Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/76454
|
| Title: | 不同多媒體合作標註對於國小學童英語字彙學習成效的影響研究
A Study on the Effects of Collaborative Multimedia Annotations on Elementary School Students’ Vocabulary Learning Performance |
| Authors: | 李懿融
Li, Yi Rong |
| Contributors: | 陳志銘
Chen, Chih Ming
李懿融
Li, Yi Rong |
| Keywords: | 合作式數位標註
多媒體
字彙學習
英語學習動機
認知風格
cooperative digital annotation
multimedia
vocabulary learning
English learning motivation
cognitive style |
| Date: | 2015 |
| Issue Date: | 2015-07-13 11:12:32 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 英語字彙的知識和能力是學好英語的關鍵因素之一，同時亦是影響閱讀流暢度的主要原因。但英語字彙教學常受限於時間及語言學習環境的限制，致使學習成效有限。隨著資訊科技的進步，許多研究著手於發展科技輔助英語字彙學習系統來輔助學習者進行英語字彙學習，希望能將英語字彙學習擴展到課程之外的時間。過去閱讀標註系統已被成功應用在提升學生的閱讀及字彙能力，然而相關的研究大都以使用文字、圖片和影片單一標註功能為主，鮮少研究探討多媒體閱讀標註對於字彙學習的研究。此外，閱讀標註部份也以教師的標註輔助學習為主，未有透過學生合作標註輔以英語字彙學習的研究。鑒於多媒體標註功能對教學的助益，本研究探討以具多媒體標註功能的數位閱讀標註系統來輔助英語字彙學習，不同多媒體標註組合對於英語字彙學習的影響差異。
據此，本研究探討在英文閱讀文本上讓國小學童採用文字及聲音(學生錄音)、圖片及聲音(學生錄音)與文字、圖片及聲音(學生錄音)等三種不同多媒體閱讀標註輔以英語字彙學習，對於兒童英語字彙學習成效、英語學習動機、學習滿意度以及記憶保留的影響差異。此外，也進一步探討採用上述三種不同多媒體閱讀標註輔以英語字彙學習，對於不同認知風格、不同英語能力及不同性別學童的英語字彙學習成效、英語學習動機、學習滿意度，以及記憶保留的影響差異，希望能發展出最有助於兒童基於多媒體閱讀標註輔以英語字彙學習的有效閱讀標註輔助學習模式。
研究結果發現：（1）採用語音標註搭配文字及圖片標註的學童在英語字彙學習的成效上，顯著優於採用語音標註搭配圖片標註的學童，而採用語音標註搭配圖片標註的學童之成效又顯著優於採用與語音標註搭配文字標註的學童；（2）採用語音標註搭配文字及圖片標註以及採用語音標註搭配圖片標註的學童在英語字彙記憶保留的成效上顯著優於採用語音標註搭配文字標註的學童；（3）採用三種不同多媒體搭配進行合作式閱讀標註的學童，其英語學習動機除了使用語音標註搭配文字標註的學童在「動機強度」向度的表現顯著優於使用語音標註搭配圖片標註的學童外，其餘向度未達顯著差異；而學習滿意度均無顯著差異；（4）採用語音標註搭配文字及圖片標註的圖像型學童，在英語字彙學習成效顯著高於採用語音標註搭配文字標註的圖像型學童；（5）採用語音標註搭配文字及圖片標註進行英語字彙學習的圖像型學童之英語字彙學習保留成效，顯著優於採用語音標註搭配文字標註的圖像型學童；（6）採用語音標註搭配文字及圖片標註的高分組學童之英語字彙學習成效，顯著高於採用語音標註搭配文字標註以及採用語音標註搭配圖片標註的高分組學童；（7）採用語音標註搭配文字及圖片標註的高分組學童之英語字彙學習保留成效，顯著優於採用語音標註搭配文字標註的高分組學童；（8）學童採用語音標註搭配文字、語音標註搭配圖片標註、語音標註搭配文字及圖片標註三種模式進行合作式閱讀標註，其英語字彙學習成效與英語字彙記憶保留程度，以及英語學習動機與學習滿意度之間具顯著相關性。最後，本研究亦提出應用多媒體標註於英語教學以及未來研究方向上的建議。
English vocabulary knowledge and capability are the key factors in well learning English as well as the major factor in reading fluency. Nonetheless, English vocabulary teaching is often restricted to time and language learning environments to further restrict the learning achievement. With the advance of information technology, a lot of research focuses on developing technology-assisted English vocabulary learning systems to help learners’ English vocabulary learning, expecting to expand English vocabulary learning to the time beyond lessons. Past reading annotation systems were successfully applied to enhance students’ reading and vocabulary capabilities. However, most relevant research stressed on single annotation function of text, picture, and video, but seldom on multimedia reading annotation towards vocabulary learning. Moreover, reading annotation also concentrated on teacher annotation-assist learning, but not on student cooperative annotation assisted English vocabulary learning. In consideration of the assistance of multimedia annotation in teaching, a digital reading annotation system with multimedia annotation functions is utilized for English vocabulary learning to discuss the effects of different multimedia annotation combination on English vocabulary learning.
Accordingly, English vocabulary learning assisted with different multimedia reading annotation of text & voice (student recording), picture & voice (student recording), and text, picture & voice (student recording) in English reading texts for elementary pupils is investigated the effects on children’s English vocabulary learning achievement, English learning motivation, learning satisfaction, and memory retention. Furthermore, the above multimedia reading annotation assisted English vocabulary learning are also discussed the effects on English vocabulary learning achievement, English learning motivation, learning satisfaction, and memory retention of pupils with different cognitive styles, English capabilities, and genders, expecting to develop the most effective reading annotation assisted learning model based on multimedia reading annotation assisted English vocabulary learning.
The research findings are summarized as below. (1) Pupils applying voice annotation with text & picture annotation significantly outperform the ones with voice annotation and picture annotation on English vocabulary learning achievement, while the ones with voice annotation with picture annotation remarkably outperform those voice annotation and text annotation. (2) Pupils applying voice annotation with text & picture annotation and the ones applying voice annotation with picture annotation notably outperform the others with voice annotation and text annotation on the achievement of English vocabulary memory retention. (3) Among pupils applying different multimedia with cooperative reading annotation, the ones with voice annotation and text annotation present significantly better performance than those with voice annotation and picture annotation on Motive Strength in English learning motivation, but not on the rest dimensions. Besides, the learning satisfaction does not appear remarkable difference. (4) Pictorial pupils applying voice annotation with text & picture annotation notably present higher English vocabulary learning achievement than those pictorial pupils with text annotation. (5) Pictorial pupils applying voice annotation with text & picture annotation significantly outperform the other pictorial pupils with voice annotation and text annotation on the achievement of English vocabulary learning retention. (6) High-score pupils applying voice annotation with text & picture annotation remarkably outperform the other high-score pupils applying voice annotation with text annotation and voice annotation with picture annotation on English vocabulary learning achievement. (7) High-score pupils applying voice annotation with text & picture annotation notably outperform the other high-score pupils with voice annotation and text annotation on the achievement of English vocabulary learning retention. (8) Pupils applying different cooperative reading annotation of voice annotation with text annotation, voice annotation with picture annotation, and voice annotation with text & picture annotation show significant correlations between English vocabulary learning achievement and English vocabulary memory retention as well as English learning motivation and learning satisfaction. Finally, suggestions for applying multimedia annotation to English teaching and for future research directions are also proposed in this study. |
| Reference: | 一、中文
王姿雯（2011）。國小六年級學童家庭內社會資本、英語學習動機及英語學業成就之研究：以新北市板橋區某公立國小為例。國立台北教育大學，台北市。
安詩潔（2006）。國小六年級學生英語字彙學習策略之探究。國立嘉義大學，嘉義縣。
吳中信（2013）。不同資訊呈現方式多媒體影音開放式課程對於學習專注力、情緒、認知負荷與學習成效之影響研究。國立政治大學。台北市。
吳青蓉（1998）。營造英語的學習情境對國中學生學習表現態度與動機影響之研究。竹縣文教，17，79-100。
李宗謙（2007）。合作學習對國小學生英語學習動機、自我效能及口語表現之探究。國立彰化師範大學：彰化縣。
沈中偉（2008）。科技與學習：理論與實務。台北市：心理。
周中天（1993）。外語學習中的動機因素。人文及社會學科教學通訊，4（4），15-25。
周文欽（1996）。心理與教育測驗。台北：心理。
林至誠（2011）。多媒體輔助字彙學習：文獻回顧。師大學報：語言與文學類 ，56（1），1-20。
林秀芩（2010）標註系統輔助不同模糊容忍度國小學童英語閱讀之研究。國立政治大學。台北市。
徐玉婷（2004）。國中生英語焦慮、英語學習動機與英語學習策略之相關研究。國立成功大學教育研究所，台南市。
張玉茹（1997）。國民中學學生英語學習動機、英語學習策略與英語學習成就相關之研究。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
張玉茹、吳青蓉、羅廷瑛（2007）：國小學生英語學習動機與英語聽力學習成就相關之研究。載於台北市立教育大學主編「2007年台灣教育學術研討會」論文集(頁470-496)。(國科會計畫編號：NSC-93-2413-H-260-013-)
張春興（1991）。張氏心理學辭典。台北：東華。
張春興（2007）。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市：東華。
張嘉凌（2008）。探討線上學習筆記與自我評量與其對學習的影響。國立中央大學，桃園市。
教育部（2006）。國民中小學九年一貫課程與教學。
郭生玉（2000）。心理與教育測驗。台北：精華。
郭重吉（1987）。評介學習風格之有關研究。資優教育季刊，23，7-16。
陳志銘（2009）。創新數位學習模式與教學應用。臺北市：文華。
陳志銘、韋祿恩、吳志豪（2011）。認知型態與標註品質對閱讀成效之影響與關聯研究：以數位閱讀標註系統為例。圖書與資訊學刊，76，1-25。
陳芳雅（2012）。不同合作模式對國小學童閱讀學習影響之研究。國立政治大學。台北市。
陳勇汀（2011）。合作式閱讀標註之知識萃取機制研究。國立政治大學。台北市。
陳威廷（2009）。調查多媒體註記功能對英語單字學習的影響。私立中原大學，桃園市。
陳彥廷（2008）。以影音註記系統支援線上錨式學習法之研究。私立靜宜大學，台中市。
陳錦芬（1999）。電腦多媒體在英語教學上的潛能與考量。載於戴維揚（主編），國民小學英語科教材教法（304-323頁）。台北市：文鶴。
黃柏翰（2013）。優質標註萃取機制提昇閱讀成效之研究：以合作式閱讀標註系統為例。國立政治大學。台北市。
楊接期（2003）。網路多媒體英語學習環境之開發。載於「第一屆亞太多媒體語文教學研討會論文集/第七屆國電腦多媒體語文教學研討會論文集」(頁493-501)。
葉玉珠、高源令、修慧蘭、陳世芬、曾慧敏、王珮玲、陳惠萍，（2011）。教育心理學 。臺北市 : 心理。
羅貝珍（2010）。應用點讀筆提升英語朗讀流暢度、學習動機及學習滿意度研究。國立政治大學。台北市。
二、英文
Abeer Aidh S. Alshwiah (2009). The Effects of a Blended Learning Strategy in Teaching Vocabulary on Premedical Students` Achievement, Satisfaction and Attitude Toward English Language. College of Arts for Girls in Dammam. Thesis.
Acha, J. (2009). The effectiveness of multimedia programs in children`s vocabulary learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 23-31. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00800.x.
Akbulut, Y. (2007). Effects of Multimedia Annotations on Incidental Vocabulary Learning and Reading Comprehension of Advanced Learners of English as a Foreign Language. Instruction Science, 35, 499-517.
Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The Effect of Multimedia Annotation Modes on L2 Vocabulary Acquisition: A Comparative Study. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 202-232.
Anderson, R. C., & P. Freebody. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guthrie (ed.), Comprehension and Teaching: Research Reviews. Newark, DE: International.
Bender, W. N., & Larkin, M. J. (2003). Reading strategies for elementary students with learning difficulties. Thousand Oaks,CA : Corwin Press.
Birgit, B. (2005). Adaptation of learning spaces: Supporting ubiquitous learning in higher distance education. Retrieved from http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2005/371
Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating students to learn. Talks to teachers. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In Franz E. Weinert &; Rainer H. Kluwe, Metacognition, motivation, and understanding, 65-116. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brush, A. J. B. (2002). Annotating Digital Documents for Asynchronous Collaboration. Technical Report, 02-09-02.
Cameron, L. (2001c). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
Carter, R. (1987). Vocabulary: Applied linguistic perspectives. London: Unwin Hyman.
Chapelle, C. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms? Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 19-43.
Chapelle, C. (1998). Multimedia call: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1), 22-34.
Chapelle, C. A. (1994). Are C-tests valid measures for L2 vocabulary research?
Second Language Research, 10, 157-187
Childers, T. L., Houston, M. J., Heckler, S. E. (1985).Measurement of individual differences in visual versus verbal information processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 12,125-134.
Chun, D. M. and J. L. Plass. (1996). Effect of Multimedia Annotations on Vocabulary Acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 183-198.
Chun, D., & Brandl, K. K. (1992). Beyond form-based drill and practice: Meaning-enhancing CALL on the Macintosh. Foreign Language Annals, 25(3), 255-265.
Coady, J. (1993). Research on ESL/EFL vocabulary acquisition: putting it in context. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 3-23). Norwood, N. J.: Ablex Publishing Corp.
Coady, J. (1997). L2 vocabulary acquisition through extensive reading. In J.
coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Covington, M. V. (1984). The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and implications. Elementary School Learning, 85, 5-20.
Dornyei(1998).Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31(3), 117-135.
Dornyei, Z. (1990) Conceptualizing motivation in foreign language learning. Language Learning, 40(1), 45-78.
Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and Researching Motivation. England: Pearson Education Limited.
Dunkel, H. B. (1948). Second language learning. Boston: Ginn.
Dunkel, P (1990). Implications of the CAI effectiveness research for limited English proficient learners. Computers in the Schools, 7(1-2), 31-52.
Dunn, R., Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching Secondary Students Through Their Individualized Learning Styles. Reston, VA: Reston Publishing Co.
Effken, J. A., &; Doyle, M. (2001). Interface design and cognitive style in learning an instructional computer simulation. Comput Nurs, 19(4), 164-171.
Ehsani, F, & Knodt, E. (1998). Speech technology in computer-aided language learning: Strengths and limitations of a new CALL paradigm. Language Learning and Technology, 2(1), 45-60.
Ellis, N. C. (1995). Psychology of foreign language vocabulary acquisition: Implications for CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8(2), 103-128.
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Ely, C. (1986). Language learning motivation: A descriptive and causal analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 28-35.
Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching Styles in engineering education. Journal of 1.Engineering Education, 78(7), 674-681.
Foil, C, R., & Alber, S, R. (2002). Fun and effective ways to build your
students’ vocabulary. Interaction in School and Clinic, 37 (3), 131-139.
Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Newbury House Publisher.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
Gardner, R. C. (1985b). The attitude motivation test battery: Technical report. London, Ontario, Canada: University of West Ontario, Department of Psychology.
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W.E. (1959). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 266-272.
Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). A student’s contributions to second- language learning. Part II: Affective variables. Language Teaching, 26, 1-11
Gardner, R. C., & Smythe, P. C. (1975). Second language acquisition: a social psychological approach (Research Bulletin No. 332). London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario, Department of Psychology.
Gardner, R.C. (1985a). Social psychology and second-language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London, England: Edward Arnold.
Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. (1997). Reading and vocabulary development in a
second language: A case study. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second
language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy. NY: Cambridge
University Press.
Gui, S. (1985) A survey analysis of the English majors’ vocabulary size in China. Modern Foreign Languages, 27(1), p1-6.
Guo, J. H., & Okita, Y. (2001). Chinese-Singaporean University students’ motivation for learning Japanese. Japanese Education, 110, 130-141.
Hart, G. (2007). Combining words and pictures: Degrees of abstraction. Intercom, 42, 38-39.
Herdon, J. N. (1987). Learner intersts, achievement, and continuing motivation in instruction. Journal of instructional development, 110, 130-141.
Hoffman, S. (1995-1996). Computers and instructional design in foreign language/ESL instruction. TESOL journal, 5(2), 24-29.
Horton, W. K. (1991). Illustrating computer documentation: The art of presenting information graphically on paper and online. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hult, S., Kalaja, M., Lassila, O., & Lehtisalo, T (1990). HYPERREADERAn interactive course in reading comprehension. System, 18(2), 189-198.
James, R. (1996). CALL and the speaking skill. System, 24(1), 15-21.
Janet Yu-gi Chao(2013). Factors Affecting College EFL Learners’ Listening Comprehension and Listening Problems. NCUE Journal of Humanities, 8, 71-84
Jonassen, D. H., Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning and instruction. NJ: Erlbaum.
Jones, F. (1991). Mickey Mouse and the state of the art: Program sophistication and classroom methodology in communicative CALL. System, 19(1-2), 1-13.
Jones, L. C. (2006b). Effects of collaboration and multimedia annotations on vocabulary learning and listening comprehension. CALICO Journal, 24, 33-58.
Jones, L. C., & Plass, J. L. (2002). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition in French with multimedia annotations. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 546-561.
Kawase, R., Herder, E. &; Nejdl, W. (2009). A comparison of paper-based and online annotations in the workplace. In Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning: Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines. (pp. 240 - 253). New York: ACM Press.
Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A Review of Note-Taking: The Encoding-Storage Paradigm and Beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1 (2), 147-172.
Kolb, D. A. (1976). Learning Style Inventory: Technical manual. Boston, MA: McBer & Co.
Kolb, D. A. (1985). The learning style inventory and technical manual. Boston, MA: McBer.
Kost, C. R., P. Foss, and J. J. Lenzini. (1999). Textual and Pictorial Glosses: Effectiveness on Incidental Vocabulary Growth When Reading in a Foreign Language. Foreign Language Annals, 1(32), 89-113.
Kramsch, C., & Andersen, R. (1999). Teaching text and context through multimedia. Language Learning and Technology, 2(2), 31-42.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon.
Kuo, F. L. and H. K. Chiang. Story Animation: Helping Students Build Connections between Words and Pictures in Multimedia Learning, in Proceedings of 2006 International Conference on English Instruction and Assessment.
Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics, 126-132.
Lewis, M. (1993). The Lexical Approach. Hove, UK: Language Teaching
Publications.
Long, M.H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. M. Gass & C. G. madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377-393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
Marshall, C. C. (1997). Annotation: From paper books to the digital library. In proceedings of the second ACM conference on digital libraries, July 23-26.
Marson, B., & Krashen, S. (1997). Extensive reading in English as a foreign
language. System, 25, 91-102.
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1-19.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. USA: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning.
Educational psychology review, 14(1), 87-99.
Meara, P. & Jones, G.. (1987). Tests of vocabulary size in English as a foreign language. Potyglot, 8(1), 1-40.
Meara, P. (1980). Vocabulary acquisition: a neglected aspect of language
learning. Language Teaching and Linguistics, 13, 221-246.
Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19(1), 59-74.
Najjar, L. J. (1996). Multimedia information and learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5, 129-150.
Nation, I.S.P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston, Mass.: Heinle & Heinle Publishers
Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in another language. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nielsen, B. (2003). A review of research into vocabulary learning and acquisition. Retrieved December 2, 2010, from the World Wide Web: http://www.kushiro-ct.ac.jp/library/kiyo/kiyo36/Brian.pdf.
Numeroff, L. (1985). The Very Hungry Caterpillar. United States: Harper & Row.
O`Malley & Chamot (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Ovsiannikov,A. I., Arbib, M. A. & Mcneill, T. H. (1999). Annotation Technology. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 50, 329-362.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning Strategies : What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Oxford, R. L., Park-Oh, Y., Ito, S., & Sumrall, M. (1993). Learning Japanese by satellite: What Japanese by satellite: What influences student achievement? System, 21(1), p31-48.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Patrick Rau, P. L., Chen, S. H., & Chin, Y. T. (2004). Developing web annotation tools for learners and instructors. Interacting with Computers, 16, 163–181.
Pearson, P. D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In R. Bar, et al (eds.) Handbook of Reading Research. vols. 2815-860. New York: Longman.
Pedro P., Pilar R. (2006). The application of learning styles in both individual and collaborative learning. Advanced Learning Technologies.
Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44(3), 493-527.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Plass, J. L. and L. Jones. (2002). Supporting listening comprehension with multimedia an-notations. The Modern Language Journal, 86 (4), 546-561.
Plass, J. L. and L. Jones. (2005). Multimedia Learning in Second Language Acquisition. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp.467-488). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Purdy, M. (1996). The limits to human contact: How communication technology mediates relationships. Paper presented to the International Listening Association.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Read, J. (2000). Vocabulary and testing. In Schmitt N. and McCarthy M. (Eds.),
Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 303-320). Cambridge.
Richardson, A. (1977). Verbalizer-visualizer: A cognitive style dimension. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1(1), 109-126.
Riding, R. J., & Sadler-Smith, E. (1997). Cognitive style and learning strategies: Some implications for training design. International Journal of Training and Development, 1(3), 199-208.
Rivers, W. M. (1982). Psychology linguistics and language teaching. English Teaching Forum, 20(2), 2-9.
Rost, M. (2011). Teaching and researching listening (2Nd ed.). London: Longman.
Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 39-56.
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. The proceedings of Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy, 194-227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, S.M., Woody, P.C. (2000). Interactive effect of multimedia instruction and learning styles. Teaching of Psychology, 27(3), 220-223.
Stoffer, I. (1995). University foreign language student’s choice of vocabulary learning strategies as related to individual difference variables. University of Alabama, Alabama.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass, & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review, 10(3), 251–296.
Wachob, P. (2005). Methods and materials for motivation and learner autonomy. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 1(5), 93-122.
Weiner, B (1972). Theories of motivation. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Weiner, B (1974) (Ed). Cognitive views of human motivation. New York: Academic Press.
Weiner, B (1982). The emotional consequences of casual ascriptions. In M.S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and Cognition. Hillsidale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. .
Witkin, H. A. (1976). Cognitive style in academic performance and in teacher- student relations. In S. Messick & Associates: Individulity in learning. San Francisco: Jossey-bass Publishers.
Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Education Psychologist, 11, 87-95.
Wolfe, J. (2002). Annotation technologies: A software and research review. Computers and Composition, 19(4), 471-497.
Xu, J. (2010) .Using Multimedia Vocabulary Annotations in L2 Reading and Listening Activities. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 311-327.
Yalcinkaya, F., Muluk, N. B., & Ashin, S. (2009). Effects of listening ability on speaking, writing and reading skills of children who were suspected of auditory processing difficulty. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 73(8), 1137-1142.
Yeh, Y. and C. Wang. (2003). Effects of Multimedia Vocabulary Annotations and Learning Styles on Vocabulary Learning, CALICO Journal, 21(1),131-144.
Yoshii, M. (2006). L1 and L2 Glosses: Their Effects on Incidental Vocabulary Learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 85-101.
Yoshii, M. and J. Flaitz. (2002) Second Language Incidental Vocabulary Retention: The Effect of Picture and Annotation Types. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 33-58.
Zhao, X., & Okamoto, T. (2011). Adaptive multimedia content delivery for context-aware u-learning. International Journal Mobile Learning and Organization, 5(1), 46-63. doi:10.1504/IJMLO. 2011.038691 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班
102913002
103 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102913002 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [圖書資訊與檔案學研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 300201.pdf | 3268Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 270 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
