数据加载中.....
|
请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81254
|
| 题名: | 以零件類別考量，從中心廠角度探討跨國供應鏈策略－以台灣自行車產業為例
Discuss the international supply chain from the perspective of Central Factory, based on categories of component：Taiwanese bicycle industry as example |
| 作者: | 江哲毅 |
| 贡献者: | 羅明琇
Lo, Sonia M.
江哲毅 |
| 关键词: | 供應商選擇組合的進入模式
跨國供應鏈
產業群聚
自行車產業
Supplier Portfolio Entry Model
International Supply Chain
Industrial Cluster
Bicycle Industry |
| 日期: | 2015 |
| 上传时间: | 2016-02-15 10:06:42 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | 近年來，政府大力推行台商返鄉投資已引起不小迴響。回顧台商的跨國移動，經營者們不斷追尋各地的優勢條件，投入廠房設備生產具競爭力的產品，期望建立最適切的跨國供應鏈。本研究以供應商選擇組合的進入模式理論作為核心，探討企業在建構跨國供應鏈時，如何就不同零件性質考量選擇適合的進貨來源，讓供應鏈得以順利運作，例如透過母廠自製、本地廠商外包，甚至進口等方式，進行供應鏈佈局的策略探討。
本研究選定自行車產業做為研究對象，原因為台灣自行車產業已發展出中心協力工廠體系的產業群聚型態，透過觀察成車廠深化的夥伴關係，主導零件廠策略走向，進行跨國境的產業鏈移轉與發展。本研究以台灣自行車產業的兩大龍頭廠商，捷安特與美利達，為資料收集對象，並蒐集台灣廠進貨數據資料進行分析。
根據訪談資料之研究結果，本研究從兩成車廠過去的發展軌跡，整理出企業評估跨國供應鏈建置時的考量因素，從市場、地理區域層面思考利基點，再透過軟硬兼施的兩面手段，拉攏各種來源的供應商，以解決對岸早期供應鏈資源匱乏的困境。本研究接著整理A-Team組織的成效，它改變了台灣自行車的產業體質，訂定走向發展自有品牌的高單價路線，也讓兩岸供應鏈配置出現分野，大陸重視量產能力，台灣重視品質質量。最後本研究比較兩成車廠發展狀況，找出兩間企業在跨國供應鏈管理上的差異點，例如美利達採行整合兩岸供應鏈資源策略，捷安特則以貼近市場、當地供應等原則，供應鏈獨立發展。
本研究亦透過進貨資料分析，以技術門檻、進貨金額、本地進貨比率等三項指標，修改原供應商選擇組合的進入模式模型，藉此歸納出美利達台灣區進貨零件的三類群組特性，以及台灣一般平均成車廠進貨零件的兩類群組特性。除有多產品線、專利權保護等特殊零件外，其餘技術門檻與進貨金額皆低者，適合從本地進貨，反之需仰賴國外資源。
本研究證實供應商選擇組合的進入模式有實際運用價值，但操作上需依照不同條件狀況，修正零件分類標準，並尋找能取代第二階段的需求線的指標。此外本研究針對國內有意拓展海外供應鏈的自行車成車廠、零件廠，以及其他製造產業，分別給予不同意見，期待藉由系統性的工具輔助，企業可建構出體質健全之供應鏈。然而，本研究面臨的限制為只站在成車廠本位思考，忽略零件廠商的利益思考，因此未來的研究方向，可從零件廠商的角度，再比較兩者利益是否一致。
During the past few years, Taiwanese government have introduced home-coming investment policy, which is supported by many oversea Taiwanese entrepreneurs. For these businesses, that are always moving internationally in order to find the most suitable place to ensure a complete supply chain. In this research, “supplier portfolio entry model” is used to drive the international supply chain strategy, such as homemade or outsourcing etc., in the aspect of different categories of component.
Bicycle industry is focused, due to that bicycle industry in Taiwan has develop a center-satellite system, where assembly factories dominate their suppliers for international strategy development by deep partnership can be observed. Furthermore, it was an honor to invite the top two bicycle assembly factories in Taiwan, Merida and Giant, for data collection.
According to research result, it is observed businesses evaluate their international supply chain in the view of geographic benefit and market demand, then solicit suppliers in Taiwan, this is to transfer by using both carrot and stick for the purpose to solve the problem of the lack of supply chain resource in China. Besides, effects of A-Team are elaborated, which upgrades Taiwanese bicycle industry, making its product become quality and fostering its own brand. Henceforth, Chinese factories focus on production quantity and Taiwanese factories on quality. In which this research compare the difference of Merida and Giant in the way of how they run their international supply chain. For example, Merida tends to leverage its supply chain resource between Taiwan and China; on the other hand, Giant is inclined to keep its supply chain independent.
In addition, this research modify the supplier portfolio entry model by using new index. The factors are technical threshold, the amount of component sourcing and local sourcing rate. With these, Merida’s component suppliers are categorized into three different types and two categorize for Taiwanese bicycle industry. With exception for the product with diverse product-line or under property right protection, this research suggest low technical components source from local suppliers and high technical ones purchase from foreign company.
In conclusion, this research confirms practical effects of supplier portfolio entry model. However, whether to modify original index depends on different situations. Moreover, this research provide suggestions for those who plan to deploy international supply chain, such as assembly factory, component manufacturer and other Taiwanese manufacturing. And these suggestions would help Taiwanese business strengthen their supply chain. In the end, the research points out restriction as that outcome with the view of assembly factory ignoring opinions from component manufacturer. Consequently, recommendation for further research can expand in component manufacturer’s shoes and then compare results. |
| 參考文獻: | 中文部分
文崇一、楊國樞，(2000)，訪問調查法，社會及行為科學研究法下冊，台北東華。
石育賢，2004，2004汽、機、自行車產業年鑑，工業技術研究院產業經濟與資訊服務中心，台北：經濟部技術處
自行車輸出業同業公會，2015，出進口統計2014年份，台灣區自行車輸出業同業公會網站，http://www.tba-cycling.org/
李政賢、廖志恒、林靜如譯，2007，質性研究導論(原作者：Flick, U.)，台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司(原著出版年： 1995年)
吳克，2005，策略夥伴選擇準則與聯盟不穩定性之研究－以台灣半導體產業為例，東吳經濟商學學報，49，75-110
吳思華，2000，「策略九說-策略思考的本質」，台北市：臉譜出版
吳濟華、李亭林、陳協勝、何柏正，2012，產業群聚與區域創新：聚集經濟理論與實證，新北市：前程文化
金家禾、周志龍，2007，臺灣產業群聚區域差異及中國效應衝擊，地理學報，49，55-79
邱瑞淙，2006，供應鏈協同之策略性夥伴關係研究--以國內汽車製造業為研究對象，取自臺灣博碩士論文系統(系統編號：095PU005026008)
美利達公司，2014，美利達公司102年度公司年報，11-59
張永佶，2004，並聯型新產品開發模式－台灣自行車產業的研發經驗，國立中山大學，高雄市
捷安特公司，2014，巨大機械股份有限公司102年度公司年報，1-48
陳琇玲、林宜萱譯，2004，供應鏈管理創新解決方案(原作者：大衛．史密契李維、菲利普．卡明斯基、伊蒂絲．史密契李維)，台北市：美商麥格羅‧希爾
許蕙卿，2001，影響中衛體系協力廠推行環境管理之因素與績效探討，取自臺灣博碩士論文系統(系統編號：089NCKU0320016)
葉至誠、葉立成，2001，研究方法與論文寫作，商鼎數位出版有限公司
鄭勇軍、湯筱曉，2006，跨區域產業集群整合模式研究，科學學與科學技術管理，7，102-106。
潘淑滿，2003，質性研究理論與應用，台北：心理出版社
瞿宛文、李佳靜，1999，「成長與產業組織：台灣與南韓自行車業之比較研究」，台灣社會研究季刊，35，47-73。
英文部分
Anderson, Gary (1994). “Industry clustering for economic development”. Economic Development Review, 12 (2), 26-32
Artz, K. W., & Brush, T. H. (2000). “Asset specificity, uncertainty and relational norms: an examination of coordination costs in collaborative strategic alliances.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 41(4), 337-362.
Aydin, G., Cattani, K., & Druehl, C. (2014). “Global supply chain management.” Business Horizons, 57(4), 453–457.
Babbie, E. (2004). “Survey research.” The practice of social research, 10, 242-280.
Barratt, M. (2004). “Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain.” Supply Chain Management: an international journal, 9(1), 30-42.
Barney, J. (1991). “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.” Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
Baptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998). “Do firms in clusters innovate more?.” Research policy, 27(5), 525-540.
Bask, A. H., & Juga, J. (2001). “Semi-integrated supply chains: towards the new era of supply chain management.” International Journal of Logistics, 4(2), 137-152.
Bessant, J. (2004), “More than the sum of its part’’, Financial Times, September 24, available at: www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/6ce370f0-0e0b-11d9-97d3 00000e2511c8.html#axzz1ooromzzm (accessed 7 March2012).
Bechtel, C., & Jayaram, J. (1997). “Supply Chain Management: A Strategic Perspective.” International Journal of Logistics Management, 8(1), 15–34.
Bensaou, M. (1999). “Portfolios of buyer-supplier relationships.” Sloan Management Review, 40.
Bergman, E. M., & Feser, E. J. (1999). Industrial and regional clusters: concepts and comparative applications.
Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). “Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate.” MIS quarterly, 87-111.
Booz-Allen and Hamilton. (1993). “The Impact of Supply Chain Management Practices on Competitive Advantage and Organizational Performance”, N.Y.
Bowersox, D. J. (1989). Leading edge logistics competitive positioning for the 1990s: comprehensive research on logistics organization strategy and behavior in North America. Council of Logistics Management.
Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. (1989). “Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms.” Annual review of sociology, 97-118.
Cauley de la Sierra, M. (1994). Managing global alliances. Key steps for successful collaboration. Reading, Masp. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., c1995, xi.
Caves, R.E. (1982), “Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cavinato, J. L. (2002). “What`s your supply Chain Type?” Supply Chain Management Review, 6(3), 60-66: ILL.
Cheng, H., Niu, M.-S., & Niu, K.-H. (2014). “Industrial cluster involvement, organizational learning, and organizational adaptation: an exploratory study in high technology industrial districts.” Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(5), 971–990.
Christopher, M., (1992), “Logistics and Supply Chain Management”, London: Pitman Publishing.
Connell, J., Kriz, a, & Thorpe, M. (2014). “Industry clusters: an antidote for knowledge sharing and collaborative innovation?” Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(1), 137–151.
Cook, K. (1977), “Exchange and power in networks of interorganizational relations”, Sociological Quarterly, 8, 62-8.
CSX World Terminals Glossary of Terms (2004), http://www.csxworldterminals.com/resources/glossary.asp?s=s
CSCMP. (2010). CSCMP supply chain management definitions.
den Hertog, P., & Bilderbeek, R. (1999). Conceptualizing service innovation and service innovation patterns. Research Programme on Innovation in Services (SIID) for the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Dialogic, Utrecht.
Dickson, G. W. (1996). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions.
Ellram, L. M. (1991). “A managerial guideline for the development and implementation of purchasing partnerships.” Journal of Supply Chain Management, 27(3), 2.
Fawcett, S. E., & Magnan, G. M. (2002). “The rhetoric and reality of supply chain integration.” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 32(5), 339–361.
Fedows, K. (1989), “Mapping international factory networks”, in Ferdows, K. (Ed.), Managing International Manufacturing, North-Holland, New York, NY, pp. 3-21.
Ganesan, S. (1994). “Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships.” The Journal of Marketing, 1-19.
Gallear, D., Ghobadian, A., & Chen, W. (2012). “Corporate responsibility, supply chain partnership and performance: An empirical examination.” International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 83–91.
Gao, P. (2004). “Shaping the future of China`s auto industry.” McKinsey Quarterly, 123-126.
Gibson, B. J., Mentzer, J. T., & Cook, R. L. (2005). “Supply Chain Management : the Pursuit of a Consensus Definition.” Journal of Business Logistics, 26(2), 17–25.
Granovetter, M. (1985), “Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness ”, American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
Grainger, A. (2007). Supply chain security: adding to a complex operational and institutional environment. World Customs Journal, 1(2), 17-29.
Harland, C. M. (1996). “Supply chain management: relationships, chains and networks.” British Journal of management, 7(s1), S63-S80.
Houlihan, J. B. (1988). “International supply chains: a new approach.” Management Decision, 26(3), 13-19.
Iida, T. (2012). “Coordination of cooperative cost-reduction efforts in a supply chain partnership.” European Journal of Operational Research, 222(2), 180–190.
Jahre, M., & Fabbe-Costes, N. (2005).” Adaptation and adaptability in logistics networks.” International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 8(2), 143-157.
Klepper, R., & Jones, W. O. (1998). Outsourcing information technology, systems and services. Prentice-Hall, Inc..
Kumar, K., & Van Dissel, H. G. (1996). “Sustainable collaboration: managing conflict and cooperation in interorganizational systems.” Mis Quarterly, 279-300.
Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). “Issues in supply chain management.” Industrial marketing management, 29(1), 65-83.
Lambert, D. M., Knemeyer, A. M., & Gardner, J. T. (2004). “Supply chain partnerships: model validation and implementation.” Journal of business Logistics, 25(2), 21-42.
Liao, K., & Hong, Paul. (2007). “Building global supplier networks: a supplier portfolio entry model.” Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 20(5), 511–526.
Loch, C. H., & Wu, Y. (2005). “Behavioral Operations Management.” Foundations and Trends® in Technology, Information and Operations Management, 1 (3), 121–232.
Markusen, A. (1996). “Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts.” Economic geography, 293-313.
Marshall, A. (1890), Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). “The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing.” The Journal of Marketing, 20-38.
McAdam, R., McCormack, D. (2001).”Integrating business processes for global alignment and supply chain management.” Business Process Management, 7(2), 113–130.
McCormick, D. (1999). “African enterprise clusters and industrialization: theory and reality.” World development, 27(9), 1531-1551.
Mentzer, J., DeWitt, W., & Keebler, J. (2001). “Defining supply chain management”, Journal of Business, 22(2), 1–25.
Mishler, E. G. (1986). “The analysis of interview-narratives.” TR Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct, pp. 233-255
Mohanty, R. P. and Deshmukh, S. G. (1993), “Using of Analytic Hierarchic Process for Evaluating Sources of Supply”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 23(3), pp.22-28.
Monczka, R. M., Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L. (1998). Success Factors in Strategic Supplier Alliances: The Buying Company Perspective*. Decision Sciences, 29(3), 553-577.
Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). “Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques.” Strategic management journal, 15(2), 135-152.
Niu, K.-H. (2010). “Organizational trust and knowledge obtaining in industrial clusters.” Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(1), 141–155.
Novack, R. A. & Simco, S. W. (1991), “The Industrial Procurement Process: A Supply Chain Perspective”, Journal of Business Logistics, 12(1), pp. 145-167.
O’Leary-Kelly, S. W., & Flores, B. E. (2002). The integration of manufacturing and marketing/sales decisions: impact on organizational performance. Journal of operations management, 20(3), 221-240.
Oliver, R. K., & Webber, M. D. (1982). Supply-chain management: logistics catches up with strategy. Outlook, 5(1), 42-47.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York,NY: Harper and Row.
Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The second industrial divide: possibilities for prosperity. Basic books.
Porter, M. E. (1998). Cluster and the new economics of competition.
Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization, 295-336. Greenwich, CT.
Rackham, N., Friedman, L. G., & Ruff, R. (1996). Getting partnering right: How market leaders are creating long-term competitive advantage. McGraw Hill Professional.
Sako, M. (1992). Price, quality and trust: Inter-firm relations in Britain and Japan (No. 18). Cambridge University Press.
Schiele, H. (2008).” Location: the geography of industry clusters.” Journal of Business Strategy, 29(3), 29–36.
Slack, N. and Lewis, M. (2003), “Supply network behavior”, Operations Strategy, first ed.,
Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp. 192-219.
Souza, G. C. (2014). “Supply chain analytics.” Business Horizons, 57(5), 595–605.
Sweeney, E. (2013). “Towards a Unified Definition of Supply Chain Management.” International Journal of Applied Logistics, 2(3), 30–48.
Swedenborg, B. (1979), The Multinational Operations of Swedish Firms, Almqvist & Wicksell International, Stockholm
Szwejczewski, M., Lemke, F., & Goffin, K. (2005). Manufacturer-supplier relationships: An empirical study of German manufacturing companies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(9), 875-897.
Tagaras, G. and H.L. Lee.(1996), “Economic Models for Vendor Selection With Quality Cost Analysis”, Management Science, 42(11), pp.1531-1543.
Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N. and Pinch, S. (2004), ‘‘Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage’’, Academy of Management Review, 29(2), pp. 258-71.
Teece, D., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp. 509-533.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic intstitutions of capitalism. Simon and Schuster.
Wind, Y. and Claychamp, H.J. (1976), “Planning product line strategy: a matrix approach”, Journal of Marketing, 40(1), pp. 2-9.
Youn, S., Yang, M. G. M., Hong, P., & Park, K. (2013). “Strategic supply chain partnership, environmental supply chain management practices, and performance outcomes: an empirical study of Korean firms.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 121-130. |
| 描述: | 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
102363070 |
| 資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102363070 |
| 数据类型: | thesis |
| 显示于类别: | [企業管理研究所（MBA學位學程）] 學位論文
|
文件中的档案:
| 档案 |
大小 | 格式 | 浏览次数 |
|---|
| 307001.pdf | 1830Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 258 | 检视/开启 |
|
在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.
|
