Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/75469
|
| Title: | 道德企業的臉書粉絲團：社群對話與意義行銷
Facebook Followers of Ethical Companies: Community Conversations and Meaningful Marketing |
| Authors: | 丁莉安
Busch, Cara Elizabeth |
| Contributors: | 王淑美
Wang, Sumei
丁莉安
Busch, Cara Elizabeth |
| Keywords: | 民族志
道德消費
臉書
公平貿易
行銷
社交媒體
digital ethnography
ethical consumption
Facebook
Fair Trade
marketing
social media |
| Date: | 2014 |
| Issue Date: | 2015-06-01 13:24:24 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 道德企業的臉書粉絲團：社群對話與意義行銷
Fair Trade is for more than just coffee: Oliberté and prAna sell clothing, shoes, and accessories. Corporate social responsibility now takes the shape of business models. For each item sold, TOMS and Warby Parker give an item to someone in need. The present study takes a closer look at what is happening on these four brands’ Facebook pages with the focus on user-generated contributions. Observation of those pages during the 2014 American holiday shopping season identifies what people are posting. Depth interviews with active Facebook followers provide insight as to why people are posting about these companies and how they came to be brand advocates. The results indicate that though there are plenty of discussions about products, Facebook brand pages are not merely advertising channels. They are tools that the greater ethical consumption community uses to strengthen and expand its values-based groups of followers. People also choose Facebook over face-to-face conversation to start tough conversations about consumer and political issues within their own networks because it is easier to present controversial ideas. The informants, regardless of voting frequency, reported being skeptical of government and large organizations. Yet, they have faith in capitalism’s ability to carry out good around the world, and they are an active audience for meaningful marketing. Finally, informants reported hating shopping. Yet, they invested time checking corporate websites, reading literature written by a brand’s founder, and sharing information about companies on Facebook. Websites and social media are essential to the shopping process today because they are spaces where consumers learn about and share brand stories. |
| Reference: | 1) About TOMS®. Retrieved 13 November 2014, from http://www.toms.com/about-toms - companyInfo
2) Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968.
3) Anderson, J. (2012). Main Findings: Corporate responsibility: Which road will be taken? Pew Research Internet Project, 1-22.
4) Ardévol, E. (2012). Virtual/Visual Ethnography: Methodological Crossroads at the Intersection of Visual and Internet Research. In S. Pink (Ed.), Advances in Visual Methodology (pp. 74-93). London: Sage.
5) Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 868-882.
6) Barnett, C., Cloke, P., Clarke, N., & Malpass, A. (2011). Globalizing Responsibility: The Political Rationalities of Ethical Consumption [Kindle edition]. Retrieved from amazon.com database
7) Barwise, P., & Farley, J. U. (2005). The state of interactive marketing in seven countries: interactive marketing comes of age. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(3), 67-80.
8) Baszanger, I., & Dodier, N. (1997). Ethnography: relating the part to the whole. Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, 2, 9-34.
9) Bauman, Z. (2013). Consuming Life [Kindle version]. Retrieved from amazon.com database
10) Beaulieu, A. (2004). Mediating ethnography: objectivity and the making of ethnographies of the internet. Social Epistemology, 18(2-3), 139-163.
11) Belk, R. W. (2005). Studies in the New Consumer Behavior. In D. Miller (Ed.), Acknowledging Consumption [Kindle version] (pp. 53-94). New York, USA: Routledge.
12) Bhattacharjee, A., Berger, J., & Menon, G. (2014). When identity marketing backfires: consumer agency in identity expression. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 294-309.
13) Biddle, S. (2015). Brands Are Not Your Friends. Retrieved from http://gawker.com/brands-are-not-your-friend-1684232182
14) Blair, E., & Valdez Noel, K. (2014). Improving higher education practice through student evaluation systems: is the student voice being heard? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7), 879-894.
15) Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 597-608.
16) Bucic, T., Harris, J., & Arli, D. (2012). Ethical consumers among the Millennials: a cross-national study. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1), 113-131.
17) Burris, E. R., Detert, J. R., & Romney, A. C. (2013). Speaking up vs. being heard: The disagreement around and outcomes of employee voice. Organization Science, 24(1), 22-38.
18) Cadbury, A. (2006). Corporate social responsibility Twenty-First Century Society (pp. 147-186).
19) Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review, 32(3), 946-967.
20) Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2009). The missing link between corporate social responsibility and consumer trust: The case of fair trade products. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 1-15.
21) Chary, S. R. K. (2014). Social Media Marketing-The Paradigm Shift in International Marketing. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 16(9), 11-13.
22) Chawak, S., & Dutta, D. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility: Trends and Challenges. Abhinav-International Monthly Refereed Journal Of Research In Management & Technology (Online ISSN 2320-0073), 3(4), 32-39.
23) Chernev, A., Hamilton, R., & Gal, D. (2011). Competing for consumer identity: limits to self-expression and the perils of lifestyle branding. Journal of Marketing, 75(3), 66-82.
24) Cooper, R., & Evans, M. (2006). Breaking from tradition: market research, consumer needs, and design futures. Design Management Review, 17(1), 68-74.
25) Crawford, K. (2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 23(4), 525-535.
26) Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 15(1), 1-13.
27) De Pelsmacker, P., Driesen, L., & Rayp, G. (2005). Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair‐trade coffee. Journal of consumer affairs, 39(2), 363-385.
28) Donnelly, J. (2007). The Relative Universality of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(2), 281-306.
29) Du, S., Bhattacharya, C., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8-19.
30) Duggan, M. (2013a). Additional Analysis. Pew Research Internet Project, 1-11.
31) Duggan, M. (2013b). Social Media Update 2013. Pew Research Internet Project, 1-3.
32) Evans, D. (2011). Consuming conventions: sustainable consumption, ecological citizenship and the worlds of worth. Journal of Rural Studies, 27(2), 109-115.
33) Fernandez, K. V., Brittain, A. J., & Bennett, S. D. (2011). “Doing the duck”: negotiating the resistant-consumer identity. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1779-1788.
34) Franco, S. (2014). Social Mobile Marketing: Evolution of Communication Strategies in the Web 2.0 Era. Tema. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 7(2), 173-184.
35) Freestone, O. M., & McGoldrick, P. J. (2008). Motivations of the ethical consumer. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(4), 445-467.
36) Gerodimos, R. (2012). Online youth civic attitudes and the limits of civic consumerism: The emerging challenge to the Internet`s democratic potential. Information, Communication & Society, 15(2), 217-245.
37) Goodman, M. K. (2010). The mirror of consumption: Celebritization, developmental consumption and the shifting cultural politics of fair trade. Geoforum, 41(1), 104-116.
38) Greenberg, P. (2010). The impact of CRM 2.0 on customer insight. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 25(6), 410-419.
39) Hafner-Burton, E. (2009). Forced to Be Good: Why Trade Agreements Boost Human Rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
40) Hennig-Thurau, T., Malthouse, E. C., Friege, C., Gensler, S., Lobschat, L., Rangaswamy, A., & Skiera, B. (2010). The impact of new media on customer relationships. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 311-330.
41) Hirschman, E. C., & Thompson, C. J. (1997). Why media matter: toward a richer understanding of consumers` relationships with advertising and mass media. Journal of Advertising, 26(1), 43-60.
42) History - Warby Parker. Retrieved 13 November 2014, from http://www.warbyparker.com/history
43) Horst, H., & Miller, D. (2012). Normativity and materiality: A view from digital anthropology. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy(145), 103.
44) Howard, D., Mangold, W. G., & Johnston, T. (2014). Managing your social campaign strategy using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube & Pinterest: An interview with Dana Howard, social media marketing manager. Business Horizons, 57(5), 657-665.
45) Järvikoski, A., Martin, M., Autti-Rämö, I., & Härkäpää, K. (2013). Shared agency and collaboration between the family and professionals in medical rehabilitation of children with severe disabilities. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 36(1), 30-37.
46) Jefferess, D. (2012). The ‘me to we’social enterprise: Global education as lifestyle brand. Critical Literacy: Theories and Practices, 6(1), 18-30.
47) Joachimsthaler, E., & Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building brands without mass media. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 39-41, 44-36, 48-50.
48) Johnston, J., & Szabo, M. (2011). Reflexivity and the Whole Foods Market consumer: the lived experience of shopping for change. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(3), 303-319.
49) Joyner, A. (2014). Beyond Buy-One-Give-One Retail. The New Yorker.
50) Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
51) Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241-251.
52) Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010). Corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 1-7.
53) Linton, A., Liou, C. C., & Shaw, K. A. (2004). A taste of trade justice: marketing global social responsibility via Fair Trade coffee. Globalizations, 1(2), 223-246.
54) Luedicke, M. K., Thompson, C. J., & Giesler, M. (2010). Consumer identity work as moral protagonism: how myth and ideology animate a brand‐mediated moral conflict. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(6), 1016-1032.
55) Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357-365.
56) Marquis, C., & Park, A. (2014). Inside the Buy-One Give-One Model.
57) Marzocchi, G., Morandin, G., & Bergami, M. (2013). Brand communities: loyal to the community or the brand? European Journal of Marketing, 47(1/2), 93-114.
58) Masten, D. L., & Plowman, T. M. (2003). Digital ethnography: The next wave in understanding the consumer experience. Design Management Journal (Former Series), 14(2), 75-81.
59) Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review, 33(2), 404-424.
60) McDonald, R., Mead, N., Cheraghi‐Sohi, S., Bower, P., Whalley, D., & Roland, M. (2007). Governing the ethical consumer: identity, choice and the primary care medical encounter. Sociology of health & illness, 29(3), 430-456.
61) Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Pickett, J. P., . . . Orwant, J. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. science, 331(6014), 176-182.
62) Miller, D. (2005). Consumption as the Vanguard of History: A Polemic by Way of Introduction. In D. Miller (Ed.), Acknowledging Consumption [Kindle version] (pp. 1-51). New York, USA: Routledge.
63) Murthy, D. (2008). Digital ethnography an examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology, 42(5), 837-855.
64) Myers, C., & Hamilton, J. F. (2014). Social Media as Primary Source: The narrativization of twenty-first-century social movements. Media History(ahead-of-print), 1-14.
65) Newholm, T., & Shaw, D. (2007). Studying the ethical consumer: A review of research.
66) Nightingale, V. (2008). Why Observing Matters. In M. Pickering (Ed.), Research Methods for Cultural Studies. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
67) Nightingale, V. (2012). Media Ethnography and the Disappearance of Communication Theory. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy(145), 94.
68) Niinimäki, K. (2010). Eco‐clothing, consumer identity and ideology. Sustainable Development, 18(3), 150-162.
69) Oliberté - About Us. Retrieved 13 November 2014, from http://www.oliberte.com/story/about-us/
70) Olsson, T., & Svensson, A. (2012). Producing prod-users: Conditional participation in a web 2.0 consumer community. Javnost-The Public, 19(3), 41-58.
71) Our Story - prAna Life. Retrieved 13 November 2014, from http://www.prana.com/life/our-story/
72) Papaoikonomou, E., Ryan, G., & Valverde, M. (2011). Mapping ethical consumer behavior: Integrating the empirical research and identifying future directions. Ethics & Behavior, 21(3), 197-221.
73) Papaoikonomou, E., Valverde, M., & Ryan, G. (2012). Articulating the meanings of collective experiences of ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1), 15-32.
74) Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2011). How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 117-135.
75) Pink, S. (2001). Doing Visual Ethnography. London: Sage Publications.
76) Pink, S. (2012). Visual Ethnography and the Internet: Visuality, Virtuality and the Spatial Turn. In S. Pink (Ed.), Advances in Visual Methodology (pp. 113-130). London: Sage.
77) Pomirleanu, N., Schibrowsky, J. A., Peltier, J., & Nill, A. (2013). A review of internet marketing research over the past 20 years and future research direction. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 7(3), 166-181.
78) Ponte, S., & Richey, L. A. (2014). Buying into development? Brand Aid forms of cause-related marketing. Third World Quarterly, 35(1), 65-87.
79) Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: the digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy(145), 123.
80) Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350-361.
81) Rotfeld, H. J. (2006). Understanding advertising clutter and the real solution to declining audience attention to mass media commercial messages. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(4), 180-181.
82) Shani, D., & Chalasani, S. (1992). Exploiting niches using relationship marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 9(3), 33-42.
83) Smith, T. (2009). The social media revolution. International journal of market research, 51(4), 559-561.
84) Social Networking Fact Sheet. (2014). Pew Research Internet Project, 1-6.
85) Steinmetz, K. F. (2012). Message received: Virtual ethnography in online message boards. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(1), 26-39.
86) Thurlow, C. (2013). Fakebook: Synthetic Media, Pseudo-Sociality and the Rhetorics of Web 2.0. Discourse 2.0 Language and New Media, 225-249.
87) Tully, S. M., & Winer, R. S. (2014). The Role of the Beneficiary in Willingness to Pay for Socially Responsible Products: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Retailing.
88) Vitell, S. J. (2003). Consumer ethics research: Review, synthesis and suggestions for the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1-2), 33-47.
89) Ward, A. M., & Wylie, J. (2014). Word of Mouse: Using Social Media to Inform Your Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy. Accountancy in Ireland, 46(6), 58-60.
90) West, L., & Trester, A. M. (2013). Facework on Facebook. Discourse 2.0 Language and New Media, 133-154. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
International spread of English Master Program (IMICS)
102461012
103 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102461012 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [國際傳播英語碩士學程] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 101201.pdf | | 28577Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 583 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
