English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50930165      Online Users : 1010
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/78607


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78607


    Title: 師範學院教育實習教學能力形成性評量之研究
    Authors: 謝文英;胡悅倫
    Hu, Yueh-Luen
    Contributors: 教育系
    Keywords: 教學能力評量標準;形成性評量;教育實習;Teaching evaluation criteria;Formative evaluation;Educational practicum
    Date: 1995-01
    Issue Date: 2015-09-21 16:30:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在瞭解(一)師院生教育實習形成性評量所需的教學能力；(二)師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量標準之重要性與鑑別度；(三)師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量之相對重要性。 本研究以自編之「師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量調查問卷」，對師院教授、國小校長、主任、教師及師院學生進行施測，藉此調查問卷瞭解受試者對師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量標準之重要性的看法。形成性評量調查問卷共發出1394份，回收問卷計1101份，回收率為79.0%。本研究採用的統計方法有：信度考驗、描述統計、鑑別度分析、肯氏和諧度係數。 研究結果發現： 1.師院生教育實習形成性評量在教學態度、教學計畫、教學方法、教學技術及教學評量上，所需的教學能力，計有22項教學行為，73項行為指標。 2.師院生教育實習能力形成性評量，各項目之重要性均很好，鑑別度大致良好，為一良好的評量工具。 3.師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量最重要的教學能力依序為：(1)教學態度，(2)教學技術，(3)教學方法，(4)教學計畫，(5)教學評量。
    The main purpose of this study was to examine formative teaching evaluation criteria for student teachers. This study employed the self-devised "Formative Teaching Evaluation Criteria for Student Teacher Evaluation Questionnaire" and was administered to educational professors of teachers’ colleges, principals, grade principals, elementary teachers and teachers’ college students. A total of 1,101 of 1,394 questionnaires were returned, for a rate of 79.0%. Descriptive statistics, reliability, item discrimination, and Kendall’s W were employed to analyze the data collected. The findings showed that: 1. There were five areas of teaching performance of formative teaching evaluation criteria for student teachers. The five areas of teaching performance were teaching attitudes, teaching plans, teaching methods, teaching techniques and teaching evaluations. 2. The five areas of teaching performance included twenty-two teaching behaviors which included seventy-three teaching behavior indicators. 3. The most important area of teaching performance was teaching attitudes. The second was teaching techniques. The third was teaching methods. The fourth was teaching plans. The last was teaching evaluations. 4. The items of formative teaching evaluation criteria for students’ teachers were rated as important on a Likert scale. The index of discrimination of those items was generally good.
    Relation: 新竹師院學報, 8, 235-290.
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2684View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback