政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/79668

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51052793 Online Users : 923

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 社會學系 > 期刊論文 > Item 140.119/79668

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/79668

Title:	Ethnomethodology reconsidered: The practical logic of social systems theory
Authors:	Liu, Yu Cheng 劉育成
Contributors:	社會學系
Keywords:	Autopoiesis;ethnomethodology;indexicality;reflexivity;systems theory
Date:	2012-09
Issue Date:	2015-12-15 18:12:40 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	This article compares ethnomethodology to social systems theory and attempts to clarify their theoretical concerns, differences and similarities when synthetically considering the former as a practical logic of the latter. As two poles on a continuum of research methods, ethnomethodology is a microanalysis of social order and human agency, whereas systems theory assumes a macro and theoretical abstraction of system formation and social evolution. When attempts are made to solve the problems of the micro/macro, part/whole, or individual/society relation, this comparison is conducive to elucidating how the practical logic is implied on both micro and macro sides, and to enhance our understanding of the human social world. Three points are suggested. First, systems theory and ethnomethodology do not contradict each other; they are complementary in an intricately dialectical process. Second, ethnomethodology can be observed through indexical rather than objective expressions. Third, due to a higher level of abstraction of systems theory, this article argues that ethnomethodology can possibly be utilized to explicate and also be regarded as the practical logic of systems theory. This comparison may contribute to reformulating systems theory, and also to some philosophical puzzles.
Relation:	Current Sociology , vol. 60 no. 5, 581-598
Data Type:	article
DOI 連結:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011392111426193
DOI:	10.1177/0011392111426193
Appears in Collections:	[社會學系] 期刊論文

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML2	896	View/Open

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

Loading...