政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/76837
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51295006      線上人數 : 848
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/76837


    題名: 台灣銀行業系統重要性之衡量
    Measuring Systemic Importance of Taiwan’s Banking System
    作者: 林育慈
    Lin, Yu Tzu
    貢獻者: 林信助
    Lin, Shinn Juh
    林育慈
    Lin, Yu Tzu
    關鍵詞: 系統風險
    系統重要性
    極值理論
    systemic risk
    systemic importance
    extreme value theory approach
    日期: 2015
    上傳時間: 2015-07-27 11:17:52 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文利用Gravelle and Li (2013)提出之系統重要性指標來衡量國內九家上市金控銀行對於系統風險之貢獻程度。此種衡量方法係將特定銀行之系統重要性定義為該銀行發生危機造成系統風險增加的幅度，並以多變量極值理論進行機率的估算。實證結果顯示：一、系統重要性最高者為第一銀行；最低者為中國信託銀行。其中除中國信託銀行之重要性顯著低於其他銀行外，其餘銀行之系統重要性均無顯著差異。二、經營期間較長之銀行其系統重要性較高；具公股色彩之銀行對於系統風險之貢獻程度平均而言高於民營銀行。三、銀行規模與其對系統風險之貢獻大致呈現正向關係，即規模越大之銀行其重要性越高。在此情況下可能會有銀行大到不能倒的問題發生。四、存放比較低之銀行系統重要性亦較低，而資本適足率與系統重要性間並無明顯關係。
    In this thesis, we apply the measure proposed by Gravelle and Li (2013) to examine the systemic importance of certain Taiwanese banks. The systemic importance is defined as the increase in the systemic risk conditioned on the crash of a particular bank, and is estimated by the multivariate extreme value theory. Our empirical evidence shows that the most systemically important bank is First Commercial Bank, and the CTBC Bank is significantly less important than other banks, while the differences among the remaining banks are not significant. Second, banks established earlier have higher systemic importance; and the contribution to systemic risk of public banks, on average, is higher than the contribution of private banks. Third, we also find out that the size of a bank and its risk contribution have positive relationship. That is, the bigger a bank is, the more important it is. Under this circumstances, the too big to fail problem may occur. Last, the bank which has lower loan-to-deposit ratio will be less systemically important than those with higher ones, while the relation between capital adequacy ratio and systemic importance is unclear.
    參考文獻: 吳蕙如，2013。金融產業之穩定性與競爭度，國立中正大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文。
    吳懿娟，2003。我國金融危機預警系統之研究，中央銀行季刊，第二十五卷第三期，5-42頁。
    李桐豪、江永裕，2009。台灣金融服務業聯合總會委託計畫─台灣金融危機領先指標之研究，台灣金融服務業聯合總會。
    張瑞元、林金賢，2005。建構銀行危機預警模型─訊號法與Panel Logit之結合，會計與公司治理，第一卷第二期，9-32頁。
    陳怡君，2010。CoVaR風險值對金融機構風險管理之重要性─以台灣金融控股公司為例，國立政治大學金融研究所碩士論文。
    楊德淳，2006。台灣金融業系統風險之衡量，國立中山大學經濟研究所碩士論文。
    劉清標，2014。業務自由化對個別銀行利益與整體銀行系統穩定性之衝突，兩岸金融季刊，第二卷第二期，69-103頁。
    蔡永順，2012。金融合併與風險傳染：台灣實證研究，商略學報，第四卷第二期，93-113頁。
    蔡永順、吳振榮，2007。銀行間市場風險傳染與金融不穩定─台灣實證研究，台灣金融財務季刊，第八卷第四期，1-27頁。
    鍾經樊，2009。壓力測試的架構，中央銀行季刊，第三十一卷第二期，7-34頁。
    鍾經樊，2010。我國銀行信用損失評估之研究，中央銀行季刊，第三十二卷第二期，13-46頁。
    鍾經樊，2011。涵蓋信用風險、銀行間傳染風險、與流動性險的台灣金融系統風險量化模型，中央銀行季刊，第三十三卷第二期，13-40頁。
    Adrian, Tobias, and Markus Brunnermeier, 2010. CoVaR. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report 348.
    Danielsson, J., L. de Haan, L. Peng, and C.G. de Vries, 2001. Using a Bootstrap Method to Choose the Sample Fraction in Tail Index Estimation. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 76, 226-248.
    Daníelsson, Jón, and Casper G. de Vries, 1997. Tail Index and Quantile Estimation With Very High Frequency Data. Journal of Empirical Finance 4, 241-257.
    De Haan, Laurens, Dennis W. Jansen, Kees Koedijk, and Casper G. de Vries, 1994. Safety First Portfolio Selection, Extreme Value Theory and Long Run Asset Risks. In: Galambos, J. (Ed.), Proceedings from a Conference on Extreme Value Theory and Applications. Kluwer Press.
    Frankel, Jeffrey A., and Andrew K. Rose, 1996. Currency Crashes in Emerging Market: An Empirical Treatment. Journal of International Economics 41, 351-368.
    Goldie, Charles M., and Richard L. Smith, 1987. Slow Variation with Remainder: Theory and Applications. Quarterly Journal of Mathematics 38, 45-71.
    Gravelle, Toni, and Fuchun Li, 2013. Measuring Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions: An Extreme Value Theory Approach. Journal of Banking and Finance 37, 2196-2209.
    Hartmann, Philipp, Stefan Straetmans, and Casper de Vries, 2005. Banking System Stability, a Cross-Atlantic Perspective. European Central Bank Working Paper No. 527.
    Hill, Bruce M., 1975. A Simple General Approach to Inference about the Tail of a Distribution. The Annals of Statistics 3 (5), 1163-1173.
    Hoggarth, Glenn, Ricardo Reis, and Victoria Saporta, 2002. Costs of Banking System Instability: Some Empirical Evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance 26, 825-855.
    International Monetary Fund, Bank for International Settlements, and Financial Stability Board, 2009. Guidance to Assess the Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions, Markets and Instruments: Initial Considerations. Report to the G-20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors.
    Kaminsky, Graciela L, and Carmen M Reinhart, 1999. The Twin Crises: The Causes of Banking and Balance-of-Payment Problems. The American Economic Review 89(June), 437-500.
    Kaminsky, Graciela, Saul Lizondo, and Carmen M. Reinhart, 1998. Leading Indicators of Currency Crises. IMF Staff Paper 45(March), 1-48.
    Ledford, Anthony W., and Jonathan A. Tawn., 1996. Statistics for Nearly Independence in Multivariate Extreme Values. Biometrika 83, 169-187.
    Lehar, Alfred, 2005. Measuring Systemic Risk: A Risk Management Approach. Journal of Banking and Finance 29, 2577-2603.
    Müller, Jeannette, 2006. Interbank Credit Lines as a Channel of Contagion. Journal of Financial Services Research 29, 37-60.
    Poon, S.-H., M. Rockinger, and J. Tawn, 2004. Extreme Value Dependence in Financial Markets: Dianostics, Models, and Financial Implications. Review of Financial Studies 17(2), 581-610.
    Sachs, Jeffrey, Aarón Tornell, and Andrés Velasco, 1996. The Mexican Peso Crisis: Sudden Death or Death Forefold?. Journal of International Economics 41, 265-283.
    Segoviano, Miguel A., Charles Goodhart, 2009. Banking Stability Measures. Technical Report, IMF Working Paper 09/04.
    Straetmans, Stefan, and Sajid M. Chaudhry, 2012. Tail Risks and Systemic Risks for U.S. and Eurozone Financial Institutions in the Wake of the Global Financial Crisis. 25th Australasian Finance and Banking Conference 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2135575.
    Tarashev, Nikola, Claudio Borio, and Kostas Tsatsaronis, 2009. The Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions. BIS Quarterly Review (September), 75-87.
    Zhou, Chen, 2010. Are Banks too Big to Fail? Measuring Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions. International Journal of Central Banking 6(4), 205-250.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易研究所
    102351011
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102351011
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    101101.pdf1005KbAdobe PDF279檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋