English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50804128      Online Users : 746
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78077


    Title: 企業流程整合過程中之不穩定因子之管理─以績效獎勵制度為例
    The Management of Inflexibility in an Integrated Process--- Using Sales Compensation Process as an Example
    Authors: 曾蕙婷
    Contributors: 尚孝純
    曾蕙婷
    Keywords: 企業流程
    不穩定因子
    績效獎勵
    The Management of Inflexibility
    Integrated Process
    Sales Compensation Process
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2015-09-01 16:15:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: The objective of this paper is to provide a foundation for understanding the management of inflexibility in an integrated process by using sales compensation process as a studied case. The majority of process integration studies have focused on the design and management of an efficient operation by taking the advantage of information technology. Little was known about the downsides of process integration. It is necessary to build deep knowledge about the management of integration inflexibility so that risks of integration failure can be minimized.
    By summarizing literature and industry experiences of process integration and enterprise flexibility and inflexibility, three types of inflexibility are proposed. They are operational, organizational, and system inflexibilities. The sources of these inflexibilities can be categorized into two types: nature of IT-enabled integrating and technological barriers. These two sources of inflexibility, observed in the studied case, are interrelated and can correlatively affect business performance.
    Companies that intend to apply process integration to their sales compensation process would aim for eliminating the risk of integration downsides by examining the sources of inflexibilities in the IT-enabled process. Only with a solid and thorough view of the system, could companies achieve their goals of rolling out the packaged service in the compensation plan process. This paper analyses the up and down sides of process integration and plans to provide guidance for further application of process integration packages.
    Abstract 1
    Chapter One: Research Background and Motivation 2
    Chapter Two: Literature Review 5
    2.1 Process integration 5
    2.2 Process integration package 7
    2.3 Flexibility and inflexibility of process integration 9
    2.3.1 Organization flexibility and inflexibility 9
    2.3.2 Operational flexibility and inflexibility 10
    2.3.3 System flexibility and inflexibility 11
    2.3.4 Sources of integration inflexibility 11
    2.4 Sales Compensation 13
    Chapter Three: Case Analysis Framework 15
    3.1 Incentive management 15
    3.2 Causes of integration inflexibility 16
    Chapter Four: The Case Result 17
    4.1 Why Care About Commission Management? 17
    4.2 Burning issues in Current State 18
    4.3 How Future state will be 20
    4.4 Tool Selection 20
    4.5 Design strategy 24
    4.5.1 How to simplify pay plan 25
    4.5.2 Inflexibility faced during the integration 28
    Chapter Five: Discussion 35
    Chapter Six: Conclusion and Contribution 38
    References 40
    Reference: 1. Bruce Claremont (1992), Understanding the Business Aspects of Software Migrations.
    2. Deloitte (2007) 2006 Strategic Sales Compensation Survey “Building a Sales Compensation Plan That Works”, 2007 Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation
    3. Garner (2004) The Mission and Future of Integration.
    4. Goodhue, D. L., Wybo M. D., and Kirsch L. J. (1992) The Impact of Data Integration on the Costs and Benefits of, MIS Quarterly, 16, 3, 293.
    5. Hecht, B. (1997) Choose the right ERP software, Datamation, 43, 3, 56.
    6. Kern, Harris (2001), IT Organization: Building A World class Infrastructure, Prentice Hall.
    7. Michael Dunne (2006) Introducing the Concept of Sales Performance Management, Gartner Inc., 21 June 2006.
    8. Moore, J. E., and Love, M. S. (2005) IT professionals as organizational citizens, Association for Computing Machinery, Communications of the ACM, 48, 6, 88.
    9. Roldán, J. L., and Leal, A. (2003) A validation test of an adaptation of the DeLone and McLean’s Model in the Spanish EIS field. In Jeimy J. Cano (Eds.). Critical Reflections on Information Systems: A Systemic Approach. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
    10. Shang, S. (2005) A comparative study on users` role in of ERP software and BPM software implementation, eBusiness Journal, 2005, 331-351.
    11. Shang, S. (2007) The “What” and “Why” of the inflexibility of IT-enabled Process Integration, working in progress
    12. Sheth, A. P., and Larson J. A. (1990) Federated Database Systems for Managing Distributed, Heterogeneous, and Autonomous Databases, ACM Computing Surveys, 22, 3,184-236.
    13. Singletary, L. A. (2003) Empirical study of attributes and perceived benefits of applications integration for enterprise systems, Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College: United States – Louisiana.
    14. Singletary, L. A. (2004) Applications Integration: Is it Always Desirable?, Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
    15. Smith, Jack P. (2006), Building a sales compensation that works.
    16. Spathis, C., and Constantinides, S. (2003) The usefulness of ERP systems for effective management, Industrial Management + Data Systems, 103, 8/9, 677.
    17. Sushil, (2001) Enterprise Flexibility, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2, 4, 53.
    18. Sundaram, V. Liu, F. Dalmia, S. White, G.E. Tummala, R.R. (2001) Process integration for low-cost system on a package (SOP), Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2001. Proceedings., 51st.
    19. Themistocleous, M. (2004) Justifying the decisions for EAI implementations: a validated proposition of influential factors, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 17, 2, 85.
    20. Volkoff, O., Strong, D. M., and Elmes, M. B. (2005) Understanding enterprise systems-enabled integration, European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 110-120.
    21. Waring, T. and Wainwright, D. (2000) Interpreting integration with respect to information systems in organizations - image, theory and reality, Journal of Information Technology, 15, 2, 131.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營管理英語碩士學位學程(IMBA)
    93933011
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093933011
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營管理英語碩士學程IMBA] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2393View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback