Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/77257
|
| Title: | 創意政策的開發與評鑑： 以高雄市政策創新發展為例
The Development and Evaluation of Creative Policies: A Case Study of Kaohsiung City Innovative Policies |
| Authors: | 楊婷安
Yang, Ting An |
| Contributors: | 童振源
Tung, Chen Yuan
楊婷安
Yang, Ting An |
| Keywords: | 政府創新
創意市場
創新政策
企業型政府
idea market
innovation policy
innovation government
entrepreneurial government |
| Date: | 2015 |
| Issue Date: | 2015-08-03 13:33:30 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 公共服務的來臨，政府單位不斷用心發展更積極創新的作為以提升各項業務服務品質，創新的政策對於政府效能與國民福祉的提升有非常重要的地位，然而優質的政策並不容易提出，在創意開發的運用實例上，不乏國際大企業利用預測市場的網路平台開發公司員工的集體智慧或匯聚眾人資訊協助企業進行決策，因此本文欲以創意市場運用在高雄市政府開發創新政策，探究此機制是否有助於提升市府的施政品質。
本研究內容主要根據政治大學童振源教授與高雄市政府合作之「高雄市發展政策創新與評鑑計畫」，從旁觀察紀錄，事後以質性研究法與量化研究法，檢證創意市場在政府部門的可行性，期能將創意市場機制應用在公部門體系，成為促進政府創新改革重要方法之一。計畫透過提案階段、書審階段、初選階段、決選階段，以虛擬貨幣的方式交易評鑑，判斷提案之優劣，選出最佳創新政策。
研究結果發現獲選之最佳創新政策提案在可行性、創新程度、預期效益、符合市民需求、對高雄發展有利、建議市府採用等指標均獲得相當程度認同，值得高雄市政府深入檢視與評估，進一步規劃相關的政策配套與執行方案。政策創新市場提供基層同仁參與政策產生與決策的機會，營造一個可溝通、討論的平台，使政策在眾人的互相激盪與琢磨之下，能夠更多元、更豐富。而未來有更健全的配套措施與實施辦法後，期望能開放一般民眾加入政策的開發與評鑑，以增加市民對市政議題的關注、參與及認同，提升高雄市政府在市民心中的認同感。
The coming of public service causes that the government agencies continuously develop more positive and innovative conducts by heart to improve service quality for various businesses. Innovative policy occupies an important place in the promotion of government effectiveness and national welfare. However, it’s not so easy to put forward a good quality policy. For living examples applied in creative development, there is no lack of large-sized international companies using collective intelligence of employees in network platform development companies engaged in market predicting, or collecting people’s information to assist company’s decision-making. Therefore, this article intends to use idea marketplace in Kaohsiung City Government to develop innovative policy and explore if this mechanism contributes to the improvement of city government’s administrative quality.
The contents of this study mainly based on “Innovation and Assessment Program for Kaohsiung City’s Development Policies” under the cooperation between Professor Tung, Chen-Yuan of Chengchi University and Kaohsiung City Government, recording and watching from the sideline, using qualitative and quantitative research methods afterwards to verify the feasibility of idea marketplace in government sectors, which is expecting to apply the mechanism of idea marketplace in public sector system and become one of important ways to improve the government’s innovation and reform. The best innovative policy will be selected from this program through the stage of proposal, written review, primary selection and final selection to judge the strength and weakness of the proposal with the assessment of virtual currency trading.
Research results found that the selected proposal for the best innovative policy in the feasibility, degree of innovation and predicted effectiveness complies with the demand of the citizens and benefits to the development of Kaohsiung City. This study proposed the city government to adopt such indicators to obtain a considerable degree of identification, which is worth of Kaohsiung City Government’s deep review and evaluation for further planning of the relevant policy set and implementation scheme. Policy idea marketplace provides colleagues at the basic level with the opportunities to participate in policy generating and decision-making, building a platform for communication and discussion, and enabling the policy to be more multiple and plentiful under people’s mutual brainstorming and study. After more healthy supporting measures and implementation methods in the future, this study hopes to open the development and assessment of policy for general public so as to increase citizen’s concern about, participation in and identification of municipal issues and improve the acceptance of Kaohsiung City Government in citizen’s heart. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
專書著作
《政府創新服務新主張 : 3Q Very much》，2004b。台北：行政院研考會。
《創新的智慧－創新思考輕鬆學》，2006。台北：國家文官培訓所。
《創新機制在政府部門之運用》，2004a。台北：行政院研考會。
王佃利、曹現強，2003，《公共決策導論》。北京，中國人民大學出版社。
丘昌泰，1998，《政策科學之理論與實際─美國與台灣經驗》。台北：五南。
丘昌泰，2004，《公正政策：基礎篇》。台北：巨流。
朱志宏，1995，《公共政策》。台北：三民。
江岷欽，劉坤億，1999，《企業型政府 : 理念・實務・省思》。台北：智勝。
池秉聰，童振源，2015，創意市場之建構與成效評估：以一家臺灣保險公司為例，Working Paper。
余致力，2002，《民意與公共政策：理論探討與實證研究》。台北：五南。
余致力、毛壽龍、陳敦源、郭昱瑩，2008，《公共政策》。台北：致勝。
吳瓊思、李允傑、陳銘薰，2005，《公共管理》。台北：空大。
杜武志，1993，《員工提案制度實務》。台北：清華科學管理圖書中心。
林水波，1999，《政府再造》。台北：智勝。
張金馬，1992，《政策科學導論》。北京：中國人民大學出版社。
張國慶，1997，《現代公共政策導論》。北京：北京大學出版社。
陳坤賞，1992 ，《如何做好提案改善》。台北：遠流。
陳振明，2006，《公共政策學》。北京，中國人民大學出版社。
舒澤虎，2005，《公共政策學》。上海：人民大出版社。
楊望遠，1999，《企業合理化改善案例與實務》。台北:中衛發展中心。
劉奕鐘，2000，《品管圈及提案改善活動的活化》。桃園：福升國際顧問股份有限公司。
劉靖華等著，2002，《政府創新》。北京：中國社會科學。
鄭克強，2009，《政府應急管理與公共服務案例研究》。北京：中國社會科學。
鄭興弟，2011，《政策規劃：理論與方法》。台北：商鼎文化。
謝明，2006，《公共政策導論》。北京：中國人民大學出版社。
專書譯著
Arthur A. Berger著，黃光玉、劉念夏、陳清文譯，2004，《媒介與傳播研究方法：質化與量化研究途徑。台北：風雲論壇。
Charles E. Lindblom and Edward J. Woodhouse 著，陳恆鈞、王崇斌、李珊瑩譯，2001，《政策制定的過程》。台北:韋伯文化。
David Osborne and Ted Gaebler著，劉毓玲譯，1993，《新政府運動》。台北：天下文化。
James Surowiecki著，楊玉齡譯，2005，《群眾的智慧 : 如何讓整個世界成為你的智囊團》。台北：遠流。
Joseph A. Maxwell著，高熏芳、林盈助、王向葵譯，2001，《質化研究設計：一種互動取向的方法》。台北：心理。
Kruschke, Earl R and Jackson, Byron M著，唐理斌等譯，1992，《公共政策詞典》。上海:遠東。
根井雅弘著，劉錦秀譯，2003，《熊彼得 : 知識經濟的創造性破壞》(シュンペ-タ- : 企業者精神.新結合.創造的破壞とは何か)。台北:商周。
期刊
余伯泉，1989，〈組織升級的關鍵-提案制度〉，《管理雜誌》(178):83-85。
孫本初，2003，〈公部門創新之基礎－厚植智慧資本〉，《T&D飛訊》(11)。
黃哲彬、黃湘婷，2005，〈創新管理與學校創新經營〉，《國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究集刊》(1):211-232。
劉嘉鳳，2010，〈創新管理運用於公部門組織之探討－以台北市民政團隊提案制度為例〉，《T&D飛訊》(95)。
學位論文
杜映磊，2014，《創意市場之開發與運用：以「國寶人壽登峰造極計畫」為例》。台北：國立政治大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
陳必碩，1999 年，《員工改善提案績效決定性因素之研究》。桃園：國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
官方文件
考試院，2012/2/6。《行政院與所屬中央及地方各機關建立參與及建議制度實施要點》。
行政院研究發展考核委員會，2012，《公共服務創新策略與評獎機制之研究》。
參考網站
〈政治大學預測市場研究中心〉，https://nccupm.wordpress.com/。
〈未來事件交易所〉，http://xfuture.org/。
〈高雄市發展政策創新與評鑑活動專網〉，https://betterkh.wordpress.com/。
二、英文部分
專書
Bozeman, B., and Straussman, J. D., 1990, Public Management Strategies : Guidelines for Managerial Effectiveness. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
Denz, F. A., 1946, Why a Suggestion Plan? In American Association (ED), Getting and Using Employees’ Ideas.
DiIulio, J. J., 1994, Deregulating the Public service : Can Government Be Improved? Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Imai M., 1986, KAIZEN-The Key To Japan’s Competitive Success. New York: McGraw-Hill , Inc.
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H., 1995, The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Peters, B. G., 1996, The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models. Lawrence, Kan: University Press of Kansas.
Seinwerth, H. W., 1948, Getting Results From Suggestion Plans, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
專書篇章
Skiera, B. and Spann, M., 2011, “Using Prediction Markets in New Product Development,” In L. V. Williams (Ed.), Prediction Markets: Theory and Applications(pp. 75-86), London: Routledgepp.
期刊論文
Berg, J., Nelson, F. and Rietz, T., 2008, “Prediction Market Accuracy in the Long Run.” International Journal of Forecasting 24(2):285–300.
Brüggelambert, G., 2004, “Information and Efficiency in Political Stock Markets: Using Computerized Markets to Predict Election Results.” Applied Economics 36(7): 742-768.
Cambell, T., 2004, Metropolitan Management Lessons and Challenges in Governing Mega-Cities, INTA 28 World Urban Development Congress.
Carnevale, D. G. and Sharp, B. S., 1993, “The Old Employee Suggestion Box.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 13(2): 82-92.
Garfield, M. J., Taylor, N. J., Dennis, A. R. and Satzinger, J. W., 2001, “Modifying Paradigms - Individual Differences, Creativity Techniques, and Exposure to Ideas in Group Idea Generation,” Information Systems Research 12(3): 322-333.
Griffiths-Hemans, J. and Grover, R., 2006, “Setting the Stage for Creative New Products: Investigating the Idea Fruition Process,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(1): 27-39.
HMSO, 1969, Report of the committee on public participation in planning: People and planning. London: HMSO.
Ho, T.-H. and Chen, K.-Y.,2007, “Discovering and Managing New Product Blockbusters: The Magic and Science of Prediction Markets,” California Management Review 50(1):144-158.
Jansen, Justin J. P., Frans A. J. Van Den Bosch, and Volberda H. W., 2006, “Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators”, Management Science 52(11): 1661-1674.
Justin, W. and Zitzewitz, E., 2004, “Prediction Markets.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(2): 107-126.
LaComb, Ann, C., Barnett, J. A. and Pan Q., 2007, “The Imagination Market”, Information Systems Frontier 9(2-3): 245-256.
Lavoie, J., 2009, “The Innovation Engine at Rite-Solutions: Lessons from the CEO,” Journal of Prediction Markets 3(1): 1-11.
Leigh, A., Wolfers, J. and Zitzewitz, E., 2003, “What Do Financial Markets Think of War in Iraq?” Working paper, No. 9587.
Nunamaker, J. F., Briggs, R. O., Mittleman, D. D., Vogel, D. R. and Balthazard, P. A., 1996, “Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings,” Journal of Management Information Systems 13(3): 163-207.
Ozer, Muammer, 2005, “Factors Which Influence Decision Marking in New Product Evaluation”, European Journal of Operational Research 163(3): 784-801.
Polzin, M. J., 1998, “Employee suggestion system：Boosting Productivity and Profits.” HR. Human Resource Planning 21(3):49-50.
Servan-Schreiber, E., Wolfers, J., Pennock, D. M. and Galebach, B., 2004, “Prediction Markets: Does Money Matter?” Electronic Markets 14(3): 243-251.
Soukhoroukova, A., Spann, M. and Skiera, B., 2007, “Creating and Evaluating New Product Ideas with Idea Markets,” Working Paper, University of Passau.
Spears, B., LaComb, C., Interrante, J., Barnett, J. and Senturk-Dogonaksoy, D., 2009, “Examining Trader Behavior in Idea Markets: An Implementation of GE’s Imagination Markets,” Journal of Prediction Markets 3(1): 17-39.
Toubia, O., 2006, “Idea Generation, Creativity, and Incentives,” Marketing Science 25(5): 411-425.
Van Bruggen, G. H., Lilien, G. L. and Kacker, M., 2002, “Informants in Organizational Marketing Research: Why use Multiple Informants and How to Aggregate Responses,” Journal of Marketing Research 39(4): 469-478. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
國家發展研究所
102261014 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102261014 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [國家發展研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 101401.pdf | 3037Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 112 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
