政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/76846
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 51096963      在线人数 : 962
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/76846


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/76846


    题名: 相同會計師查核關係人交易之雙方與盈餘品質認知
    Same Auditor Auditing Both Sides of Related Party Transactions and Perceptions of Earnings Quality
    作者: 張浚仰
    Chang, Chun Yang
    贡献者: 周玲臺
    Chou, Ling Tai
    張浚仰
    Chang, Chun Yang
    关键词: 關係人交易
    相同會計師
    盈餘品質認知
    產業專家會計師
    Related party transactions
    Same auditors
    Perceptions of earnings quality
    Industry specialist auditors
    日期: 2015
    上传时间: 2015-07-27 11:19:23 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 儘管關係人交易的存在係屬營業常態，但因近年來國內外陸續爆發的財報舞弊多與關係人交易相關，顯示出關係人交易常被視為輸送利益的工具，且根據文獻，關係人交易將造成公司財務報表的資訊不確定性增加，進而傷害盈餘品質認知。本研究預期公司與關係人由相同會計師查核能降低關係人交易對盈餘品質認知產生的不良影響，因相同會計師能掌握關係人交易雙方之資訊，作出更資訊性的判斷以及更精確的風險評估，有利於會計師蒐集證據以辨認關係人與評估揭露方式，減少公司調增盈餘之管理行為，進而能抑制關係人交易對投資大眾盈餘品質認知的負面影響。
    實證結果指出，若關係人交易之雙方由相同會計師查核，能抑制關係人交易對投資大眾盈餘品質認知之負向影響，且若受查公司之關係人依存度較高時，該抑制效果更明顯。此外，若受查公司由非產業專家會計師查核時，選任相同會計師之抑制效果較具備產業專家之相同會計師查核者更強。綜合上述結果，當關係人交易金額越多由相同會計師查核時，投資大眾會認為該公司之盈餘更具有資訊性。關係人交易雙方由相同會計師查核之效果可提供公司治理單位作為委任會計師之參考，並可作為關係人交易雙方由不同會計師查核時，因較缺乏資訊溝通而可能導致揭露品質較差之證據。
    Even though related party transactions (RPTs) serve as normal business operation and resource allocation means among affiliated firms in Taiwan, RPTs were associated with a number of financial scandals and provided channels for inappropriate tunneling activities. Prior research finds that RPTs increase the uncertainty of financial information reported and impair perceptions of earnings quality. In this study, we explore whether same auditors auditing both sides of RPTs can mitigate the declined perceptions of earnings quality caused by RPTs. We expect that information advantage due to auditing both sides of RPTs may help auditors (1) make more informed judgments and more accurate risk assessments regarding RPTs and (2) make disclosures of RPTs more transparent, thus producing a higher-quality audit and mitigating RPTs negative effects on investors’ perceptions of earnings quality.
    Our empirical results show that the adverse effects of RPTs on perceptions of earnings quality are alleviated if both sides of RPTs are audited by the same auditor. We further find that such effects are stronger for companies of higher dependence on RPTs or audited by non-specialists. In other words, investors perceive companies’ earnings to be more informative when higher amounts of RPTs are audited by the same auditors. Our results provide insights to companies’ audit committee members when they consider engagement auditors of related parties. In addition, the findings of this study might provide evidence of possible lacking of communication between different auditors of both sides of RPTs.
    參考文獻: 中文文獻
    李建然與陳信吉，2012，會計師任期與審計品質認知—股市投資人的觀點，中山管理評論，第20卷，第3期：881-907。
    沈中華與李建然，2000，事件研究法─財務與會計實證研究必備，華泰文化事業公司。
    邱垂昌與黃秀姿，2006，自願設立獨立董事、關係人交易與公司價值關聯性之研究：代理理論與訊號發射理論之比較，Asian Journal of Management and Humanity Sciences，第1卷，第3期：379-403。
    張瑞當、方俊儒與沈文華，2008，集團企業是否委託同一會計師事務所查核財務報表對其盈餘管理行為之影響，管理評論，第27卷，第2期：29-52。
    許智順、簡俱揚、黃媺婷與陳燕錫，2012，產業專家會計師事務所對關係人交易之影響，商管科技季刊，第13卷，第2期：99-129。

    References
    Ali, A., T. Y. Chen, and S. Radhakrishnan. 2007. Corporate disclosure by family firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44: 238–286.
    American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2001. Accounting and auditing for related party transactions: A toolkit for accountants and auditors. New York, NY: AICPA.
    American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1983. Related parties. Statement on auditing standard No.45. AU. 334. New York, NY: AICPA.
    American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2002. Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit. Statement on auditing standards No. 99. AU. 316. New York, NY: AICPA.
    Aobdia, D., C. J. Lin, and R. Petacchi. 2015. Capital market consequences of audit partner quality. The Accounting Review, Forthcoming.
    Baber, W. R., J. Krishnan, and Y. Zhang. 2014. Investor perceptions of the earnings quality consequences of hiring an affiliated auditor. Review of Accounting Studies 19: 69–102.
    Balsam, S., J. Krishnan, and J. S. Yang. 2003. Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22(2): 71–97.
    Beasley, M. S., J. V. Carcello, and D. R. Hermanson. 2001. Top 10 audit deficiencies: SEC sanctions. Journal of Accountancy 191 (4): 63–67.
    Bedard, J., and S. Biggs. 1991. The effect of domain-specific experience on evaluation of management representation in analytical procedures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 10 (Supplement): 77–95.
    Bennouri, M., M. Nekhili, and P. Touron. 2015. Does auditors` reputation `discourage` related–party transactions? The French case. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, forthcoming.
    Benston, G. 1985. The self-serving management hypothesis: Some evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7(1–3): 67–84.
    Berkman, H., Cole. R. A., and L. J. Fu. 2009. Expropriation through loan guarantees to related parties: evidence from China. Journal of Banking and Finance 33: 141–156.
    Berle, A. A., and G. C. Means. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York: The Commerce Clearing House.
    Branson J., and D. Breesch. 2004. Referral as a determining factor for changing auditors in the Belgian auditing market: An empirical study. The International Journal of Accounting 39(3): 307–326.
    Brown, S., and J. B. Warner. 1985. Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics 14(1): 3–31.
    Carcello, J. V., and C. Li. 2013. Costs and benefits of requiring an engagement partner signature: Recent experience in the U.K. The Accounting Review 88(5): 1511–1546.
    Chang, W., and Y. Chen. 2015. The role of external auditors in business group governance: Evidence from the number of audit firms selected in Taiwanese groups. The International Journal of Accounting, forthcoming.
    Chen, J., Y. Chou, R. Duh, and Y. Lin. 2014. Audit committee director-auditor interlocking and perceptions of earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 33(4): 41–70.
    Cheung, Y.-L., P. R. Rau, and A. Stouraitis. 2006. Tunneling, propping, and expropriation: Evidence from connected party transactions in Hong Kong. Journal of Financial Economics 82 (2): 343–386.
    Cheung, Y.-L., Y. Qi, P. R. Rau, and A. Stouraitis. 2009. Buy high, sell low: How listed firms price asset transfers in related party transactions. Journal of Banking and Finance 33 (5): 914–924.
    Chi, W., H. Huang, Y. Liao, and H. Xie. 2009. Mandatory audit partner rotation, audit quality, and market perception: Evidence from Taiwan. Contemporary Accounting Research 26(2): 359–391.
    Chiu, H., L. L. Chou, and H. Lin. 2015. Same auditor auditing both sides of related-party transactions and analyst earnings forecasts. 2015 AAA International Accounting Section Midyear Meeting.
    Choi, J.-H., F. Kim, J.-B. Kim, and Y. Zang. 2010. Audit office size, audit quality, and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 29 (1): 73-97.
    Collins, D. W., and S. P. Kothari. 1989. An analysis of intertemporal and cross–sectional determinants of earnings response coefficient. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11: 143–181.
    Craswell, A. T., J. R. Francis, and S. L. Taylor. 1995. Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20(3): 297–322.
    DeFond, M. L., and M. Hung. 2003. An empirical analysis of analysts’ cash flow forecasts. Journal of Accounting and Economics 35 (1): 73–100.
    Easton, P. D., and M. E. Zmijewski. 1989. Cross–sectional variation in the stock market response to accounting earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11(2–3): 117–141.
    Ferguson, A., J. R. Francis, and D. Stokes. 2003. The effect of firm-wide and office-level industry expertise on audit pricing. The Accounting Review 78 (April): 428–448.
    Francis, J. R., K. Reichelt, and D. Wang. 2005. The pricing of national and city-specific reputations for industry expertise in the U.S. audit market. The Accounting Review 80 (1): 113–136.
    Ge, W., D. H. Drury, S. Fortin, F. Liu, and D. Tsang. 2010. Value relevance of disclosed related party transactions. Advances in Accounting 26: 134–141.
    Ghosh, A., and D. Moon. 2005. Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. The Accounting Review 80 (2): 585–612.
    Gordon, E. A., E. Henry, and D. Palia. 2004. Determinants of related party transactions and their impact on firm value. American Accounting Association 2004 Annual Conference.
    Gordon, E. A., and E. Henry. 2005. Related party transactions and earnings management. Working paper vailable at SSRN.
    Gordon, E. A., E. Henry, T. J. Louwers, and B. J. Reed. 2007. Auditing related party transactions: A literature overview and research synthesis. Accounting Horizons 21 (1): 81–102.
    Gul, F., D. Wu, and Z. Yang. 2013. Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival Data. The Accounting Review 88(6): 1993–2023.
    Hackenbrack, K. E., and C. E. Hogan. 2002. Market response to earnings surprises conditional on reasons for an auditor change. Contemporary Accounting Research 19(2): 195–223.
    Hayn, C. 1995. The information content of losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20: 125 –153.
    Hwang, N. R., J. Chiou, and Y. Wang. 2013. Effect of disclosure regulation on earnings management through related–party transactions: Evidence from Taiwanese firms operating in China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 32: 292–313.
    Jian, M., and T. J. Wong. 2003. Earnings management and tunneling through related party transactions: Evidence from Chinese corporate groups. EFA 2003 Annual Conference.
    Jian, M., and T. J. Wong. 2010. Propping through related party transactions. Review of Accounting Studies 15(1): 70–105.
    Johnstone, K., C. Li, and S. Luo. 2014. Client-auditor supply chain relationships, audit quality, and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 33(4): 119–166.
    Kohlbeck, M. J., and B. W. Mayhew. 2004a. Related party transactions. AAA 2005 FARS Meeting.
    Kohlbeck, M. J., and B. W. Mayhew. 2004b. Agency costs, contracting and related party transactions. Working paper, University of Wisconsin.
    Kohlbeck, M. J., and B. W. Mayhew. 2010. Valuation of firms that disclose related party transactions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 29(2): 115–137.
    Kohlbeck, M. J., and B. W. Mayhew. 2014. Are related party transactions red flags? Working paper, University of Wisconsin.
    Krishnan, G. V. 2003. Does big 6 auditor industry expertise constrain earnings management? Accounting Horizons 17(Supplement): 1–16.
    Kwon, S. Y., C. Y. Lim, and P. M. Tan. 2007. Legal systems and earnings quality: The role of auditor industry specialization. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 26 (2): 25–55.
    Lei, A. C. H., and F. M Song. 2011. Connected transactions and firm value: Evidence from China–affiliated companies. Pacific–Basin Finance Journal 19: 470–490.
    Lipe, R. 1990. The relation between stock returns and accounting earnings given alternative information. The Accounting Review 65 (1): 49–71
    Lo, A. W. Y., R. M. K. Wong, and M. Firth. 2010. Can corporate governance deter management from manipulating earnings? Evidence from related-party sales transactions in China. Journal of Corporate Finance 16: 225–235.
    Louwers, T. J., E. Henry, B. J. Reed, and E. A. Gordon. 2008. Deficiencies in auditing related–party transactions: Insights from AAERs. Current Issues in Auditing 2(2): A10–A16.
    Low K. Y. 2004. The effects of industry specialization on audit risk assessments and audit–planning decisions. The Accounting Review 79(1): 201–219.
    Nekhili, M., and M. Cherif. 2011. Related parties transactions and firm`s market value: the French case. Review of Accounting and Finance 10: 291–315.
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2009. Guide on fighting abusive related party transactions in Asia. OECD publishing.
    Owhoso, V. E., W. F. Messier, Jr., and J. G. Lynch, Jr. 2002. Error detection by industry-specialized teams during sequential audit review. Journal of Accounting Research 40(3): 883–900.
    Pattel, J. M. 1976. Corporate forecasts of earnings per share and stock price behavior: Empirical tests. Journal of Accounting Research 14: 246–276.
    Peng, Q., K. C. J. Wei, and Z. Yang. 2011. Tunneling or Propping: Evidence from connected transactions in China. Journal of Corporate Finance 17: 306–325.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2014. Related parties amendments to certain PCAOB auditing standards regarding significant unusual transactions and other amendments to PCAOB auditing standards. Auditing Standards (AS) No.18. Washington D. C. PCAOB.
    Reichelt, K. J., and D. Wang. 2010. National and office–specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research 48 (3): 647–686.
    Ryngaert, M., and S. Thomas. 2012. Not all related party transactions (RPTs) are the same: Ex ante versus ex post RPTs. Journal of Accounting Research 50: 845–882.
    Securities and Exchange Commision (SEC). 2002. Report Pursuant to Section 704 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. Avaiable at SEC 704 Study.
    Solomon, I. M., D. Shields, and O. R. Whittington. 1999. What do industry–specialist auditors know? Journal of Accounting Research 37 (1): 191–208.
    Warfield, T. D., J. J. Wild, and K. L. Wild. 1995. Managerial ownership, accounting choices, and informativeness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20(1): 61–91.
    Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice–Hall.
    White, H. 1980. A heteroskedasticity–consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48(4): 817–838.
    Wilks, T., and M. Zimbelman. 2004. Decomposition of fraud–risk assessments and auditors` sensitivity to fraud cues. Contemporary Accounting Research 21(3): 719–745.
    Yeh, Y. H., P. G. Shu, and Y. H. Su. 2012. Related–party transactions and corporate governance: The evidence from the Taiwan stock market. Pacific–Basin Finance Journal 20(5): 755–776.
    Zibart, D. A. 1985. Control of beta reliability in studies of abnormal return magnitudes: A methodological note. Journal of Accounting Research 23(2): 920–926.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    102353013
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102353013
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    301301.pdf1562KbAdobe PDF2146检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈