政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/79513

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/79513

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 113324/144300 (79%)
造访人次 : 51148176 在线人数 : 861

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/79513

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/79513

题名:	我國審計委員會之會計、法律專家對債務條款及債務信用評等之影響 The Impact of Audit Committee Accounting and Legal Expertise on the Corporate Loan Terms and Credit Rating in Taiwan
作者:	林孟璇 Lin, Meng Hsuan
贡献者:	金成隆林孟璇 Lin, Meng Hsuan
关键词:	審計委員會專家債務條款債務信用評等 Audit Committee Expertise loan terms credit rating
日期:	2015
上传时间:	2015-12-02 16:07:57 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本研究主要探討我國審計委員會中具備會計以及法律專家對債務條款及債務信用評等的影響。本研究發現結果如下：第一、審計委員會具備會計專家時，公司債票面利率會較低，且較不會發行可轉換公司債。第二、審計委員會具備法律專家時，公司債較不會被要求提供擔保條款、亦較少發行可轉換公司債，且票面利率較低，債務信用評等也較好。第三、就經濟顯著性而言，審計委員會只具備法律專家，較只具備會計專家的情況，債務條款條件較有利。第四、審計委員會只具備法律專家，較只具備會計專家時債務信用評等明顯較好。然而，國內外皆無審計委員會須聘任法律專家的相關規範，故公司自願納入法律專家的理由可能係因其具有兩種角色：監督與信號功能，但本研究未探討這兩種角色的關係，因此本研究之實證結果可解釋為公司自願聘任法律專家為審計委員會成員的結果，使得公開市場債權人認為其能有效監督公司之財務報表品質，可降低資訊不對稱風險，而較願意降低借款風險溢酬。 The objective of this thesis is to examine the effect of accounting expertise and legal expertise on corporate audit committees on loan terms and credit rating in Taiwan. The findings can be summarized as follows. First, accounting expertise on audit committee is negatively associated with the coupon interest rate of bonds, and lower likelihood of issuing convertible bonds. Second, legal expertise on audit committee is negatively related to the coupon interest rate of bonds, lower probability of issuing secured corporate bonds and convertible bonds, and the better credit rating. Third, in terms of economic significance, I find that the magnitude of the positive effect of audit committee legal-only expertise on loan terms is larger than that of accounting-only expertise alone. Finally, the empirical results indicate that the effect of audit committee legal-only expertise on credit rating is more pronounced than that of accounting-only expertise. So far, there are no rules or provisions for mandatorily engaging legal experts in audit committee at home and abroad. As a result, engaging legal experts can serve two roles: monitoring and signal functions. However, I cannot disentangle between the two in this paper. As a result, the alternative explanation for my findings is that creditors on the public market may perceive the presence of legal experts in audit committee to be an effective monitoring mechanism for decreasing the risk of information asymmetry, and thus offer lower risk premium to these borrowers with legal experts.
參考文獻:	中文部分余駿展，2006，資產減損會計揭露準則之實證研究，國立政治大學會計學系未出版碩士論文吳慧玲，2013年，淺談我國審計委員會制度發展沿革及相關規範，證券暨期貨月刊，第31卷，第5期：5-17 戚務君，2011年，高等審計學：實證視野下的審計研究，台北：指南書局許永聲、陳俊合與曾奕菱，2013，企業社會責任與信用風險評等，會計學報，第 5卷，第1期：1-26 郭敏華，1996，資訊不對稱對負債資金成本之影響─以銀行借款為實證，國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文陳麗娟，2007，從美國Sarbanes-Oxley法探討獨立董事制度，兼論我國引進獨立董事制度之成效，二零零七現代會計論壇學術研討會論文集，逢甲大學財經法律研究所廖聖慧，2004，公司治理與負債資金成本之關係，國立政治大學會計學系未出版碩士論文劉威廷，2006，獨立董事及監察人之設置與債務資金成本關聯性之研究，國立政治大學會計學系未出版碩士論文簡俱揚與陳玉梅，2009，產業審計專家與獨立董監事對新發行公司債資金成本的影響，當代會計，第十卷，第1期：99-130 英文部分 Abbott, L., Park, Y., and Parker, S. 2000. The effect of audit committee activity and independence on corporate fraud. Managerial Finance 26: 55-67 Agrawal, A. and Chadha, S. 2005. Corporate governance and accounting scandals. Journal of Law and Economics 48(2): 371-406 Anderson, R., Mansi, S.A., and Reeb, D. 2004. Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of accounting and Economics 37: 315-342 Archambeault, D and Dezoort, F.T. 2001. Auditor opinion shopping and the audit committee: an analysis of suspicious auditor switches. International Journal of auditing (5): 33-52 Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D., and LaFond, R. 2004. Corporate governance and the cost of equity capital. Working paper, University of Iowa. Barr, S.1999. Watchdogs or Lapdogs? CFO Publishing Corporation, May1. Bédard, J., S. M. Chtourou, and L. Courteau. 2004. The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23(2): 13-35 Bédard, J., and Y. Gendron. 2010. Strengthening the Financial Reporting System: Can Audit Committees Deliver? International Journal of Auditing 14 (2):174-210 Bharath, S., J. Sunder, S. Sunder, 2004, Accounting quality and debt contracting, working paper, Northwestern University. Bhattacharya, U., Daouk, H., and Welker, M. 2003. The world of earnings opacity. The Accounting Review 78(3): 641-678 Botosan, C. A. 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review 72: 323-349 Brennan, M.J., and Schwartz, E.S. 1977. Convertible bonds: valuation and optimal strategies for call and conversion. The Journal of Finance 32(5): 1699-1715 Brigham, EF. 1966. An analysis of convertible debentures: theory and some empirical evidence. Journal of Finance 21: 35-54 Carcello, J., Hollingsworth, C., Klein, A., and Neal, T. 2010. The Role of Audit Committee Financial Experts in the Post-Sox Era: Have Smaller Public Companies Benefited Disproportionately? Working paper, University of Tennessee. Carcello, J., Hollingsworth, C., Klein, A., and Neal, T. 2006. Audit committee financial expertise, Competing governance mechanisms, and earnings management. Working paper, University of Tennessee. Li, Xie, and Zhou. 2010. National level, city level auditor industry specialization and cost of debt. Accounting Horizons 24(3):395-417 Chin, and Liu. 2014. Audit Committee Member with Banking Expertise and the Cost of Bank Loan. Ph. D. dissertation, National Chengchi University Chin, Yao, and Liu. 2014. Industry audit experts and ownership structure in syndicated loan market: at the firm and partner levels. Accoounting Horizons 28(4): 749-768 Cohen, Hoitash, Krishnamoorthy and Wright. 2014. The Effect of Audit Committee Industry Expertise on Monitoring the Financial Reporting Process. The Accounting Review 89(1):243-273 Cunningham, L. A. 2002. Sharing accounting’s burden: Business lawyers in Enron’s dark shadows. Business Lawyer 57(4): 1421-1462 Dhaliwal, Naiker, and Navissi. 2010. The association accruals quality and the characteristics of accounting experts and mix of expertise on audit committees. Contemporary Accounting Research Vol.27 No.3 (Fall): 787-827. DeFond, M.L., Hann, R.N., and Hu, X. 2005. Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? Journal of Accounting Research 43: 153-193 Dezoort, F.T., Hermansonm D.R., Archambeault, D.S., and Reed, S.A. 2002. Audit committee effectiveness: A synthesis of the empirical audit committee literature. Journal of Accounting Literature 21: 38-74 Eisenberg, Sundgren, and Wells. 1998. Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Cornell Law Faculty Publications. 393. Farber, D.B. 2005. Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter? The Accounting Review 80(2): 539-561 Felo, A.J., Krishnamurthy, S. and Solieri, S.A. 2003. Audit committee characteristics and the perceived quality of financial reporting: An empirical analysis. Unpublished Paper, Binghamton University. Grinstein, and Hribar. 2004. CEO compensation and incentives: Evidence from M&A bonuses. Journal of Financial Economics 73(1): 119–143 Hoitash, U., R. Hoitash, and J. C. Bedard. 2009. Corporate governance and internal control over financial reporting: A comparison of regulatory regimes. The Accounting Review 84(3): 839-867 Jenny Stewart, and Lois Munro. 2007. The Impact of Audit Committee Existence and Audit Committee Meeting Frequency on the External Audit: Perceptions of Australian Auditors. International Journal of Auditing 11(1): 51–69 Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305-360 Khairul Anuar Kamarudin, Wan Adibah Wan Ismail, and Alwi. 2014. The Effects of Audit Committee Attributes on Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing Vol.10 No.5: 507-514 Krishnan, G. V., and G. Visvanathan. 2008. Does the SOX definition of an accounting expert matter? The association between audit committee director’s accounting expertise and accounting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research 25(3): 827-857. Krishnan, J. 2005. Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis. The Accounting Review 80(2): 649-675 Krishnan, J., C. Li, and Q. Wang. 2009. National and city level auditor industry specialization and client cost of equity. Working paper, Temple University. Krishnan, Wen, and Zhao. 2011. Legal expertise on corporate audit committees and financial reporting quality. The Accounting Review 86 (November): 2099-2130. Langevoort, D.C. 2007. The social construction of Sarbanes-Oxley. Michigan Law Review 105(8): 1817-1855\\ Leuz, C., and R. E. Verrecchia. 2005. Firm’s capital allocation choices, information quality, and the cost of capital. Working paper. University of Pennsylvania. Linck, J.S., J.M. Netter, and T.Yang. 2009. The effects and unintended consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the supply and demand for directors. Review of Financial Studies 22(8):3287-3328 Linda McDaniel, Roger D. Martin and Laureen A. Maines. 2002. Evaluating Financial Reporting Quality: The Effects of Financial Expertise vs. Financial Literacy. The Accounting Review Vol.77, Supplement: Quality of Earnings Conference (2002):139-167 Magena, M. amd Pike, R. 2004. Shareholding of audit committee members, audit committee size and expertise and the quality og interim financial reporting. Working Paper Series No.04/25 McMullen, D.A., and Raghunandan, K. 1996. Enhancing audit committee effectiveness. Journal of Accountancy 182(2): 79-82 Ojeka, Stephen Aanu, Iyoha, Francis Odianonsen, and Asaolu, Taiwo. 2015. Audit Committee Financial Expertise: Antidote for Financial Reporting Quality in Nigeria? Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 6 No. 1 (January): 136-146 Paul N. Tanyi and David B. Smith. 2015. Busyness, Expertise, and Financial Reporting Quality of Audit Committee Chairs and Financial Experts. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory: May 2015, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 59-89. Pittman J. A., and S. Fortin. 2004. Auditor choice and the cost of debt capital for newly public firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37: 113-136 Qin, B. 2007. The influence of audit committee financial expertise on earnings quality: U.S. evidence. ICFAI Journal of Audit Practice 4 (3): 8-28 Sengupta, P. 1998. Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. The Accounting Review 73: 459-474 Srinivasan, S. 2005. Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors: Evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members. Journal of Accounting Research 43(2): 291-334 Steven L. Schwarcz. 2006. Financial Information Failure and Lawyer Responsibility, Journal of Corporation Law 31: 1097-1123 Vaefas, N. 2000. Board structure and the informativeness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Policy 19(2): 139-160 Welker, M. 1995. Disclosure policy, information asymmetry and liquidity in equity markets. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (Spring)：801-827 Chen and Chen. 2010. Audit committee financial experts and the cost of equity capital. Master thesis, National Taiwan University. Yermack, D. 1996. Hoigher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40(2): 185-212 Ziebart, D. A. and S. A. Reiter. 1992. Bond ratings, bond yields and financial information. Contemporary Accounting Research 9: 252-282
描述:	碩士國立政治大學會計學系 101353039
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101353039
数据类型:	thesis
显示于类别:	[會計學系] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

档案	大小	格式	浏览次数
303901.pdf	550Kb	Adobe PDF2	80	检视/开启

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈