政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/78720
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51025182      Online Users : 864
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Commerce > MBA Program > Theses >  Item 140.119/78720


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78720


    Title: 創新企業競爭情報：臺灣中小企業的人力資源
    INNOVATION COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE: Human Resource of Taiwanese SME
    Authors: 謝昕璞
    Hsieh, Hsin Pu
    Contributors: 林月雲
    Lin, Yeh Yun
    謝昕璞
    Hsieh, Hsin Pu
    Keywords: 創新
    競爭情報
    人力情報
    SME
    Innovation
    Competitive Intelligence
    Human Intelligence
    SME
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2015-10-01 14:11:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著中小企業（Small and Medium Enterprises，SMEs）在台灣這個國家數量的提升，建立一個能夠運作至水準的團隊以確保公司維持具競爭力的型態已變得重要。為了維持競爭力，這些中小企業會找尋新穎、具創意的方法，為要能夠從同業當中脫穎而出。創新源自於兩處，藉由打造一項服務或是產品。在本篇研究當中，服務和產品皆被用來作為調查研究。要有具創意的想法，對於一個團隊就有其需要將想法付諸行動。然而，團隊的打造是一個長久的過程。團隊成長的過程會有第一次開會、相互瞭解、然後能夠作為一個單位去運作。在這個過程中，會有衝突和困惑的障礙。因此，本篇研究提出一項新的競爭情報─人力情報（Human Intelligence，HI）─以協助成長中的公司快速地建立一個團隊。
    HI的目的是去建立一個讓公司可以更為快速建立團隊的程序。HI的架構遵循計畫與方向、資料蒐集、分析與傳播之競爭情報架構的原則。藉由三家有創新服務或產品的台灣中小企業之研究，本篇研究使用質性研究蒐集資料並且能夠為著分析從訪談、網路研究、和所在地觀察當中挖掘資料。在團隊效能上採用基礎實際理論，HI能夠告知一家公司建立中的團隊是處在哪一個階段。一旦建立中的團隊所處階段被確認了，人力資源實務就能針對公司給予建議，進而完成競爭情報架構的過程。
    人力情報架構的結果能夠給目前的團隊情況給予見解並且提供回饋或是建議，這使得成長中的公司能夠有效地打造一個團隊。
    With small and medium enterprises (SMEs) raising all over the country of Taiwan, thus forming a team that can perform up to standard to ensure the company stay in competitive form has become crucial. To stay competitive these SMEs find new innovative ways to be able to differentiate themselves from peers. Innovation can come from two sources, either by creating a service or product. In this paper, both service and product are used as sample studies. To have an innovative idea, there is a need for a team to carry the idea to action. However, team building is a long process. This process of team performance went through meeting for the first time, understanding each other and then being able to perform as one unit. During this process, there are bounds to be conflicts and confusions. Thus this paper brings about a new competitive intelligence, “Human Intelligence” (HI), to help growing companies to build a team rapidly.
    HI’s aim is to create a process that allows companies to build teams faster. HI’s framework follows the principle of competitive intelligence process framework of planning and direction, collection of data, analysis and dissemination. Through the study of 3 Taiwanese SMEs that have innovation of either product or service. This paper uses qualitative study to collect data and is able to mine data from interview, internet research and on-site observation for analysis. Using basic practical theories on team performance, HI is able to determine which stage of team forming a company is in. Once the stage of team forming is determined, human resource practices give recommendation for the company, thus completing the process of competitive intelligence framework.
    The result of the Human Intelligence framework was able to provide insight to current team situation and offer a feedback or recommendation. This allows growing companies to form a team efficiently.
    Reference: 1. Adair, J. (1986), Effective Teambuilding, Gower, Aldershot.
    2. Albury, D. & Mulgan, G. (2003). Innovation in the public sector.
    3. Albury, D. (2005). "Fostering Innovation in Public Services," Public Money & Management, 25 (1), pp. 51-56.
    4. Allameh, S. M., Ghazinour, S., Ansari, A., Kianpour, K., & Nazari, Z. (2014). Study the Effect of Competitive Intelligence Components on Creating Innovation. International Journal of Management Academy, 2(1), 27-35.
    5. Amabile, T.M. (1996), Creativity in Context. Westview Press, New York, NY.
    6. Amit, R., &Schoemaker, P. (1993). Strategic assets and organisational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1), 33–46.
    7. Andrew, J. P., & Sirkin, H. L. (2006). Payback–Repeating the Rewards of Innovation.
    8. Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82 (1), 150–169.
    9. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99 – 120
    10. Blyler, M., & Coff, R. W. (2003). Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies. Social Capital, and Rent Appropriation: Ties that Split Pies (July 26, 2012). Strategic Management Journal (24), 677-686.
    11. Boisot, M. (1998). Knowledge assets: Securing competitive advantage in the information economy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    12. Britan, G. M. (1978). Experimental and contextual models of program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 1(3), 229-234.
    13. Buller, P. F., & McEvoy, G. M. (2012). Strategy, human resource management and performance: Sharpening line of sight. Human resource management review, 22(1), 43-56.
    14. Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2005). How leveraging human resource capital with its competitive distinctiveness enhances the performance of commercial and public organizations. Human Resource Management 44 (4), 391–412.
    15. Chen, Y.-S., Lin, M.-J. J. & Chang, C.-H. 2009. The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 38: 152-158.
    16. Ciprian, G. G., Valentin, R., Mădălina, G. I. A., & Lucia, V. V. M. (2012). From visible to hidden intangible assets. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 682-688.
    17. Collis, D., & Montgomery, C. (1995). Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, 73 (4), 118–128.
    18. Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59, 501–528.
    19. Critchley, B., & Casey, D. (1984). Second thoughts on team building. Management Learning, 15(2), 163-175.
    20. Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Transaction publishers.
    21. Deschamps, J. P. 1995. Product juggernauts: How companies mobilize to generate a stream of market winners, Harvard Business Press.
    22. Du Toit, A. S. A. (1998). Information management in South African manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Information Management, 18(3), 205–213.
    23. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23 (4), 660–679.
    24. Eveleens, C. (2010). Innovation management; a literature review of innovation process models and their implications. Science, 800(2010), 900.
    25. Flamholtz, E., & Hua, W. (2003). Searching for competitive advantage in the black box. European Management Journal, 21 (2), 222–236.
    26. Fleisher, C. S. 2003. Should the field be called competitive intelligence or something else? Controversies in Competitive Intelligence, Praeger, Westport, CT: 56-69.
    27. Friar, J., & Horwitch, M. 1985. The emergence of technology strategy: A new dimension of strategic management. Technology in Society, 7(2): 143-178.
    28. Grant, R. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategic formulation. California Management Review, 33 (3), 114–135.
    29. Guest, D. E. (2011). Human resource management and performance: Still searching for some answers. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(1), 3–13.
    30. Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. Sage.
    31. Jacobs D., Snijders H. (2008) "Innovation Routine: How Managers Can Support Repeated Innovation", Stichting Management Studies, Van Gorcum, Assen.
    32. Jhunjhunwala, S. (2009). Monitoring and measuring intangibles using value maps: Some examples. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10 (2), 211–223.
    33. Jiménez-Jimenez, D., Valle, R., & Hernandez, M. 2008. Fostering innovation: the role of market orientation and organizational learning. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(3): 389-412.
    34. Kahaner, L. (1996) Competitive Intelligence. Simon and Schuster,New York.
    35. Kerr, C., Mortara, L., Phaal, R., & Probert, DR. 2006. A conceptual model for technology intelligence. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 2(1): 73-93.
    36. Kinsinger, P. C. 2007. The “business intelligence” challenge in the context of regional risk. Thunderbird International Business Review, 49(4): 535-541.
    37. Lev, Baruch (2003): Intangibles: medición, gestión e información, Barcelona, Deusto.
    38. Li, S., Shue, L., & Lee, S. 2008. Business intelligence approach to supporting strategy-making of ISP service management. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3): 739-754.
    39. Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (1997). Virtual teams: Reaching across space, time, and organizations with technology. Jeffrey Stamps.
    40. Luecke, R., & Katz, R. (2003). Harvard business essentials: managing creativity and innovation. Harvard Business School Press.
    41. Luu, T. 2014. Knowledge sharing and competitive intelligence, Marketing intelligene& Planning, Vol 32 Iss 3 pp. 269-292
    42. Manickavasagam, J. (2006). Human resources development strategy. In C. Mann, & K. Gotz (Eds.), Borderless business (pp. 107 – 122). Westport, CT: Praeger.
    43. McGonagle, J. J., & Vella, C. M. (2004). Competitive intelligence in action. Information Management Journal, 38(2), 64-68.
    44. Merriam, S. B. (2014). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
    45. Mills, T., Tyson, S. and Finn, R. (2000), "The developement of a generic team competency model", Journal of Competency and Emotional Intelligence, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 37-41.
    46. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.
    47. Najafi, j. (2010). Competitive intelligence, Journal of Tadbir, 154, 14-20. (In persian).
    48. Paauwe, J., & Boselie, P. (2005). HRM and performance: What next? Human Resource Management Journal, 15(4), 68–83.
    49. Patterson, M. (2000). Strategic intelligence: Moving up the value chain. WWW: http://nlc-bnc.ca/cfl-cbgf/liaison/2000/2000-1/01e.htm.
    50. Phan, P., Chan, E., & Lee, S. H. (2005). The impact of HR configuration on firm performance in Singapore: A resource based explanation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16 (9), 1740 – 1758.
    51. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
    52. Porter, M. E., Ketels, C.HM, & Britain, G. 2003. UK Competitiveness: moving to the next stage.
    53. Ranjit, B. (2004) "Knowledge management metrics", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 104 Iss: 6, pp.457 - 468
    54. Rezaeeian, A., & Lashkarboluki, M. (2010). Competitive intelligence and strategic decision, Journal of Vision of Trade Management, 35(2), 43-65. (In persian).
    55. Rodenberg, J. H. A.M., 2008 Competitieve intelligence and senior management. Eburon Academic Publishers
    56. Rothwell, R., (1994) Towards the Fifth-generation Innovation Process, International Marketing Review, Vol. 11 No. 1, 1994, pp. 7-31.
    57. Rouach, D., & Santi, P. (2001). Competitive Intelligence Adds Value: Five Intelligence Attitudes. European Management Journal, 19(5), 552-559.
    58. Salles, M. (2006), “Decision making and information requirements for competitive intelligence”, Production Planning & Control, Vol. 17, pp. 229‐37.
    59. Sheard, A. G., & Kakabadse, A. P. (2002). From loose groups to effective teams: The nine key factors of the team landscape. Journal of Management Development, 21(2), 133-151.
    60. Slocum, J., Lei, D., & Buller, P. (2014). Executing business strategies through human resource management practices. Organizational Dynamics, 43(2), 73-87.
    61. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    62. Tanev, S., & Bailetti, T. (2008). Competitive intelligence information and innovation in small Canadian firms. European Journal of Marketing, 42(7/8), 786-803.
    63. Teece, D. (2000). Managing intellectual capital: Organizational, strategic, and policy dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    64. Teece, D. (2006). Reflection on “Profiting from Innovation”, Research Policy, Vol 35 Iss 8 pp. 1131-1146
    65. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long range planning, 43(2), 172-194.
    66. Teo, T., & Pian, Y. 2003. A contingency perspective on Internet adoption and competitive advantage. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(2): 78-92.
    67. Thomson, M., & Ngugi, K. 2012. Influence of competitive intelligence on profitability of mobile telecommunication companies in Kenya. International Journal of Innovative Research, 11(24): 229-241.
    68. Tidd, J., Bessant, J. & Pavitt, K. (2001), Managing Innovation – Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 2nd ed., Chichester.
    69. Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection.
    70. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological bulletin, 63(6), 384.
    71. Vazifedust, H., & Ghasemi, F. (2008). Competitive intelligence: approaches and applications, Journal of Tadbir, 197, 34-37. (In persian).
    72. Wang, H. L. (2014). Theories for competitive advantage.
    73. Yamin, S., Mavondo, F., Gunasekaran, A. & Sarros, J. (1997), “A study of competitive strategy, organizational innovation and organizational performance among Australian manufacturing companies”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 52 No. 1/2, pp. 161‐72.
    74. Yin, R.K. (2003), “Case study research: design and methods”,Robert K. Yin.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    102363118
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102363118
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[MBA Program] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    311801.pdf1053KbAdobe PDF2105View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback