政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/77133
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51303441      Online Users : 831
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Commerce > MBA Program > Theses >  Item 140.119/77133


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/77133


    Title: 床墊產業之消費者網路口碑研究
    A Study on Consumer’s e-Word-of-Mouth in Taiwanese Mattress Industry
    Authors: 林天瀚
    Contributors: 張愛華
    李嘉林
    林天瀚
    Keywords: 床墊產業
    網路口碑
    消費者行為
    消費者決策流程
    內容分析法
    Mattress Industry
    e-Word-of-Mouth
    Consumer Behvior
    Consumer Purchase Decision Process
    Content Analysis
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2015-08-03 13:14:03 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著經濟成長，高度競爭的生活環境造成人們睡眠品質不佳或失眠，多半是深受入睡困難、淺眠和早醒等困擾。因此，對於現代人逐漸願意投資在寢具和床墊產品只求一夜好眠。
    床墊是為耐久財，生命週期長且消費者感知風險高，因此大多消費者在購買前會先進行相關資訊蒐集。網路的普及使得商品資訊在網路上公開，使得網路成為消費者購物前蒐集資訊的主要管道。而隨著web2.0的興起，消費者在網路上分享產品資訊的網路口碑有了爆炸性的增加，產生了讓廠商無法忽視的網路口碑效應。透過網路口碑的分析可以了解消費者與市場需求，提供廠商未來修正整體經營策略。
    本研究透過網路蒐集網路口碑進行內容分析法，瞭解消費者選購床墊的決策流程以及對國內外高價品牌床墊的評價。從研究結果可以發現，近四成的消費者是為了改善睡眠品質而產生購買床墊的需求。實體通路及網路是消費者主要蒐集資訊的管道。在評估床墊時，消費者重視床墊品質、價格以及軟硬度，他們在意床墊和彈簧的設計以及床墊軟硬度。而有近五成五的消費者是偏好較硬床墊。近九成九的購買管道為品牌床墊專賣店和一般床墊經銷通路居多。約1%的消費者由於網路購物的七天鑑賞期而選擇在網路購物平台購買。近七成五的消費者購買後表示滿意，近二成五的消費者購後仍不滿意床墊與彈簧的設計與材質，以及依舊腰酸背痛等。
    消費者對於國內外床墊品牌的正面口碑多於負面口碑，其中消費者對席伊麗品牌形象最佳，負面評論少。而消費者對本土床墊品牌，如：德泰彈簧床、老K牌彈簧床和10 Days的品質也有正面的評價，但對於品牌形象與經營則保持負面的態度，建議未來應針對加強品牌權益的目標，調整行銷策略。
    With economic growth, a highly competitive environment results people in poor quality sleep or insomnia. Most of them suffer from difficulty in falling asleep, light sleep and wake early. Therefore, people are more and more willing to invest in bedding, pillow and matress just for a good quality sleep.
    Due to the mattresses are durable goods with long product life cycle and perceived risk, consumers usually spend a lot of time to study the mattresses before purchasing. On the other hand, with the universal of the Internet and the growth of web2.0, the blooming e word-of-mouths (eWOM) makes consumer tend to uderstand products in advance by reading comments. That indeed cause a serious effect on eWOM for firms who should not ignore. Through analyzing the eWOM, firms could understand the trend on the demand side then modify their strategies.
    This study collected eWOM from the Internet and use content analysis to understand consumer purchase decision process as well as the consumers’ insights into upscale mattresses. From the results, we could know that almost 40% of consumers buy a new mattress for improving sleeping quality. They usually collect the necessary information by visiting physical channels and surfing on the Internet. They evaluate the mattresses quality, price, softness and firmness. They care about mattresses and springs’ design and matieral. Almost 55% of consumers prefer to buy a firm mattress. Almost 99% of consumers buy mattresses at the physical channels. Rest of consumers buy mattresses on e-commerce due to the 7-days return warranty. Almost 75% of consumers feel satisfied after purchasing. Rest of them are not satisfied at the mattresses and springs’ design and material and uncomfortableness.

    Consumers gave more positive comments than negative comments on the selected mattresses brands. Sealy had a reputation on its brand image and quality; King Koil, The-Tai Mattress, Kingbed, Tempur and 10 Days are all well-know for their quality as well, but still had some negative comments on the brand image and price. After the eWOM studies on each selected brand, this study gave suggestions to each brand for its future marketing strategy.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    1.丁學勤、林素吟、陳正男、詹琇蓉(2004)，「產品涉入、消費者特性與情境對網路購物的影響：風險的觀點」，中華管理評論，第7卷，第1期，台灣：台北市。
    2.王石番(1989)，傳播內容分析法-理論與實證，幼獅文化，台灣：台北市。
    3.呂惠富(1999)，「產品涉入、購買涉入與品牌認同感理論模型之研究」，四海學報，第13期，台灣：台北市。
    4.李孟陵(2003)，「消費者滿意度、涉入程度對其忠誠度影響之研究－以台北市咖啡連鎖店為例」，國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文，台灣：新竹市。
    5.李啟誠、李羽喬(2010)，「網路口碑對消費者購買決策之影響—以產品涉入及品牌形象為干擾變相」，中華管理評論，第13卷，第1期，台灣：台北市。
    6.任秀芸(2007)，「從品牌觀點探討台灣企業部落格之發展」，國立政治大學管理碩士學程(AMBA)碩士論文，台灣：台北市。
    7.池文海、唐資文、林怡安(2010)，「消費者購買涉入、品牌權益、知覺風險與顧客忠誠度之關係」，中華管理評論，第13卷，第2期，頁1-22，台灣：台北市。
    8.沈能元(2015年03月27日)，全台逾400萬人失眠　近5成睡前看電視，蘋果日報。
    9.林四川(2008)，「床墊消費行為與行銷策略之探討∼以台灣地區床墊市場消費者實證研究」，國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，台灣：嘉義縣。
    10.林茂興(2001)，「以生活型態區隔台北地區ADSL 消費者對多媒體服務接受意願之研究」，國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文，台灣：新竹市。
    11.林恩沛(2009)，「產品類型及評價正負性對消費者網路口碑接受度之影響—品牌承諾為干擾因素」，國立臺灣師範大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文，台灣：台北市。
    12.林沛盈(2013)，「隱藏意見萃取—辨識多世代商品之關鍵特色」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，台灣：台北市。
    13.周庭妤(2014)， 「涉入程度及認知需求度對於消費者資訊搜尋與分享行為之影響，以資訊成本為調節變數」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，台灣：台北市。
    14.侯嘉政、傅柏霖(2008)，「產品涉入與品牌涉入對品牌忠誠度之影響－以數位相機為例」，行銷評論，第5卷，第1期，頁27-56，台灣：台北市。
    15.徐達光（2003），消費者心理學，台灣：台北市。
    16.黃俊英、賴文彬(1990)，「涉入的理論發展與實務應用」，管理科學學報，第7卷，第1期，頁15-30。
    17.秦孝華(2006)，「品牌形象與消費者涉入對品牌購買行為影響之研究」，國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。台灣：台北市。
    18.陳英傑(2011)，「床的世界進軍大陸行銷策略之研究」，國立中山大學管理學院高階經營碩士學程在職專班碩士論文，台灣：高雄市。
    19.陳景淵(2015年04月15日)，推中高價位床墊 特力營收看俏，聯合報。
    20.張淑安(2005)，「電視購物消費者決策過程研究」，國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文，台灣：新竹市。
    21.張君愷(2014)，「網路口碑之研究:從眾行為與沉默的大多數」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，台灣：台北市。
    22.閻沁恒(1972)，「大眾傳播研究法」，台北市新聞記者公會，台灣：台北市
    23.楊文壽(2000)，「行動電話手機消費者之涉入程度及購買決策相關因素之關聯性研究」，國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文，台灣：新竹市。
    24.詹俊彥(2010)，「口碑對耐久財購買行為之影響－以大金變頻空調為例」，國立台灣科技大學管理研究所EMBA碩士在職專班碩士論文，台灣：台北市。
    25.謝佩璇(2014)，「綠樣實業－Power Sleep的睡眠資訊系統與顧客黏著度」，光華管理個案收錄庫，台灣：台北市。
    26.賴儀宣(2001)，「產品類別、生活型態對產品涉入程度影響之探討－以國立東華大學學生為例」，國立東華大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文，台灣：花蓮縣。
    27.藍才洋(2013) ，「產品價格與複雜度對線上購物決策行為之影響」，國立中山大學資訊管理學系碩士論文，台灣：高雄市。


    英文文獻
    1.Ahluwalia, R., and Shiv, B. (1997). The effects of negative information in the political and marketing arenas: Exceptions to the negativity effect. Advances in consumer Research, 24, pp.222-222.
    2.Arndt, J. (1967). Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research, 4(3), pp.291-295.
    3.Balasubramanian, S., and Mahajan, V. (2001).The economic leverage of the virtual community. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(3), pp.103-138.
    4.Bart, Y., Shankar, V., Sultan, F., and Urban, G. L. (2005). Are the drivers and role of online trust the same for all web sites and consumers? A large-scale exploratory empirical study. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), pp.133-152.
    5.Belk, Russel W. (1975). Situational Variables and Consumer Behavior, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.2, pp.157.
    6.Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research., New York: Free Press.
    7.Bickart, B., and Schindler R. M. (2001). Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), pp.31-40.
    8.Bloch, Peter H, (1982). Involvement Beyond the Purchase Process: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Investigation, in Advance in Consumer Research, Vol.9, Edited by Andrew Mitchell. Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research, pp.408-411.
    9.Bristor, J. M. (1990). Enhanced explanations of word of mouth communications: the power of relationships. Research in Consumer Behavior, 4(1), pp.51-83.
    10.Brown, J., Broderick, A. J., & Lee, Nick. (2007). Word of mouth communication within online communities conceptualizing the online social network. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 21(3), pp.2-20.
    11.Budd, R. W., Thorp, R. K., & Donohew, L. (1967). Content Analysis of Communications., New York: Macmillan.
    12.Chatterjee, P. (2001). Online reviews: Do consumers use them? Advances in Consumer Research. 28(1), pp.129-133.
    13.Chaudhuri, A. (2000). A macro analysis of the relationship of product involvement and information search：the role of risk, Journal of Marketing, Vol.64, pp.1-12.
    14.Chen, L., Qi, L., and Wang, F (2012). Comparison of feature-level learning methods for mining online consumer reviews. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 9588-9601.
    15.Childers, T. L. (1986). Assessment of the psychometric properties of an opinion leadership scale, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.23, No.2, pp.184-188.
    16.Chiou, J. S., and Cheng, C. (2003). Should a company have message boards on its web sites? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17(3), pp.50-61.
    17.Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, M. K. O., & Rabjohn, N. (2008). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research. 18(3), pp.229-247.
    18.Clarke, Keith, & Belk, Russel W. (1978). The Effects of Product Involvement and Task Definition on Anticipated Consumer Effort, in Advance in Consumer Research, Vol.56, H. Keith Hunt, ed., Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, Mich., pp.313-318.
    19.Court, David C., Jonathan W. Gorden, and Jesko Perrey (2005).Boosting Returns on Marketing Investment. McKinsey Quarterly, 2(May), pp.1-7.
    20.Dickson, B. (2000). The ethicist conception of environmental problems, Environmental Values, 9(2), pp.127-152.
    21.Dichter, E. (1966). How word-of-mouth advertising works. Harvard Business Review, 44(6), pp.147-160.
    22.Dowling, G. R. & R. Staelin (1994). A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.21, pp.119-134.
    23.Duhan, D. F., Johnson, S. D., Wilcox, J. B., & Harrell, G. D. (1997). Influences on consumer use of word-of-mouth recommendation sources. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 25(4), pp.283-295.
    24.Duric, A., and Song, F. (2011). Feature selection for sentiment analysis based on content and syntax models. In Proceeding of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis (pp. 96-103). Association for Computational Linguistics.
    25.Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., and Miniard, P. W. (1993). Consumer Behavior 8th Edition, Fort Worth: Dryden Press.
    26.Engel, J.F., Blackwell, R. D. &; Kollat, D.T. (1996). Consumer Behavior 8th ed., The international edition: the Dryden press, Harcourt Brace College Publisher.
    27.Engel, J. F., Miniard, P. W., & Blackwell, R. D. (2001). Consumer Behavior 9th ed., Orlando: Harcourt, Inc.
    28.Feiguina, O., & Lapalme, G. (2007). Query-based summarization of customer reviews. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence (pp.452-463). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    29.Feldman, S. (1966). Motivational aspects of attitudinal elements and their place in cognitive interaction. Cognitive consistency: Motivational antecedents and behavioral consequences, pp.75-108.
    30.Fu, X., Liu, G., Guo, Y., & Wang, Z. (2013). Multi-aspect sentiment analysis for Chinese online social reviews based on topic modeling and HowNet lexicon. Knowledge-Based Systems.
    31.Gatignon, Hubert, and Thomas S. Robertson (1986). An exchange theory model of interpersonal communication. Advances in Consumer Research Vol.13: Richard J. Lutz, ed., Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp.534-538.
    32.Gelb, B., & Johnson, M. (1995). Word-of-mouth communication: Causes and consequences. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 15(Fall), 54-58.
    33.Gelb, B. D., & Sundaram, S. (2002). Adapting to word of mouse. Business Horizons, 45(4), 21-25.
    34.Gershoff, A. D., Mukherjee, A., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2007). Few ways to love, but many ways to hate: Attribute ambiguity and the positivity effect in agent evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research. 33(4), pp.499-505.
    35.Gilly, Mary C., Ohn L. Graham, Mary Finley Wolfinbarger and Laura J. Yale (1998). A Dyadic Study of Interpersonal Information Search, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26 (2), pp.83-100.
    36.Godes, D., and D. Mayzlin. (2004). Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science, pp.545-560.
    37.Gruen, T. W., Osmonbekov, T., & Czaplewski, A. J. (2006). eWOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty. Journal of Business Research. 59(4), pp.449-456.
    38.Gu, B., Park, J., and Konana, P. (2012). Research Note: The Impact of External.
    39.Hanna, N. & R. Wozniak (2001). Consumer Behavior: An Applied Approach, Upper Saddle River/NJ: Prentice Hall.
    40.Harrison-Walker, L. J. (2001). E-complaining: a content analysis of an Internet compliant forum. Journal of Services Marketing, 15(5), pp.397-412.
    41.Harrison-Walker, L. J. (2001). The measurement of word-of-mouth communication and an investigation of service quality and customer commitment as potential antecedents. Journal of Service Research, 4(1), 60-75.
    42.Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21(2), pp.107-112.
    43.Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: John Wiley.
    44.Hennig-Thurau, T., & Walsh, G. (2003). Electronic word-of-mouth: Motives for and consequences of reading customer articulations on the internet. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 8(2), pp.51-74.
    45.Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K., Walsh, G., &; Gremler, D. (2004). Electronic word of mouth via consumer opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), pp.38-53.
    46.Henricks, Mark (1998). Spread the Word: When your customers talk…people listen. So why aren’t more business owners using the cheapest and easiest form of advertising?: Entrepreneur Media, Inc.
    47.Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., and Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. The Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), pp.454-462.
    48.Herr, P. M., & Page, C. M. (2004). Asymmetric association of liking and disliking judgments: So what`s not to like?. Journal of Consumer Research. 30(4), pp.588-601.
    49.Holsti, O.R.（1969）, Content Analysis for the Social Science Humanities Reading. , Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc.
    50.Horrigan, J. A. (2008). Online shopping. Pew Internet & American Life Project Report, pp.36.
    51.Houston, M. J., & Rothschild, M. L. (1978). Methodological Perspectives in Involvement, Research Frontiers in Marketing: Dialogues and Direction, Chicago: American Marketing Association.
    52.Hovland, G. I., and Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), pp.635.
    53.Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L. & Kelley, H.H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    54.Jim Blythe (2005). Consumer Behavior, Thomson.
    55.John H. Antil (1984). Conceptualization and Operationalization of Involvement, in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Vol, 11. Edited by. Thomas C. Kinnear, Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: pp.203-209.
    56.Kanouse, D. E., and Hanson, L. R. (1972). Negativity in Evaluations: Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
    57.Kanouse, D. E., and Hanson, L. R. (1987). Negativity in evaluations
    58.Kaikati, Andrew M., and Jack G. Kaikati (2004). Stealth marketing: How to reach consumers surreptitiously. California Management Review, 46, pp.6-22.
    59.Katona, George and Eva Mueller (1954). A Study of Purchasing Decisions, In Consumer Behavior: The Dynamics of Consumer Reaction. Edition. L. H. Clark. New York: New York University Press.
    60.Katz, E., and Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications: Free Press (Glencoe, Illinois)
    61.Kotler, P. (1997). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control.
    62.Krugman, H. E. (1965). The impact of television advertising: learning without involvement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, no.3, pp.349-356.
    63.Kulviwat, S., Guo, C., & Engchanil, N. (2004). Determinants of online information search: a critical review and assessment. Internet Research, 14(3), pp.245-253.
    64.Lastovicka, John L. and Gardner, David M. (1978). Components of Involvement, in Attitude Research Plays for High Stakes, pp.53-73.
    65.Levin, I. P., and Gaeth, G. J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, pp.374-378.
    66.Maheswaran, D., and Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), pp.261-367.
    67.Mayzlin, D. (2006). Promotional chat on the Internet. Marketing Science, 25(2), pp.155-163.
    68.Meyerowitz, B. E., and Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), pp.500.
    69.Paul, E.F., F.D. Miller Jr, and J. Paul. 1993. Altruism: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [England]; New York.
    70.Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (1993). Consumer behavior: concepts and applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    71.Peter, J. P., &; Olson, J. C. (1993). Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy, 3rd Edition, Chicago: American Marketing Association.
    72.Mittal, B. L. (1989). Measuring purchase-decision involvement. Psychology and Marketing, 6(2), pp.147-162.
    73.Nagel, T. (1978). The possibility of altruism: Princeton University Press.
    74.Richins, Marsha L., & Bloch, Peter H. (1986). After the New Wears Off: The Temporal Context of Product Involvement, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.13, pp.280-285.
    75.Rothschild, M. L. (1984). Perspectives in involvement: current problem and future directions, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11, pp.216-217.
    76.Runyon, K. E. (1980). Consumer Behavior and the Practice of Marketing, 2nd Edition, Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co.
    77.Schiffman, L. G., and Kanuk, L. L. (1995). Consumer Behavior, 9th Ed.: Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    78.Schoell, W., & Guilitinan J.P. (1993), Marketing Essentials, Kluwer Academic Publishers Press.
    79.Sen, Shahana, and Dawn Lerman (2007). Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the Web. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), pp.76-94.
    80.Sherif, M. & Cantril, H. (1947). The psychology of ego involvements: Social attitudes and identifications. New York: Wiley.
    81.Skowronski, J. J., and Carlston, D. E. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), pp.689-699.
    82.Solomon, M. R. (1992). Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, and Being, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    83.Sternthal, B., Phillips, L. W., & Dholakia, R. (1978). The persuasive effect of scarce credibility: A situational analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly. 42(3), pp.285-314.
    84.Sundaram, D. S., Mitra, K., and Webster, C. (1998). Word-of-mouth communications: A motivational analysis. Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1), pp.527-531.
    85.Swinyard, W. R. (1993). The Effects of Mood, Involvement, and Quality of Store Experience on Shopping Intentions, Journal of Consumer Research, September, Vol.20, pp.271-280.
    86.Tedeschi, B. (1999). Consumer Products are Being Reviewed on More Web Sites, Some Featuring Comments from Anyone with an Opinion. New York Times, E-Commerce Report, October 25.
    87.CSIL Centre for Industrial Studies. (2014). The World Mattress Industry.
    88.Tyebjee, Tyzoon T. (1979). Refinement of Involvement Concept: An Advertising Planning Point of View. In Attitude Research Plays For High Stake, Edited by J. C. Maloney and B. Silverman, Chicago: American Marketing Association, pp,94-111.
    89.Walters, C. G., &; Bergiel, B. J. (1989). Consumer Behavior: A Decision-Making Approach. South-Western Publishing Company.
    90.Weinberger, M. G., and Dillon, W. R. (1980). The effects of unfavorable product rating information. Advances in Consumer Research, 7(1), pp.528-532.
    91.Westbrook, R. A. (1987). Product/consumption-based affective responses and postpurchase processes. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3), 258-270.
    92.Wilson, E. J., and Sherrell, D. L. (1993). Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(2), pp.101-112.
    93.Wimmer, R.D., And Dominick J.R. (1983). Mass Media Research： An Introduction. Belmont, Calif.：Wadsworth Publishing Co
    94.Yang, Z., and Peterson, R. T. (2003). I Read about It Online…
    95.Zaichkowsky, J. K. (1985). Measuring the Involvement Construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, no.3, pp.341-352.
    96.Zaichkowsky, J. K. (1986). Conceptualizing Involvement. Journal of Advertising, 15, no.2, pp.4-14.
    97.Zhang, W., Xu, H., & Wan, W. (2012). Weakness Finder: Find product weakness from Chinese reviews by using aspects based sentiment analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(11), pp.10283-10291.
    98.Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure 1.Pers. Soc. Psycho 9 (2 pt 2).
    99.Zhang, Y., and Buda, R. (1999). Moderating effects of need for cognitive on responses to positively versus negatively framed advertising messages. Journal of Advertising, pp.1-15.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    102363075
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102363075
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[MBA Program] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    307501.pdf2567KbAdobe PDF22497View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback