政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/78476
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51049516      Online Users : 946
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78476


    Title: 德國罷工法秩序：1950至1980年的法官造法及其形成背景分析
    Other Titles: German Legal Order to Strike--Analysis of the Background of Judge-Made Law 1950-1980
    Authors: Lin, Chia-Ho
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 德國勞動法;罷工;勞動法院;工會運動
    German Labor Law;Strike;Labor Court;Trade Union Movement
    Date: 2014-12
    Issue Date: 2015-09-15 11:54:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在沒有任何制定法存在的情形下，德國罷工法秩序完全來自法官法，但並非由法院任意依自己的法政策想像形塑，毋寧是相關的社會行動者，包括工會運動與對抗的資本力量，在社會變遷之過程中，扮演一定的共同形成力量，由法院逐步發展與建立。從戰後1955、1971、1980的三則聯邦勞動法院判決，可看到今日作為德國罷工法秩序的主要內容，也當然可以觀察到不同社會行動者留下的軌跡。在當代經濟全球化發展下，面對不同的衝擊，新的罷工法秩序是否將誕生？基於過往經驗，社會行動者之影響與交互作用，顯然扮演重要的角色。
    In the absence of any statute, the legal framework governing the legality of striking in West Germany was determined entirely from judge-made law, known of prejudication. The question was not settled through the usual give and take of social actors-including trade unions-that typically shapes legislation subsequently interpreted by the courts. Instead, the court, not the legislature, established the legal order governing the right to strike in Germany. Three important decisions by the German Federal Labor Court, in 1955, 1971, 1980, can be seen, today, as major contributors to German law on strikes, though the influences of different social actors can also be observed. As social actors, labor and capital, are likely to play an important role in shaping industrial affairs, as is the growing importance of economic globalization. Should the old legal order governing industrial action be maintained, new judge-made law be accepted, or should a new legal order be adopted through the legislature?
    Relation: 歐美研究, 44(4), 467-535
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Law] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    467-535.pdf1466KbAdobe PDF2452View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback