English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113325/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51177093      Online Users : 873
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/83272
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/83272


    Title: 勞動供給、所得稅與超額負擔-台灣的實證研究
    Authors: 許穎心
    Contributors: 林全
    許穎心
    Keywords: 勞動供給
    綜合所得稅
    無謂損失
    累進所得稅
    超額負擔
    labor supply
    income tax
    dead weight loss
    progressive income tax
    excess burden
    Date: 2000
    Issue Date: 2016-03-31 15:32:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究根據Housman(1981)的實證方式,對我國現行所得稅制對男性經濟戶長之勞動供給影響進行迴歸分析,進而估計目前我國所得稅制度下,個人的最適勞動供給曲線,並求算在此一勞動供給曲線下,所得稅對不同納稅人所造成的無謂損失(分別以高所得階層及中低所得階層代表性個人加以計算)。
    利用民國八十七年「人力資源調查」所做出的實證結果發現,稅後工資率與非勞動所得的變動,對勞動工時皆有相當顯著的解釋能力。其中稅後工資率的係數符號為正,表示當工資上升,休閒相對價格提高,故個人會減少休閒,而勞動工時會相對增加;非勞動工時的係數符號為負,表示休閒為正常財,個人會隨所得提高而增加休閒時間,故勞動工時會相對減少,而比較二者的效果,非勞動所得變動對勞動工時的影響,較稅後工資率變動對勞動工時的影響為大。同時,累進所得稅對勞動供給所造成的無謂損失,無論在絕對量或相對於稅前總所得的比例,皆隨總所得的提高而增加,因此所得稅對高所得者效率上的衝擊較低所得者來得大,亦即所得稅扭曲高所得者的勞動供給行為之程度,較低所得者的扭曲程度為大。
    Reference: 中文部分
    1.陳圳忠(1989),大小家庭結構對已婚婦女勞動供給的影響,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。
    2.梁正德(1986),所得稅與勞動供給,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。
    3.單驥(1988),我國小家庭夫婦勞動供給之決定-兼論所得稅的影響,經濟論文,No.16.2,pp.251-267。
    4.張慶輝(1982),台灣勞動參與與勞動供給之研究,勞工行政委託研究叢書,行政院勞工委員會。
    5.______(1982),所得稅、家計生產與勞動供給,財稅研究,No.14.5,pp.9-21。
    6.______(1991),我國勞動工給與勞動參與之研究,台北國科會。
    英文部分
    1.Ashenefelter, O. and J. Heckman(1974), “The Estimation of Income and Substitution Effect in a Model of Family Labor Supply,”Econometrica, Vol. 42, pp.73-85.
    2.Atkinson, A. and J. Stigliz(1980), “Household Decisions, Income Taxation and Labour Supply,” Lectures on Public Economics, McGraw-Hall, England, pp. 23-61.
    3.Battarai, K. and J. Whalley(1997), “Discreteness and the Welfare Cost of Labor Supply Tax Distortions,” NBER Working Paper 6280, National Bureau of Economic Research.
    4.Bowen, W. and T. Finegan(1965), “Labor Force Participation and Unemployment” in A. Ross, eds., Employment Policy and the Labor Market, Berkely, California University Press, pp.115-161.
    5.Brown, C. V.(1981), Taxation and Labor Supply, London, George Allen and Unwin..
    6.Burtless, G. and J. Hausman(1978), “The Effect of Taxation on Labor Supply : evaluation the Gray negative income tax experiment,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol.74, No.2, pp.242-248.
    7.Colombino, U. and D. Del Boca(1990), “The Effect of Taxes on Labor Supply in Italy,” Journal of Human Resources, Vol.25, No.3, pp.390-414.
    8.Eduardo Pontual Ribeiro and Jane H. Leuthold(1999), “Preference Structures and the Excess Burden of Income Taxes in Brazil,” Public Finance Review, Vol.27, No.3, pp.243-261.
    9.Hall, R.(1973), “Wage, Income, and Hours of Work in the U.S. Labor Force” in Cain and Watts, eds., Income Maintenance and Labor Supply, Chicago : University Press.
    10.Hausman, J.(1979), “The Econometrics of Labor Supply on Convex Budget Sets,” Economics Letters 3.
    11._________(1981a), “Labor Supply” in : H. Aaron and H. Pechman, eds., How Taxes Effect Economic Activity, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
    12._________(1981b), “Exact Consumers’ Surplus and Deadweight Loss,” American Economic Review, Vol.71.
    13._________, and Rudd P.(1984), “Family Labor Supply with Taxes,” American Economic Review, Vol.74.
    14._________(1983), “Taxes and Labor Supply,” NBER Working Paper No.1102, National Bureau of Economic Research.
    15._________(1985), “Taxes and Labor Supply” in : A. J. Auerbach and M. Feldstein, eds., Handbook of Public Economics, Vol.1, pp.213-263, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    16.Paker, J. and L. Shaw(1968), “Labor Force Participation in Metropolitan Areas,” Southern Economic Journal, Vol.34, No.3, pp.31-44.
    17.Tella, A. D. Tella and C. Green(1971), The Hours of Work and Family Income Response to Negative Income Tax Plans, Michigan: Upjohn Institute.
    18.Von Soest, A., I. Woittiez, A. Kapteyn(1990), “Labor Supply, Income Taxes, and Hours Restriction in the Netherlands,” Journal of Human Resources, Vol.25, No.3, pp.517-558.
    19.Wales, T. and A. Woodland(1976), “Estimation of Household Utility Function and Labor Supply Response,” International Economic Review, Vol.17, No.2, pp.397-410.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政學系
    87255011
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002001841
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2271View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback