English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50951530      Online Users : 969
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/81463
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81463


    Title: 臺灣上市櫃董監事薪酬影響因子與投資組合
    Determinants of Board Compensation of Taiwan Listed Companies and Investment Portfolios
    Authors: 李宛諭
    Li, Wan Yu
    Contributors: 盧敬植
    Liu, Ching Chih
    李宛諭
    Li, Wan Yu
    Keywords: 董監薪酬
    董事會特性
    公司特性
    經營績效
    投資組合
    board compensation
    board characteristics
    firm characteristics
    corporate performance
    portfolio
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2016-03-01 10:27:31 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究主要探討我國上市櫃公司的董監薪酬影響因素,採用新制董監薪酬揭露制度,將董監事兼任經理人、兼任員工的薪酬與分紅排除後,以董監薪酬合計和平均董監薪酬作為研究對象。本研究以2005年至2013年所有上市上櫃(含下市下櫃)的公司為研究樣本,並使用普通最小平方法則和固定效果模型進行檢測影響董監薪酬因子。
    研究結果發現我國上市櫃公司的董監薪酬確實受到董事會特性、公司特性以及公司經營績效影響。董事會特性中以董事會規模、董監事持股比例和董事兼任經理人比例具有顯著之影響;公司特性以公司規模、負債比例、股價日報酬波動度和投資機會均對董監薪酬具顯著影響;最後,公司經營績效指標中以Tobin`s Q、資產報酬率、營業收入淨額與股利殖利率與董監薪酬呈顯著正向影響。這表示我國公司在制定公司董監薪酬時,確實會考量其董事會特性、公司特性以及公司之經營績效。
    最後,本研究使用迴歸式的殘差項由大至小組合投資組合以觀察其績效表現,殘差項最大(小)投資組合表示支付過高(低)董監薪酬的公司,研究發現並無法從投資組合的績效表現看出支付過高(低)董監薪酬對公司股價報酬表現之影響,本研究認為這可能是因為支付過高董監薪酬可能同時包含因為該公司的董監事之能力佳而支付較高的薪酬亦可能該公司的董監事僅為坐領高薪的肥貓。
    This study empirically examines variables that influence director compensation of Taiwanese companies. With new disclosure rule for board compensation, we exclude the salaries and bonus of concurrently serving as managers or employees, and divide board compensation as total director compensation and average director compensation. We collect 2005 to 2013 listed companies on Taiwan Stock Exchange and Taipei Exchange as research samples. In our regression analysis, we distinguish three types of determinants: board characteristics, firm characteristics and corporate performance.
    Using ordinary least squares estimator method and fixed effect method, our results show that board characteristics, firm characteristics and corporate performance do affect board compensation. We find board size, directors’ equity holding ratio and the ratio of director concurrently serving as manager that significant influence director compensation. From the aspect of firm characteristics, results show that firm size, leverage ratio, daily stock returns volatility and investment opportunity also significant influence director compensation. We also provide evidence that higher Tobin’s Q, ROA, sales and dividend yield, higher director compensation.
    Finally, we use residuals from the regression to construct portfolios and observe their performance. The portfolio with highest (lowest) residuals considers as companies overpaying (underpaying) their directors. However, from performance of portfolios, we cannot conclude that directors are overpaid or underpaid can reflect companies future performance, since directors are overpaid may because of their extraordinary ability or simply because they are fat cats.
    Reference: 一、 中文文獻
    江俞庭,《橡膠股》股東批董監酬勞太高,正新:已下調,上網日期104年7月7日,檢自:http://ctee.com.tw/LiveNews/Content.aspx?nid=20150611002731-260410&ch=aj

    周昭平,日月光董監報酬完勝台積電 員工卻淪科技勞工,上網日期104年7月7日,檢自:http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20150427/600057/

    周振鋒,(2014)。美國Say-on-pay制度介紹與引進可行性之分析。法學評論,第137期,頁217-266。

    林郁馨,(2014)。公開發行公司經營者薪酬決定機制之實證分析—兼論薪資報酬委員會新制。中研院法學期刊,第14期,頁245-317。

    林穎芬,(2012)。臺灣上市公司董事薪酬影響因子之研究。臺大管理論叢,第23卷,第1期,頁175-208。

    陳春山、李彥興、陳清祥,(2011)。強制設置薪酬委員會之影響。出版者:新學林。

    蔡昌憲,(2012)。評我國強制設置薪酬委員會之立法政策—從經濟分析及美國金融改革法談起。中研院法學期刊,第11期,頁249-340。

    賴英照,(2011)。股市遊戲規則—最新證券交易法解析。出版者:元照總經銷。

    二、 英文文獻
    Agrawal, A. and G. N. Mandelker (1987). "Managerial Incentives and Corporate Investment and Financing Decisions." The Journal of Finance 42(4): 823-837.

    Becher, D. A., et al. (2005). "Incentive Compensation for Bank Directors: The Impact of Deregulation." The Journal of Business 78(5): 1753-1778.

    Brick, I. E., et al. (2006). "CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism?" Journal of Corporate Finance 12(3): 403-423.

    Bryan, S., et al. (2000). "CEO Stock‐Based Compensation: An Empirical Analysis of Incentive‐Intensity, Relative Mix, and Economic Determinants." The Journal of Business 73(4): 661-693.

    Bryan, S., et al. (2000). "Compensation of Outside Directors: An Empirical Analysis of Economic Determinants."

    Bryan, S., et al. (2006). "Can the agency costs of debt and equity explain the changes in executive compensation during the 1990s?" Journal of Corporate Finance 12(3): 516-535.

    Bryan, S. H., et al. (2000). "Compensation of outside directors: An empirical analysis of economic determinants."

    Coles, J. L., et al. (2008). "Boards: Does one size fit all?" Journal of Financial Economics 87: 329-356.

    Conyon, M. J. (1997). "Corporate governance and executive compensation." International Journal of Industrial Organization 15(4): 493-509.

    E., H. B. and W. M. S. (1998). "Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO." American Economic Review: 96-118.

    Fama, E. F. and M. C. Jensen (1983). "Separation of Ownership and Control." Journal of Law and Economics 26(2): 301-325.

    Ferreira, R. B. A. D. (2009). "Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance." Journal of Financial Economics 94(2): 291-309.

    Fich, E. M. and A. Shivdasani (2006). "Are Busy Boards Effective Monitors?" The Journal of Finance 61(2): 689-724.

    Finkelstein, S. and D. C. Hambrick (1989). "Chief Executive Compensation: A Study of the Intersection of Markets and Political Processes." Strategic Management Journal 10(2): 121.

    Gaver, J. J. and K. M. Gaver (1995). "Compensation Policy and the Investment Opportunity Set." Financial Management 24(1): 19-32.

    Gillette, A. B., et al. (2003). "Corporate board composition, protocols, and voting behavior: experimental evidence." The Journal of Finance 58: 1997-2031.

    Gompers, P. A., et al. (2003). "Corporate Governance and Equity Prices." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1): 107-155.

    Jensen, M. C. (1986). "Agency cost of free cash flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers." American Economic Review 76(2).

    JENSEN, M. C. (1993). "The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems." The Journal of Finance 48(3): 831-880.

    John, K. and L. W. Senbet (1998). "Corporate governance and board effectiveness." Journal of Banking & Finance 22: 371-403.

    Jr., H. E. R. and R. A. W. III (2004). "Who is in whose pocket? Director compensation, board independence, and barriers to effective monitoring." Journal of Financial Economics 73: 497-524.

    Linn, S. C. and D. Park (2005). "Outside director compensation policy and the investment opportunity set." Journal of Corporate Finance 11: 680-715.

    Lipton, M. and J. W. Lorsch (1992). "A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance." The Business Lawyer 48(1): 59-77.

    Maug, E. (1997). "Boards of directors and capital structure: Alternative forms of corporate restructuring " Journal of Corporate Finance 3: 113-139.

    Mehran, H. (1995). "Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance." Journal of Financial Economics 38: 163-184.

    Michael, J. and M. William H. (1976). "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure." Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305-360.

    Perfecta, S. B. and K. W. Wiles (1994). "Alternative constructions of Tobin`s q: An empirical comparison." Journal of Empirical Finance 1(3): 313-341.

    Prendergast, C. (2000). "What trade-off of risk and incentives?" American Economic Review: 421-425.

    Prendergast, C. (2002). "Uncertainty and Incentives." Journal of Labor Economics 20(2): S115-S137.

    W., C., et al. (1992). "The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies." Journal of Financial Economics 32(3): 263-292.

    Williamson, O. E. (1988). "Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance." The Journal of Finance 43(3): 567-591.

    Yermack, D. (1996). "Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors." Journal of Financial Economics 40: 185-211.

    Yermack, D. (2004). "Remuneration, Retention, and Reputation Incentives for Outside Directors." The Journal of Finance 59(5): 2281-2308.
    (5).
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理研究所
    102357011
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1023570112
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback