政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/78792
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造访人次 : 51584405      在线人数 : 920
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/78792


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78792


    题名: 全人教育與體現認知論
    Holistic Education and Theories of Embodied Cognition
    作者: 徐永康
    贡献者: 馮朝霖
    徐永康
    关键词: 全人教育
    想像力
    標準認知論
    體現認知論
    靈性教育
    holisitc education
    imagination
    standard cognitve theory
    theories of embodied cognition
    spiritual education
    日期: 2015
    上传时间: 2015-10-01 14:25:52 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本論文試圖從體現認知論來證成全人教育的重要性。全人教育作為一種教育理念，主要在恢復全人整體圖像，把身體、心理與靈性的元素，融入生活處境中進行整合，而這也成為我國教育改革期望能達到的目標之一。體現認知論成為二十一世紀中，逐漸成形一種新型態的認知科學，各領域的學者，都一致地認為身體與環境，不只是扮演過去傳統認知科學中的因果角色，而且是認知活動的構成要件，換言之，認知活動並不侷限我們的腦內，身體與情境的改變，足以影響我們認知的心理內容，認知是整合性的動態活動。
    重新整頓我們對認知的理解，過去錯誤地認為認知只限於腦內的標準認知論，體現認知論對我們的認知學習現象，如知覺活動、概念範疇與語言意義提出新穎的建構與再描述，並建立出較為恰當的認知模型。體現認知論要點在於個體的認知現象是知覺與行動的不可分，反對自我身處在旁觀者的客觀知識模式，所有的知識學習都是和身體有關係。
    研究者為了要把體現認知論和全人教育的思想結合，把體現論當作是全人教育的理論基礎，本文先論述全人教育的理念，探究身體、心理與靈性統合的教育思想，提出一種人類的整體圖像來修正物質主義、化約主義的偏差。然而整體論的思想又繼續區分成腦內計算表徵論的認知學習模式以及擴大到身體、環境與認知整合的體現論。研究者在比較兩種不同的整體論後，從知覺與行動的不可分後，確立出身體與情境具有認知構成性，並推論出認知是具有身體活動為主的認知意像圖式的動態生成性。
    最後，研究者認為，體現認知論重新定位身體的意義，以身體為核心發展與環境互動下意像圖式作為基礎的想像力，能夠統整個體的知覺、情意、理性，並從想像力中看出我們都具有同樣的認知結構，使得全人教育有更深刻意涵。
    關鍵字：全人教育、想像力、標準認知論、體現認知論、靈性教育
    The purpose of dissertation focuses on justifying the value of holistic education from theories of embodied cognition. Holistic education as the ideal of education tries to recover a human being’s whole image which integrating body, mind, and spirituality as a unity. At the meanwhile, the holistic education is the one of our educational goals in Taiwan. It is very interesting that there is a new science of mind called theories of embodied cognition gradually forming in beginning of 21 century. Scholars from different domains claim consistently that our body and environment do not only play the causal roles but also being the constitutive elements in our cognitive processes. In other words, our body and environment have significant meaning to influence our cognitive content. The cognitive activities can’t be constrained in our brain alone, which are integrative and dynamical activities actually.

    Theories of embodied cognition disagrees with the claims of standard cognitive theories which believe that all the phenomena of cognition only occur in our brain. Embodied cognition tries using different angle to re-describe what is perception, conceptual categories, the meaning of language, and building a new cognitive model properly. The core of embodied cognition is based on the perception as action which implies that the structure of knowledge is based on our body. This ideas are different the disembodied structure of knowledge.

    In order to making the connection between the embodied cognition and holistic education, I use the embodied cognition as the foundation of holistic education. The dissertation illustrates the picture of holistic education which wants to integrate body, mind, and spirituality as a unity and fix the erroneous materialism and reductionism in our education. However, there are two kinds of holisms, one is called standard cognition which claim that cognitive phenomena are constrained in our brain, and the others are called the embodied cognition which claim that our body and environment constitute our cognitive processes. Compared with the two theories, there are many evidences to support the embodied cognition which justifies the body and environment playing significant roles in our cognition and give a conclusion that the cognition is a dynamical enactedness which involves using the image schema.

    Finally, I think the embodied cognition give new meaning of the body, the body is the core to develop the image schema as the foundation of imagination which can integrates perception, emotion, and reason. Everyone has this cognitive structure which give the new interpretation of holistic education.
    Keywords: embodied cognitive theories, holistic education, imagination, spiritual education, standard cognitive theories.
    參考文獻: 中文部分
    王浩威（2014）。晚熟的世代。台北。心靈工坊。
    江宜樺（2005）。從博雅到通識：大學教育理念的發展與現況。政治與社會哲學
    評論，14，37-64頁。
    朱建民（2014）。哲學教育的困境與挑戰。揭締， 26，238-251頁。
    何金針（2009）。全人教育與大專學生心理健康。諮商與輔導，281，33-37頁。
    李奉儒 （2014）。教育哲學研究之詮釋學方法。載於林逢祺、洪仁進（主編），教育哲學：方法篇（頁45-76）。台北：學富文化。
    吳清基（2009）。在巨人的肩膀上綜觀全局。載於謝明珊（譯）：傳統與創新
    -大學的通識教育與再整合（Belknap, R and Kuhns, R.,1977）。台北：國立編譯館。
    林文寶、楊茂秀 （1995）。敘述在思考實驗的功能一。政院國科會科資中心。
    林文寶、楊茂秀 （1996）。敘述在思考實驗的功能二。政院國科會科資中心。
    林文寶、楊茂秀 （1997）。敘述在思考實驗的功能三。政院國科會科資中心。
    林思伶（2010）。課程評鑑彰顯通識教育的價值。載於黃心怡（譯）：通識教
    育課程評鑑（Allen, J. M., 2006）。台北：國立編譯館。
    邱如美（譯）（ 2007 ）。團隊的天才。台北：天下。（Sawyer, K., 2008）。
    邱美虹、劉俊庚（ 2008 )。從科學學習的觀點探討模型與建議能力。科學教育月刊，314，2-20頁。
    陳信宏（譯）( 2006 )。維根斯坦的甲蟲。台北：麥田出版。（Cohen, M., 2005）。
    張淑美、蔡淑敏（譯）（2007）。學校為何存在？台北：心理出版社。（Miller, R., 1997）。
    趙永芬（譯）（1996）。火星上的人類學家。台北：天下。（Sack, O., 1995）。
    鄧育仁（1995）。思考實驗。行政院國科會科資中心。
    詹志禹 ( 2000 )。誰謀殺了Einstein？教育研究月刊，77，63-67頁。
    馮朝霖、王俊斌。（2003）。詮釋學的發展與教育哲學。邱兆偉（主編），當代教育哲學（頁91-127）。台北：師大書院出版，。
    馮朝霖 （2003）。 教育哲學專論-主體、情性與創化（再版）。台北：高等教育文化。
    馮朝霖、范信賢與白亦方（2011）。國民中小學課程綱要系統圖像之研究報告書。國家教育研究院專題研究計畫成果報告書（NAER-100-12-A-1-02-01-1-02）。
    馮朝霖（2012）。另類教育與美學三重奏。載於中國教育學會（主編），2020教育願景（頁83-116）。台北：學富出版社。
    馮朝霖 （2013）。和光同塵與天地遊-論當代美感素養。教育研究月刊， 236，29-43頁。
    彭孟堯（2005）。人心難測：心與認知哲學問題。台北：三民書局。
    彭孟堯（2011）。心與認知哲學。台北：三民書局。
    楊茂秀（譯）（2005）。Elfie，艾兒飛。台北：毛毛蟲兒童哲學基金會出版。（Lipman, M. 2005）。
    楊劍豐（2005）。梅洛-龐蒂存有論與道家之比較。http://eshare.stust.edu.tw/EshareFile/2009_12/2009_12_c3d16bf2.pdf。擷取時間：104.05.03.
    蔣國英（譯）（2007）。創意心理學。台 北：遠流。（Lubart, T., 2003）。
    潘正德、潘惠銘（2005）。教育理念落實之研究¬-以中原大學全人教育為例。中原學報，33（2），237-251頁。
    蔣興儀 （2004）。在對話與遊戲之間：高達美的「陶養」概念與教育經驗之本質。教育與社會研究，7，41-68頁。
    蔣勳（2008）。身體美學。台北：遠流出版。
    劉金源 （2009）。傳統與創新-大學的通識教育與再整合導讀。載於謝明珊（譯），傳統與創新-大學的通識教育與再整合（Belknap, R and Kuhns, R., 1977）。
    台北：國立編譯館。
    鄭谷苑、郭俊賢（譯）（2004）。學習原理：心智、經驗與學校。台北：遠流。（D. Bransford，2000）。
    鄭喜恆（2012）。意志、審慮與信念：詮釋詹姆士的〈信念意志〉。歐美研究，42（4），635-671頁。

    英文部分
    Adams, F and Aizawa, K. (2001). The Bounds of Cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14, 43-64.
    Adams, F and Aizawa, K. (2010). The Defending the Bounds of Cognition. In M. Richard (Eds), The Extended Mind (pp.67-80).Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    Adams, F and Aizawa, K. (2008). The Bounds of Cognition. Malden: Blackwell Press.
    Adams, F and Aizawa, K. (2009). Why the Mind Still in the Head. In P. Robbins and M Aydede ( Eds), Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (pp. 78-95). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
    Aizawa, K. (2014). Extended cognition. In L. Shapiro (Eds). The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition (pp. 31-38). New York: Routledge.
    Alibali, M. W., Spencer, R. C., Knox, L., and Kita, S. (2011). Spontaneous Gestures Influence Strategy Choices in Problems Solving. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1138-1144.
    Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to "The Social Psychology of Creativity." Boulder: Westview Press.
    Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual Thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and Visual Perception. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Autti O., Hyry-Beihammer, E., K. (2014). School Closures in Rural Finnish Communities. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 29(1), 1-17.
    Barrett, L. (2011).Beyond the Brain : How Body and Environment Shape Animal and Human Minds. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Boncoddo, R., Dixon, J. A. and Kelly, E. (2010). The Emergence of a Novel Representation from Action: Evidence from Preschoolers. Developmental Science, 13(2), 370-377.
    Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does Language Shape Thought? Mandarin and English Speakers Conceptions of Time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1-22.
    Brooks, R. (1991). New Approaches to Robotics. Science, 253, 1227-1232.
    Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Educaton. New York: Harvard University Press.
    Bundy, W. M. (1927). The Theory of Imagination in the Classical and Mediaeval Thought. Illinois: The University of Illinois.
    Burge, T. (1979). From Individualism and the Mental. In P Andrew and S. Goldberg (Eds). The Twin Earth Chronicles (pp.125-141). New York: M.E. Sharpe.
    Carr, D. (2003). Three Conceptions of Spirituality for Spiritual Education. In D. Carr and J. Haldane (Eds.), Spirituality, Philosophy and Education (pp 213-225). London: Routledge.
    Chalmers, D. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of Fondmantal Theory. New York: The Oxford University Press.
    Christman, J. (2004). Narrative Unity as a Condition of Personhood. Metaphilosophy 35(5), 695-713.
    Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Mind and World Together Again. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind : Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis 58, 7-19.
    Clark, A and Toribio, J. (1994). Doing Without Representing? Synthese 101, 401-431.
    Cole, S. (2011). Situating Children in the Discourse of Spirituality. In N. N. Wane, E. L. Manyimo, and E. J. Ritskes (Eds.), Spirituality, Education and Society: An Integrated Approach (pp.1-15). Boston: Sense Publishers.
    Cook, S. W., and Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). The Role of Gesture in Learning: Do Children Use Their Hands to Change Their Mind? Journal of Cognition and Development, 7, 211-232.
    Cooper, R. (2005). Thought Experiments. Metaphilosophy, 36, 328-427.
    Cowie, F. (1999). What’s Within: Nativism Reconsidered. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Dawson, M. (2014). Embodded and Situated Cognition. In L. Shapiro (Eds). The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition (pp. 59-67). New York: Routledge.
    Descartes, R. (1984). The Philosophical Writing of Descartes (J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch , A. Kenny Trans). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
    Dewey, J. (1998). Experience and Education. New York, NY: Kappa Delta Pi.
    Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: H. Holt and Company.
    Diamond, C. (2002). What if X is not the Number of Sheep? Wittgenstein and Thought Experiments in Ethics. Philosophical Papers, 31, 227-250.
    Dijkstra, K. and Zwaan, A., R. (2014). Menory and Action. In L. Shapiro (Eds). The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition (pp. 296-305). New York: Routledge.
    Dretske, F. (1994). If You Can’t Make One, You Don’t Know how to Works. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 19, 468-482.
    Dworkin, G. (1988). The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Evers, C. and Lakomski, G. (1996). Science in Educational Administration: A Postpositivist Conception. Educational Administration Quarterly 32(3), 379-402.
    Fodor, J. (1975). The Language of Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Fodor, J. (1998) Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Fodor, J. (1999). Some Reflection on L. S. Vygotsky’s Thought and Language. In P. Lloyd and C. Fernyhough (Eds), Lev Vygotsky V(I). New York: Routledge.
    Fodor, J. (2001). Language, Thought and Compositionality. Mind and Language, 16, 1–15.
    Frankfurt, H. G. (1988). Identification and Wholeheartedness. In Harry G. Frankfurt (Eds), The Importance of What We Care About (pp.159-176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Frankfurt, H. G. (2004). The Reasons of Love. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Frankfurt, H. G. (2006). Taking Ourselves Seriously and Getting it Right. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    Gallagher, S. (2005). How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Gallagher, S. (2014). Phenomenology and Embodied Cognition. In L. Shapiro (Eds). The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition (pp. 9-18). New York: Routledge.
    Gallagher, S., and Zahavi, D. (2012). The Phenomenological Mind. New York; Routledge.
    Gertler, B. (2007). Overextending the Mind? In B. Gertler and L. Shapiro (Eds). Arguing about the Mind (pp.196-205). New York: Routledge.
    Gibbs, R. (2006). Embodiment and Cognitive Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Gibson, E., A. Pick. (2000). An Ecological Approach to Perceptual Learning and
    Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
    Gilmore, J. H., and Pine, B. J. (2007). Authenticity: What Consumers Really Want (Vol. 1). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Hadot, P. (1996). Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to
    Foucault. Cambridge Mass.: Blackwell.
    Hammershoj, L., G. (2009). Creativity as a Question of Bildung. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43(4), 545-558.
    Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenonemology ( D. C. Evanston, Trans). New York: Northwestern University Press.
    Husserl, E. (1989). Idea pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy, second book: Studies in the phenomenology of constitution (R. Rojcewicz and A Schuwer, Trans). Dorfrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
    Husserl, E. (2001). Logical Investigations (J. N. Findlay, Trans). London: Routledge.
    Hyde, B. (2008). Children and Spirituality: Searching for Meaning and Connectedness. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
    James, W. (1978). Pragmatism and the Meaning of Truth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Johnson, M. (2007). The Meaning of the Body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Karthwohl, D. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41,(4), 212-264.
    Keast, J. (2003). Spiritual development and the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. In D. Carr and J. Haldane (Eds.), Spirituality, Philosophy and Education (pp 157-169). London: Routledge.
    Keepin, M. (2012). Interspirituality: Bridging the Religious and Spiritual Traditions of the World. In M. Harland and W. Keepin (Eds.). The Song of Earth (pp.194-201). Wiltshire, UK: Permanent Publication.
    Keil. F. (1989). Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. New York: The MIT Press.
    Kelso, S. (1995). Dynamic Patterns. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Mass,: Harvard University.
    Kuhn, T,. S. (1977). A Function for Thought Experiments. In T. Kuhn (Eds), The Essential Tension, (pp.323- 334). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Kuhn, T. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
    Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Lakoff, G and M. Johnson. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Baisc Books.
    Lakoff, G and M. Johnson. (2003). Metaphor We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in Education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Luntley, M. (2008). Conceptual Development and the Paradox of Learning. Journal of Philosophy and Education 42(1), 1-14.
    Luntley, M. (2010). On Education and Initiation. Journal of Philosophy and Education 43(1), 41-56.
    McDowell, J. (1996). Mind and World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gesture Reveal about Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans). New York: Routeledge.
    Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The Visible and Invisible (A. Lingis, Trans). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
    Metzinger, T. (2003). Being No One. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    Michael, F., C. and Palatinus, Z. (2014). A Ten Commandments for Ecological Psychology. In L. Shapiro (Eds). The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition (pp. 19-28). New York: Routledge.
    Miller, R. (1997). What are Schools for: Holistic Education in American Culture.New York: The Holistic Education Press.
    Newell, A. and Simon, H. (1961). Computer Simulation of Human Thinking. Science 134: 2011-2017.
    Nietzsche, F. (1974). The Gay Science with a Prelude in Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs (W. Kaufmann, Trans ). New York: Vintage Books.
    Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    Nussbaum, M. (1997). Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in
    Liberal Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Nussbaum, M. (2010). Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press.
    Peters, M. (2004). Education and the Philosophy of the Body: Bodies of Knowledge and Knowledge of the Body. In L. Bresler (Eds). Towards Embodied Teaching and Learning (pp.13-28). New York: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
    Piaget, J. (1954). The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books.
    Pinker, S. (1984). Language, Learnability and Language development. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Pinker, S. (1991). Learnability and Cognition: The Acquistion of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Putnam, H. (1975). The Meaning of Meaning. In K Gunderson (Eds), Language, Mind, Quantum Theory in The Logic of Scientific Discovery (pp. 442-456). London: Hutchinson.
    Richardson J., M. and Chemero, A. (2014). Complex Dynamical System and Embodiment. In L. Shapiro (Eds). The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition (pp. 39-50). New York: Routledge.
    Riener, C., and Stefanucci, J. (2014). Perception And/For/With/As Action. In L. Shapiro (Eds). The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition (pp. 99-107). New York: Routledge.
    Rizzolatti, G and Craighero, L. (2004). The Mirror Neuron System. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
    Rorty, R. (1982). The Contemporary Philosophy of Mind. Syntheses, 53, 323-348.
    Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and Social Hope. New York: Penguin Books.
    Rorty, R. (2006). Take Care of Freedom and the Truth will Take Care of Itself. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    Rorty, R.(2010). The Rorty Reader. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
    Roussearu, J-J. (1957). The Confessions of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. In Lester C. (Ed). New York: Pocket Books.
    Rousseau, J-J. (1979). Emile (A. Bloom, Trans). New York: Basic Book.
    Rowlands, M. (2010). The New Science of the Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    Rupert, R. (2009). Cognitive System and the Extended Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Ryle, G. (1976). The Concept of Mind. New York: Barnes and Noble.
    Sabo, W. (2008). Where Concepts Come From: A theory of Concept Acquisition.
    University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina: Ph.D Dissertation.
    Searle, J. (1980), Minds, Brains, and Programs. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 417-457.
    Searle, J. (1992). The Rediscovery of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    Shapiro, L. (2011). Embodied Cognition. New York. Routledge.
    Shoemaker, S. (1994). Self-knowledge and Inner-Sense. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54, 249-314.
    Shusterman, R. (1997). Practicing Philosophy: Pragmatism and the Philosophical Life. New York: Routledge.
    Shusterman, R. (1999). Somaethetics: A Disciplinary Proposal. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 57(3), 299-313.
    Susterman, R. (2000). Pragmatist Aesthetics: Living Beauty, Rethinking Art. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Pubblishers, Inc.
    Shusterman, R. (2008). Body Consciousness: A Philosophy of Mindfulness and Somaesthetics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Shusterman, R. (2009). Body Consciousness and Performance : Somasethetics East and West. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 67(2), 133-145.
    Smith, L and Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a Dynamic System. Trend in Cognitive Science 7, 343-348.
    Sorensen, R,. A. (1992). Thought Experiments. Oxford: Oxford University
    Splitter, L. J. (2009). Authenticity and Constructivism in Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28(2), 135-151.
    Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory Scanning: Mental Processes Revealed by Reaction-Time Experiments. American Scientist, 57, 421-457.
    Susan, H. (2002). Authenticity. In Snyder, C. R. and Lopez, Shane J. (Eds), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 382-394). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the Self. The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Taylor, C. (1991). The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Thelen, E. and Smith L. (1994). A Dynamic System Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    Tomasello, M., Call, j., and Gluckman, A. (1997).The Comprehension of Novel
    Communicative Signs by Apes and Human Children. The Child Development,
    68, 1067-1081.
    Tomasello, M. (1998). Reference: Intending that Others Jointly Attend. Pragmatics
    and Cognition, 6, 219-243.
    Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language. Cambridge: Harvard
    University Press.
    Varela, F., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E. (1993).The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, Mass. : The MIT Press.
    Varga, S. (2012). Authenticity as an Ethical Ideal. New York: Routledge.
    Victor G.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Van Gelder, T. (1995). What Might Cognition Be, If Not Computation. Journal of Philosophy, 92, 345-381.
    Vokey, D. (2003). Longing to Connect. In D. Carr and J. Haldane (Eds.), Spirituality, Philosophy and Education (pp. 170-184). London: Routledge.
    Whorf, B. (1956). Language, Thought and Reality. In J Carroll (Eds). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    Wilson, M. (2002). Six Views of Embodied Cognition. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 9, 625-636.
    Wilson, R. (1994). Wild Computationalism. Mind, 103, 351-372.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    教育研究所
    101152501
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101152501
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[教育學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    250101.pdf2697KbAdobe PDF21404检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈