政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/78827
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造访人次 : 51289284      在线人数 : 842
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78827


    题名: 學術理論與實務觀點的對話─傳統紡織企業的經營績效與公司治理問題探討
    The Dialogues between Academic and Practice -- Business Performance and Corporate Governance from Traditional Textile Industry
    作者: 李淑芬
    贡献者: 戚務君
    李淑芬
    关键词: 紡織業
    經營績效
    公司治理
    財報分析
    個案研究法
    深度訪談法
    日期: 2015
    上传时间: 2015-10-01 15:18:52 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文從學術理論的研究觀點出發，利用大量的量化資料與質化資料對個案公司進行競爭力分析，同時提出(1)學術理論與實務觀點的差異問題，以及(2)對個案公司的針砭與建言。
    量化資料使用個案公司的經營績效與公司治理等財務與非財務相關的次級資料，藉由傳統學術理論發展的指標與財務報表分析方法(同時包含時間序列的縱斷面分析與同紡織業公司間的橫斷面分析)，提出個案公司可能存在的優勢、缺失與風險並做成訪談內容，進一步採用質化研究中的個案研究方法與深度訪談法，取得本研究之訪談初級資料。最後對訪談的初級資料進行質化分析，以了解學術觀點所提出的問題對實務界是否具有管理意涵與適用性，並且對個案公司提出可能的缺失與改善的建言。預期研究的成果可給予實務界與主管機關進一步思考紡織與傳統產業可能面臨的問題，以及給予學術界了解傳統學術與實務觀點落差的問題。
    參考文獻: 畢恆達，1996，詮釋學與質性研究，載於胡幼慧(主編)，質性研究─理論與方法及本土女性研究實例，頁27-45。台北：巨流圖書公司。
    潘淑滿，2003，質性研究：理論與應用，台北：心理出版社。
    林揚舜、鍾俊文，2005，員工分紅配股與員工流動率間之關係，貨幣觀測與信用評等，第52期，P88-P98。
    林宛瑩、許崇源、戚務君與陳宜伶，2009，公司治理與信用風險，臺大管理論叢，第19卷，第52期，頁71-98。
    江義平，2000，教學服務品質衡量模式建構與分析之研究，亞太管理評論(Asia Pacific Management Review)，第三卷，第一期，頁95-116。(TSSCI).
    徐宗國譯，1997，質性研究概論，台北：巨流圖書公司。(原著Juliet Corbin & Andelm Strauss)
    陳向明，2002，《社會科學質的研究》。台北：五南出版社。
    黃光玉、 劉念夏、陳清文譯，2004。《媒介與傳播研究方法：質化與量話研究途徑》。台北：風雲論壇。(原書Arthur A. Berger. 2000. Media and Communication Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approache)
    黃英忠、葉俶禎、蔡正飛、陳錦輝，2002，「從交易成本理論探討暑期專案研究作為管理教育之產學合作模式」，商管科技月刊，第3卷，第3期，頁229-247。
    宋致皓，2006，董監酬勞與公司治理關聯性之研究，國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
    楊宜蓁、龔薇文、王冠翔、閩潔等，2014，2014年紡織產業年鑑，紡織綜合所
    吳清山、林天祐，2007，教育名詞：品牌管理，教育資料與研究，75，163-164。
    吳明政、陳怡靜，2007，經理人報償誘因與盈餘管理之研究：以台灣上市櫃電子產業為例，2007會計理論與實務研討會。
    吳萬益、林文寶，2002，主管行為特性、組織文化、組織學習方式與經營績效關係之研究，輔仁管理評論。
    王立昇、吳武典、周祝瑛、黃光國，2014，適性分流學制研究計畫經簡報結案報告，台灣大學公共政策及法律研究中心出版。
    紡織綜合所，網址：http://www.ttri.org.tw/index.aspx
    紡拓會全球資訊網，網址：http://www.textiles.org.tw
    ITIS智網，網址：http://www2.itis.org.tw/Default.aspx
    Abarbanell, J. S., and B. J. Bushee. 1998. Abnormal returns to a fundamental analysis strategy. The Accounting Review 73 (1): 19–45.
    Ball, R. and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Jounral of Accounting Research 6: pp. 159-178.
    Cyert, R. M., Kang, S. H., & Kumar, P. 2002. Corporate governance, takeovers, and topmanagement compensation: Theory and evidence. Management Science, 48 (4): 453-470.
    Daily, C. M. and M. J. Dollinger. 1992. An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally-managed firms. Family Business Review 5: 117-136.
    DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183-199.
    Defond, M. L., Hann, R. N., Hu,X., 2005. Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of board of directors? Journal of Accounting Research43,153–193.
    DeZoort, F.T., 1997. An investigation of audit committees oversight responsibilities. Abacus (September), 208–227.
    DeZoort, F.T., 1998. An analysis of experience effects on audit committee members oversight judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23 (1), 1–22.
    Dhaliwai, D., V. Naiker and N. Farshid, 2010. The Association Between Accruals Quality and the Characteristics of Accounting Experts and Mix of Expertise on Audit Committees. Contemporary Accounting Research Vol27(3) 787–827.
    Dalton, D. R. and I. F. Kesner. 1987. Composition and CEO Duality in Boards of Directors: An International Perspective. Journal of International Business Studies 18, 1987, pp.33-42
    Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 532-550.
    Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1): 25-32.
    Fama, E. and M. Jensen. 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.
    Gordon, L. A., & Pound, J. 1993. Information, ownership structure, and shareholder voting: Evidence from shareholder-sponsored corporate governance proposal. Journal of Finance, 48 (2): 697-718.
    Grinstein, Y., & Hribar, P. 2004. CEO compensation and incentives: Evidence from M&A bonuses. Journal of Financial Economics, 73 (1): 119-143.
    Hartzell, J. C. and L. T. Starks. 2003. Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation. Journal of Finance, 58, 2351-2374.
    Holthausen W. and Larcker D. 1992. The Prediction of Stock Returns using Financial Statement Information, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15, 373-411.
    Imhoff, E. A. 2003. Accounting quality, auditing, and corporate governance. Accounting Horizons, 17 (Supplement): 117-128.
    Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (3): 305-360.
    Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. 1983. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11 (1/4): 5-50.
    Krishnan, G. V., & Visvanathan, G. (2009). Do auditors price audit committee’s expertise? The case of accounting vs. non-accounting financial experts. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 24(1), 115-144.
    Konchitchki, Y. 2011. Inflation and nominal financial reporting: Implications for performance and stock prices. The Accounting Review 86 (3): 1045–1085.
    Lev, B., and R. Thiagarajan. 1993. Fundamental information analysis. Journal of Accounting Research 31 (2): 190–215.
    Levitt, A., 1998. The numbers game. Speech delivered at NYU Center for Law and Business, September.
    La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, A. 2002. Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance, 57 (3): 1147-1170.
    McMullen, D.A., & Raghunandan, K. (1996). Enhancing audit committee effectiveness. Journal of Accountancy, 182, 79–81
    McDaniel, L., Martin, R.D., Maines, L.A., 2002. Evaluating financial reporting quality: the effects of financial expertise vs. financial literacy. Accounting Review 77, 139-167.
    Mishler, E. G. 1986. Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
    Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1): 293-315.
    Nissim, D., and S. H. Penman. 2001. Ratio analysis and equity valuation: From research to practice. Review of Accounting Studies 6 (1): 109–154.
    Ou, J. A., and S. H. Penman. 1989. Financial statement analysis and the prediction of stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11 (4): 295–329.
    OECD. 2004. OECD principles of corporate governance. Paris, France: OECD Publications. Patatoukas, P. N. 2012. Customer-base concentration: Implications for firm performance and capital markets. The Accounting Review 87 (2): 363–392.
    Oviatt, B. M. 1988. Agency and Transaction Cost Perspectives on the Manager-shareholder Relationship, Incentives for Congruent Interests. Academy of Management Review, 13, 214-225.
    Porter, M. E. 1985. The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. NY: Free Press.
    Penman, S. H. 1992. Return to fundamentals. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 7 (Fall): 465-483.
    Sharma V. D. 2004. Board of Director Characteristics, Institutional, and Fraud: Evidence from Australia. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), 105-117.
    Wahlen, J., and M. Wieland. 2011. Can financial statement analysis beat consensus analysts` recommendations? Review of Accounting Studies, 16(1), 89-115.
    Weisbach, M. S. 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial and Economics, 20 (1/2): 431-460.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
    101932193
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101932193
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2296检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈