Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81573
|
| Title: | 身心障礙者生存機會與社會適應
Life Chances and Social Adaptation of People with Disability in Taiwan |
| Authors: | 陳雅琪
Chen, Ya Chi |
| Contributors: | 林佳瑩
Lin, Chia Ying
陳雅琪
Chen, Ya Chi |
| Keywords: | 中途致障
累積的不利
障礙人口特徵
生存機會
becoming disabled
cumulative disadvantages
characteristics of people with disability
life chances |
| Date: | 2015 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-03-01 10:50:22 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 過去，我們常以旁觀者的觀點出發，以局外人的角度設想身心障礙者所面對的問題，對身心障礙者的了解十分有限。不當的對待或歧視，往往限制了身心障礙者的生存機會，使其處於弱勢中的弱勢，導致身心障礙者及其家庭陷於重重困境之中。
鑒於過去研究對於身心障礙者之統計資訊的缺乏，以及個案分析難以釐清人口群之特徵，本研究著眼於解析障礙圖像，並以不同生命階段可能面對之危機及重要生命事件做為切入的角度，探討身心障礙者在過去三十餘年生存機會與社會適應之差異。由於公務統計之資訊無法呈現細部的障礙者生命歷程，本研究輔以身心障礙國民生活需求調查資料，釐清導致障礙的時點對障礙者可能產生的影響，並分析其需求與福利資源之契合度，以檢討政策施行對身心障礙者造成行為或生存機會的改變。
研究使用民國101年（2012）內政部統計處社會經濟資料庫，以及衛生福利部之統計資訊為主，透過地理資訊系統的呈現，描繪出身心障礙者的分布狀況，以及資源分配的情況。有關生存機會的差異，採用民國99年人口及住宅普查全臺閩地區資料與民國100年身心障礙者生活狀況調查原始資料相互對照，以不同生命歷程作為主要的軸線，釐清障礙者與非障礙者的生存機會（就學、就業、婚育）與多元差異。
研究發現，都會區的障礙人口龐大，偏鄉、山地區域的障礙人口佔總人口比例卻十分驚人。身心障礙者之教育程度較低、成為非勞動力的比例較高，此外，身心障礙者較一般人不易進入婚姻，在進入婚姻後，又曝露於更高的離婚風險。從不同致障時間來看，先天致障者面臨較低的教育、婚育機會，但是在就業部分沒有較大的差異；智能障礙者、慢性精神病患者面臨各種機會的弱勢，然而，兩者致障的時間卻有不一樣的情境；自閉症則是在婚育機會中與智能障礙者同等弱勢，但是在教育和就業面向則有較好的表現。
研究建議，障礙發生的時程反映不同的情境，如以同一套的處遇模式，是無法滿足障礙者的需求。在地方資源分配不均的情況下，應考量福利介入最佳的時點與資源，改善身心障礙者不利的處境，增強其社會適應之可能。
In the past, misunderstanding of people with disabled resulted in improper treatment or discrimination. This perspective of an outsider vision limited their life chances, and their families were caught in a predicament.
Given the lack of previous studies for the disabilities of statistical information, as well as case studies is difficult to clarify the characteristics of population groups, this study focuses on displaying maps of disability, and exploring different life courses in which people may be in face of crisis and major life events. Since the official statistics of the information cannot render detail of life course, researcher supplemented by survey data, to clarify the impact on the time of becoming disabled, to analyze the fitness of welfare resources and needs, and to review the implementation of the policy.
Research on the use of the Republic of China 101 years (2012) at the Ministry of the Interior statistics socio-economic database, as well as the Ministry of Health and Welfare statistics information mainly through geographic information system, depicting the distribution of people with disabilities, and the distribution of resources. Researcher also use the data of Republic of China 2010 Population and Housing Census in Taiwan and Fujian area, and 2011 Physically and Mentally Disabled Citizens Living and Demand Assessment Survey to clarify differences life chances about education, employment, marriage and child rearing.
The study found that a large number of people with disability live in urban area; however, the proportion of disability is alarming in mountainous regions and rural area. People with disability are lower educated, have less chances to become labor forces. In addition, compared with people without disability, people with disability have less chances to get married. Even getting married, they are easier to be divorced. People born to be disabled are lower educated, have less chances to get married and to have babies, compared with those who are not born to be disabled. People with mentally disability and chronic psychosis face disadvantaged opportunities, but their time of being disabled are totally different. People with autism and mentally disability have less chances of getting married and having babies, but the former with higher educated and higher chances to be employed.
Research suggested that the time of becoming disability reflecting different situations. As a result, we have to concern the life course and timing of becoming disabled, and to provide appropriate resources for people with disability. Owing to uneven distribution of resources, we should consider the welfare of the best intervention point with the right resources to improve the well-being of people with disability and enhance their social adaptation. |
| Reference: | 內政部統計年報，歷年。
王育瑜（2003）。〈瑞典、英國中途致障者職業重建模式〉，《社區發展季刊》，101，445-452。
王育瑜（2011）。〈「中途障礙」的概念內涵與障礙事件對個體及家庭之衝擊：南投縣服務提供者觀點的探究〉。台灣社會福利學刊，9(2) ，頁185-234。
王國羽（2012）。障礙概念模式與理論發展。收錄於《障礙研究：理論與政策應用》，王國羽、林昭吟、張恆豪主編，頁43-70。
王國羽（2008）。身心障礙國民健康政策白皮書：普同主義與權益保障之實踐。身心障礙研究，6(1)，頁13-36。
王國羽（1995）。殘障的定義系統與社會福利政策的運用。公共衛生學刊，22(1)，頁51-61。
王國羽（2004）。老年、障礙：研究概念取向與我國資料討論。身心障礙研究，2(3)，頁134-159。
林萬億（2010）。社會福利。台北：五南。
林萬億、劉燦宏等（2014）。臺灣身心障礙者權益與福利。台北：五南。
林勝義（2008）社會政策與社會立法。台北：五南。
周月清（2000）。障礙福利與社會工作，台北：五南。
周月清、彭淑芬、舒靜嫻、鄭芬芳（2004）。〈中途障礙社會模式介入與生活重建服務整合─伊甸、新事暨揚光服務方案為例〉，《臺灣社會工作學刊》，2，123-157。
社團法人中華民國殘障聯盟編著（2011）。臺灣身心障礙年鑑 : 1990-2010。臺北市：中華民國殘障聯盟。
許世芳（2005）。〈台灣人口的慢性疾病生命表〉，未出版之碩士論文。長庚大學醫務管理學研究所。
許志成（2012）。《身心障礙者提前老化及平均餘命基礎研究》。行政院衛生署委託研究報告。
梁玲郁、張傢鈺、黃旭明、藍忠孚（2008）。《台灣地區無失能平均餘命趨勢－疾病擴張或壓縮》。「少子女化與高齡化社會的人口挑戰-人口政策與人口發展課題」臺灣人口學會2008年學術研討會。臺北：臺灣大學。
黃源協、蕭文高（2011）。《社會政策與社會立法》(第二版)。台北：雙葉。
陳寬政（2004）。〈老人健康狀況與慢性疾病之發展〉，國科會委託研究計畫。
陳曉瑩（2006）。〈中途致障者就業支持服務理念〉，《工業安全衛生月刊》，12，14-16。
郭駿耀（2004）。〈人口老化與健保費率〉，未出版之碩士論文。長庚大學醫務管理學研究所。
蘇峰山、張恆豪（2009）。〈戰後台灣國小教科書中的障礙者意象分析〉，《臺灣社會學刊》，42，143-188。
臺北縣政府社會局（2010）。《幸福轉動之間 圓夢計畫十一篇章》。台北：電腦王。
Cabinet Office – Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit (2005) Improving the Life Chances of Disabled People. London: Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit.
Hendriks, Aart. (1995). Disabled Persons and Their Right to Equal Treatment: Allowing Differentiation While ending Discrimination. Health and Human Rights, 1(2), 153-173.
World Health Organization and World Bank (2011). World Report on Disability. Geneva: WHO.
Lonsdale, S. (1990). Women and disability: The experience of physical disability among women. New York: St. Martin`s Press.
Mason, Philip & Trollope, Anthony. (2005). “Chapter 1: An Introduction to the Study of Social Inequality” In Social Inequality: Patterns & Processes, edited by Mager, Martin N. ,1-24. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mayer, Karl Ulrich.(2005). “Life Courses and Life Chances in a Comparative Perspective” In Analyzing inequality : life chances and social mobility in comparative perspective, edited by Stefan Svallfors. Calif. : Stanford University Press.
Rimmerman, Arie. (2015). Family policy and disability. New York, USA : Cambridge University Press.
Swain, J., French, S. and Cameron, C. (2003). Controversial Issues in a Disabling Society. Buckingham: Open University Press. |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
社會學系
96254501 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096254501 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [社會學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 450101.pdf | 3174Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 120 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
