政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/76587
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51256320      線上人數 : 854
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/76587


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/76587


    題名: 專家意見評價結果與品質和主併公司股價關聯性-以台灣上市公司為例
    Appraisal Outcome & Quality In Fairness Opinion For Acquiring Firms
    作者: 盧作倫
    Lu, Tso Lun
    貢獻者: 吳啟銘
    Wu, Chi Ming
    盧作倫
    Lu, Tso Lun
    關鍵詞: 併購
    併購溢酬
    專家意見
    評價品質
    事件研究法
    M&A
    Acquisition Premium
    Fair Opinion
    Appraisal Quality
    Event Study
    日期: 2015
    上傳時間: 2015-07-14 10:37:33 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究以2002年至2013年台灣主併公司為上市公司的併購案件為樣本，探討專家意見評價結果和品質對主併公司短期股價影響。本研究結果有兩項發現：
    1. 於意見書揭露日時，若專家意見書評估價格高於雙方約定交易價格愈多時，即評價溢酬愈大，主併公司會有負向的累積異常報酬率。
    2. 於意見書揭露日時，若併購溢酬越大、或是併購溢酬大與評價品質高，主併公司會有負向的累積異常報酬率。

    故本研究認為，台灣獨立專家制度相較歐美國家仍不成熟，相關配套措施及規範未規畫周詳，對於獨立專家的獨立性、專業性之確保，以及出具意見時評價方法的選擇標準、意見書應記載事項等規範過少，使得專家意見書於揭露時評價結果易受到市場及投資人懷疑。另外評價品質與主併公司異常報酬的關聯性在少數的樣本下無法表現出顯著性，市場及投資人較傾向以併購溢酬做為交易出價是否過高之依據。
    This study analyses the relation between target firm appraisal outcome and quality disclosed in the fairness opinions and acquiring firm performances by using the samples of Taiwanese listed company in M&A transaction between 2002 and 2013. We find that the stock price reactions to the public disclosure of fairness opinions are negatively related to the difference between target firms valuations contained in the fairness opinion and the merger offer price. In addition, the greater the acquisition premium for or acquisition or high acquisition premium with high appraisal quality would result in negative stock price reactions as well.

    Under these conditions, this study suggests that Taiwan`s independent expert system in Taiwan still appeared to be immature, including that related supplementary measures are not careful planned, the independence of the independent expert, the professionalism of independent expert, and the criteria of valuation methods are not carefully regulated by the government. Therefore, the outcome and the quality of the fairness opinion may not to be trusted by the market and investors. Also, the association between appraisal quality and abnormal unable to be significant could result from the lack of number of samples.
    參考文獻: 林嬋娟、吳安妮(1992)，台灣企業併購綜效及績效之實證研究，會計評論，第 26 期(4 月)，1-23。
    鄔洪勇 (1994)，企業評價關鍵因素之研究，東海大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    伍忠賢 (2000)，企業購併─理論與實務，台北：新陸書局。
    吳啟銘 (2001)，企業評價個案實証分析, 智勝出版社
    孫梅瑞、陳隆麒(2002)，台灣地區上市公司從事併購活動對經營績效影響之研究，中山管理評論，第 10 卷第 1 期，155-184。
    孫梅瑞、陳雅君(2010)，公司融資決策與併購績效關聯性之研究，商略學報，第 2 卷第 3 期，199-215。
    陳傳毅(2010)，企業併購交易中獨立專家意見之功能與法律責任，東吳大學法律學系碩士在職專班法律專業組碩士論文。
    陳楷仁(2011)，企業併購法第六條獨立專家相關問題之研析，國立臺北大學法律學系碩士論文。
    黃玉雯(2012)，併購獨立專家之選擇及併購後綜效之探討，國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
    Agrawal, A., Knoeber, C. R., (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problem between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31(3), 377-397.
    Bowers, H. M. (2002). Fairness opinions and the business judgment rule: an empirical investigation of target firms` use of fairness opinions. Northwestern University Law Review, 96, 567–578.
    Bowers, H. M., & Latham, W. R. (2004). Value of Fairness Opinions in US Mergers and Acquisitions,1980-2003. Working Paper, University of Delaware.
    Cain, M. D., & Denis, D. J. (2013). Information production by investment banks:evidence from fairness opinions. Journal of Law and Economics, 56(1), 245-280.
    Carney, W. J. (1992). Fairness opinions: How fair are they and why we should do nothing about it. Washington University Law Quarterly, 70, 523.
    Chen, K. Y., & Wu, S.-Y. (2002). The effect of industry specialization on audit fees in Taiwan: The role of industry type. Working Paper. National Cheng Kung University.
    Chen, L. H., & Sami, H. (2010). Does the Use of Fairness Opinions Impair the Acquirers` Abnormal Returns? The Litigation Risk Effect. Advances in Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management, 4, 81-112.
    Darren J. Kisgen (2008). Are fairness opinions fair? The case of mergers and acquisitions
    Kisgen, J., Qian, J., Song, W., (2009). Are fairness opinions fair? The case of mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics 91, 179-207.
    Liu, T. (2013). The Bidder`s Choice of a Fairness Opinion in Mergers and Acquisitions: The Impact on Value Creation. Working Paper.
    Malcolm Baker, Xin Pan, and Jeffrey Wurgler (2012). The Effect of Reference Point Prices on Mergers and Acquisitions Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 106, No. 1 (October 2012): 49-71
    Muraa. P., Rappb. M., Schwetzlera, B., Wilmsa, A. (2011). The certification hypothesis of fairness opinions for acquiring firms. International Review of Law and Economics 31, 240– 248.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理研究所
    102357033
    103
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102357033
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    703301.pdf1066KbAdobe PDF2100檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋