政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/77125
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51071503      線上人數 : 932
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/77125


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/77125


    題名: 廠商回應環境管理規範之研究
    Firm Responses To Environmental Regulations
    作者: 梁晉嘉
    Liang, Chin Chia
    貢獻者: 于卓民
    Yu, Chwo Ming
    梁晉嘉
    Liang, Chin Chia
    關鍵詞: 環境管理規範
    廠商能力發展
    個案研究
    environmental management regulations
    Firm`s capability development
    case study
    日期: 2015
    上傳時間: 2015-08-03 13:13:01 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 許多環境管理績效研究顯示廠商會受到許多內外部利害關係人的影響而促使廠商採行環境管理作為以提高環境管理績效。影響廠商行為的利害關係人有不同的類型(Freeman, 1984)，在環境管理議題方面，主要影響廠商行為的利害關係人有四種類型，分別為：規範性、組織性、社區和媒體(Henriques and Sadorsky, 1999)。其中規範性利害關係人對廠商環境管理行為的影響深遠(Cordano, Marshall And Silverman 2010; 2010 Darnall, Heniques and Sadorsky, 2010)。其次，股東也是對廠商環境管理行為具有影響力的利害關係人(Flammer, 2013)。再者，Kassinis and Vafeas (2006)發現在美國，社區型利害關係人壓力有助於提昇工廠的環境管理績效水準。然而，既有研究尚未清楚探討，利害關係人對新興經濟體廠商實際污染行為產生是否影響？據此，關於利害關係人與廠商實際環境污染行為的實證，本研究發現，本國大股東、國外法人股東，和已開發國家客戶等利害關係人的壓力皆會正向影響廠商實際環境污染行為。然而，設置獨立董事會導致廠商實際環境污染行為機率提高的實證結果，本研究將深入討論。
    最後，本研究以微觀基礎架構去剖析廠商回應利害關係人要求，發展出符合環境管理規範的回應能力。本研究透過個案研究與內容分析等方式，區分出三種類型環境管理規範，分別是技術應用型環境管理規範、專業知識型環境管理規範，和跨領域專業知識型環境管理規範。針對不同類型的環境管理規範，廠商也發展出三種類型環境管理規範回應能力，分別是：單一部門整合回應能力、跨部門整合回應能力，和跨領域整合回應能力，並進一步討論不同環境管理規範和廠商環境管理規範回應能力的關係，以及說明研究限制和後續建議。
    There are many environmental management performance studies have shown that many firms will be affected by internal and external stakeholders, their pressures force firms to improve their environmental management performance as they adopt environmental management act. Different stakeholders’ pressures influence the behavior of firm (Freeman, 1984). To environmental management issues, there are four types of stakeholders may affect firm’s behavior, namely: normative, organizational, community and media (Henriques and Sadorsky, 1999). The normative stakeholder influence firm’s environmental management act deeply (Cordano , Marshall And Silverman 2010; 2010 Darnall, Heniques and Sadorsky, 2010) . In addition, shareholders also influence firm’s environmental management actions (Flammer, 2013). Kassinis and Vafeas (2006) found that in the United States, community-based stakeholders improve factory’s environmental management performance. However, the relationship between stakeholder’s pressures and emerging markets firm’s actual pollution behavior has not been clear.
    Relationships between Stakeholders and firm’s actual pollution behavior, our empirical findings show that home country’s major shareholders, foreign institutional shareholders, and developed country customers may positively improve actual pollution behavior of emerging market firm. However, firm with independent board directors may lead to increase firm’s actual pollution behavior; we also have intensely discussion to this empirical result.
    Finally, this study use the micro-foundation framework to demonstrate firm’s development of environmental management regulation’ responding capacities. This study uses case studies and content analysis to distinguish three types of environmental management regulations, which are technology applied environmental management regulation, professional knowledge-based environmental management regulation, and interdisciplinary knowledge-based environmental management regulation. With different types of environmental management regulations, firm developed three types’ capabilities to respond to those environmental management regulations, namely: single department`s intergation ability to fit enrionmental management regulations, cross-department integration capability to fit emvironmental management resulations, and interdisciplinary integration capability to fit environmental management regulatuons, then we discuss the relationships between different types of environmental management regulations and firm’s integration capability to fit environmental regulations. Research limitations and future research issues also discussed.
    參考文獻: 中文文獻
    于卓民，翁煌哲 (2006)，循序漸進的海外投資策略:以台灣資訊電子零組件產業對中國投資為例，管理評論，25(1)，47-68。
    王正芬，(1999)，台灣資訊電子產業版圖，台北: 財訊出版社。
    呂執中，黃文星，(2009)，符合綠色產品標準之管理系統導入模式，品質月刊，45(10)，48-53。
    柯烽堯，(1995)，環境管理系統標準之認識，工業安全衛生，(77)，33-38。
    紀佳雄，(1998)，認識ISO14001 國際標準環境管理系統，工業安全衛生，(111)，26-30。
    高宜凡，呂愛麗，(2010)，企業社會責任特別企劃，遠見雜誌，285。
    高明瑞，劉常勇，黃義俊，張乃仁， (2010)，企業綠色管理，環境績效與競爭優勢關聯性之研究，管理與系統，17(2)，255-278。
    陳宥杉，賴士葆，溫筆東，(2005)，環保壓力對企業競爭優勢影響之研究-綠色創新之中介效果，企業管理學報，64，79-102。
    黃意錦，(2008)，綠色採購的國際趨勢從美國EPEAT，歐洲EuP指令到溫室氣體確證與查證-ISO14064，品質月刊，44(8)，36-40。
    黃義俊，高明瑞，(2004)，從利害相關人的觀點實證研究綠色創新的採行與組織績效之關係: LISREL 模式，中山管理評論，12(4)，633-674。
    溫肇東，陳泰明，(1997)，台灣的綠色創新組織初探，臺大管理論叢，8(2)， 99-124。
    蔡爭岳，粘孝堉，(2007a)，以ISO 14000經驗引進綠色製造，品質月刊，43(11)， 41-44。
    蔡爭岳，粘孝堉，(2007b)，企業執行綠色製造之考量方案探討，品質月刊， 43(12)，34-39。
    鄭茂盛，(1996)，ISO9000品質管理，ISO14000環境管理及ISO18000安全衛生管理對工業的影響，工業安全衛生，(85)，37-39。
    黄永東，(2007)，綠色採購之PDSA循環的探討，品質月刊，43(11)，24-28。
    英文文獻
    Abell, P., Felin, T., & Foss, N. (2008). Building micro-foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29(6), 489-502.
    Agrawal, A., and Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(03), 377-397.
    Bansal, P., and Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93-103.
    Bansal, P., and Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736.
    Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
    Berry, M. A., and Rondinelli, D. A. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental management: a new industrial revolution. The Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 38-50.
    Bolton, S. C., Kim, R. C.-h., & O`Gorman, K. D. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as a dynamic internal organizational process: A case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(1), 61-74.
    Bourdeau, P. (1992). The European Environmental Agency in The Context of The European Community Environmental-Policy. Columbia Journal of World Business, 27(3-4), 112-119.
    Boyd, R. (1988). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Brickley, J. A., Linck, J. S., & Coles, J. L. (1999). What happens to CEOs after they retire? New evidence on career concerns, horizon problems, and CEO incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(3), 341-377.
    Brown, N., and Deegan, C. (1998). The public disclosure of environmental performance information-a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 29(1), 21-41.
    Buchholz, R. A. (1991). Corporate responsibility and the good society: From economics to ecology. Business Horizons, 34(4), 19-31.
    Buysse, K., and Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453-470.
    Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33-53.
    Chang, S. J. (1995). International expansion strategy of Japanese firms: Capability building through sequential entry. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 383-407.
    Chen, C. J. P., and Jaggi, B. (2001). Association between independent non-executive directors, family control and financial disclosures in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19(4), 285-310.
    Chen, Y.-R., Chiou, J.-R., Chou, T.-K., & Syue, M.-S. (2009). Corporate Governance and Long-Run Performance of Equity Issues: The Role of Foreign Ownership in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Management Review, 14(1), 27-46.
    Chen, Y.-S. (2008). The driver of green innovation and green image?帯reen core competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 531-543.
    Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331-339.
    Cheng, E. C. M., and Courtenay, S. M. (2006). Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure. The International Journal of Accounting, 41(3), 262-289.
    Christmann, P. (2004). Multinational companies and the natural environment: Determinants of global environmental policy. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 747-760.
    Christmann, P., and Taylor, G. (2001). Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 439-458.
    Collins, J. M. (1990). A market performance comparison of US firms active in domestic, developed and developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(2), 271-287.
    Cordano, M., Marshall, R. S., & Silverman, M. (2010). How do small and medium enterprises go green a study of environmental management programs in the US wine industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(3), 463-478.
    Cox, D. R., and Oakes, D. (1984). Analysis of survival data. London: CRC Press.
    Cox, P., Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2004). An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 27-43.
    Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2010). Adopting proactive environmental strategy: the influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1072-1094.
    Darrell, W., and Schwartz, B. N. (1997). Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(2), 125-154.
    Donaldson, T., and Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
    Donnelly, R., and Mulcahy, M. (2008). Board structure, ownership, and voluntary disclosure in Ireland. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 416-429.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
    Eisenhardt, K. M., and Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
    Faleye, O., Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. (2013). The Trouble With Too Much Board Oversight. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(3), 52-56.
    Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. The Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288-307.
    Felin, T., and Foss, N. J. (2009). Organizational routines and capabilities: Historical drift and a course-correction toward microfoundations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(2), 157-167.
    Felin, T., Foss, N. J., Heimeriks, K. H., & Madsen, T. L. (2012). Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1351-1374.
    Flammer, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 758-781.
    Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: a stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
    Gadenne, D. L., Kennedy, J., & McKeiver, C. (2009). An empirical study of environmental awareness and practices in SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 45-63.
    Galbreath, J. (2013). ESG in Focus: The Australian Evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(3), 529-541.
    Goodpaster, K. E. (1991). Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 53-73.
    Groenewegen, P., and Vergragt, P. (1991). Environmental issues as threats and opportunities for technological innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 3(1), 43-55.
    Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
    Henriques, I., and Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87-99.
    Holder-Webb, L., Cohen, J. R., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2009). The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among US firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 497-527.
    Huang, L., Lai, G. C., McNamara, M., & Wang, J. (2011). Corporate governance and efficiency: evidence from US property-liability insurance industry. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(3), 519-550.
    Jennings, P. D., and Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: an institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015-1052.
    Jizi, M. I., Salama, A., Dixon, R., & Stratling, R. (2014). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the US banking sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 601-615.
    Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437.
    Kassinis, G., and Vafeas, N. (2002). Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(5), 399-415.
    Kassinis, G., and Vafeas, N. (2006). Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 145-159.
    Kathyayini, K., Tilt, C. A., & Lester, L. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental reporting: an Australian study. Corporate Governance: The InternationalJjournal of Business in Society, 12(2), 143-163.
    King, A., and Lenox, M. (2002). Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science, 48(2), 289-299.
    Kolk, A., and Pinkse, J. (2008). A perspective on multinational enterprises and climate change: Learning from “ an inconvenient truth”? Journal of International Business Studies, 39(8), 1359-1378.
    Lamming, R., and Hampson, J. (1996). The environment as a supply chain management issue. British Journal of Management, 7(s1), S45-S62.
    Lampe, M., Ellis, S. R., & Drummond, C. K. (1991). What companies are doing to meet environmental protection responsibilities: Balancing legal, ethical, and profit concerns. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society.
    Leonard, H. J., and Duerksen, C. J. (1980). Environmental regulations and the location of industry: an international perspective. Columbia Journal of World Business, 15(2), 52-68.
    Lin, C.-Y., and Ho, Y.-H. (2011). Determinants of green practice adoption for logistics companies in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 67-83.
    Lippman, S. A., and Rumelt, R. P. (2003). The payments perspective: micro-foundations of resource analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 903-927.
    Lohrke, F. T., and Bruton, G. D. (1997). Contributions and gaps in international strategic management literature. Journal of International Management, 3(1), 25-58.
    Luoma, P., and Goodstein, J. (1999). Research Notes. Stakeholders and Corporate Boards: Institutional Influences on Board Composition and Structure. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 553-563.
    Mace, M. L. (1986). Directors, Myth and Reality. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Mahoney, J. T. (1995). The management of resources and the resource of management. Journal of Business Research, 33(2), 91-101.
    Majocchi, A., and RogerStrange. (2012). 2012 Majoccji and Strange_International Diversification TheImpactofOwnershipStructure,theMarket forCorporateControlandBoardIndependence. Management International Review, 52, 879-900.
    Marshall, R. S., Akoorie, M. E. M., Hamann, R., & Sinha, P. (2010). Environmental practices in the wine industry: An empirical application of the theory of reasoned action and stakeholder theory in the United States and New Zealand. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 405-414.
    Martin, R., and Nisar, T. M. (2007). Activist investment: institutional investor monitoring of portfolio companies. Management Decision, 45(5), 827-840.
    Miller, K. D., Pentland, B. T., & Choi, S. (2012). Dynamics of performing and remembering organizational routines. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1536-1558.
    Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
    Morekwa Nyamongo, E., and Temesgen, K. (2013). The effect of governance on performance of commercial banks in Kenya: a panel study. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 13(3), 236-248.
    Murillo-luna, J. L., Garces-ayrbe, C., & Rivera-torres, P. (2008). Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders` pressure approach. Strategic Management Journal, 29(11), 1225-1240.
    Nelson, R. R. (1991). Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2), 61-74.
    Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Neville, B. A., Bell, S. J., & Whitwell, G. J. (2011). Stakeholder salience revisited: Refining, redefining, and refueling an underdeveloped conceptual tool. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(3), 357-378.
    North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
    Patton, A., and Baker, J. C. (1987). Why Wont Directors Rock the Boat. Harvard Business Review, 65(6), 10-18.
    Peng, M. W. (2004). Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal, 25(5), 453-471.
    Peng, Y.-S., and Lin, S.-S. (2008). Local responsiveness pressure, subsidiary resources, green management adoption and subsidiary`s performance: Evidence from Taiwanese manufactures. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(1-2), 199-212.
    Penrose. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. London: Basil Blackwell.
    Petra, S. T. (2005). Do outside independent directors strengthen corporate boards? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5(1), 55-64.
    Pinkse, J., and Kolk, A. (2009). International business and global climate change. New York: Routledge.
    Porter, M. E., and Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and Society. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
    Porter, M. E., and Van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120-134.
    Priem, R. L., and Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based "View" a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22-40.
    Ramus, C. A. (2002). Encouraging innovative environmental actions: what companies and managers must do. Journal of World Business, 37(2), 151-164.
    Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (Vol. 2). Oxford: Blackwell publishers
    Rockart, S. F., and Dutt, N. (2015). The rate and potential of capability development trajectories. Strategic Management Journal, 36(1), 53-75.
    Rojsek, I. (2001). A comparison of the purchasing and consumption behaviour of Slovenian and other Eastern European consumers. International Marketing Review, 18(5), 509-520.
    Rugman, A. M., and Verbeke, A. (1998). Corporate strategy and international environmental policy. Journal of International Business Studies, 819-833.
    Rumelt, R. P. (1974). Strategy, structure, and economic performance. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University Boston, MA.
    Russo, M. V., and Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534-559.
    Saha, M., and Darnton, G. (2005). Green Companies or Green Con-panies: Are Companies Really Green, or Are They Pretending to Be? Business and Society Review, 110(2), 117-157.
    Schaefer, A. (2007). Contrasting Institutional and Performance Accounts of Environmental Management Systems: Three Case Studies in the UK Water & Sewerage Industry. Journal of Management Studies, 44(4), 506-535.
    Schneper, W. D., and Guillin, M. F. (2004). Stakeholder rights and corporate governance: A cross-national study of hostile takeovers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 263-295.
    Schueth, S. (2003). Socially responsible investing in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 189-194.
    Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Scott, R. W. (2014). Do Institutional Investors Influence R&D Investment Policy in Firms with High Information Asymmetry? International Business Research, 7(10), 22-35.
    Scott, W. R. (1995). Organizations and Institutions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 936-960.
    Sirsly, L. A. T., and Sur, S. (2013). Strategies for sustainability initiatives: why ownership matters. Corporate Governance, 13(5), 541-550.
    Sparkes, R., and Cowton, C. J. (2004). The maturing of socially responsible investment: A review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 52(1), 45-57.
    Sullivan, D. (1994). Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 325-342.
    Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
    Teece, D. J. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1395-1401.
    Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
    Vintila, G., and Gherghina, S. C. (2012). An empirical investigation of the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms, CEO characteristics and listed companies performance. International Business Research, 5(10), p175.
    Vredenburg, H., and Westley, F. (1993). Environmental leadership in three contexts: Managing for global competitiveness. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Association of Business and Society.
    Walden, W. D., and Schwartz, B. N. (1997). Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(2), 125-154.
    Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
    Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991-995.
    Winter, S. G. (2012). Capabilities: their origins and ancestry. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1402-1406.
    Yammeesri, J., and Kanthi Herath, S. (2010). Board characteristics and corporate value: evidence from Thailand. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 10(3), 279-292.
    Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA.
    Zahra, S. A., and George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
    Zahra, S. A., and Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291-334.
    Zander, U., and Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1), 76-92.
    Zollo, M., and Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    97355507
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097355507
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    550701.pdf11289KbAdobe PDF2259檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋