Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/79260
|
| Title: | 在地創業歷程與關鍵要素之探究
Exploring The Local Entrepreneurial Process and Key Elements |
| Authors: | 陳參騰
Chen, San Teng |
| Contributors: | 鄭至甫
Jeng, Jyh Fu
陳參騰
Chen, San Teng |
| Keywords: | 在地創業
社會創業
創業歷程
Timmons Model
Local Entrepreneurship
Social Entrepreneurship
Timmons Model
Entrepreneurial Process |
| Date: | 2015 |
| Issue Date: | 2015-11-02 15:01:03 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 近年來，台灣對地方文化的認同與地方文化意識高漲，青年回鄉創業，例如各類巷弄創業與咖啡店，而台灣各地傳統農村也正好遭遇到人口老化、外移等相同之問題；也因此，有一部分創業者選擇在地創業的方式，同時兼顧「社會創業」、「社會企業」的理念與精神，但重點是擺在解決地方問題，協助地方發展，共同的特色就是會大量整合在地資源，因此本研究欲探究在地創業家是如何走過在地創業的歷程，如何整合在地資源使之達到平衡，提供有志返鄉之在地創業者參考。
本研究採個案分析法，選擇多個案分析，共有「老寮hostel」、「大山北月」、「天空的院子與小鎮文創」三個研究個案，除了先從個案的創業歷程觀察，也試著從Timmons Model 創業三要素「機會」、「團隊」、「資源」三者的動態變化，以及內外部的資源分析與串聯，和個案公司擁有的獨特性與競爭優勢來建立核心資源，探討在地創業從無到有，資源不斷交互影響，壯大企業本身之發展過程。
在研究的結果中，我們發現在地創業家從認知到挖掘創業機會、到發現機會皆從自身經驗出發，因此易受自身經驗影響而不同。而在地創業家一定會有自身堅持之理念，但為了解決地方問題與推維持穩定收入常會陷入兩難。另外在地創業家自身擁有的資源一開始容易不足，創業家也會認知到此點，因此會積極在社會關係及社經資料蒐集與調查上，以利未來企業發展與資源串聯，使創業三要素能達成穩定平衡。
我們也針對這些研究發現與結論給出實務上的建議，除了取得創業三要素與外部資源互動之平衡，這是必須要做好之基本功外。也最好能在不偏離在地創業理念之前提下，專心在本身的核心能耐和事業上，善用可掌握之外部資源去發揮最大效益，通常就對地方發展產生正向影響。
In the recent years, perceptions of local cultural identity and awareness garner significant attention in Taiwan. That is, a variety of entrepreneurial activities in domestic neighborhoods appeared. Taken into consideration issues of aging population and labor force immigration in the countryside, a number of entrepreneurs have adopted the notion of “social entrepreneurship” and “social enterprise,” with emphases on solutions to local struggles and assistance to local development when starting up their businesses. A common feature for such operation is the substantial integration on local resources; thus, this study is anticipated to dig into local entrepreneurial processes and the balances achieved under integrations of local resources. Meanwhile, this study may also be seen as a guidance for future entrepreneurs in developing their businesses locally.
In compliance with the case study method, “Mountain Lodge,” “Big Hill North Moon” and “El Patio Del Cielo” are the three research cases selected for this study. To analyze the cases, this study adopts the framework of the Timmons Model, namely the three elements – opportunity, team, and resource – and the dynamics among them, along with internal and external resource analyses and connections. Furthermore, this study underscores the uniqueness and competitive advantage, combination and interaction of internal and external resources of the research cases in developing core competence from scratch to the current stage.
This study concludes with the finding that recognitions and explorations of business opportunities derive mostly and mainly from the personal experience of local entrepreneurs, which varies greatly for one and another. Generally speaking, local entrepreneurs tend to be determined as to their beliefs, however, they may be in a dilemma when trying to strike a balance between resolving local issues and maintaining a stable cash flow. Moreover, entrepreneurs, at early stage, often encounter lack of resources. Being aware of such situation, entrepreneurs tend to involve actively in networking and relevant social and economic insight gatherings to facilitate future business development and resource connection, of which, eventually, the dynamic relationship among the three elements of entrepreneurship shall be in a stable equilibrium.
In addition to the findings and conclusions, this study propose a number of practical suggestions. Besides balancing the three elements of the entrepreneurial interactions with external resources, local entrepreneurs are recommended not to depart from the premise of their entrepreneurial concept. Local entrepreneurs should focus mainly on core competence and business operation, and make the best use of external resources in maximizing the outcome. By doing so, positive impacts on local development should be anticipated. |
| Reference: | 壹、英文文獻
Alvord, S. H., Brown, L. D., & Letts, C. W. (2004). Social Entrepreneurship and Societal Transformation An Exploratory Study. The journal of applied behavioral science, 40(3), 260-282.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
Blank, S. (2013). Why the Lean Start-up Changes Everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 51-59.
Christensen, C. M., Baumann, H., Ruggles, R., & Sadtler, T. M. (2006). Disruptive innovation for social change. Harvard business review, 84(12), 94.
Christian, B, P-A. Julien (2000). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Review, 16,165-180.
Dees, J. G. (2001). The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship, Kansas, Ka: Kauffman Foundation. Grant, R.M.(1991). The Resource-Rased Theory of Competitive Advantage : Implications for Strategy Formulation, California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
Hillary, G. (1955). Definitions of Community: Areas of Agreement. Rural Sociology, 20(2) , 111-123.
Herbert, T. T. (1976). Dimensions of organizational behavior. New York: Collier Macmillan.
Johannisson, B & Lindholm Dahlstrand, Å. (2009). ”Bridging the Functional and Territorial Rationales – Proposing and Integrating Framework for Regional Dynamics”. European Planning Studies, 17(8): 1117-1134.
Katzenback, J. R. and Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high performance organization. New York: Happer Collins.
Maslow, A.H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
Mair, J. & Marti, I. (2006). Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight, Journal of World Business, Vol.41, 36-44.
Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), 28-39.
Proshansky, H.M., Fabian, A.K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57-83.
Peterson, R. A. and Albaum, G. (1984). Corporate Creativity. BY : Jaeger.
Pine B.J. II & Gilmore, J.H., (1999). The Experience Economy: work is theatre & every business a stage. Harvard Business School Press, 39-45.
Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34-43.
Porter, Michael E. and Kramer, Mark R. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, Vol.89 (1-2), 62-77.
Robert E. Park (1952). Human community: the city and human ecology. Glencoe: Free Press.
Sanders, Irwin T.(1975). The community: An introduction to Social Systems (3rd.). New York: Ronald Press Co.
Steyaert, C. and Katz, J.(2004). Reclaiming the Space of Entrepreneurship in Society: Geographical, Discursive and Social Dimensions, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Vol.16, 179–196.
Steyaert, C.(2007). Entrepreneuring as a conceptual attractor? A review of process theories in 20 years of entrepreneurship studies, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Vol.19, 453-477.
Tonnies, F. (1887), Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, translation, Loomis C.P., East Lansing, Michigan State University.
Timmons, J. A. (1985). New venture creation: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Timmons, J. A. & Spinelli, S. (1994). New venture creation: Entrepreneurship for
the 21st century (Vol. 4): Irwin Boston.
Timmons, J.A. (1999). New Venture Creation, 5 ed., Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Teece, D. J., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen (1997). Dynamiccapabilities and strategic
management, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
Walker, R. (1985). .Applied Qualitative Research, Aldershot: Gower
Westlund, H. (2003) Implications of Social Capital for Business in the Knowledge Economy: Theoretical Considerations.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd ,Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
貳、中文文獻
洪孟啟 (2006)。文化資產保存的世界潮流－從有形到無形，美育，154期，頁12-19。
吳穎、鄧祝仁 (2006)。 論深度旅遊產品及其開發，社會科學家，2006年04期。
胡哲生、張子揚、黃浩然 (2012)。社會創業模式與社會企業資源整合的關聯性。創業管理研究，7 (1)，頁1-26。
周孟嫻 (2014)。我國農業人力與人才發展策略規劃選、訓、育、用、留的人資養成。台灣經濟研究月刊 第37卷第3期，頁17-24。
溫肇東 (2012)。由地方智慧資本看創意城鄉之經營與發展--總計畫含子計畫，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫，NSC 101-2420-H-004-016。
陳其南 (1995)。〈社區總體營造與文化產業發展〉，《文化產業研討會暨社區總體營造中日交流展論文集》，p4-7。文建會編印，台北市。
許家瑋 (2010)。網絡策略動態研究-以台灣製鞋廠為例 (碩士論文)。國立台北大學，新北市。
龔芳儀 (2012)。以風土資本探討創意觀光及其源整備與營造－竹山鹿谷地區與臺東光點及池上為例 (碩士論文)。 國立政治大學，台北市。
陳霈絃 (2013)。初探創業空間中的織組 (碩士論文)。國立中山大學，高雄市。
張旭佑 (2014)。 社會創業歷程之研究─以志工團隊自主創業為例 (碩士論文)。 國立政治大學，台北市。
吳思華 (2000)。策略九說: 策略思考的本質, 三版。台北：臉譜出版社。
陳其南 (1997)。社區總體營造與生活學習。宜蘭：仰山基金會。
夏忠堅 (1997)。大家來打拼-教會參與社區營造手冊。中華基督教福音協進會，台北。
蕭瑞麟 (2007)。初版，不用數字的研究：鍛鍊深度思考力的質性研究。臺北，培生出版社。
蕭富峰、李田樹譯。創新與創業精神， ( Peter Drucker, Innovation and entrepreneurship : practice and principles, 1985) 台北，臉譜出版社，2005。
林大容譯。智慧資本：如何衡量資訊時代無形資產的價值 (Leif Edvinsson, and Michael S. Malone, 1997)，台北，麥田出版公司，1999。
夏業良、盧煒譯。體驗經濟時代， (B. Joseph Pine & James H. Gilmore, The Experience Economy: work is theatre & every business a stage, 2003) 台北，城邦文化，2003。
廖宜怡譯。精實創業 (Eric Ries, Lean Startup, 2012)，初版。行人文化實驗室，台北，2012。
季晶晶譯。從0到1：打開世界運作的未知秘密，在意想不到之處發現價值， (Peter Thiel, Blake Masters, Zero to One, 2014)，天下雜誌，台北，2014。
交通部觀光局 (2014)。觀光統計年報。台北：行政院交通部
行政院農業委員會 (2010)。農業統計要覽。台北；行政院農業委員會
參、網路資料
王章凱 (2012)，淺釋「社區總體營造」
為公智庫，取自：http://www.wisdomshare.com.tw/msg_info.php?id=153
許萬龍、曾薏如 (2013)，突破舊式思維窠臼：探討社會企業的創新價值與經營策略，社企流。取自：http://www.seinsights.asia/story/257/794/1353
林以涵 (2013)，村民變股東讓英國最荒涼村翻身，社企流，
取自: http://www.seinsights.asia/story/573/13/943
Flying v (2014)，【南庄老寮】背包空間，山林回神計畫，Flying v，取自：https://www.flyingv.cc/project/4619
游琁如 (2014)，台灣最美民宿「天空的院子」何培鈞在沒落小鎮創奇蹟，東森旅遊雲，取自：http://travel.ettoday.net/article/3711 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
102364128 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1023641281 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 128101.pdf | | 1470Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 118 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
