Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/77152
|
| Title: | 管理階層能力與企業社會責任績效之關聯性
The Relationship between Managerial Ability and Corporate Social Performance |
| Authors: | 彭珮欣
Peng, Pei Hsin |
| Contributors: | 金成隆
彭珮欣
Peng, Pei Hsin |
| Keywords: | 管理階層能力
企業社會責任
企業社會責任績效
Managerial ability
Corporate Social Responsibility
Corporate Social Performance |
| Date: | 2015 |
| Issue Date: | 2015-08-03 13:17:05 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 近年來台灣企業爆發許多食安及環境保護問題，引起社會大眾對企業的倫理行為產生高度的關切，使得政府、企業及社會也越來越重視企業社會責任相關議題，因此如何將公司與永續經營策略結合，是高階管理階層所面臨的重要課題。本研究以台灣上市櫃公司為樣本，旨在探討管理階層能力是否會影響企業社會責任之揭露及執行程度。本研究推論管理階層決定企業策略方針、管理制度及組織文化，而較有能力之管理階層較能宏觀全球趨勢，並在永續經營理念下，採行較高程度之社會責任行動。本研究之管理階層能力採用Demerjian et al.(2013)的衡量方式，以資料包絡分析法(DEA)來計算各產業下的公司效率並區分出管理階層所創造之經營效率。實證結果顯示：管理階層能力愈好，愈會揭露企業社會責任資訊，且執行企業社會責任的程度亦較高，符合本研究之推論。
A series of food safety and environmental incidents in recent years in Taiwan had intrigued public concern about ethical activities of company. Aware of the influence of these activities on society, the government, corporates and society have further increased their attention to corporate social responsibility (CSR).
Therefore, the lesson managers have to learn is to formulate corporate strategies aligned with sustainability principles. The objective of this thesis is to explore whether managerial ability is associated with CSR among Taiwan listed firms. We assume that managers are usually empowered with the authority to decide corporate strategies, policies and culture; therefore, more able managers are more knowledgeable of macro-economic trends and tend to engage more in CSR with
sustainability goals. With respect to the measurement of managerial ability, we follow Demerjian et al.(2013), who conduct data envelopment analysis (DEA) to estimate firm efficiency and purge key firm-specific characteristics. The empirical results reveal that the higher quality managers are willing to disclose more information of CSR and in turn positively affects firm’s corporate social
performance in accordance with our assumption. |
| Reference: | 方世榮、黃瓊瑤與陳育成，2008，投資人回應企業網站資訊揭露訊號模型－
代理理論與關係行銷的觀點，中原企管評論，第六卷1 期：99-114。
王慧馨，2006，公司治理幫企業走遠路，經濟日報， A1 版。
江正信，2000，高階經營團隊與企業策略決策模式、組織學習傾向、創新能
力及經營績效之關係研究，成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
李秀英、劉俊儒與楊筱翎，2011，企業社會責任與公司績效之關聯性，東海
管理評論，第13 卷，第1 期：77-112。
沈中華與張元，2008，企業的社會責任可以改善財務績效嗎?-以英國FTSE
社會責任指數為例，經濟論文，第36 期 (3 月)：339-386。
邱秀清、童雅玲與陳玟齡，2013，董事會特性對企業社會責任之影響。
許崇源與朱全斌，2006，獨立董事及外部董事功能之研究，2006 會計理論
與實務研討會，東吳大學。
許鎦響，2009，台灣 IC 設計產業生產效率評估/三階段 DEA 法之應用，
商管科技季刊，第10 期(3 月)：439-463。
程心瑤，2011，公司治理與企業責任報告之揭露，會計評論，第52 期：35-
76。
馮燕，2004，企業基金會公益資源運用個案研究，行政院國家科學委員會研
究報告。
黃台心與陳盈秀，2005，應用三階段估計法探討台灣地區銀行業經濟效率，
貨幣市場，第九卷，第4 期：1-27。
黃正忠，2009，突破CSR 在台灣的罩門，證券櫃檯月刊，141 期：22-26。
黃瓊瑤、方世榮與陳育成，2012，家族控制與企業社會責任績效之關聯性，
中山管理評論，2012 年(六月)，第二十卷，第2 期：673-711。
黃鏡如、傅祖壇與黃美瑛，2008，績效評估－效率與生產力之理論與應用，
新陸書局股份有限公司。
盧永祥與傅祖壇，2007，產出品質、組織特性與臺灣高等技職院校之經營效
率，管理評論，第26 期(2 月)：1-21。
67
Abbott, M., and C. Doucouliagos, 2003. The efficiency of Australian
universities: a data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education
review, 22(1), 89-97.
Aggarwal, R. K. and D. Nanda, 2004. Access, Common Agency and Board
Size. Working paper, University of Virginia.
Aier, J., J. Comprix, M. Gunlock, and D. Lee. 2005. The financial expertise of
CFOs and accounting restatements. Accounting Horizons 19 (3): 123–
135.
Alexander, G. J., and A. Buchholz, 1978. Corporate social responsibility and
stock market performance. Academy of Management journal, 21(3) :
479-486.
Altman, E. I., and E. Hotchkiss, 2006. Corporate financial distress and
bankruptcy: Predict and avoid bankruptcy, analyze and invest in
distressed debt (Vol. 289) : John Wiley and Sons.
Al-Tuwaijri, S. A., E. Christensen, and E. Hughes Ii, 2004. The relations among
environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic
performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Accounting,
organizations and society 29(5): 447-471.
Anderson, J. C., and W. Frankle, 1980. Voluntary social reporting: an iso-beta
portfolio analysis. Accounting Review :467-479.
Arrow, K. J. 1975. Vertical integration and communication. The Bell Journal of
Economics: 173-183.
Attig, N. 2011. A good horse never lacks a saddle: Management quality
practices and corporate social responsibility. Working paper, Saint
Mary’s University.
Attig, N., and S. Cleary. 2012. Organization capital and access to finance: The
effect of management style. Working paper, Queen‘s University.
Aupperle, Kenneth E. 1991 ‘The use of forced-choice survey procedures in
assessing corporate social orientation’ in Research in corporate social
performance and policy.James E. Post (ed.), 12, 269-279. Greenwich,
CT: JAI Press.
Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, , and W. Cooper, 1984. Some models for estimating
technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis.
Management science 30 (9):1078-1092.
Baron, D.P., 2001. Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and
integrated strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy
10 (1): 7-45.
Barr, R. S., and T. F. Siems, 1997. Bank failure prediction using DEA to
measure management quality. In Interfaces in Computer Science and
Operations Research Springer US.: 341-365.
Becchetti, L., R. Ciciretti, , and I. Hasan, 2007. Corporate social responsibility
and shareholder`s value: an event study analysis (No. 2007-6).
68
Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
Bénabou, R., and J. Tirole, (2010). Individual and corporate social
responsibility. Economical 77 (305):1-19.
Bowen, H. 1953. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York 1:
Harper.
Bowman, E. H., and M. Haire, 1975. A Strategic Posture Toward Corporate
Social Responsibility. California Management Review 18(2).
Bushman, R., Q. Chen, E. Engel and A. Smith. 2004. Financial accounting
information, organizational complexity and corporate governance
systems. J. Accounting Economic 37(2):167–201.
Carroll, A. B. 1991. The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward
the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business
Horizons 34. (4):39-48.
Carroll, A. B. 1999. Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional
construct. Business and society 38(3): 268-295.
Chakravarthy, B. S. 1986. Measuring strategic performance. Strategic
management journal7(5): 437-458.
Charnes, A., W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, 1978. Measuring the efficiency of
decision making units. European journal of operational research 2(6):
429-444.
Cormier, D., and M. Gordon, 2001. An examination of social and environmental
reporting strategies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability
Journal 14(5): 587-617.
Davis, E. and J. Kay, 1993. European mergers and merger policy, 1st, New
York: Oxford University Press.
Davis, K. 1973. The case for and against business assumption of social
responsibilities. Academy of Management journal 16(2): 312-322.
DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo and M. Stulz. 2010. Seasoned equity offerings,
market timing, and the corporate lifecycle. J. Financial Economic
95(3):275–295.
Demerjian, P. R., B. Lev, F. Lewis, and E. McVay, 2013. Managerial ability and
earnings quality. The Accounting Review 88(2): 463-498.
Demerjian, P., B. Lev, and S. McVay. 2012. Quantifying managerial ability: A
new measure and validity tests. Management Science 58 (7): 1229–
1248.
Dhaliwal, D. S., Z. Li, A. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang, 2011. Voluntary nonfinancial
disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate
social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review 86(1): 59-100.
Dierkes, M., and R. Coppock, 1978. Europe tries the corporate social report.
Business and Society Review, 16(Spring), 21-24.
El Ghoul, S., O. Guedhami, C. C. Kwok and D. R. Mishra, 2011. Does
69
corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?. Journal of
Banking and Finance, 35(9), 2388-2406.
Epstein, M. J. 2008. Making sustainability work. Best practices in managing
and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic
impacts. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
Farrell, M. J. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the
Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 253-290.
Fernández‐Kranz, D., and J. Santaló, 2010. When necessity becomes a virtue:
The effect of product market competition on corporate social
responsibility. Journal of Economics and Management
Strategy, 19(2), 453-487.
Finkelstein, S., and D. C. Hambrick, 1990. Top-management-team tenure and
organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial
discretion. Administrative science quarterly, 484-503.
Flannery, B. L., and D. R. May, 1994. Prominent factors influencing
environmental activities: Application of the environmental leadership
model (ELM). The Leadership Quarterly, 5(3), 201-221.
Francis, J., A. Huang, S. Rajgopal, and A. Zang. 2008. CEO reputation and
earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (1): 109–
147.
Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. Strategic Planning. Sloan Management Review,
25(2), 83-84.
Fried, H. O., C. K. Lovell, S. S. Schmidt and S. Yaisawarng, 2002. Accounting
for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment
analysis. Journal of productivity Analysis, 17(1-2), 157-174.
Friedman, M., 1970, The Social responsibility of business is to increase its
profits. New York Yunes Magazine 3. No.13 : 32-33.
Frooman, J. 1997. Socially Irresponsible and Illegal Behavior and Shareholder
Wealth A Meta-Analysis of Event Studies. Business and
Society, 36(3), 221-249.
Gephart, R. P. 1991. Multiple approaches for tracking corporate social
performance: Insights from a study of major industrial
accidents. Research in Corporate Social Performance and
Policy, 12, 359–383.
Godfrey, P. C. 2005. The Relationship between Corporate Philanthropy and
Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective. Academy of
Management Review 30.No. 4:777-798.
Godfrey, P. C., C. B. Merrill and J. M. Hansen, 2009. The Relationship between
corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test
of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal
30. No. 4: 425-445.
Graves, S. B. and S. A. Waddock, 1994. Institutional owners and social
70
performance. Academy of Management Journal 37. No.4:1034-1046.
Greider, W. 1998. One world, ready or not: The manic logic of global
capitalism. Simon and Schuster.
Griffin, J. J., and J. F. Mahon, 1997. The corporate social performance and
corporate financial performance debate twenty-five years of
incomparable research. Business and Society, 36(1), 5-31.
Haleblian, J., and S. Finkelstein, 1993. Top management team size, CEO
dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of
environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management
Journal, 36(4), 844-863.
Hambrick, D. C., and P. A. Mason. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a
reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review 9 (2):
193-206.
Hart, S. 1997. Beyond Greening: Strategies for asustainable world. Harvard
Business Review 75.No.1: 66-76.
Herrmann, P., and D. K. Datta, 2002. CEO successor characteristics and the
choice of foreign market entry mode: An empirical study. Journal of
International Business Studies, 551-569.
Hitt, M. A., and B. B. Tyler, 1991. Strategic decision models: Integrating
different perspectives. Strategic management journal, 12(5), 327-351.
Hofstede, G. 1984. Culture`s consequences: International differences in workrelated
values (Vol. 5).
Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling, 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial
behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial
economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Jo, H., and M. A. Harjoto, 2011. Corporate governance and firm value: The
impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business
Ethics, 103(3), 351-383.
Jo, H., and M. A. Harjoto, 2012. The causal effect of corporate governance on
corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 106(1), 53-
72.
Johnson, R. A., and D. W. Greening, 1999. The effects of corporate governance
and institutional ownership types on corporate social
performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564-576.
Jones, M. T. 1999. The institutional determinants of social responsibility.
Journal of Business Ethics, 20(2), 163-179.
Jones, M. T., 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and
economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), p.404-437.
Kanter, R. M. 1999. From spare change to real change: The Social Sector as
Beta Site for Business Innovation. Harvard Business Review 77. No.3:
122-132.
71
Kim, Y., M. S. Park and Wier, B. 2012. Is earnings quality associated with
corporate social responsibility?. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 761-
796.
Kotler, P. and N. Lee, 2005. Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most
good for your company and your cause. 1st. Hoboken. NJ: Wiley.
Laszlo, C. 2003. The sustainable company: How to create lasting value through
social and environmental performance. Washington, DC: Island Press.
1st.
Leverty, J. T., and M. F. Grace, 2012. Dupes or incompetents? An examination
of management`s impact on firm distress. Journal of Risk and
Insurance, 79(3), 751-783.
Levitt, T. 1958. The Dangers of social-responsibility. Harvard business
review, 36(5), 41-50.
Libby, R., and J. Luft, 1993. Determinants of judgment performance in
accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(5), 425-450.
Mackey, A., T. B. Mackey, and J. B. Barney, (2007). Corporate social
responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and
corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817-
835.
McGuire, J. B. 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial
performance. Academy of Management Journal 31 (4): 854-872.
McGuire, J. W. 1963. Business and society :272-3). New York: McGraw-Hill.
McWilliams, A., D. S. Siegel, and P. M. Wright, 2006, Corporate social
responsibility: strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies
43.No.1:1-18.
Norburn, D., and S. Birley, 1988. The top management team and corporate
performance. Strategic Management Journal, 9(3), 225-237.
Orlitzky, M., and J. D. Benjamin, 2001. Corporate social performance and firm
risk: A meta-analytic review. Business and Society, 40(4), 369-396.
Orlitzky, M., F. L. Schmidt, and Rynes, S. L. 2003. Corporate social and
financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3),
403-441.
Patrick, J.A., R.F. Scherer, 1993. Competing social responsibility values and the
functional roles of managers, Journal of Managerial Psychology,
Vol.8 No.3 :14-20
Patten, D. M. 1992. Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of
accounting and public policy, 10(4), 297-308.
Peter, R. Demerjian, Baruch Lev, Melissa F. Lewis, and Sarah E. McVay. 2013.
Managerial Ability and Earnings Quality. The Accounting Review 88.
No. 2 : 463–498.
72
Porter, M. E. 1990. The Competitive advantage of notions. Harvard business
review.
Porter, M. E. and M. R. Kramer, 2002. The Competitive advantage of corporate
philanthropy. Harvard Business Review 80. No.12: 56-68.
Porter, M. E., and M. R. Kramer, 2011. Creating shared value. Harvard business
review, 89(1/2), 62-77.
Posner, R. A. 1973. Economic approach tolegal procedure and judicial
administration, An. J. Legal Stud., 2, 399.
Preston, L. E., and D. P. O’bannon, 1997. The corporate social-financial
performance relationship. Business and society, 36(4), 419-429.
Richardson, A. J., and M. Welker, 2001. Social disclosure, financial disclosure
and the cost of equity capital. Accounting, Organizations and
Society, 26(7), 597-616.
Ruf, B. M., K. Muralidhar, R. M. Brown, J. J. Janney, and K. Paul, (2001). An
empirical investigation of the relationship between change in
corporate social performance and financial performance: a stakeholder
theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(2), 143-156.
Russo, M. V., and P. A. Fouts, 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate
environmental performance and profitability. Academy of
management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.
Schuler, D. A., and M. Cording, 2006. A corporate social performance–
corporate financial performance behavioral model for
consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 540-558.
Schwartz, M. S., and A. B. Carroll, 2003. Corporate social responsibility: a
three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 503-530.
Servaes, H., and A. Tamayo, 2013. The impact of corporate social responsibility
on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management
Science, 59(5), 1045-1061.
Sethi, S. P. 1975. Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical
Framework. California management review, 17(3).
Shang, J. K., W. T. Hung, C. F. Lo, and F. C. Wang, 2008. Ecommerce and hotel
performance: three-stage DEA analysis. The Service Industries
Journal,28(4), 529-540.
Sheldon, O. 1923. The Philosophy of Management. Bath, England: Sir Isaac
Pitman and Sons.
Shen, C. H., and Chang, Y., 2009. Ambition versus conscience, does corporate
social responsibility pay off? The application of matching
methods. Journal of Business Ethics, 88 (1):133-153.
Shrivastava, P. 1995. Industrial/environmental crises and corporate social
responsibility. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 24(1), 211-227.
Staw, B. M., and L. D. Epstein, 2000. What bandwagons bring: Effects of
73
popular management techniques on corporate performance,
reputation, and CEO pay. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3),
523-556.
Stulz, R. 1990. Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Journal of
financial Economics, 26(1), 3-27.
Sturdivant, F. D., J. L. Ginter, and A. G. Sawyer, 1985. Managers` conservatism
and corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 6(1), 17-
38.
Surroca, J., J. A. Tribó, and S. Waddock, 2010. Corporate responsibility and
financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic
Management Journal, 31(5), 463-490.
Thomas, A. S., and R. L. Simerly, 1994. The chief executive officer and
corporate social performance: An interdisciplinary
examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(12), 959-968.
Thomas, A. S., and R. L. Simerly, 1995. Internal determinants of corporate
social performance: The role of top managers. In Academy of
Management Proceedings (Vol. 1995, No. 1, pp. 411-415). Academy
of Management.
Trotman, K. T., and G. W. Bradley, 1981. Associations between social
responsibility disclosure and characteristics of
companies. Accounting, organizations and society, 6(4), 355-362.
Ullmann, A. A. 1985. Data in search of a theory: a critical examination of the
relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and
economic performance of US firms. Academy of management
Review, 10(3), 540-557.
Vance, S. C. 1975. Are socially responsible corporations good investment
risks. Management review, 64(8), 19-24.
Waddock, S. and S. Graves, 1997. The Corporate Social Performance-Financial
Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal 18.No.4:303-319.
Wagner, W. G., J. Pfeffer, and C. A. O`Reilly III, 1984. Organizational
demography and turnover in top-management group. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 74-92.
Waldman, D. A., M. S. de Luque, N. Washburn, R. J. House, B. Adetoun, A.
Barrasa, and C. P. Wilderom, 2006. Cultural and leadership predictors
of corporate social responsibility values of top management: a
GLOBE study of 15 countries. Journal of International Business
Studies, 37(6), 823-837.
Wang, E. C., and W. Huang, 2007. Relative efficiency of rand activities: A
cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA
approach. Research Policy, 36(2), 260-273.
Wartick, S. L., and P. L. Cochran, 1985. The evolution of the corporate social
performance model. Academy of management review, 10(4), 758-769.
74
Wood, D. J. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of
management review, 16(4), 691-718.
Zahra, S.A., J.A. Pearce, 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial
performance: a review and integrative model. Journal of Management
15 (2) :291-334. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
101353025 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101353025 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
