政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/78818
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51289619      Online Users : 855
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78818


    Title: 集團企業交易與租稅規避之關聯性研究
    Related Party Transactions and Tax Avoidance
    Authors: 曾柏維
    Tseng, Po Wei
    Contributors: 何怡澄
    曾柏維
    Tseng, Po Wei
    Keywords: 租稅規避
    關係人交易
    公司治理
    Tax Avoidance
    Related Party Transaction
    Corporate Governmance
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2015-10-01 15:02:07 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 關係人交易因其特殊之交易性質，經常成為企業進行特殊交易安排之手段。隨著全球化及國際化的發展，企業的營運策略變得更加多元化，營運版圖、營業地點也擴及全球，關係企業間也可以透過關係人交易將所得移轉到低稅率地區，減少整體稅負。
    本文以2002年到2013年之台灣上市公司非均衡追蹤資料 (Unbalanced panel data) 探討關係人交易或不同性質關係人交易對企業租稅規避程度的影響。實證結果指出進行較多關係人交易或較多複雜交易反而使企業租稅規避的程度降低，但進行關係人交易、(較多) 單純交易或複雜交易對企業租稅規避程度則無顯著影響。
    本文也加入法人持股比率、獨立董事席次占董事會席次比率、董事長是否兼任總經理及是否委任大型會計師事務所等4種公司治理變數，檢驗公司治理結構是否會改變關係人交易及不同性質關係人交易對企業租稅規避程度的影響。實證結果顯示司治理結構並沒顯著改變進行 (較多) 關係人交易及進行 (較多) 不同性質關係人交易之企業的租稅規避程度。
    Related party transaction, with its special nature, has become a common source for firms to engage in many kinds of manipulation. With the trends of globalization and internationalization, business operating strategies have become more and more diversified, operating territory and operation location have also expanded all over the world. In order to reduce the overall tax payment, related parties can engage in income shifting from high-tax regions to low-tax regions through related party transactions.
    This study uses the data of the firms listed in Taiwan Stock Exchange from 2002 to 2013 to investigate whether engaging (more) in related party transaction or different kinds of related party transaction in nature influence corporation tax avoidance. The results indicate that firms engaging in more related party transactions and more complex transaction exhibit lower levels of tax avoidance, but engaging in related party transactions, simple transactions and complex transaction do not significantly influence the level of corporate tax avoidance.
    This study also uses four corporate governance variables- institutional ownership, the rate of independent directors in the board of directors, chairman as CEO, and big 5 accounting firms- to exams whether corporate government have impact on the relationship between related party transaction and corporate tax avoidance. The result shows that corporate governance does not significantly change the level of corporate tax avoidance of the firms engaging (more) in related party transaction or different kinds of related party transaction in nature.
    Reference: 中文部分
    王建煊與吳家勳 (2012)，《租稅法》，台北：華泰文化。
    馬嘉應與賴榮舟 (2009)，「我國實施移轉訂價制度之實證研究—以臺灣電子產業上市公司財務報表與合併財務報表為例」，《財稅研究》，41(4)，89-106，台北：財稅研究雜誌社。
    馬嘉應與賴榮舟 (2013)，「關係企業間財務安排移轉訂價議題之探討」，《財稅研究》，27，23-33，台北：財稅研究雜誌社。
    陳明進 (2003)，「我國租稅優惠對營利事業租稅負擔之影響」，《管理評論》，22(1)，127-151。
    陳明進與林怡伶 (2011)，「資產減損準備與股權結構對中國上市公司有效稅率之影響」，《會計審計論叢》，1(2)，24-55。
    陳明進與蔡麗雯 (2006)，「財稅所得差異決定因素及課稅所得推估之研究」，《管理學報》，23(6)，739–763。
    黃昭勇、陳一姍、高有智與陳竫詒 (2013)，「企業好大稅好低」，《天下雜誌》，523，76-86，台北：天下雜誌。
    黃美祝與楊佩璇 (2011)，「集團企業與非租稅規避程度之比較」，《會計學報》，4(1)，1-22 。
    葛克昌 (1977)，「租稅規避之研究」，《國立臺灣大學法論叢》，6(2) ，167 -187 。
    謝亨莉 (2014)，《參加馬來西亞內地稅務局與經濟合作暨發展組織 (OECD) 2013年「國際租稅規避、稅基侵蝕及利潤移轉」研討會會議報告》，台北：財政部臺北國稅局。

    英文部分
    Ahn, S., and M. Walker (2007), “Corporate governance and the spinoff decision,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 76-93.
    Bae, K.H., J.K. Kang, and J.M. Kim (2002), “Tunneling or value added? Evidence from mergers by Korean business groups,” The Journal of Finance, 57,2695–2740
    Bauguess, S., S. Moeller, F. Schlingemann, and C. Zutter (2009), “Ownership structure and target returns,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 15, 48-65.
    Becker, C., Defond, M., Jiambalvo, J., and K. Subramanyam (1998), “The effect of audit quality on earnings management,” Contemporary accounting research, 15, 1-24.
    Bhagat, S., and B. Bolton (2008), “Corporate governance and firm performance,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 14, 257-273.
    Brav, A., J. Graham , C. Harvey, and R. Michaely (2005), “Payout policy in the 21st century,” Journal of Financial Economics, 77, 483-527.
    Chen, G.M., M. Firth, D. Gao, and O. Rui (2006), “Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: evidence from China,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 424–448.
    Chen, K.C.W., Z. Chen, and J.K.C. Wei (2009), “Legal protection of investors, corporate governance, and the cost of equity capital,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 15, 273-289.
    Chen, Q., X. Cheng, K. Schipper, Y. Xu, and J. Xue (2012), “The Sensitivity of Corporate Cash Holdings to Corporate Governance,” Review of Financial Studies, 25, 3610-3644.
    Chen, S., X. Chen, Q. Cheng, and T. Shevlin (2010), “Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?” Journal of Financial Economics, 95, 41–61.
    Cheng, Q., and T. Warfield (2005), “Equity incentives and earnings management,” The Accounting Review, 80, 441–476.
    Cheung, Y. L., P. R. Rau, and A. Stouraitis (2006), “Tunneling, propping, and expropriation: evidence from connected party transactions in Hong Kong,” Journal of Financial Economics, 82, 343-386.
    Cheung, Y. L., Y. Qi, P. R. Rau, and A. Stouraitis (2009), “Buy high, sell low: How listed firms price asset transfers in related party transactions,” Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(5), 914-924.
    Chidambaran, N.K., and N.R. Prabhala (2003), “Executive stock option repricing, internal governance mechanisms, and management turnover,” Journal of Financial Economics, 69, 153-189.
    Chung, R., M. Firth, and J.B. Kim (2002), “Institutional monitoring and opportunistic earnings management,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 8, 29-48.
    Collier, J., and R. Esteban (1999), “Governance in the participative organization: freedom, creativity and ethics,” Journal of Business Ethics, 21, 173-188.
    Denis, D., and J.J. McConnell (2003), “International corporate governance,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38, 1-36.
    Denis, D.J., D.K. Denis, and A. Sarin (1997), “Agency problems, equity ownership, and corporate diversification,” Journal of Finance, 52, 135-160.
    Desai, M. A., A. Dyck, and L. Zingales (2007), “Theft and taxes,” Journal of Financial Economics, 84, 591–623.
    Desai, M. A., and D. Dharmapala (2006), “Corporate tax avoidance and high powered incentives,” Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 145–179.
    Desai, M. A., and D. Dharmapala (2009), “Corporate Tax Avoidance and Firm Value,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 537-546.
    Donaldson, T., and L.E. Preston (1995), “The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications,” Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
    Dyreng, S., M. Hanlon, and E. L. Maydew (2008), “Long-Run Corporate Tax Avoidance,” The Accounting Review, 83(1), 61-82.
    Fan, J.P.H., and T.J. Wong (2005), “Do external auditors perform a corporate governance role in emerging markets? Evidence from East Asia,” Journal of Accounting Research, 43(1), 35-72.
    Francis, J.R., E.L. Maydew, and H.C. Spark (1999), “The Role of Big 6 Auditors in the Credible Reporting of Accruals,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 18(2), 17-34.
    Frank, M., L. Lynch, and S. Rego (2009), “Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting,” The Accounting Review, 84, 467–496.
    Gaspar, J., M. Massa, and P. Matos (2005), “Shareholder investment horizons and the market for corporate control,” Journal of Financial Economics, 76, 135–165.
    Graham, J.R., and A.L. Tucker (2006), “Tax shelters and corporate debt policy,” Journal of Financial Economics, 81, 563-594.
    Guo, P. (2014), “The Effect of Innovation on Corporate Tax Avoidance,” Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Louisiana State University.
    Hanlon, M. (2005), “The persistence and pricing of earnings, accruals, and cash flows when firms have large book-tax difference,” The Accounting Review, 80(1), 137–167.
    Hanlon, M., and J. Slemrod (2009), “What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement,” Journal of Public Economics, 93, 126–141.
    Hanlon, M., and S. Heitzman (2010), “A review of tax research,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, 127–178.
    Jensen, M., and W. Meckling (1976), “Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
    Jensen, M.C. (2005), “Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14, 8-21.
    Jian M., and T.J. Wong (2008), “Propping Through Related Party Transactions,” Review of Accounting Studies, 15, 70-105.
    Khurana, I. K., and W. Moser (2013), “Institutional shareholders’ investment horizons and tax avoidance,” Journal of The American Taxation Association, 35(1), 111-134.
    Kohlbeck M., and . W. Mayhew (2010), “Valuation of firms that disclose related party transaction,” Journal of Account. Public Policy, 29, 115-137.
    Lo, W.Y., M.K. Wong, and M. Firth (2010), “Can corporate governance deter management from manipulating earnings? Evidence from related-party sales transactions in China,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 16, 225-235.
    Matten, D., and A. Crane (2005), “Corporate citizenship: toward an extended theoretical conceptualization,” Academy of Management Review, 30, 166-179.
    McGuire, S. T., T. C. Omer, and D. Wang (2012), “Tax avoidance: Does tax-specifit industry expertise make a difference?” The Accounting Review, 87(3), 975-1003.
    Mills, L. F. (1998), “Book-tax differences and internal revenue service adjustments,” Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 343–356.
    Mills, L.F., K. Newberry, and W. Trautman (2002), “Trends in book-tax income and balance sheet differences,” Tax Notes, 96(8), 1109-1124.
    Mills, L.F., S.E. Nutter, and C.M. Schwab (2013), “The Effect of Political Sensitivity and Bargaining Power on Taxes: Evidence from Federal Contractors,” The Accounting Review, 88(3), 977-1005.
    Minnick K., and T. Noga (2010), “Do corporate governance characteristics influence tax management?” Journal of Corporate Finance,16,703–718.
    Mironov, M. (2013), “Taxes, Theft, and Firm Performance,” The Journal of Finance, 68(4), 1441-1472.
    Netter, J.M., A.B. Poulsen, and M. Stegmoller (2009), “The rise of corporate governance in corporate control research,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 15, 1-9.
    OECD (1987), International tax avoidance and evasion : four related studies.
    Park, Y., and H. Shin (2004), “Board composition and earnings management in Canada,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 10, 431-457.
    Phillips, J., M. Pincus, and S. Rego (2003), “Earnings management: New evidence based on deferred tax expense,” The Accounting Review ,78(2), 491.
    Rego, S.O. (2003), “Tax-avoidance activities of U.S. multinational corporation,” Contemporary Accounting Research, 20, 805–833.
    Scholes, M. S., M. A. Wolfson, M. M. Erickson, E. L. Maydew, and T. J. Shevlin (2009), Taxes and business strategy: a planning approach, Prentice Hall.
    Swenson, D.L. (2001), “Tax Reforms and Evidence of Transfer Pricing,” National Tax Journal, 54(1), 7-25
    Wilson, R. (2009), “An examination of corporate tax shelter participants,” The Accounting Review, 84, 969-999.
    Yeh, Y. H., P. G. Shu, and Y. H. Su (2012), “Related-party transactions and corporate governance: The evidence from the Taiwan stock market,” Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 20, 755-776.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政研究所
    102255004
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102255004
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Public Finance] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    500401.pdf583KbAdobe PDF21402View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback