政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/81764

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/81764

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51057113 Online Users : 945

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Department of Public Administration > Theses > Item 140.119/81764

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81764

Title:	流動性認知對民眾重分配政策態度之研究 The study between prospect of upward mobility and preference to redistributive policy
Authors:	郭建佑
Contributors:	董祥開郭建佑
Keywords:	POUM理論重分配政策社會流動
Date:	2016
Issue Date:	2016-03-02
Abstract:	Benabou與Ok 提出POUM理論架構以分析民眾流動性預期以及重分配政策偏好之間的關係，渠等指出人們即便目前的社經地位低於社會平均，但如果預期將來自己會向上流動到高於社會平均，則這股向上流動的預期會削弱他們對重分配政策的偏好；同樣的，Piketty認為人們在成長過程的經歷會影響到他們成年後的重分配政策偏好；也因此人們目前的重分配政策偏好，是受到他們過去的流動性經歷以及未來的流動性預期所形塑。本研究利用TEDS2013年面訪資料庫，以敘述統計與二元羅吉斯迴歸分析臺灣民眾的重分配政策偏好是否受到他們的流動性認知所影響，經過實證分析後，有下列幾個研究發現：第一，臺灣民眾的重分配政策偏好會因政策不同而不同。第二，有樂觀的流動性認知者的確較反對政府的重分配政策。第三，個體層級的流動性預期較總體層級的流動性預期更具影響力。第四、和流動性經歷相比，流動性預期的影響力較具有邏輯與一致性。這些發現有助於將來臺灣更多研究來檢視POUM理論以及流動性認知與重分配政策偏好的關係。
Reference:	中文文獻丘昌泰（2013）。公共政策（3）。台北：巨流。何智翔、林翠芬（2011）。我國人民對政府重分配政策偏好之探討。當代財政，3，P61-74。余致力、毛壽龍、陳敦源、郭昱瑩（2008）。公共政策（1），台北：智勝。余振華、蔡佳泓（2011）。社會公平與經濟發展：臺灣民眾的政策意向之初探。社會科學論叢，5(2)，P135-172 宋明志（2008）。公共風險管理。台北：五南。徐偉初、歐俊男、謝文勝（2012）。財政學（3）。台北：華泰。張傳賢（2014）。利己或利他：民眾於2012年總統選舉中重分配議題的立場。選舉研究，21(2)，P43-80。張福建（2006年5月）。公民權與社會正義：羅爾斯公民觀念的分析。臺灣社會變遷基本調查第八次研討會，台北。陳文學、羅清俊（2012）。影響臺灣民眾重分配政策偏好的因素。人文及社會科學集刊，24(3)，P367-397。黃紀（主編）(2013)。臺灣選舉與民主化調查(TEDS)方法論之回顧與前瞻（1）台北：五南。黃德福、謝俊義、劉嘉薇（2010）。臺灣民眾政治信任與政策偏好之研究。台北：行政院研究發展考核委員（編號：978-986-02-5325-2），未出版。羅清俊（1988）。分配政策研究的發展與應用。人文及社會科學集刊，10(4)，575-609。蘇偉業（譯）（2010）。公共政策入門（Smith, K. & C., W. Larimer.原著）。台北：五南。英文文獻 Alesina, A., & E. L. Ferrara. (2005). Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5), 897-931. Alesina., A. & P. Giuliano. (2009). Preference for Redistribution. National Bureau of Economic Research ,14825,1-38. Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. The economic journal, 100(401), 464-477. Benabou, R., & , E. A. OK. (2001). Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: the POUM hypothesis. National Bureau of Economic Research, 116(2), 447-489. Buscha, F. (2012). Financial expectations and the ‘left–right’political value scale: Testing for the POUM hypothesis. Economics Letters, 115(3), 460-464. Chang, W. C. (2010). Religion and preferences for redistributive policies in an East Asian country. Poverty & Public Policy, 2(4), 81-109. Checchi, D., & A. Filippin. (2003). An experimental study of the POUM hypothesis. Res. Econ, 121, 115-136 Cojocaru, A. (2014). Prospects of upward mobility and preferences for redistribution: evidence from the Life in Transition Survey. European Journal of Political Economy, 34, 300-314. Dabalen, A., Parinduri, R. A., &, P. Saumik (2015). The effects of the intensity, timing and persistence of personal history of mobility on support for redistribution in transition countries. Economics of Transition, 23(2), 565-595. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6nd Ed). London : Pearson. Isaksson, A. S., & A. Lindskog. (2009). Preferences for redistribution—A country comparison of fairness judgements. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72(3), 884-902. James, C., & W. Savedoff. (2010). Risk pooling and redistribution in health care: an empirical analysis of attitudes toward solidarity. World health report, 5(1), 4-26. Keely L. C & C. M. Tan. (2008). Understanding Preferences for Income Redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 92( 5), 944– 961. Litwin, G. H., & Stringer Jr, R. A. (1968). Motivation and organizational climate. DC: Harvard University Press. Lowi, T. (1972). Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice. Public Administration Review, 33, 298-310. Meier, K. J. (2007). Politics and the bureaucracy: Policymaking in the Fourth Branch of Government (4th ed.). TX: Harcourt College Publishers. Peterson, P. (1995). The price of federalism. D.C: The Brookings Institution. Piketty, T. (1995). Social mobility and redistributive politics. The Quarterly journal of economics, 110(3), 551-584. Rainer, H., & T. Siedler. (2008). Subjective income and employment expectations and preferences for redistribution. Economics Letters, 99(3), 449-453. Ravallion, M., & M. Lokshin. (2000). Who wants to redistribute? The tunnel effect in 1990s Russia. Journal of public Economics, 76(1), 87-104. Rehm, P. (2005). Citizen support for the welfare state: Determinants of preferences for income redistribution. WZB Markets and Political Economy Working Paper 2,2-39. Rehm, P. (2009). Risks and redistribution an individual-level analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 42(7), 855-881. Robbins, S.P. (2013). Organisational behavior (15rdEd.). AU: Pearson Higher Education. Schildberg-Hörisch, H. (2010). Is the veil of ignorance only a concept about risk? An experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 94(11), 1062-1066.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學公共行政學系 102256029
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1022560291
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Public Administration] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
029101.pdf		1516Kb	Adobe PDF2	385	View/Open
029102.pdf		1516Kb	Adobe PDF2	284	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback