政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/76485
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 51074420      在线人数 : 934
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/76485


    题名: 新戰爭趨勢下的空海軍事作戰硏究: 以美中軍事競爭爲例
    A Study on “Air-Sea Battle” Concept by Changes of War Pattern in Military Competition between U.S. and China
    作者: 李鎮乾
    Lee, Jingun
    贡献者: 盧業中
    Lu, Yeh Chung
    李鎮乾
    Lee, Jingun
    关键词: 混合戰爭
    空海軍事作戰
    區域阻絕/反介入
    Hybrid War
    Air-Sea Battle
    A2/AD
    日期: 2015
    上传时间: 2015-07-13 11:20:46 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 新戰爭趨勢下的空海軍事作戰硏究: 以美中軍事競爭爲例
    By announcing ‘pivot to Asia’ policy in 2011, the 2nd Obama Administration is moving U.S. strategic center of gravity to East Asia-western Pacific area. Inter alia, U.S. is intensively deploying its conventional military forces on this area in order to check China emerging regional military power by its sustained economic growth, and ‘Air-Sea Battle’ concept is mentioned as a background of the military disposition. This battle concept is now interpreted as a thing to counter-act Chinese expansionists’ maritime strategy has been constructed since 1980’s for regional extension of influence in military. Received much attention from military academia, the Air-Sea Battle concept is recognized as a regular operation doctrine derived from superiority in military technology has dominated war fighting styles of the U.S. military forces for a long time as well as the military has put stress on it by itself and conservative military professionalism.
    However, war was just a repeated event tackling enemy’s weak points through unthinkable war patterns in terms of its mean and way, and especially the war patterns served a golden opportunity for the weak encountering the strong enemy. Meanwhile, the military cannot adapt to changes seasonably signed its own death warrant and recent asymmetric warfare between regular forces and irregular ones in Middle East shows that point suitably. In the respect, this thesis will identify critical but neglected threats on the Air-Sea Battle and will search for its limitations while expecting China’s spectrum of war at the comprehensive and multi-modal level.
    參考文獻: 1. Air-Sea Battle Office. Air-Sea Battle: Service Collaboration to Address Anti-Access & Area Denial Challenges. _: Air-Sea Battle Office, 2013.
    2. Arquilla, John and David Ronfeldt. Swarming & the Future of Conflict. Santa Monica: RAND, 2000.
    3. Bitzinger Richard A. and Michael Raska. The Air Sea Battle Debate and the Future of Conflict in East Asia. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University, 2013.
    4. Blackwill, Robert D., and Naresh Chandra. The United States and India: A Shared Strategic Future. New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 2011.
    5. Blasko, Dennis J. The Chinese Army Today: Tradition and Transformation for the 21st Century. New York: Routledge, 2012.
    6. Booth, Ken and Nicholas J. Wheeler. The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation and Trust in World Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
    7. Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. New START Nuclear Reductions Treaty Briefing Book. Washington DC: Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, 2010.
    8. Clausewitz, Carl von. On war. Translated by Michael Howard and Peter Paret. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984.
    9. Cliff, Roger. et al. Entering the Dragon’s Lair: Chinese Antiaccess Strategies and Their Implications for the United States. Santa Monica: RAND, 2007.
    10. Cronin, Audrey K. and James M. Ludes. Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Grand Strategy. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 2004.
    11. Daggett, Stephen. Cost of Major U.S. Wars. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service, 2010.
    12. Department of the Army. FM 31-21 Department of the Army Field Manual: Guerilla Warfare and Special Forces Operations. Washington DC: Department of the Army, 1961.
    13. Department of Defense. Irregular Warfare (IW) Joint Operating Concept (JOC) (version 1.0). Washington DC: Department of Defense, 2007.
    14. Department of Defense. Joint Operational Access Concept (JOAC) version 1.0. Washington DC: Department of Defense, 2012.
    15. Department of Defense. Quadrennial Defense Review 2014. Washington DC: Department of Defense, 2014.
    16. Department of Defense. Joint Publication 1-02: Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. Washington DC: Department of Defense, 2015.
    17. Feng, Huiyun. Chinese Strategic Culture and Foreign Policy Decision-Making: Confucianism, Leadership and War. Oxon: Routledge, 2007.
    18. Friedberg, Aaron L. Beyond Air-Sea Battle: The Debate Over US Military Strategy in Asia. Oxon: IISS, 2014.
    19. Griffiths, Martin and Terry O’Callaghan. International Relations: The Key Concepts. London: Routledge, 2002.
    20. Hackett, James. (ed.). The Military Balance 2012. London: Routledge, 2012.
    21. Hanauer, Larry and Lyle J. Morris. Chinese Engagement in Africa: Drivers, Reactions, and Implications for U.S. Policy. Santa Monica: RAND, 2013.
    22. Headquarters Department of the Army. FM 100-2-1 The Soviet Army: Operations and Tactics. Washington DC: Department of the Army, 1984.
    23. Hooker, Jr., R.D. The Grand Strategy of the United States. Washington DC: National Defense University Press, 2014.
    24. Joint Chiefs of Staff. Joint Concept for Entry Operations (JCEO). Washington DC: Joint Chiefs of Staff, 2014.
    25. Kaldor, Mary. Old & New Wars. California: Stanford University Press, 2007.
    26. Joint Chief of Staff. Capstone Concept for Joint Operations: Joint Force 2020. Washington DC: Joint Chief of Staff, 2012.
    27. Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996.
    Krepinevich, F. Andrew. Why AirSea Battle? Washington DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2010.
    28. Labonte, Marc and Jared C. Nagel Foreign Holdings of Federal Debt. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service, 2014.
    29. Manyin, Mark E., et al. Pivot to the Pacific? The Obama Administration’s “Rebalancing” Toward Asia. Washington DC: Congress Research Service, 2012.
    30. McNeilly, Mark. Sun Tzu and the Art of Modern Warfare. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
    31. Mingst, Karen A. Essentials of International Relations. New York: W.W. Norton, 2004.
    32. Ministry of Defense. Defense of Japan 2012. Tokyo: Ministry of Defense, 2012.
    33. Office of the Secretary of Defense. Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2014. Washington DC: Department of Defense, 2014.
    34. Peng, G. and Y. Yao (ed.). The Science of Military Strategy. Beijing: Military Science Publishing House, 2005.
    35. Pierre Hoff, Pierre. Les programmes d’armenent de 1919 à 1938. Vincennes: Service hitorique de l’armée de terre, 1982.
    36. Pillsbury, Michael. China Debates the Future Security Environment. Washington DC: National Defense University Press, 2000.
    37. Posen, Barry R. The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars. London: Cornell University Press, 1984.
    38. Qiao, Liang and Xiangsui Wang. Unrestricted Warfare. Beijing: PLA Literature and Arts Publishing House, 1999.
    39. Republic of Korea Air Force. Korean Air Force Tactics, Techniques & Procedures (KAFTTP) 3-3 Volume 5: Basic Employment Manual F-16C. __: Republic of Korea Air Force, 2005.
    40. Schreer, Benjamin. Planning the Unthinkable War: ‘AirSea Battle’ and Its Implications for Australia. Barton: ASPI, 2013.
    41. Sun, Tzu, Sun Tzu on the Art of War. Translated by Lionel Giles M.A. England: Allandale Online Publishing, 2000.
    42. The Infantry Journal Incorporated. Infantry in Battle. Richmond: Garrett & Massie, 1939.
    43. Thornton, Rod. Asymmetric Warfare: Threats and Response in the 21st Century. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.
    44. Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC). An Army White Paper: The Profession of Arms. __: U.S. Army, 2010.
    45. U.S Marine Corps. FMFRP 12-18 Mao Tse-tung on Guerilla Warfare. Washington DC: Department of the Navy, 1989.
    46. Van Tol, Jan et al. AirSea Battle: A Point-of-Departure Operational Concept. Washington DC: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2010.
    47. Waltz, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics. Long Grove: Waveland Press, 2010.
    48. Daggett, Stephen. Cost of Major U.S. Wars. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service, 2010.
    49. Bin, Yu. “What China Learned from Its “Forgotten War” in Korea.” In Chinese Warfighting: The PLA Experience since 1949, edited by Mark A. Ryan, David M. Finkelstein, and Michael A. McDevitt, 123-142, New York: An East Gate Book, 2003.
    50. Huang, Alexander Chieh-cheng. “Transformation and Refinement of Chinese Military Doctrine: Reflection and Citique on the PLA’s View.” In A Retrospective on Chinese Military Studies in the Post-Mao Era, 131-138, Santa Monica: National Security Research Division RAND, 2001.
    51. Huntington, Samuel P. Introduction to Modern Guerilla Warfare: Fighting Communist Guerilla Movement 1941-1961, edited by Franklin M. Osanka, xvi, New York: The Free Press, 1962.
    52. Li, Xiaobing. “PLA Attacks and Amphibious Operations During the Taiwan Strait Crises of 1954-55 and 1958.” In Chinese Warfighting: The PLA Experience since 1949, edited by Mark A. Ryan, David M. Finkelstein, and Michael A. McDevitt, 143-172, New York: An East Gate Book, 2003.
    53. Ahrari, Ehsan. “China’s Preoccupation with Asymmetric War: Lessons Learned from the Hezbollah-Israeli War.” Small Wars Journal __ (2009): 1-7.
    54. Allison, Graham T. “Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis.” The American Political Science Review 63 (1969): 689-718.
    55. Andrew Cottey, Timothy Edmunds, and Anthony Forster. “The Second Generation Problematic: Rethinking Democracy and Civil-Military Relations.” Armed Forces & Society 29 (2002): 31-56.
    56. Billington, Michael. “Air-Sea Battle Is a Plan for War on China.” EIR (2013): 29-31.
    57. Blasko, Dennis J. “PLA Special Operation Forces: Organizations, Missions and Training.” China Brief 15 (2015): 7-10.
    58. Breen, Michael and Joshua A. Geltzer. “Asymmetric Strategies as Strategies of the Strong.” Parameters-Journal of the United States ArmyWar College 41 (2011): 41-55.
    59. Evera, Stephen Van. “Offense, Defense, and the Cause of War.” International Security 22 (1998): 5-43.
    60. Gilderhus, Mark T. “The Monroe Doctrine: Meanings and Implications,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 36 (2006): 5-16.
    61. Jervis, Robert. “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma.” World Politics 30 (1978): 167-214.
    62. Hammes, Thomas X. “War Evolves into the Fourth Generation.” Contemporary Security Policy 26 (2005): 196-217.
    63. Hoffman, Frank G. “Hybrid Threats: Reconceptualizing the Evolving Character of Modern Conflict,” Strategic Forum no. 240 (2009): 1-8.
    64. Kanwal, Gurmeet, “China’s New War Concepts for 21st Century Battlefields.” IPCS 48 (2007): 1-5.
    65. Kanwal, Gurmeet. “China’s Emerging Cyber War Doctrine.” Journal of Defense Studies 3 (2009):14-22.
    66. Kier, Elizabeth. “Culture and Military Doctrine: France between the Wars.” International Security 19 (1995): 65-93.
    67. Leiner, Barry M. “A Brief History of the Internet,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 39 (2009): 22-31.
    68. Lind, William S. “Understanding Fourth Generation War,” Military Review (2004): 12-16.
    69. Lyle, Stuart. “Maoism versus “Hybrid” Theory: Is the Military Being Distracted by This Latest Doctrinal Buzz-Word?” UK Defense Forum ___ (2011): 1-11.
    70. Lynn-Jones, Sean M. “Offense-Defense Theory and Its Critics.” Security Studies 4 (1995): 660-691.
    71. Montgomery, Evan B. “Breaking Out of the Security Dilemma: Realism, Reassurance, and the Problem of Uncertainty.” International Security 31 (2006): 151-185.
    72. Ross, Robert S. “US Grand Strategy, the Rise of China, and US National Security Strategy for East Asia.” Strategy Studies Quarterly (2013): 20-40.
    73. Scales, Robert H. “Urban Warfare: A Soldier’s View.” Military Review (2005): 9-18.
    74. Thomas, Ward. “Norms and Security: The Case of International Assassination.” International Security 25 (2000): 105-133.
    75. Walker, Christopher and Robert W. Orttung. “Breaking The News: The Role of State-run Media.” Journal of Democracy 25 (2014): 71-85.
    76. Waltz, Kenneth N. “The Emerging Structure of International Politics.” International Security 18 (1993): 44-79.
    77. Glaser, Bonnie S. “‘China’s Grand Strategy in Asia’: Statement before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission.” Paper presented at the meeting for the Senior Adviser for Asia, Freeman Chair in China Studies, CSIS, Washington DC, March 13, 2014.
    78. O. Work, Robert. “‘AirSea Battle’: Power Projection in the Mature Guided Munitions Era.” Paper presented at the AIE Counter A2/AD Conference, Department of the Navy, October 26, 2010.
    79. Mahnken, Thomas G. “‘The United States’ Grand Strategy in the Asia-Pacific Region’: Changing Military Dynamics in East Asia.” Paper presented at the policy brief 1 for the Study of Innovation and Technology in China, California, January, 2012.
    80. Rovner, Joshua. “‘AirSea Battle and Escalation Risks’: Changing Military Dynamics in the East Asia.” Paper presented at the policy brief 12 for the Study of Innovation and Technology in China, California, January, 2012.
    81. Kuo, Lily. “China’s military has declared war on Western thought on the internet.” Financial Time. May 21, 2015. Accessed May 23, 2015.
    http://qz.com/409582/chinas-military-has-declared-war-on-western-thought-on-the-internet/.
    82. Song, Sang-ho. “U.S. Military Applies new warfighting concept in Korea,” The Korea Herald. May 13, 2015. Accessed May 10, 2015.
    http://khnews.kheraldm.com/view.php?ud=20140619001157&md=20140622004021_BL&kr=1.
    83. Rogan,Tom. “The Russian Bear and the Chinese Dragon Are Standing Together against America.” CBS News. May 11, 2015. Accessed May 23, 2015.
    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/418180/russian-bear-and-chinese-dragon-are-standing-together-against-america-tom-rogan.
    84. Transitioning Skyscraper. “Transitioning Skyscraper.” Accessed May 10, 2015.
    https://transportcity.wordpress.com/#jp-carousel-122.
    China Highlights. “An Introduction to China’s LARGEST Cities.” Accessed May 25, 2015.
    http://www.chinahighlights.com/travelguide/top-large-cities.htm.
    85. Oxford Dictionaries. “Cyber war.” Accessed May 24, 2015.
    http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/cyberwar
    86. China Briefing. “China’s String of Pearls Strategy.” Accessed May 13, 2015.
    http://www.china-briefing.com/news/2009/03/18/china%E2%80%99s-string-of-pearls-strategy.html.
    87. GlobalFirePower. “Military power comparison results for China vs. United States of America.” Accessed May 23, 2015.
    http://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-comparison-detail.asp?form=form&country1=china&country2=united-states-of-america&Submit=COMPARE.
    88. World Affairs. “Putin’s Russia as a State Sponsor of Terrorism.” Accessed May 24, 2015.
    http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/blog/alexander-j-motyl/putin%E2%80%99s-russia-state-sponsor-terrorism.
    89. Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism. “Section 2656f(d) of Title 22 of the United States Code.” Accessed May 24, 2015.
    http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2012/209990.htm.
    90. SIPRI. “SIPRI Military Expenditure Database.” Accessed May 1, 2015.
    http://www.sipri.org/research/armaments/milex/milex_database.
    91. The White house Office of the Press Security. “Remarks By President Obama to the Australian Parliament,” Last modified November 17, 2011.
    https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/11/17/remarks-president-obama- australian-parliament.
    92. Department of Defense. “Armed Forces Strength Figures,” Accessed February 20, 2015. https://www.dmdc.osd.mil/appj/dwp/reports.do?category=reports&subCat=milActDuteg.
    93. Roosevelt, Franklin D. “Day of Infamy.” United States Senate. Washington DC: SEN 77A-H1. December 8. 1941. Rpt. National Archives.
    94. Cho, Hanseong (조한승). “하이브리드 전쟁양상과 북한 급변사태, Hybrid Warfare and Its Implication for the Post-collapse of North Korea,” Kookbang Jeongcheak yeon-gu (국방정책연구, Defense for Policy Analysis) 38, no.3 (Autumn 2012): 9-40.
    95. Ko, Won (고 원). “전쟁 패러다임의 변화와 한국군에의 시사점, War Paradigm Shift and its Implications for Korea Military Operation.” GukbangJeongchaekYeongu (국방정책연구, Defense for Policy Analysis) 26, no. 4 (Winter 2010): 9-46.
    96. Park, Kisung (박기성). “Joonghaebanggoon, Sonjabyengbup Hoonlyunkyojaero chaetaek (中해방군, ‘손자병법’ 훈련교재로 채택, China’s PLA, adopted the Art of War as a training manual).” Yeonhap News (연합뉴스), May 3, 2006, Accessed May 22, 2015.
    http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=102&oid=001&aid=0001288130.
    97. Song, Eun Mi (송은미). “Hanmijoolil sai nonchiboki weikyo…Banjoongdongmyang duteun pihara (한미중일 사이 눈치보기 외교…반중동맹 덫은 피하라, An astute diplomatic relations between Korea, US, and Japan…Avoid the trap of counter-China alliance).” Hankook Ilbo (한국일보, The Korean Times). April 29, 2015, Accessed May 13, 2015.
    http://www.hankookilbo.com/v/8ccd5fcdc8db4fdf97c0805dfe00794a
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際研究英語碩士學位學程 (IMPIS)
    102862010
    103
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1028620101
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[國際研究英語碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    010101.pdf1298KbAdobe PDF2157检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈