project”, Journal of Applied Communication Research, Vol.23, pp. 93-107. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology 1998 Electronic Government – Information Technologies and the Citizen, London: UK Parliament, URL: http://www.parliament.uk/post/egov.html(visited 1999/10/25). Pateman, Carole 1978 Participation and Democracy Theory, London: Cambridge UniversityPress. Poster, M. 1997 “Cyberdemocracy: Internet and the public sphere”, in D. Porter (ed.), Internet Culture, New York: Routledge. Press, Daniel 1994 Democracy Dilemmas in the Age of Ecology: Trees and Toxics in the American West, Durham: Duke University Press. Rheingold, Howard 1995 The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. London: Addison-Wesley Publishing. Rodota, Stefano 1996 “Citizen’s participation in an electronic democracy: Building an electronic citizenship?”, On-line Paper, URL: http://www2.echo.lu/stockholm/en/rodota.html (visited 1999/10/25). Rogers , E. M. 1986 Communication Technology: The New Media in Society, New York: The Free Press. Rogers, E. M. and S. Rafaeli 1985 “Computer and communication”, In Brent D. Ruben (ed.), Information and Behavior, Vol.1, pp. 95-112, NJ: Transaction Books. Rosenbaum, Walter A. 1978 “Public involvement as reform and ritual: The development of federal participation program”, in Stuart Langton (ed.), Citizen Participation in America, Massachusetts Toronto: Lexington, pp. 81-96. Ryan, Susan M. 1996 Downloading Democracy: Government Information in an Electronic Age,N.J.: Hampton Press. Sachs, Hiram 1995 “Computer networks and the formation of public opinion: An ethnographic study”, Media, Culture & Society, Vol.17, pp. 81-99. Schmidtke, Oliver 1998 “Berlin in the Net: Prospects for cyberdemocracy from above and from below,” in Roza Tsagarousianou, Damian Tambini, and Cathy Bryan (eds), Cyberdemocarcy: Technology, cities and civic networks, London: Routledge, pp. 60-83. Schuler, Doun 1994 “Community networks: Building a new participatory medium”, Communication of the ACM, January, pp. 39-51. Shepherd, Anne and Christi Bowler 1997 “Beyond the requirements: Improving public participation in EIA”, Journal of Environment Planning & Management, Vol.40, No.6, pp. 725-738. Smith, Stephen A. 1984 “Communication and technology: The future of American democracy”, On-line Paper, URL: http://www.uark.edu/depts/comminfo/ss/1984.html(visited 1999/10/30). Starling, Anne and Christi Blower 1997 “Beyond the requirements: Improving public participation in EIA”, Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, Vol.40, No.6, pp. 725-738. Steinfield , C. W. 1986 “Computer-mediated communication in an organizational setting: Explaining task-related and socioemotional uses”, In M. L. Mclaughlin(ed.), Communication Yearbook, Vol.9, pp. 777-804, CA: Sage Publication. Sun, Su-lien and George A. Barnett 1994 “The international telephone network and democratization”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol.45, p. 412. Tambini, Damian 1998 “City networking and universal rights to connectivity: Bologna,” in Roza Tsagarousianou, Damian Tambini, and Cathy Bryan (eds),Cyberdemocarcy: Technology, cities and civic networks, London:Routledge, pp. 84-109. Tehranian, Majid 1990 Technologies of Power: Information Machines and Democratic Prospects, Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. Tsagarousianou, Roza 1998a “Back to the future of democracy? New technologies, civic networks and direct democracy in Greece”, in Roza Tsagarousianou, Damian Tambini, and, Cathy Bryan (eds), Cyberdemocarcy: Technology, cities and civic networks, pp. 41-59. 1998b “Electronic democracy and the public sphere”, in Roza Tsagarousianou, Damian Tambini, and Cathy Bryan (eds), Cyberdemocarcy: Technology, cities and civic networks, London: Routledge, pp. 167-178. Tsagarousianou, Roza, Damian Tambini, and Cathy Bryan (eds) 1998 Cyberdemocracy: Technology, Cities, and Civic Network, London: Routledge. Waldo, Dwight 1984 The Administrative State, New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers Inc. Wamsley, Gary L. and James F. Wolf (eds) 1996 Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. White, Charles S. 1997 “Citizen participation and the internet: prospects for civic deliberation inthe information age,” Social Studies, Vol. 88, No. 1, pp. 23-28. Williams, F., R. E. Rice, and H. S. Dordick 1982 “Behavior impacts in the information age”, Information and Behavior, Vol.1, pp. 165-181.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學公共行政學系
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001867
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[公共行政學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
index.html	0Kb	HTML2	246	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋