政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/78051
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51673457      Online Users : 536
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78051


    Title: 相同會計師查核關係人交易雙方對負債資金成本之影響
    The Effect of Same Auditor Auditing Both Sides of Related Party Transactions on Cost of Debt
    Authors: 賴彥均
    Contributors: 周玲臺
    Chou, Ling Tai
    賴彥均
    Keywords: 關係人交易
    負債資金成本
    相同會計師查核交易雙方
    Related party transactions
    Cost of debt
    Same auditor auditing both sides of transactions
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2015-09-01 16:09:00 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究係探討關係人交易雙方是否委任相同會計師進行查核，對企業負債資金成本之效果。本文以企業利息費用除以平均帶息負債衡量企業之負債資金成本，企業之關係人交易部分則分成關係人銷貨交易、關係人進貨交易、關係人應收款、關係人應付款等四類型交易，來討論關係人交易與企業負債資金成本之關聯，接著將各類型關係人交易再細分成由相同會計師查核關係人交易雙方與由不同會計師查核關係人交易雙方兩類，以檢驗相同會計師查核對於企業負債資金成本之影響。
    研究結果發現關係人交易與企業負債資金成本之關聯並無統計上之顯著性。然將關係人交易進一步拆分為是否由相同會計師查核關係人交易雙方後，關係人進貨交易與關係人銷貨交易等兩類型交易若由相同會計師查核交易雙方，其相較於不同會計師查核能夠有效減緩企業負債資金成本增加之情形。
    This study examines the effect of same auditor auditing both sides of related party transactions (RPTs) on cost of debt. In this study, cost of debt is measured using interest expenses divided by average interest bearing debt and we hand collect from annual reports the data of the four common types of RPTs: sales to related parties, purchases from related parties, accounts receivable from related parties and accounts payable to related parties. For the four types, we further split RPTs into RPTs whose involved sides are audited by the same auditor and RPTs whose involved sides are audited by different auditors.
    We do not find any evidence that RPTs are associated with cost of debt. However, we find that for sales to related parties and purchases from related parties, RPTs whose involved sides are audited by the same auditor are associated with cost of debt less strongly than RPTs whose involved sides are audited by different auditors. Our results suggest that same auditor auditing can mitigated the detrimental effect of RPTs on cost of debt.
    Reference: 朱建宇，2014，關係人交易揭露─臺灣與美國之比較，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    李奕萱，2013，關係人交易與審計品質─以台灣高科技公司為例，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    馬秀如與侯宜庭，2007，受查者舞弊與審計失敗─力霸案之省思，會計研究月刊，第261期：28-47。
    陳瑞斌、翁慈青與朱全斌，2009，揭露水準對於信用評等與負債資金成本之影響，財務金融學刊，第17卷第2期：71-110。
    張瑞當、方俊儒與沈文華，2008，集團企業是否委託同一會計師事務所查核財務報表對其盈餘管理行為之影響，管理評論，第27卷第2期：29-52。
    黃菀琪，2013，關係人交易、公司治理與銀行授信利率，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    葉揚甲，2013，亞洲排行 台灣公司治理不如泰、馬，今周刊，第852期。
    Armstrong, C., J. E. Core, D. J. Taylor and R. E. Verrecchia. 2011. When does information asymmetry affect the cost of capital? Journal of Accounting Research 49(1): 1-40.
    Barth, M. E., Y. Konchitchki and W. R. Landsman. 2013. Cost of capital and earning transparency. Journal of Accounting and Economics 55: 206-224.
    Chava, S. and R. A. Jarrow. 2004. Bankruptcy prediction with industry effects. Review of Finance 8: 537-569.
    Chen, T. and Y. Liao. 2015. The economic consequence of disclosure quality under SFAS No. 131. Accounting Horizons 29(1): 1-22.
    Cheung, Y., P. R. Rau and A. Stouraitis. 2006. Tunneling, propping, and expropriation: Evidence from connected party transactions in Hong Kong. Journal of Financial Economics 82: 343-386.
    Chiu. S., L. Chou and S. Lin. 2015. Same auditor auditing both sides of related party transactions and analyst earnings forecasts. Working Paper.
    Dhaliwal, D., C. Hogan, R. Trezevant and M. Wilkins. 2011. Internal control disclosures, monitoring, and the cost of debt. The Accounting Review 86(4): 1131-1156.
    Eckles, D. L., M. Halek and R. Zhang. 2013. Information risk and cost of capital. The Journal of Risk and Insurance 81(4): 861-881.
    Easley, D. and M. O’Hara. 2004. Information and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance 59(4): 1553-1583.
    Fama, E. F. and K. R. French. 1992. The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance 47(2): 427-465.
    Fama, E. F. and K. R. French. 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on stock and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics 33(1): 3-56.
    Fee, C. E., C. J. Hadlock and S. Thomas. 2006. Corporate equity ownership and the governance of product market relationships. The Journal of Finance 61(3): 1217-1251.
    Francis, J., R. LaFond, P. Olsson and K. Schipper. 2005. The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39: 295-327.
    Gordon, E., E. Henry, and D. Palia. 2004a. Related party transactions and corporate governance. Advances in Financial Economics 9: 1–28.
    Gordon, E. A., E. Henry, T. J. Louwers, and B. J. Reed. 2007. Auditing related party transactions: A literature overview and research synthesis. Accounting Horizons 21(1): 81-102.
    Gray, P., P. Koh and Y. H. Tong. 2009. Accruals quality, information risk and cost of capital: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 36(1-2): 51-72.
    Healy, P. M. and K. G. Palepu. 2001. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31: 405-440.
    Hughes, J. S., J. Liu and J. Liu. 2007. Information asymmetry, diversification, and cost of capital. The Accounting Review 82(3): 705-729.
    Hwang, N. R., J. Chiou and Y. Wang. 2013. Effect of disclosure regulation on earnings management through related-party transactions: Evidence from Taiwanese firms operating in China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 32(4): 292-313.
    Johnstone, K. M., C. Li and S. Luo. 2014. Client-auditor supply chain relationships, audit quality, and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 33(4): 119-166.
    Kaplan, R. S. and G. Urwitz. 1979. Statistical models of bond ratings: A methodological inquiry. The Journal of Business 52: 231-261.
    Krishnan, G. V., B. Srinidhi and L. Su. Inventory policy, accruals quality and information risk. Review of Accounting Studies 13(2): 369-410.
    Kohlbeck, M. and B. W. Mayhew. 2010. Valuation of firms that disclose related party transactions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 29(2): 115-137.
    Lambert, R., C. Leuz and R. E. Verrecchia. 2007. Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research 45(2): 385-420.
    Lambert, R., C. Leuz and R. E. Verrecchia. 2011. Information asymmetry, information precision, and the cost of capital. Review of Finance 16(1): 1-29
    Lo, A. W. Y., R. M. K. Wong and M. Firth. 2010. Can corporate governance deter management from manipulating earnings? Evidence from related-party sales transactions in China. Journal of Corporate Finance 16: 225-235.
    Louwers, T., E. Henry, B. J. Reed and A. Gordon. 2008. Deficiencies in auditing related-party transactions: Insights from AAERs. Current Issues in Auditing 2(2): A10-A16.
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2009. Guide on fighting abusive related party transactions in Asia.
    Ryngaert, M. and S. Thomas. 2012. Not all related party transactions (RPTs) are the same: Ex ante versus ex post RPTs. Journal of Accounting Research 50(5): 845-882.
    Sengupta, P. 1998. Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. The Accounting Review 73(4): 459-474.
    Wall Street Journal. 2003. Many companies report transactions with top officers. (December 29): A1.
    Wong, R. M. K., J. Kim and A. W. Y. Lo. 2015. Are related-party sales value-adding or value-destroying? Evidence from China. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 26(1): 1-38.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    102353018
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102353018
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    301801.pdf679KbAdobe PDF2191View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback