Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81212
|
| Title: | 地方政府資訊透明化研究—以我國六都地方政府網站為例
Information Transparency of Local Government: The case of Websites of Six Municipal Governments |
| Authors: | 葉蒨
Yeh, Chien |
| Contributors: | 黃東益
Huang, Tong Yi
葉蒨
Yeh, Chien |
| Keywords: | 地方政府資訊透明化
地方政府網站
內容分析法
information transparency of local government
websites of local government
content analysis |
| Date: | 2016 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-02-03 12:17:46 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 政府透明化為人民「知的權利」之一，不僅賦予民眾課責與監督政府的能力，更能維護民主制度中雙方之信任價值，而近年網際網路等電子技術日漸普及，關於政府透明化的環節亦可透過電子化的途徑開誠布公。過去我國政府透明化相關研究多以中央政府為研究對象，本研究則從我國地方政府著手，研究目的在於期藉由透明化政府相關理論與文獻，瞭解政府透明化之意涵及其重要性、地方政府資訊透明化包含哪些核心構面、與電子治理之連結性等，運用文獻分析法回顧相關資料後，接著建構評估我國地方政府資訊透明化程度之指標。近年又適逢地方政府改制，本研究於是選擇改制後的六都臺北市、新北市、桃園市、臺中市、臺南市、高雄市為研究對象，以內容分析法的方式，運用建構的指標對此六都地方政府網站加以評估，觀察其透明化程度與可再改善之處。
簡言之，本研究將我國地方政府資訊透明化之指標架構歸納為兩個構面，基礎資訊透明化包含10項指標，及財政資訊透明化包含33項指標，值得注意的是，本研究所評估財政資訊透明化涉及2014年資料，時桃園市尚未改制，故其不在本研究財政資訊透明化評估之範圍。整體而言，本研究評估六都的表現都不錯，當然也有可再努力的空間。本研究結論，除了針對評估結果未做到的項目提供建議，從民眾知的權利出發，政府應盡可能提供完善的資訊之外，也談到近年來備受關注的政府資料開放，政府若能提供基本的資訊與開放資料兩項公共服務，將能更符合不同民眾對於政府相關資訊或資料需求，此二者的連結與政府透明化究竟該到什麼程度則有待後續研究繼續探索。
Government transparency not only provides the people with the ability to hold government accountable, but also serves to sustain trust in the government within a democratic system. Recently, the increasing popularity of information and communication technologies, have made the Internet an important link in the enforcement of government transparency.
Previous studies on government transparency have mostly been concentrated on central governments. This research chooses instead to focus on local governments. This research aims to uncover the importance and the concepts of government transparency, the the fundamental dimensions of local government information transparency assessment framework, and the connection between government transparency and E-governance, from previous studies. After reviewing and integrating the literature, this study then constructs a framework for the assessment of Taiwan’s local government information transparency. Taiwan has recently undergone an extensive local government restructuring, thus this research has made the six special municipalities, which were most restructured, the objects of analysis. The special municipalities include, Taipei City, New Taipei City, Taoyuan City, Taichung City, Tainan City, and Kaohsiung City. The research utilizes content analysis methods and the indicator framework constructed, to assess the websites of the six municipal governments. Observations, on the level of transparency and on areas in need of improvement, were made.
In short, the assessment framework of local government information transparency includes two aspects. The first is on basic information transparency with 10 indicators. The other is on fiscal information transparency with 33 indicators. It is important to note that since Taoyuan City had not been restructured into a special municipality by 2014, but data for financial transparency includes those for that year, this research would not include Taoyuan in the financial transparency assessments.
In sum, the study finds that the transparency of six municipal government websites, is decent. However, there are some indicators can be improved. The study concludes that the governments should provide more complete information to the public, in order to satisfy the public’s demand for government data. These approaches will increase citizen’s rights in obtaining government related information. This research also suggests that the connection between government information transparency and open government data is a subject worthy of further study. |
| Reference: | 王文信（2009）。臺北市政府執行公職人員財產申報制度資源之研究。國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
王雲東（2007）。社會研究方法：量化與質性取向及其應用。臺北縣：威仕曼文化。
古清華（1993）。資訊化社會中政府資訊公開之理論與問題初探。資訊法務透析， 5(11)，24-39。
立法院國會圖書館。政府資訊公開法與國家機密保護法。2015年5月，取自立法院國會圖書館網站。網址：http://npl.ly.gov.tw/do/www/billIntroductionContent?id=3 。
江思穎（2014）。政府資料開放評估指標建立。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
何全德（2012）。改變與感動的力量－電子化政府服務創新策略。研考雙月刊， 36(5)，55-70。
余致力、洪永泰、謝立功、陳俊明、莊文忠、陳偉華（2005）。國家廉政體系及指標之建構報告書。臺北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。
吳慧勤（2009）。政府機關資訊公開電子化執行現況之研究—以台北縣政府為例。國立政治大學公行政學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
呂育誠（2003）。電子化政府對地方政府管理的意涵與影響。法政學報，16，147-178。
呂育誠（2006）。地方政府管理－結構與功能的分析（二版）。臺北：元照。
李志強（2007）。陽光法案－以我國公職人員財產申報法為例。通識研究集刊，1(1)，193-216。
周志榮（2013）。實踐行政透明措施 打造乾淨廉能政府。公共治理季刊，1(1)，121-129。
周韻采（2003）。電子化政府績效的比較研究：以政府入口網站為例。公共行政學報，9，35-58。
林宜諄（1997）。亞洲國力網路決戰。天下雜誌，198，131-132。
林明鏘（1993）。公務機密與行政資訊公開。臺大法學論叢，23(1)，51-86。doi: 10.6199/ntulj.1993.23.01.03。
俞可平（2002）。中國公民社會的興起與治理。北京：人民出版社。
政府資訊公開法（民國94年12月28日）與立法理由。
孫本初（2010）。公共管理。臺北市：智勝文化。
國家法展委員會電子化政府計畫。網址：http://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=E0C48B7F39ACB61F 。
國家廉政建設行動方案（2014年4月15日修）。
莊文忠、洪永泰、陳俊明、蔡季廷（2015）。臺灣公共治理指標調查之研究。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告（編號：RDEC-TPG-101-001）。臺北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。
許慶復（1991）。我國政治獻金問題之研究。臺北市：內政部委託研究。
陳怡君（2013）。開放政府資料迎接資料民主新時代。公共治理季刊，1(1)，156-163。
陳昭珍（2005）。全球資訊自由與取用政府資訊之現況研究。研考雙月刊，29(3)，73-87。
陳美伶（2005）。現行政府資訊公開法制及其落實。研考雙月刊，29(3)，20-29。
陳祥（2003）。電子化政府整合型入口網站服務功能之研究。行政院研考會委託研究報告（編號：RDEC-RES-091-013）。臺北市：行政院研考會。
陳敦源（2009）。2020年台灣電子治理願景與方向：情境規劃的運用。行政院研考會委託研究報告（編號：09640D002503）。臺北市：行政院研考會。
陳朝建（2010）。地方政府透明化之分析與評估－以桃園縣龜山鄉為例。公共政策與地方治理─地方自治論文集(2009)，119-129。
陳舜伶、林珈宏、莊庭瑞（2013）。藏智於民：開放政府資料的原則與現況。臺北：中央研究院臺灣創用CC計畫。
項靖（2000）。線上政府：我國政府WWW網站之內涵與演變。行政暨政策學報，4，259-286。
項靖（2008）。電子治理關係之調適。行政院研考會委託研究報告（編號：09640D002503）。臺北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。
項靖（2009）。透明化電子治理：以網站落實政府資訊公開。行政院研考會委託研究報告（編號：0972461343）。臺北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。
項靖、楊東謀（2012）。資訊分享與共榮：政府機關資料公開與加值應用。行政院研考會委託研究報告（編號：RDEC-RES-101002）。臺北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。
項靖（2001）。公務人員對政府資訊公開制度的見解之探究，法政學報，12，1-52。
黃東益、黃佳珊（2003）。地方政府「數位民主」機制--以台灣省二十一縣市政府網站為例。法政學報，16，179-202。
黃振嘉譯（2007）。大眾媒體研究導論（Wimmer & Dominick原著）。臺北市：湯姆生。
黃朝盟、李仲彬（2001）。電子化政府的網站設計：台灣省二十一縣市政府WWW網站內容分析，中國行政，69，47-74。
楊泰順、蕭國忠、鄭子真（2012）。我國政治獻金制度改革之研究。內政部委託研究報告（編號：RRPG10105-0231-2751535）。臺北市：內政部。
葉俊榮（1998）。邁向電子化政府：資訊公開與行政程序的挑戰。經社法制論叢，22，1-49。
葉俊榮（2003）。民主轉型與金錢政治的法律因應。國家發展研究，2(2)，1-29。
蔡美娜（2008）。中央政府財政資訊透明度之研究。國立臺灣大學政治學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
蕭景燈（2012）。資料開放發展現況與展望。研考雙月刊，36(4)，22-38。
聯合國世界人權宣言（1948）。世界人權宣言官方網站簡體中文版。網址：http://www.un.org/zh/documents/udhr/index.shtml#a19 。
羅晉（2008）。邁向電子化民主新階段？政府網站民主化指標建立與評估調查。東吳政治學報，26(1)，143-198。
蘇子喬譯（2009）。政治學的關鍵概念（Heywood A. 原著）。臺北市：五南。
蘇中信（2012）。以紮根理論探討台灣商管期刊中內容分析法的類型。人文社會科學研究，6(2)，1-23。
蘇彩足（2002）。論地方財政之透明化。中國地方自治，55(7)，25-31。
蘇彩足（2013）。我國公共治理之挑戰與因應。公共治理季刊，1(1)，52-60。
蘇彩足、左正東（2008）。政府透明化分析架構建立之研究。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告（編號：RDEC-TPG-097-004）。臺北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。
蘇彩足、左正東、陳朝建（2009）。政府透明化分析架構及評估。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告（編號：RDEC-TPG-098-005）。臺北市：行政院研究發展考核委員會。
Allan, M. W., & Parry, M. T. (2003). Fiscal Transparency in EU accession countries: Progress and future challenges (No. 3-163). International Monetary Fund.
Alt, J. E., & Lassen, D. D. (2003). The Political Economy of Institutions and Corruption in American States. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3), 341-365.
Alt, J. E., & Lassen, D. D. (2005). Fiscal transparency, political parties, and debt in OECD countries. European Economic Review, 50(6), 1403-1439.
Alt, J. E., Lassen, D. D. & Skilling, D. (2002). Fiscal Transparency, Gubernatorial Approval, and the Scale of Government Evidence from the States. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 2, 230-250.
Article 19 (1999). The Public’s Right To Know: Principles on Freedom of Information Legislation. London: Article 19.
Article 19. Website: http://www.article19.org/index.php?lang=en .
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (2002). Leaders’ Statement to Implement APEC Transparency Standards. Los Cabos, Mexico, October 27. Website: http://www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Leaders-Declarations/2002/2002_aelm/statement_to_implement1.aspx .
Bastida, F., & Benito, B. (2007). Central government budget practices and transparency: An international comparison. Public Administration, 85(3), 667-716. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00664.x .
Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communications Research. NY: Free Press.
Berners-Lee, T. (2006). Linked Data. Retrieved October 8, 2015, from http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html .
Besley, T. & Prat, A. (2006). Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand: Media Capture andGovernment Accountability. American Economic Review, 96(2), 720-736.
Bhatnagar, S. (2003a). Administrative Corruption: How Does E-Government Help. DRAFT Paper prepared for the compilation of CHRI 2003 Report OPEN SESAME: looking for the Right to Information in the Commonwealth, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative.
Bhatnagar, S. (2003b). E-government and access to information. In Global Corruption Report (pp. 24-32). Berlin: Transparency International.
Denhardt, Janet V., & Denhardt, Robert B. (2003). The new public service : serving, not steering. N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe Press.
Ferejohn, J. (1986). Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control. Public Choice, 50, 2–25.
Ferejohn, J. (1999). Accountability and authority: Toward a theory of political accountability. In A. Przeworski, S.C. Stokes & B. Manin (eds.), Democracy, accountability, and representation (pp. 131–153). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fisher, A., Krafchik, W. & Shapiro, I. (2000). Transparency and Participation in the Budget Process. Cape Town: Idasa. .
Florini, A. M. (1999). Does the Invisible Hand Need a Transparent Glove? The Politics of Transparency. Paper prepared for the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, April 28-30, Washington, D.C.
Florini, A. M. (2002). Increasing Transparency in Government. International Journal of World Peace, 19(3), 3-37.
Friedman, B. (2002). The use and the meaning of words in central banking: inflation targeting, credibility and transparency. NBER Working Paper No. 8972. Retrieved from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w8972.pdf .
Global Integrity. Website: https://www.globalintegrity.org/ .
Hameed, F. (2005). Fiscal Transparency and Economic Outcomes. IMF Working Paper (WP/05/225). Washington, D.C: IMF.
Heald, D. (2003). Fiscal transparency: Concepts, measurement and UK practice. Public Administration, 81(4), 723-759. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00369.x .
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Science Humanities Reading. Mass: Addison-Wesly Publishing Company Inc.
International Monetary Fund (1998). Code of Good Practices on Fiscal Transparency – Declaration on Principles. Retrieved from: https://www.imf.org/external/np/mae/mft/code/ .
International Monetary Fund (2007). Manual on Fiscal Transparency. IMF Country Report No. 02/189. Retrieved from: http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/2007/eng/051507m.pdf .
Islam, R. (2003). Do More Transparent Governments Govern Better. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No.3077. Retrieved from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/18169/multi0page.pdf?sequence=1 .
Justice, J. B., Melitski, J. & Smith, D. L. (2006). E-Government as an Instrument of Fiscal Accountability and Responsiveness, The American Review of Public Administration, 36(3): 301-322.
Kampen, J. K. & Snijkers, K. (2003). E-Democracy: A Critical Evaluation of the Ultimate E-Dream. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 491-496.
Kaufmann, D. (2008). Myths and Realities of Governance and Corruption. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 8089, 81-98.
Kaufmann, D., & Bellver, A. (2005). Transparenting transparency: Initial empirics and policy applications. MPRA Paper (No. 8188). Retrieved from: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/8188/1/MPRA_paper_8188.pdf .
Krippendorff, K., & Bock, M. A. (2008). The Content Analysis Reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Liedorp, F., Mosch, R., Cruijsen, C., & Haan, J. (2013). Transparency of Banking Supervisors. IMF Economic Review, 61(2), 310-335.
Mendel, T. (2003). Freedom of Information Legislation: Process, Concerns, and Standards. In Global Corruption Report (pp. 57-61). Berlin: Transparency International.
Moon, M. J. (2003). Can IT Help Government to Restore Public Trust?: Declining Public Trust and Potential Prospects of IT in the Public Sector. Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS`03).
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Calif.: SAGE.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oakley, K. (2002). What Is E-Governance? Integrated Project 1 (9e). Retrieve from: http://www.coe.int/t/dgap/democracy/Activities/GGIS/E-governance/Work_of_egovernance_Committee/Kate_Oakley_eGovernance_en.asp .
OECD (2002). OECD Best Practices for Budget Transparency. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2015). Recommendation of The Council on Budgetary Governance. Paris: OECD.
Office of Democracy and Governance (2003). Money in Politics Handbook: A Guide to Increasing Transparency in Emerging Democracies. Technical Publication Series, Washington D.C.
Open Government Working Group (2007). 8 Principles of Open Government Data. Retrieved from: http://www.opengovdata.org/home/8principles .
Right2Info.org (2012). Access to Information Laws: Overview and Statutory Goals. Retrieved October 11, 2015 from: http://www.right2info.org/access-to-information-laws/access-to-information-laws#_ftnref7 .
Safire, W. (1998). On Language; Transparency, Totally. The New YorkTimes, Jan 4, p. 4.
Sakowicz, M. (2005). How to Evaluate E-Government? Different Methodologies and Methods. Retrieved from: http://enos.itcollege.ee/~linnar/IT-ROI/UNPAN009486.pdf .
The Alliance for Lobbying Transparency. Website: http://www.lobbyingtransparency.org/ .
The Center for Public Integrity. Website: https://www.globalintegrity.org/ .
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Website: http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/ .
The World Bank (2010). The World Bank’s Country Policy and Institutional Assessment: An IEG Evaluation. Washington, D.C: The World Bank.
The World Bank (2013). Guidance for Using The Readiness Assessment Framework. Retrieved from: http://opendatatoolkit.worldbank.org/docs/odra/odra_v2-en.pdf .
The World Economic Forum (2014). The Global Competitiveness Report 2014–2015. Geneva: WEF. ISBN-13: 978-92-95044-98-2.
Thomas, J. C. & Streib, G. (2005). E-Democracy, E-Commerce, and E-Research: Examining the Electronic Ties between Citizens and Governments. Administration and Society, 37(3), 259-280.
Torres, L., Vicente, P. & Basilio, A. (2006). E-Governance Developments in European Union Cities: Reshaping Government’s Relationship with Citizens. Governance, 9(2), 277-302.
Transparency International (2003). Global Corruption Report 2003. Berlin: Transparency International Press.
United Nations Education Scientific and Cultural Organization (2005). E-Governance Capacity Building. Retrieve June 8, 2015 from http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php-URL_ID=2179&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html .
United Nations Experts Group (1991). Study on Ways and Means of Promoting Transparency in International Transfers of Conventional Arms. Report to the Secretary General, UN Document (A/46/301). Retrieve from: http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/Disarm%20A46301.pdf
Vishwanath, T. & Kaufmann, D. (1999). Towards Transparency in Finance and Governance. The World Bank Paper. Retrieve from: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWBIGOVANTCOR/Resources/tarawish.pdf .
Waseda University & International Academy of CIO (2014). WASEDA – IAC 10th international e-government ranking 2014. Retrieved October 8, 2015, from http://www.e-gov.waseda.ac.jp/pdf/2014_E-Gov_Press_Release.pdf
Working Group (1998). Report of the Working Group on Transparency and Accountability. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
World Trade Organization (2002) Transparency. Working Group on the Relationship between Trade and Investment (WT/WGTI/W/109). Retrieve from: http://jmcti.org/2000round/com/doha/wg/WT_WGTI_W_109.pdf . |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
公共行政學系
102256015 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102256015 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [公共行政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 601501.pdf | 1371Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 659 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
