政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/80328
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113485/144472 (79%)
造访人次 : 51390293      在线人数 : 740
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/80328


    题名: 「原始社會」生於複製技術時代：日本時代的風景明信片、民族形塑與原住民族
    其它题名: The Birth of “Primitive Society” in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction: Picture Postcards, Ethnogenesis, and Indigenous Peoples under Japanese Colonial Rule
    作者: Barclay, Paul D.
    Mayaw　Kilang
    贡献者: 原住民族研究中心
    日期: 2014-10-12
    上传时间: 2016-01-04 17:05:59 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 此次演講，筆者透過影像研究的角度，探討原住民族與非原住民族的關係，並從照相技術、明信片生產與民族分類等方式，觀察日本殖民政府如何將台灣原住民族「形塑」為一種知識與管理對象。筆者分析兩個重要的明信片背景──屈尺（今新北市新店區）與角板山（今桃園縣復興鄉），藉此描述此「形塑」的過程。這些被製造出來並廣為傳播的原住民影像，連同被記錄下來的文化流失過程，筆者認為日本的殖民統治，非常符合傅柯所提到的「知識」與「權力」結構。1902年森丑之助在屈尺為兩對夫婦留下的影像，是日治時代第一個充滿「泰雅特質」的影像記錄。這些「人類學式」的影像，形成一種民族的完整性，筆者認為，這呼應了清代至日治時代對「蕃人」或「生蕃」的既有印象。經由這種設計好且挑選過的影像，森丑之助的記錄強化了泰雅族人孤立於新店溪流域其他漢人之形象。第二個案例，筆者探討的是角板山的「馴化」過程，角板山儼然成為一個「原住民模範部落」。1895年，角板山被形容成充滿「野蠻人」的山間部落，然而到了1920年，角板山已經成為非常熱門的旅遊景點，遊客可以在紀念品店買到許多印製族人身影的明信片。跟屈尺的狀況類似，透過剪接、選景與拍攝的角度，角板山被塑造成一個成功的文明化部落，而在這之前，這些「山地人」跟平地人的接觸並不多。這些影像的展演，建構出一個內部同質、又不同於漢人的「原住民族」，這樣的分類，也配合蕃地治理政策，將原住民族的土地交易與個人稅務獨立出來。因此，蕃地政策豎立了一道防線，原住民無法輕易遷徙到平地、港口或都市，而這些地方都屬於殖民政府的「普通行政區」。筆者認為，從日本殖民統治的方式，可以看到「第四世界」的雛形，換句話說，把原住民族視作一個具有當代政治意義的主體，其實跟日本針對「平地人／原住民族」的「雙元政策」有關。
    This talk will take a visual-studies approach to Indigenous-outsider relations to argue that the interdependent technologies of photography, postcard production, and ethnic classification “produced” Taiwan Indigenous Peoples as objects of knowledge and government in Japanese ruled Taiwan. I will analyze two important sites of photographic and postcard production to illustrate this process: “Kusshaku” (Quchi) 屈尺and “Kappanzan” (Jiaobanshan) 角板山. Based on close readings of the types of Indigenous imagery produced and disseminated from these sites, I suggest that Japanese colonial rule—in addition to its well documented destructive impact—was productive in this Foucauldian sense of the word. Mori Ushinosuke`s森丑之助1902 portraits of two married couples near “Kusshaku” were the first successful photographic documents of “Atayalness” to be made under Japanese colonial rule. These anthropometric-photographs constituted an argument for Indigenous ethnic integrity, to counter the prevailing Qing-Japanese discourse on “savages” (fanren or shengfan), I argue. Through the use of staging and image selection, Mori`s most famous photographs also exaggerated the level of Quchi-Atayal cultural isolation from Han peoples in the Xindian River area. The second case I examine is the “domestication” of Jiaobanshan/Kappanzan into a “model Aborigine village.” In 1895, “Kappanzan” was portrayed as the home of “savage” emissaries from unknown mountain locations. By the 1920s, however, Kappanzan was the most accessible Indigenous tourist site in Taiwan. The picture postcard sets distributed at the gift shop in Kappanzan, again through the use of cropping, scene selection, and captioning, told a story of a successful civilizing mission in the highlands among peoples who had been little touched by contact with Han Taiwanese. The visual discourses that constructed internally homogenous “Aborigines” as a population distinct from “Han Taiwan” paralleled practices in “Special Administration” that promoted Indigenous Peoples` isolation from participation in land markets and individually levied tax burdens. “Special Administration” also erected barriers to migration to the plains, ports, and cities of colonial Taiwan, which were ruled under “Normal Administration.” Because Special Administration was based on the notion that Indigenous Peoples were ethnically and temporally distinct from Han Taiwanese, and lacked the capacity to participate in a modern political economy, Police rule obstructed the dispersion of capillary power that characterized the disciplinary regime that obtained under “Normal Administration.” There is good reason to believe, I contend, that the birth of the Fourth World, or Indigenous Peoples as a modern political formation, is tied to practices of administrative bifurcation like the one instituted in Japanese governed Taiwan.
    關聯: 第七回台日原住民族硏究論壇
    主辦單位: 政大原住民族研究中心主辦
    舉辦日期:2014.10.12
    数据类型: conference
    显示于类别:[2014第七回台日原住民族硏究論壇] 會議論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML21174检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈